Skip to main content
Log in

The Fragility of Liberal Europe

  • Research Article
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Denouncing the persistence of nationalist reflexes in order to explain the crisis of European integration is much too simple, as is the critique of a mercantile Europe deprived of solid social and moral foundations. Yet, these interpretations, oversimplified as they are, do point to some aspects of our liberal civilisation, which are under pressure in the current trajectory of developments shaping Europe. Seen as symptoms of a widespread malaise, these perspectives should be taken seriously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To use the expression of Gauchet (2005: 501).

  2. Cf. the still very stimulating historiographic work of Milward (1992).

  3. Fernand Braudel only devoted a few pages of his Grammaire des civilisations to the construction of Europe. In it he said he was ‘fascinated by the continuity of the problems with which we are confronted. As if there was a race being run between the economy and the State, in which the former, threatened with being caught up at any moment, has to date always managed – and no doubt, as far as we can see, more than ever – to win back the advantage’ (Braudel, 1963: 463).

  4. For an updated version of this socio-historical reading of European integration, see Stefano Bartolini (2005).

  5. Norbert Elias saw in this a sign of a transition: ‘The central problem lies, as can be seen, in the specific nature of the passage from one level of integration to another. In the transition period, an often quite prolonged development phase is gone through, during which the lower-ranking group loses in the eyes of its members a large part of its value as an “us unit”, without the higher-ranking group yet being able to take over the function of us unit or carrying with it an equivalent justification on an emotional level’ (Elias, 1991: 292).

  6. Raymond Aron, ‘L'Europe face à la crise des sociétés industrielles’, Lecture to the Institut d'études européennes of the l'Université libre de Bruxelles, 28–30 April 1975, quoted in Ory (1998: 896).

  7. To use the expression of Andrew Moravcsik, ‘The Quiet Superpower’, Newsweek, 17 June 2002.

  8. This is, as we know, the famous thesis of Robert Kagan (Kagan, 2003).

References

  • Bartolini, S. (2005) The Restructuration of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1963) Grammaire des civilisations (republished in 1993), Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einaudi, L. (1995) ‘Il mito dello stato sovrano (gennaio 1945)’, in Einaudi Foundation (eds.) Scritti sull’Europa, Napoli: Istituto per gli studi filosofici, pp. 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (ed.) (1991) ‘Les transformations de l’équilibre Nous-Je’, in La société des individus, Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, J.-M. (2000) La question de l’Etat européen, Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, J.-M. (2005) Europe: la voie kantienne, Paris: Le Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, M.J. and Hix, S. (2002) ‘Defining the EU political space, an empirical study of the European elections manifestos 1979–1999’, Comparative Political Studies 35 (8): 934–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauchet, M. (2005) La condition politique, Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaelble, H. (2005) Vers la démocratie européenne, Paris: Belin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R. (2003) La puissance et la faiblesse, Les Etats-Unis et l’Europe dans le nouvel ordre mondial, Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manent, P. (2001) Cours familier de philosophie politique, Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, A. (1992) The European Rescue of the Nation State, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ory, P. (ed.), (1998) Europe? Europe, Paris: Omnibus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. (2002) ‘La diversité légitime: nouveau défi de l’intégration européenne’, Revue française de science politique 52 (6): 609–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telo, M. (2003) L’Europa, Potenza civile, Bari: Laterza, (English translation Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Valéry, P. (1919) ‘La Crise de l’esprit’, reproduced in Yves Hersant and Fabienne Durand-Bogaert, Europes, Anthologie critique et commentée, Paris: Laffont, 2000, pp. 412–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J.H. (1997) ‘To be a European citizen – Eros and civilization’, Journal of European Public Policy 4 (4): 495–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magnette, P. The Fragility of Liberal Europe. Eur Polit Sci 8, 190–200 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2008.29

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2008.29

Keywords

Navigation