Skip to main content

Abstract

In 1979, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) invaded Vietnam with a military force of nearly the strength that China had sent to Korea in 1950. Despite minor clashes along a 1,200 km frontier, Sino-Vietnamese relations had been stable since Ho Chi Minh had established the Vietnamese Communist Party in 1930 in Hong Kong. Although the People’s Army of Vietnam (PAVN) was a significant military force, it did not, unlike the Soviet Red Army in 1969, present a serious threat. Instead, however, of building national Shih on economic reform and reconstruction by preserving the status quo, China launched a massive self-defensive counterattack to punish Vietnam and teach the Vietnamese their proper place in Chinâs world. Chinâs abrupt, unconditional withdrawal left Euro-Americans and Vietnamese alike perplexed and confused.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Colin Legum, “Africâs Contending Revolutionaries,” Problems of Communism 21 (March–April 1972): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert Legvold, “Soviet and Chinese Influence in Black Africa,” in Soviet and Chinese Influence in the Third World, ed. Alvin Z. Rubinstein (New York: Alvin Z. 1975), 156, 162.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Victor Funnell, “The Soviet Union and Vietnam: Bilateral Relations in a Great-Power Triangle,” in Troubled Friendships: Moscow’s Third World Ventures, ed. Margot Light (London: British Academic Press, 1993), 87.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robert S. Ross, “Beijing as a Conservative Power,” in Chinese Foreign Policy in Transition, ed. Guoli Liu (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2004), 142.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Nayan Chanda, Brother Enemy: The War after the War (San Diego CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Thai Quang Trung, Collective Leadership and Factionalism: An Essay on Ho Chi Minh’s Legacy (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Chang Pao-min, The Sino-Vietnamese Territorial Dispute (New York: Praeger, 1986), 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jonathan R. Adelman and Shih Chih-yu, Symbolic War: The Chinese Use of Force 1840–1980, (Taipei: Institute of International Relations, National Chengshi University, 1993), 228.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ralph D. Sawyer, trans. Sun Tzu: The Art of War (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1994), 191.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Byung-Chon Ro, Dohae Sonja Byungbub (Sun Tzu’s Art of War) (Seoul: Hanwon Press, 1990), 178.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Yang Zouzhou, Nanhai Fengyun (The International Conflicts in the South China Sea) (Taipei: Zhengzhong Shuju, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2006 William H. Mott IV and Jae Chang Kim

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mott, W.H., Kim, J.C. (2006). The Sino-Vietnamese War. In: The Philosophy of Chinese Military Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983138_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics