Skip to main content
  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the European judicial and non-judicial mechanisms’ attitude to the right to conscientious objection. In this regard, the understanding of the Council of Europe, the European Union, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe will be explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For further information on the travaux préparatoires of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, see Robertson, A. H. (1975), Collected Edition of the ‘Travaux Préparatoires’ of the European Convention on Human Rights (CETP), vol. I–VIII, Preparatory Commission of the Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers, Consultative Assembly, 11 May–8 September 1949, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Decker, D. C. and Fresa, L., ‘The Status of Conscientious Objection under Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 33 (2001), p. 415.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For further information, see Erdal, U. and Bakırcı, H. (2006), Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, The World Organization Against Torture: Geneva, pp. 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyle, K., ‘Conscientious Objection in International Law and the Osman Murat Ülke Case’ in Çınar and Üsterci (2009), p. 217 (footnote omitted).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hammarberg, T., ‘Judgments Issued by the European Court Cannot be Ignored’, 19 July 2011, available at http://commissioner.cws.coe.int/tiki-view_blog_post.php?postId=154 (accessed 8 January 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Çınar, Ö. H. (2005), Avrupa İnsan Haklan Mahkemesi Kararlannin Türk Hukukuna Etkisi, İnsan Hakları Derneği İstanbul Şubesi Yayınları: İstanbul, pp. 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For further information see Brillant, R., ‘The Supervisory Machinery of the European Social Charter: Recent Development and their Impact’ in de Búrca G, de Witte B. (eds) (2005), Social Rights in Europe, Oxford University Press: New York, pp. 31–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Normal military service is nine months. See Brett, D. (2013), ‘Annual Report: Conscientious Objection to Military Service in Europe 2013’, European Bureau for Conscientious Objection: Brussels, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Charter of Fundamental Rights of European Union is available at http://wwweuroparl.europa.eu/charter/default_en.htm (accessed 15 January 2012); see also Steiner, J. and Woods, L. (2003), Textbook on EC Law, 8th edn, Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 162–163.

    Google Scholar 

  10. At the time of writing (March 2014) the EU has five candidate members (Iceland, Montenegro, Serbia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Turkey). Iceland does not possess an army. Montenegro, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia do not have compulsory military service, while Turkey has compulsory military service. In addition, Turkey does not recognise conscientious objection. For further information see Çınar, Ö. H., ‘A View on International Implementation of the Right to Conscientious Objection’ in Çınar and Üsterci (2009), p. 184; Brett (2013), p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and Office for the Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (2005), ‘OSCE Human Dimension Commitments: Thematic Compilation’, 2nd edn, vol. II, OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights: Warsaw, p. xv;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and Office for the Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (2008), ‘Handbook on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Armed Forces Personnel’, OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights: Warsaw, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Özgür Heval Çinar

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Çinar, Ö.H. (2014). Regional Level: The European Human Rights System. In: The Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Service and Turkey’s Obligations under International Human Rights Law. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468116_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics