Skip to main content

Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: A Propaganda Tool for the Enemy?

  • Chapter
Reconfiguring the Union

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

  • 95 Accesses

Abstract

President Lincoln’s preliminary Emancipation Proclamation after the battle of Antietam in September, 1862, produced an immediate outcry in the North. Surprisingly to modern readers, it was the Archbishop of New York, John Hughes, who warned Lincoln: “We Catholics … have not the slightest idea of carrying on a war that costs so much blood and treasure just to gratify a clique of Abolitionists in the North.” 1 But perhaps less well known, or understood, is the controversy that the Proclamation attracted abroad. Both Union and Confederate supporters in Britain tried to use it as a propaganda tool, and in the beginning at least, it was the Confederates who benefited the most. The reasons for this were laid down at the beginning of the war, when the British government was still pondering its response to the conflict. A poem in Punch , on March 30, 1861, neatly expressed Britain’s cotton dilemma:

Though with the North we sympathize,It must not be forgotten,That with the Southwe’ve stronger ties, Which are composed of cotton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. James McPherson, Battle Cry of Freedom (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), 507.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wendy Hinde, Richard Cobden , (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987), 305. “As for the separation of the States,” Cobden wrote, “if I were a citizen of a free state, I should vote with both hands for a dissolution of partnership with the slave states.”

    Google Scholar 

  3. Worthington C. Ford, ed., A Cycle of Adams Letters, 1861–1865, 2 vols. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1920), I, Charles Francis Adams to Charles Francis Adams Jr., June 21, 1861, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mrs. Gaskell to Charles Elliot Norton, June 10, 1861, in J.A.V. Chapple and Arthur Pollard, eds., The Letters of Mrs Gaskell (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997), 654–658.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charles Darwin to Asa Gray, June 5, 1861, in Belle Becker Sideman, and Lillian Friedman, eds., Europe Looks at the Civil War (New York: Orion Press, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quoted in Clare Taylor, Britain and American Abolitionists: An Episode in Transatlantic Understanding (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1974), 407.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilding to Hawthorne, November 14, 1861, reproduced in Julian Hawthorne, ed., Nathaniel Hawthorne and His Wife, 2 vols. (Boston, MA: Osgood, 1884), II, 165–66.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lord Russell told an audience in Newcastle on October 14, “I cannot help asking myself as affairs progress in the conflict, to what good can it lead?” According to The Times , Russell then warned his listeners that a moment might come when intervention in the American war would be inevitable. After all, the paper reported him saying, the war was not about slavery but about one side fighting for “empire, and the other for independence.” (In fact, Russell had said “power” rather than “independence,” which was less inflammatory. But someone at the paper had decided the phrase was too anodyne.) See Norman Ferris, Desperate Diplomacy: William H. Seward’s Foreign Policy 1861 (Knoxville: University of Tennessee, 1976), 238; and Henry Adams to Charles Francis Adams Jr., October 25, 1861, in

    Google Scholar 

  9. Worthing Chauncey Ford, ed., A Cycle of Adams Letters , 2 vols. (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1920), I, 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frederick William Maitland, ed., The Life and Letters of Leslie Stephen (London: Duckworth, 1906), 112.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stephen B Oates, “Henry Hotze: Confederate Agent Abroad,” The Historian, 27 (February 1965): 134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilbur D. Jones, “Blyden, Gladstone and the War,” Journal of Negro History 49 (January 1964): 58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Howard Jones, Blue and Gray Diplomacy: A History of Union and Confederate Foreign Relations (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009), 232.

    Google Scholar 

  14. He added: “Lincoln has a certain moral dignity, but is intellectually inferior, & as men do not generally measure others correctly who are above their own caliber, he has chosen for his instruments mediocre men… I know the men at the head of affairs on both sides, & I should say that in energy of will, in comprehensiveness of view, in habits & power of command, & in knowledge of economical & fiscal questions, Jefferson Davis is more than equal to Lincoln & all his Cabinet.” Cobden to Bright, October 7, 1862, in Elizabeth Hoon Cawley, ed., The American Diaries of Richard Cobden (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1952) 75.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Virginia Mason, ed., The Public Life and Diplomatic Correspondence of James M Mason (Roanoke, VA: Neale Publishing, 1906), 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sarah Agnes Wallace and Frances Elma Gillespie, eds., The Journal of Benjamin Moran, 1857–1865 2 vols. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948), II: 1110 (entry January 21, 1863)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Philip Van Doren Stern, When the Guns Roared (New York: Doubleday, 1965), 177.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brian Jenkins, Sir William Gregory of Coole: The Biography of an Anglo-Irishman (Gerrards Cross: C. Smythe, 1986), 154.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chapple and Pollard, The Letters of Mrs Gaskell , 734 (Gaskell to Charles Elliot Norton, July 4, 1863).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Warren F. Spencer, The Confederate Navy in Europe (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1984), 135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alan Hankinson, Man of War: William Howard Russell of The Times (London: Heinemann, 1982), 182.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morris Mowbrey to Charles Mackay, 21 April, 1865, in Stanley Morison, ed., The History of The Times: The Tradition Established, 1841–84 (London: The Times , 1939), 387–388.

    Google Scholar 

  23. As quoted in Oscar Maurer, “Punch on Slavery and the Civil War,” Victorian Studies 1 (September 1957): 4–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Iwan W. Morgan Philip John Davies

Copyright information

© 2013 Iwan W. Morgan and Philip John Davies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Foreman, A. (2013). Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: A Propaganda Tool for the Enemy?. In: Morgan, I.W., Davies, P.J. (eds) Reconfiguring the Union. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137336484_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137336484_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46350-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33648-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics