Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Melting pot or tribe? Country-level ethnic diversity and its effect on subsidiaries

  • Published:
Journal of International Business Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of our study is to explore the effect of country-level ethnic diversity on subsidiary-level ownership strategy and employee productivity. We examine two characteristics of ethnic diversity in society, the level of diversity and degree of inclusion. Using a multi-source and multi-year (2004–2010) sample of 30,007 subsidiaries from 79 home-countries operating in 63 host-countries, we find that high levels of diversity are not a de facto form of country risk as some have argued. Rather, it is the ability of a dominant ethnic group to exclude others from full economic and political participation. As societies become more fragmented, and one or few groups become more dominant and prevents other groups from fully participating in the political process or economic opportunities, this may increase business risk and lower labor productivity. The broader policy implications are that policymakers should have engagement policies toward disfranchised ethnic groups. Policymakers should develop polices aimed at leveraging the benefits of diversity. MNCs have an interest in promoting such policies and fostering greater economic and political inclusion in countries where they operate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, S., & Ramaswani, S. N. 1992. Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internationalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. 1999. Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4): 1243–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. 2005. Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3): 762–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. 1986. Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. 1990. Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3): 589–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. 2002. Econometrics. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, A., Miguel, E., & Posner, D. N. 2004. Sources of ethnic identification in Africa. Afrobarometer Working Paper No. 44. Afrobarometer.

  • Berry, H., Guillen, M., & Zhou, N. 2010. An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9): 1460–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. J. 1992. Ethnic capital and intergenerational mobility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1): 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boytsun, A., Deloof, M., & Matthyssens, P. 2011. Social norms, social cohesion, and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(1): 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., Umphress, E. E., Dietz, J., Burrows, J. W., Butz, R. M., & Scholten, L. 2005. Community matters: Realistic group conflict theory and the impact of diversity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5): 830–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D. 1995. The influence of international risk on entry mode strategy in the computer software industry. Management International Review, 35(1): 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederman, L.-E., Wimmer, A., & Min, B. 2010. Why do ethnic groups rebel? New data and analysis. World Politics, 62(1): 87–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 2014. The World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/. Accessed on 20 March 2018.

  • Chan, C. M., & Makino, S. 2007. Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 621–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J. 2003. Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2): 238–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M. H. 1998. Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(1): 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. N. 2007. Group composition and employee creative behavior in a Korean electronics company: Distinct effects of relational demography and group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2): 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, R. Y. J. 2013. The costs of ambient cultural disharmony: Indirect intercultural conflicts in social environment undermine creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6): 1545–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. 2000. Ethnicity, politics and economic performance. Economy and Politics, 12(3): 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. 2001. Implications of ethnic diversity. Economic Policy, 16(32): 127–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. 1998. On the economic causes of civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 50(4): 563–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. 2002. On the incidence of civil war in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(1): 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. H., Jr., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. 1991. Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4): 827–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M. 2005. Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(1): 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A. P., & Beamish, P. 1999. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10): 915–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A. P., & Henisz, W. 2000. Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Manangement Journal, 43(3): 305–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A. P., & Henisz, W. 2003. Policy uncertainty and the sequence of entry by Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(11): 1153–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delis, M. D., Gaganis, C., Hasan, I., & Pasiouras, F. 2016. The effect of board of directors from countries with different genetic diversity levels on corporate performance. Management Science, 63(1): 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6): 1155–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. 2001. Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3): 209–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow, D., Cuypers, I. R. P., & Ertug, G. 2016. The effects of within-country linguistic and religious diversity on foreign acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3): 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duanmu, J., & Guney, Y. 2013. Heterogeneous effect of ethnic networks on international trade of Thailand: The role of family ties and ethnic diversity. International Business Review, 22(1): 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W., & Levine, R. 1997. Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(4): 1203–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eifert, B., Miguel, E., & Posner, D. N. 2010. Political competition and ethnic identification in Africa. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2): 494–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elron, E. 1997. Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(4): 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban, J., Mayoral, L., & Ray, D. 2012. Ethnicity and conflict: An empirical study. American Economic Review, 102(4): 1310–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2018. Free movement – EU nationals. http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=457&langId=en.

  • Feinberg, S. E., & Gupta, A. K. 2009. MNC subsidiaries and country risk: Internalization as a safeguard against weak external institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2): 381–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. 2002. The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4): 743–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Canal, E., & Guillén, M. F. 2008. Risk and the strategy of foreign location choice in regulated industries. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10): 1097–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E. 1988. The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 4(1): 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A. S., & Lu, J. W. 2007. Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management, 33(1): 84–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giambatista, R. C., & Bhappu, A. D. 2010. Diversity’s harvest: Interactions of diversity sources and communication technology on creative group performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(2): 116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y. 2003. Subsidiary staffing in multinational enterprises: Agency, resources, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4): 728–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y. 2006. The impact of subsidiary top management team national diversity on subsidiary performance: Knowledge and legitimacy perspective. Management International Review, 46(6): 771–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grief, A. 1993. Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders’ coalition. American Economic Review, 83(3): 525–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R., & Moore, W. H. 1997. Ethnopolitical rebellion: A cross-sectional analysis of the 1980s with Risk Assessments for the 1990s. American Journal of Political Science, 41(4): 1079–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, A. 1995. Two nations: Black and white, separate, hostile and unequal. New York, NY: Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, H. E. 2004. Explaining ethnicity. Comparative Political Studies, 37(4): 458–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. 1994. Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. In B. M. Shaw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 16: 171–214. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegde, D., & Tumlinson, J. 2014. Does social proximity enhance business partnerships? Theory and evidence from ethnicity’s role in U.S. venture capital. Management Science, 60(9): 2355–2380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. 1958. The strategy of economic development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort, J. 2014. Ethnic divisions and production in firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4): 1899–1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holburn, G., & Zelner, B. A. 2010. Political capabilities, policy risk, and international investment strategy: Evidence from the global electric power industry. Strategic Management Journal, 31(12): 1290–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, R., & Kohfeld, C. W. 1989. Race and decline of class in American Politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3): 635–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, H.-J., Oh, C. H., & Paik, Y. 2015. Impact of nationality composition in foreign subsidiary on its performance: A case of Korean companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6): 806–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, K., & Rose, E. L. 1994. The genealogical structure of Japanese firms: Parent-subsidiary relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2): 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4): 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G. G., Hill, R. C., Lutkepohl, H., & Lee, T. 1985. The theory and practice of econometrics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. R. 1984. The external environment-strategic planning interface: U.S. multinational corporate practices in the 1980s. Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2): 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Hwang, P. 1992. Global strategy and multinationals’ entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1): 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M. V. S. 2009. The relationship between product and international diversification: The effects of short-run constraints and endogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1): 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Ferrara, E. 2003. Kin groups and reciprocity: A model of credit transactions in Ghana. American Economic Review, 93(5): 1730–1751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitin, D. D. 1998. Identity in formation: The Russian-speaking populations in the near abroad. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassen, D. D. 2007. Ethnic divisions, trust, and the size of the informal sector. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(3): 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-J., & Reade, C. 2015. Ethnic homophily perceptions as an emergent IHRM challenge: Evidence from firms operating in Sri Lanka during the ethnic conflict. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(13): 1645–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. Y., & Meyer, K. E. 2009. Conceptualizing experience effects in international business: A study of ownership strategies. Journal of World Business, 44(4): 370–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. 2008. Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4): 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luiz, L. M. 2015. The impact of ethno-linguistic fractionalization on cultural measure: Dynamics, endogeneity and modernization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(9): 1080–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaloppoulos, S., & Papaioannou, E. 2015. On the ethnic origins of African development: Traditional chiefs and pre-colonial political centralization. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 32–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oetzel, J., & Miklian, J. 2017. Multinational enterprises, risk management, and the business and economics of peace. Multinational Business Review, 25(4): 270–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, C. H., & Oetzel, J. 2017. Once bitten twice shy? Experience managing violent conflict risk and MNC subsidiary-level investment and expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3): 714–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Østergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B., & Kristinsson, K. 2011. Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3): 500–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. 2006. The economic value of cultural diversity: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(1): 9–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Prarolo, G. 2009. Cultural identity and knowledge creation in cosmopolitan cities. Journal of Regional Studies, 49(4): 647–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y. 2017. Strategic motives, institutional environments, and firm’s FDI ownership. Multinational Business Review, 25(4): 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parboteeah, K. P., Seriki, H. T., & Hoegl, M. 2014. Ethnic diversity, corruption, and ethical climates in sub-Saharan Africa: Recognizing the significance of human resource management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(7): 979–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdey, J. 2006. Anti-Chinese violence in Indonesia 1996–1999. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. A., Gustafson, D. J., Cheung, F. M., & Terpstra, R. H. 1993. Differences in managerial values: A study of US, Hong Kong, and PRC managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(1): 177–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reade, C., & Lee, H.-J. 2012. Organizational commitment in time of war: Assessing the impact of attenuation of employee sensitivity to ethnopolitical conflict. Journal of International Management, 18(1): 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, O. C. 2000. Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2): 164–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, F. W. 2002. Globalization, ethnic diversity, and nationalism: The challenge for democracies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 581(1): 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roessler, G. 2011. The enemy from within. Personal rule, coups, and civil wars in Africa. World Politics, 63(2): 300–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J. M., & Nee, V. 1987. Limits of ethnic solidarity in the enclave economy. American Sociological Review, 52(6): 745–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneier, B. 2003. Beyond fear: Thinking sensibly about security in an uncertain world. New Yok, NY: Copernicus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G. M., Jr. 1990. A resynthesis of the primordial and circumstantial approaches to ethnic group solidarity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 13(2): 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shekhar, V. 2014. The good news from Indonesia’s election stalemate. http://transitions.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/07/16/the_good_news_from_indonesia_s_election_stalemate. Accessed on 20 March 2018.

  • Shenkar, O. 2012. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. K., Maznevski, M. L., Voight, A., & Jonsen, K. 2010. Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4): 690–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southern Poverty Law Center. 2016. Ten days after: Harassment and intimidation in the aftermath of the election. November 29. www.splcenter.org/20161129/ten-days-after-harassment-and-intimidation-aftermat-election. Accessed 22 March 2018.

  • Tan, D., & Mahoney, J. F. 2006. Why a multinational firm chooses expartiates: Integrating resource-based, agency and transaction costs perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3): 457–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J. D. 1980. Analysis of population diversity: Measures of qualitative variation. Sociological Methods and Research, 8(3): 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiemann, T., Das, J., & DiRienzo, C. 2006. A note on an ethnic homogeneity Kuznets Curve. Challenge, 49(2): 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. 1992. Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4): 549–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tung, R. L. 2008. The cross-cultural research imperative: The need to balance cross-national and intra-national diversity. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(1): 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2014. World Investment Report 2014. http://unctad.org. Accessed 15 March 2018.

  • United Nations Global Compact (UNGC). 2010. Doing business will advancing peace and development. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/Peace_and_Business/DBWAPD_2010.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2018.

  • Whitley, R. 1992. Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets, and societies. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. 1997. Governance at work: The social regulation of economic relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A., Cederman, L. E., & Min, B. 2009. Ethnic politics and armed conflict: A configurational analysis of a new global data set. American Sociological Review, 74(2): 316–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, C. P., Beamish, P. W., & Makino, S. 1994. Ownership-based entry mode strategies and international performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2): 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this paper received the OB/HRM/OT Best Paper Award from the International Management Division of the Academy of Management, 2015 and a Best Paper Award from European International Business Academy, 2016. We would like to acknowledge the helpful comments we received from Ruth Aguilera, Mary Yoko Brannen, Roy Chua, Rajiv Kozhikode, Seung-Hyun Lee, and Martha Maznevski in an earlier version of this paper. Financial support for this research project was partially provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [435-2017-0897].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kogod School of Business, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C., 20016, USA

    Jennifer Oetzel

  2. Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, 500 Granville Street, Vancouver, BC, V6C 1W6, Canada

    Chang Hoon Oh

Authors
  1. Jennifer Oetzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chang Hoon Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Hoon Oh.

Additional information

Accepted by Helena Barnard, Area Editor, 19 December 2018. This article has been with the authors for one revision.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 278 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oetzel, J., Oh, C.H. Melting pot or tribe? Country-level ethnic diversity and its effect on subsidiaries. J Int Bus Policy 2, 37–61 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-00016-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-00016-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation