Skip to main content
Log in

Do Global Value Chains Offer Developing Countries Learning and Innovation Opportunities?

  • Special Issue Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of emerging economies in the global economy via embeddedness in Global Value Chains (GVCs) is increasing, but their ability to become innovation leaders is less certain. The GVC approach stresses that the inter-firm linkages afforded by being part of a chain are crucial for transferring knowledge. However, their impact on the innovation performance of the developing country firms involved in these GVCs remains controversial and requires more research. The present study provides a systematic review of the literature on developing country GVCs to investigate the learning channels used by local firms, both within (firm level, collective level) and outside of these value chains (i.e. external sources of learning), and the extent to which this activity promotes innovation. We use cluster analysis to classify the cases identified in a literature review to propose a novel typology of local GVC innovators: (a) GVC-led Innovators that achieve high levels of innovation, relying mainly on sources of knowledge within the GVC; (b) Autonomous Innovators whose innovation activity is based on external sources of learning; (c) Marginal Innovators, which constitute the largest group and are characterized by low levels of innovativeness and some use of knowledge available within the GVCs, but scarce use of external sources.

Le rôle des économies émergentes dans l’économie mondiale via l’intégration dans les chaînes de valeur mondiales (CVM) est croissant, mais leur capacité à devenir des leaders de l’innovation est moins certaine. La présente étude propose une revue systématique de la littérature sur les CVM des pays en développement afin d’étudier les canaux d’apprentissage utilisés par les entreprises locales au sein (au niveau des entreprises et au niveau collectif) et en dehors (les sources externes d’apprentissage par exemple) de ces chaînes de valeur. L’article étudie également la mesure dans laquelle cette activité favorise l’innovation. Nous proposons une nouvelle typologie des innovateurs locaux des CVM: (a) les innovateurs dirigés par les CVM qui atteignent des niveaux élevés d’innovation, en s’appuyant principalement sur les sources de connaissances au sein de la CVM; (b) les innovateurs autonomes dont l’activité d’innovation est basée sur des sources d’apprentissage externes; (c) Les innovateurs marginaux, qui constituent le groupe le plus important et se caractérisent par un faible niveau d’innovation et une certaine utilisation des connaissances disponibles au sein des CVM, mais une utilisation limitée des sources externes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboni, J. and Feil, B. (2007) Cluster Analysis for Data Mining and System Identification. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altenburg, T. (2006) Governance patterns in value chains and their development impact. The European Journal of Development Research 18(4): 498–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altenburg, T., Schmitz, H. and Stamm, A. (2008) Breakthrough? China’s and India’s transition from production to innovation. World Development 36(2): 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athukorala, P.C. (2014) Growing with global production sharing: The tale of Penang export hub, Malaysia. Competition and Change 18(3): 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barba Navaretti, G., Venables, A. and Barry, F. (2004) Multinational Firms in the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, H. and Tuomi, K. (2008) How demand sophistication (de-)limits economic upgrading: Comparing the film industries of South Africa and Nigeria (Nollywood). Industry and Innovation 15(6): 647–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. and Pavitt, K. (1993) Technological accumulation and industrial growth. Industrial and Corporate Change 2: 157–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, L. and Thun, E. (2011) Going mobile in China: Shifting value chains and upgrading in the mobile telecom sector. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 4: 148–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cafaggi, F., Macedo, R., Swensson, L., Andreotti, T., Piterman, C. and de Almeida, L. (2012) Accessing the global value chain in a changing institutional environment: Comparing aeronautics and coffee. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper No. IDB-WP-370.

  • Chaminade, C. and Vang, J. (2008) Globalisation of knowledge production and regional innovation policy: Supporting specialized hubs in the Bangalore software industry. Research Policy 37(10): 1684–1696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, K.C., Wong, C.Y. and Goh, K.L. (2016) Technology catch-up with Chinese characteristics: What can Southeast Asia learn from China? The Round Table 105(6): 667–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990) Absorptive-capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Castro Souza, R. and Neto, J.A. (2010) The entry of Brazilian fresh fruit small and medium producers into the global market. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 48(3): 521–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis Wei, Y.H., Liefner, I. and Miao, C.H. (2011) Network configurations and R&D activities of the ICT industry in Suzhou municipality, China. Geoforum 42(4): 484–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988) Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, XXVI (September): 1120–1171.

  • Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M. and Verspagen, B. (2010) Innovation and economic development. In Bronwyn H. Hall and Rosenberg N. (eds) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 2: 833–872.

  • Farole, T. and Winkler, D. (2014) Making Foreign Direct Investment Work for Sub-Saharan Africa. Local Spillovers and Competitiveness in Global Value Chains. The World Bank. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgy, E.W. (1965) Cluster analysis of multivariate data: Efficiency versus interpretability of classifications. Biometrics 21: 768–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, J. and Helmsing, A.H.J.B. (2016) Absorptive capacity as a mediator: Innovation of handicraft exporters in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12212.

  • Fu, X., Zanello, G., Essegbey, G.O., Hou, J. and Mohnen, P. (2014) Innovation in Low Income Countries: A Survey Report. Oxford: Department of International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. (1999) International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain, Journal of International Economics 48: 37–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. and Lee, J. (2012) Why the world suddenly cares about global supply chains. Journal of Supply Chain Management 48(3): 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J. and Sturgeon, T. (2005) The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 12(1): 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani E. (2008) Multinational Corporations and patterns of local knowledge transfer in Costa Rican High-Tech industries. Development and Change 39(3): 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, E. and Bell, M. (2005) The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy 34(1): 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, E., Pietrobelli, C. and Rabellotti, R. (2005) Upgrading in global value chains: Lessons from Latin America clusters. World Development 33(4): 549–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goto, K. (2012) Is the Vietnamese garment industry at a turning point? Upgrading from the export to the domestic market. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies-JETRO discussion paper no. 373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haakonsson, S.J. (2009) ‘Learning by importing’ in global value chains: Upgrading and South–South strategies in the Ugandan pharmaceutical industry. Development Southern Africa 26(3): 409–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatani, F. (2009) The logic of spillover interception: The impact of global supply chains in China. Journal of World Business 44(2): 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, J., and Navas-Aleman, L. (2010) Value Chains, Donor Interventions and Poverty Reduction: A Review of Donor Practice. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies Research Report No. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, J. and Schmitz, H. (2002) How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading industrial clusters? Regional Studies 36(9): 1017–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadarusman, Y. (2012) Knowledge acquisition: Lessons from local and global interaction in the Indonesian consumer electronics sector. Institutions and Economies 4(2): 65–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadarusman, Y. and Nadvi, K. (2013) Competitiveness and technological upgrading in global value chains: Evidence from the Indonesian electronics and garment sectors. European Planning Studies 21(7): 1007–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky, R., Terheggen, A. and Tijaja, J. (2011) China as a final market: The Gabon timber and Thai cassava value chains. World Development 39(7): 1177–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky, R. and Wamae, W. (2010) The determinants of upgrading and value added in the African clothing sector: The contrasting experiences of Kenya and Madagascar. Milton Keynes: Innovation Knowledge Development (IKD) Working Paper no. 59.

  • Krishna, V.V., Patra, S.K. and Bhattacharya, S. (2012). Internationalisation of R&D and global nature of innovation: Emerging trends in India. Science, Technology and Society 17(2): 165–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S.R. and Subrahmanya, B.M.H. (2010) Influence of subcontracting on innovation and economic performance of SMEs in Indian automobile industry. Technovation 30(11–12): 558–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraswamy, A., Mudambi, R., Saranga, H. and Tripathy, A. (2012) Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms responses to market liberalization. Journal of International Business Studies 43(4): 368–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (1996) Learning from the Asian Tigers: Studies in Technology and Industrial Policy. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27: 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Jee, M. and Eun, J.K. (2011) Assessing China’s catch-up at the firm level and beyond: Washington Consensus, East Asian consensus and the Beijing model. Industry and Innovation 18(5): 487–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. and Malerba, F. (2017) Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy 46(2): 338–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lema, R. (2012) Outsourcing and supplier learning: Insights from the Indian software industry. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 6(4): 285–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lema, R., Berger, A. and Schmitz, H. (2013) China’s impact on the global wind power industry. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 42(1): 37–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lema, R., Quadros, R. and Schmitz, H. (2015) Reorganising global value chains and building innovation capabilities in Brazil and India. Research Policy 44: 1376–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthee, M., Naude, W. and Viviers, W. (2006) Challenges for the floriculture industry in a developing country: A South African perspective. Development Southern Africa 23(4): 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbayi, L. (2011) Linkages in Botswana’s diamond cutting and polishing industry. Cape town: University of Cape Town and Open University MMCP Discussion Paper No. 6.

  • McDermott, G.A. and Corredoira, R.A. (2010) Network composition, collaborative ties, and upgrading in emerging-market firms: Lessons from the Argentine autoparts sector. Journal of International Business Studies 41(2): 308–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meléndez, M. and Uribe, M.J. (2012) International product fragmentation and the insertion of Latin America and the Caribbean in global production networks: Colombian case studies. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper No. IDB-WP-374.

  • Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C. and Rabellotti, R. (2008) Global value chains and technological capabilities: A framework to study industrial innovation in developing countries. Oxford Development Studies 36(1): 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadvi, K. (2011) Labour standards and technological upgrading: Competitive challenges in the global football industry. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 4(1/2/3): 235–257.

  • Nadvi, K. and Halder, G. (2005) Local clusters in global value chains: Exploring dynamic linkages between Germany and Pakistan. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 17(5): 339–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navas-Aleman, L. (2011) The impact of operating in multiple value chains for upgrading: The case of the Brazilian furniture and footwear industries. World Development 39(8): 1386–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-Perez, R. (ed) (2014) Strengthening value chains as an industrial policy instrument. Methodology and experience of ECLAC in Central America. Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmanand V. and Kurian P.H. (2014) Rise of Indian Industry. Case Illustrations on Evolving Competitiveness Across Cluster Value-Chains Through Public-Private Partnerships with a Humane Case. Kerala: Department of industries and commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli, C. and Rabellotti, R. (2011) Global value chains meet innovation systems: are there learning opportunities for developing countries? World Development 39(7): 1261–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli, C. and Rabellotti, R. (eds) (2007) Upgrading to Compete: SMEs, Clusters and Value Chains in Latin America. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli, C. & Staritz, C. (2017) Upgrading, Interactive Learning, and Innovation Systems in Value Chain Interventions. Eur J Dev Res; https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0112-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S. and Ewert, J. (2009) Which way is ‘up’ in upgrading? Trajectories of change in the value chain for South African wine. World Development 37(10): 1637–1650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K. (2012) Bottom of the Pyramid as a Source of Breakthrough Innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29(1): 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, H. (2006) Learning and earning in global garment and footwear chains. The European Journal of Development Research 18(4): 546–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, T., Van Biesebroeck, J. and Gereffi, G. (2008) Value chains, networks and clusters: reframing the global automotive industry. Journal of Economic Geography 8(3): 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, T.J. and Kawakami, M. (2011) Global Value Chains in the Electronics Industry: Characteristics, Crisis, and Upgrading Opportunities for Firms from Developing Countries. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 4(1/2/3): 120–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Zhou, Y., Lin, G.C.S. and Wei, Y.H.D. (2013) Subcontracting and supplier innovativeness in a developing economy: Evidence from China’s information and communication technology industry. Regional Studies 47(10): 1766–1784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taglioni, D. and Winkler, D. (2016) Making Global Value Chains Work for Development, World Bank Group.

  • Tencati, A., Russo, A. and Quaglia, V. (2008) Unintended consequences of CSR: Protectionism and collateral damage in global supply chains: The case of Vietnam. Corporate Governance 8(4): 518–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, M. Bair, J. and Fernandez, V.R. (2014) Linking up to development? Global value chains and the making of a post-Washington consensus. Development and Change 45(6):1219–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P.J. (2015) The competitive advantages of emerging market multinationals: A re-assessment. Critical Perspectives on International Business 11(3/4): 216–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. (2014) State-led technological innovation of domestic firms in Shenzhen, China: Evidence from liquid crystal display (LCD) industry. Cities 38: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. and Liao H. (2010) Backward linkages of cross-border production networks of Taiwanese PC investment in the Pearl River Delta, China. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 101(2): 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A previous version of this work was commissioned as a background paper for the UNIDO Industrial Development Report 2016 and was funded by UNU-MERIT. The authors benefitted from comments received in workshops organized by UNIDO in Vienna and Globelics in Cuba and they also thank two anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Giuliani.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A-1: The GVCs cases analysed

Industry

Country

Methodology

Clusters

Article

Complex products manufacturing

 Aeronautics

Brazil

Qualitative

GVCI

Cafaggi et al (2012)

 Automotive

India

Quantitative

LI

Kumar and Subrahmanya (2010)

 Automotive

India

Qualitative

LI

Krishna et al (2012)

 Automotive

China

Qualitative

AI

Altenburg et al (2008)

 Automotive

China

Qualitative

LI

Hatani (2009

 Automotive

Argentina

Quantitative

LI

McDermott and Corredoira (2010)

 Automotive

India

Quantitative

LI

Kumaraswamy et al (2012)

 Electronics

China

Qualitative

GVCl

Sturgeon and Kawakami (2011)

 Electronics

China

Qualitative

AI

Altenburg et al (2008)

 Electronics

China

Quantitative

LI

Dennis Wei et al (2011)

 Electronics

India

Quantitative

LI

Krishna et al (2012)

 Electronics

Indonesia

Quantitative

GVCI

Kadarusman (2012)

 Electronics

Indonesia

Qualitative

GVCI

Kadarusman and Nadvi (2013)

 Electronics

Malaysia

Qualitative

AI

Athukorala (2014)

 Electronics

Mexico

Qualitative

LI

Sturgeon and Kawakami (2011)

 Handset

China

Qualitative

GVCI

Brandt and Thun (2011)

 ICT

China

Quantitative

LI

Sun et al (2013)

 LCD Screens

China

Qualitative

AI

Yang (2014)

 PC

China

Qualitative

LI

Yang and Liao (2010)

 Pharmaceuticals

India

Quantitative

AI

Krishna et al (2012)

 Pharmaceuticals

Uganda

Qualitative

AI

Haakonsson (2009)

 Space Industry

India

Qualitative

AI

Altenburg et al (2008)

 Wind Turbine

China

Qualitative

AI

Lema et al (2013)

Traditional manufacturing

 Construction

Ghana

Quantitative

AI

Fu et al (2014)

 Diamond Cutting

Botswana

Qualitative

LI

Mbayi (2011)

 Food processing

Colombia

Qualitative

AI

Meléndez and Uribe (2012)

 Food Processing

Ghana

Quantitative

AI

Fu et al (2014)

 Football

China

Qualitative

AI

Nadvi (2011)

 Football

Pakistan

Qualitative

LI

Nadvi (2011)

 Footwear

Brazil

Qualitative

LI

Navas-Aleman (2011)

 Footwear

Vietnam

Quantitative

LI

Tencati et al (2008)

 Furniture

Brazil

Qualitative

LI

Navas-Aleman (2011)

 Garment

Indonesia

Qualitative

GVCI

Kadarusman and Nadvi (2013)

 Garment

Kenya

Quantitative

LI

Kaplinsky and Wamae (2010)

 Garment

Madagascar

Quantitative

LI

Kaplinsky and Wamae (2011)

 Garment

Vietnam

Qualitative

AI

Goto (2012)

 Garment and Textile

Ghana

Quantitative

AI

Fu et al (2014)

 Surgical Instrument

Pakistan

Quantitative

GVCI

Nadvi and Halder (2005)

 Textile

India

Qualitative

LI

Padmanand and Kurian (2014)

Natural resources

 Coffee

Brazil

Qualitative

GVCI

Cafaggi et al (2012)

 Floriculture

South Africa

Quantitative

GVCI

Matthee et al (2006)

 Fresh Fruits

Brazil

Qualitative

LI

de Castro Souza and Neto (2010)

 Seafood

Vietnam

Quantitative

LI

Tencati et al (2008)

 Vegetables

Guatemala

Qualitative

LI

Padilla-Perez (2014)

 Wine

South-Africa

Qualitative

LI

Ponte and Ewert (2009)

 Wood

Gabon

Qualitative

LI

Kaplinsky et al (2011)

 Wood

Thailand

Qualitative

LI

Kaplinsky et al (2011)

Services

 Film

South-Africa

Qualitative

LI

Barnard and Tuomi (2008)

 Software

India

Qualitative

AI

Altenburg et al (2008)

 Software

India

Qualitative

LI

Chaminade and Vang (2008)

  1. Legenda: GVCI: GVC-led Innovators; AI: Autonomous Innovators; LI: Marginal Innovators

Table A-2: Defining GVC groups

 

Innovation

(0–1)

Learning within the GVC

(0–1)

Learning outside the GVC

(0–1)

ANOVA

p-values

GVC-led Innovators

0.69

0.69

0.43

0.000

Autonomous Innovators

0.68

0.16

0.50

0.000

Marginal Innovators

0.33

0.27

0.14

0.000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Marchi, V., Giuliani, E. & Rabellotti, R. Do Global Value Chains Offer Developing Countries Learning and Innovation Opportunities?. Eur J Dev Res 30, 389–407 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0126-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0126-z

Keywords

Navigation