Abstract
Although inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) implementation has been widely studied, mainstream literature has not focused on understanding how implementation unfolds and how the existing components of the installed base shape the process. This paper addresses this gap by conducting a socio-technical, process-oriented, and multi-level study. Based on a longitudinal in-depth case study of the implementation of an industry IOIS, we develop an explication of IOIS implementation that considers the role of the installed base. Using the lens of actor-network theory (ANT), we counter the mainstream IOIS literature by showing that IOIS implementation cannot only be explained by a fixed set of independent factors; instead, the dynamic mutual shaping of socio-technical actors throughout implementation complements existing factor-based models in explaining the evolution and the outcome (success or failure). The study also shows the importance of complying with the technical and non-technical components of the installed base for an IOIS to be successfully initiated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Associations of shipping agents, clearing agents, port stevedores, and freight forwarders.
References
Baalen, P.v., Oosterhout, M.v., Tan, Y.H. and Heck, E.v. (2000). Dynamics in Setting Up an EDI Community, Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon Publishers.
Barret, M. (1999). Challenges of EDI Adoption for Electronic Trading in the London Insurance Market, European Journal of Information Systems 8 (1): 1–15.
Barrett, M. and Konsynski, B. (1982). Inter-Organizational Information Sharing Systems, MIS Quarterly 6 (1): 93–105.
Burns, B. and Light, B. (2007). User-Led Innovation in Call Center Knowledge Work: A social shaping perspective, in T. McMaster, D.G. Wastell, E. Ferneley and J. DeGross (eds.) Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation: Diversifying the Research Agenda, Boston: Springer, pp. 133–147.
Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay, in J. Law (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, London: Routledge, pp. 196–233.
Christiaanse, E. and Damsgaard, J. (2000). A Comparison of Electronic Infrastructures in the Air Cargo Industry in the Netherlands and Hong Kong SAR, The Journal of Global Information Management 9 (2): 15–22.
Ciborra, C. (2000). From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Doolin, B. (2002). To Reveal is to Critique: Actor-network theory and critical information systems research, Journal of Information Technology 17 (2): 69–78.
Elbanna, A.R. (2006). The Validity of the Improvisation Argument in the Implementation of Rigid Technology: The case of ERP systems, Journal of Information Technology 21 (3): 165–175.
Elgarah, W., Falaleeva, N., Saunders, C., Ilie, V., Shim, J.T. and Courtney, J.F. (2005). Data Exchange in Interorganizational Relationships: Review through multiple conceptual lenses, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 36 (1): 8–29.
Hanseth, O., Ciborra, C. and Braa, K. (2001). The Control Devolution: ERP and side-effects of globalization, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 32 (4): 34–46.
Hanseth, O., Jacucci, E., Grisot, M. and Aanestad, M. (2006). Reflexive Standardization: Complexity and side-effects in standard-making, MIS Quarterly 30 (3): 563–581.
Kumar, K., van Dissel, H.G. and Bielli, P. (1998). The Merchant of Prato – Revisited: Toward a third rationality of information systems, MIS Quarterly 22 (2): 199–226.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lyytinen, K. and Damsgaard, J. (2001). What's Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory?, in M.A. Ardis and B.L. Marcolin (eds.) Diffusing Software Products and Process Innovations, Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer, B.V., pp. 173–190.
Markus, M.L. and Robey, D. (1988). Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal structure in theory and research, Management Science 34 (5): 583–589.
McMaster, T., Vidgen, R.T. and Wastell, D.G. (1997). Technology Transfer – Diffusion or translation?, in T. McMaster, E. Mumford, E.B. Swanson, B. Warboys and D.G. Wastell (eds.) Facilitating Technology Transfer Through Partnership: Learning from Practice and Research, London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 64–75.
McMaster, T. and Wastell, D.G. (2005). Diffusion – or Delusion? Challenging an IS research tradition, Information Technology & People 18 (4): 383–404.
Monteiro, E. (2000). Actor-Network Theory and Information Infrastructure, in C. Ciborra and Associates (ed.) From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–83.
Nielsen, P. and Aanestad, M. (2006). Control Devolution as Information Infrastructure Design Strategy: A case study of a content service platform for mobile phones in Norway, Journal of Information Technology 21 (3): 185–194.
Rodon, J. (2006). Methodological and Conceptual Review of Inter-Organizational Information Systems Integration, in 14th European Conference on Information Systems (Göteborg, 2006); Göteborg: University of Göteborg, pp. 1–12.
Steinfield, C., Markus, M.L. and Wigand, R. (2005). Exploring Interorganizational Systems at the Industry Level of Analysis: Evidence from the US home mortgage industry, Journal of Information Technology 20 (4): 224–233.
Tilson, D. and Lyytinen, K. (2006). The 3G Transition: Changes in the US wireless industry, Telecommunications Policy 30 (10/11): 569–586.
Truex, D., Baskerville, R.L. and Klein, H.K. (1999). Growing Systems in Emergent Organizations, Communications of the ACM 42 (8): 117–123.
Truex, D. and Holmström, J. (2007). Dropping Your Tools: The diversity of the research agenda in organizational dynamics of technology-based innovation, in T. McMaster, D.G. Wastell, E. Ferneley and J. DeGross (eds.) Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation: Diversifying the Research Agenda, Boston: Springer, pp. 31–42.
Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretative Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and method, European Journal of Information Systems 4 (2): 74–81.
Walsham, G. (1997). Actor-Network Theory and IS Research: Current status and future prospects, in S.L. Allen, J. Liebenau and J.I. DeGross (eds.) Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 466–480.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodon, J., Pastor, J., Sesé, F. et al. Unravelling the dynamics of IOIS implementation: an actor-network study of an IOIS in the seaport of Barcelona. J Inf Technol 23, 97–108 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000131
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000131