Skip to main content
Log in

Moving to the edge of chaos: bureaucracy, IT and the challenge of complexity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

Bureaucracies in the Weberian mould, whether of the state or corporate type, are rational-legal structures organized to deliver order, stability and predictability. Early developments in information and communication technologies (ICTs) appeared set to deliver such an outcome. Yet the new economy turns out to be more ‘distributed’ than had originally been expected. What is the nature of the challenge that this poses for bureaucracies? To address this question, the paper first presents a conceptual framework, the Information-Space or I-Space, which allows us to explore the relationship between how knowledge is structured and how it flows within and between populations of agents. The paper then examines what cultural and institutional challenges the new ICTs pose for both state and corporate bureaucracies, confronted as they are with the complexities of an increasingly distributed social order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby, R.W. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics, London: Methuen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. (1999). Quantum information theory, in A. Hey (ed.) Feynman and Computation: Exploring the Limits of Computers, MA, USA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M. (1995). Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M. (1998). Knowledge Assets. Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M. and Child, J. (1988). The Iron Law of Fiefs: Bureaucratic Failure and the Problem of Governance in the Chinese Economic Reforms, Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M. and Child, J. (1996). From Fiefs to Clans: Explaining China's Emerging Economic Order, Administrative Science Quarterly 41(4): 600–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M. and Child, J. (1999). Organizations as adaptative Systems in Complex Environments: The Case of China, Organization Science 10: 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot, M. and Li, Y. (Forthcoming), Organizational versus Market Knowledge: From Concrete Embodiment to Abstract Representation, Journal of Bioeconomics.

  • Boisot, M. and Li, Y. (2005). Codification, Abstraction, and Firm Differences: A Cognitive Information-based Perspective, Journal of Bioeconomics 7: 309–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems, Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. (1937). The Nature of the Firm, Economica NS 4.

  • Cohen, I.B. (1985). Revolution of Science, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, G. (1994). Conference Opening Remarks, in G. Cowan, D. Pines and D. Meltzer (eds.) Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaitin, G.J. (1974). Information – Theoretic Computational Complexity, IEEE Transactions, Information Theory 20.pp 10–15.

  • Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press at Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1972). Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice, Sociology 6: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnithorne, A. (1981). China's Economic System, London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, K. and Van de Ven, A. (1999). Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics, Organization Science 10: 358–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, J.P. (1992). Intoduction aux Sciences Sociales: Logique des Phenoménes Collectifs, Paris: Ellipses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. and Tononi, G. (2000). A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, E. (1983). The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. and Axtell, R. (1996). Growing Artificial Societies: Social Sciences from the Bottom Up, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. and Wuster, T.S. (2000). Blown to Bits: How the New Economics of Information Transforms Strategy, Boston: Havard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. (2000). Neurodynamics: An Exploration of Mesoscopic Brain Dynamics, London: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M. (1994). Complex Adaptive Systems, in G. Cowan, D. Pines and D. Meltzer (eds.) Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. (1994). The Politics of Regionalism: Economic Development, Conflict and Negotiation, in D. Goodman and G. Segal (eds.) China Deconstructs: Politics, Trade and Regionalism, London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. (1954). Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy, Gencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, V. and Chater, N. (1997). Knowledge, Concepts and Categories, in Sloman, S., and Rips, L., (eds.) Concepts and Similarity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. (1939). Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. (1968). The Intellectual Origins of the Royal Society – London or Oxford, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 23: 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelfarb, G. (2004). The Roads to Modernity: The British, French, and American Enlightenments, New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, D. (1995). Crisis and Renewal: Meeting the Challeng of Organizational Change, Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1993). The Origins of Order, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolgomorov, A. (1965). Three Approaches for Defining the Concept of Information, Information Transmission 1: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. (1999). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some are so Rich and Some Are so Poor, New York: WW Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. (1992). Artificial Life, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, S. (2005). Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos, London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R. (1964). The Economic Theory of ‘Managerial’ Capitalism, London: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (2002). The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. and Weingast, B. (1989). The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in 17th Century England, Journal of Economic History 4: 803–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nove, A. (1977). The Soviet Economic System, London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, E., Grebogi, J. and Yorke, J. (1990). Controlling Chaos, Physical Review Letters 64: 2296–2299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, S. (1965). The Genesis of Modern Management: A Study of the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain, Middlesex: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prietula, M., Carley, K. and Gasser, L. (1998). Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institutions and Groups, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1980). From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences, New York: WH Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S.G. (1990). The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rusnock, A. (1997). Quantification, Precision and Accuracy: Determinations of Populations in the Ancien Regime, in M.N. Wise (ed.) The Values of Precision, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1994). A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipser, M. (1997). Introduction to the Theory of Computation, Boston: PWS Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, E.S. (1998). Forging Reform in China: The Fate on State-Owned Industry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2001). The Moment of Complexity: Emerging Network Culture, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C., Kaminska-Labbé, R. and McKelvey, B. (2005). Managing the MNC and the exploration/exploitation dilema: from static balance to dynamic oscillation, in G. Szulanski, Y. Doz and J. Porac (eds.) Advances in Strategic Management: Expanding Perspectives on the Strategy Process, Amsterdam: Elsevier, p 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tönnies, F. (1955). Community and Association, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M.M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1951). The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Rational Contracting, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurek, W. (1990). Algorithmic Information Content, Church-Turing Thesis, Physical Entropy, and Maxwell's Demon, in W. Zurek (ed.) Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Boisot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boisot, M. Moving to the edge of chaos: bureaucracy, IT and the challenge of complexity. J Inf Technol 21, 239–248 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000079

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000079

Keywords

Navigation