Abstract
This paper establishes the importance of situatedness of experience in Information Systems (IS) studies, but also critiques the limited notion of situatedness all too frequently employed. In the original language of phenomenology as used by Heidegger, ‘Befindlichkeit’ means not just ‘state of mind’ but also refers to disposition, mood, affectedness and emotion. The paper reviews the controversies in the literature generated by opponents to the situatedness literature and provides two case studies to show how current IS uses of the situatedness perspectives differ from the original one. From this discussion, the paper argues that the limited IS research agendas on situated action found in AI, cognitive and social sciences need to capture the inner life of the actor, mind and heart, through the scope of a renewed, authentic, phenomenological tradition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Note that Claudio Ciborra completed this working paper before he died in February 2005 but did not provide an Abstract. This has been written by the JIT special issue editors.
References
Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation, Organization Science 2 (1): 40–57.
Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, London: Heineman.
Ciborra, C. (1996). The Platform Organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises, Organization Science 7 (2): 103–118.
Clancey, W. (1977). Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge and Computer Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Contu, A. and Willmott, H. (2003). Re-embedding Situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory, Organization Science 14 (3): 283–296.
Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research – Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process, London: Sage.
Deetz, S. (1996). Describing Differences in Approaches in Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy, Organization Science 7 (2): 191–207.
Dourish, P. (2002). Where the Action is – The Foundations of Embodied Interaction, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Dreyfus, H.L. (1991). Being- in – the – World – A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division 1, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gadamer, H.G. (1975). Truth and Method, New York: Seabury Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure, Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Guignon, C. (2002). Philosophy and Authenticity: Heidegger's Search for a Ground for Philosophizing, in M. Wrathall and J. Malpas (eds.) Heidegger, Authenticity and Modernity, Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus – Vol. 1, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 79–101.
Haraway, D.J. (1991). Situated Knowledges – Simians, Cyborgs, and Women – The Reinvention of Nature, London: Free Association Books, pp. 183–201.
Heidegger, M. (2004). The Phenomenology of Religious Life, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2002). Gesamtausgabe – Band 18 – Grundbegriffe der Aristotelischen Philosophie (1924), Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (2001a). Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Introduction to Phenomenological Research, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2001b). Towards the Definition of Philosophy, London: Athlone Press.
Heidegger, M. (1993). Gesamtausgabe – Band 58 – Grundprobleme der Phanomenologie (1919/20), Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time, Oxford: Blackwell.
Husserl, E. (1970). Logical Investigations, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Kisiel, T. (1995). The Genesis of Heidegger's Being & Time, Berkley: University of California Press.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning – Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O'Sullivan, T., Dutton, B. and Rayner, P. (2003). Studying the Media, London: Arnold.
Orlikowski, W.J. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations, Organization Science 11 (4): 404–428.
Orlikowski, W.J. (1996). Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time – A Situated Change Perspective, Information Systems Research 7: 63–92.
Orr, J. (1996). Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Robertson, T. (2003). The Public Availability of Actors and Artefacts, Computer Supported Collaborative Work 11: 299–316.
Schultze, U. and Leidner, D.E. (2002). Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Research: Discourses and theoretical assumptions, MIS Quarterly 26 (3): 213–242.
Schank, R. and Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans and Knowledge, in P. Johnson – Laird and P. Wason (eds.) Thinking, Readings in Cognitive Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, L.A. (2000). Human/Machine Reconsidered, Introduction to the 2nd revised edition of Plans and Situated Actions – draft – Lancaster University.
Suchman, L.A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions – the Problem of Human Machine Communication, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vera, A.H. and Simon, H.A. (1993). Situated Action: A symbolic interpretation, Cognitive Science 17: 7–48.
Weick, K.E. (1993). The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann gulch disaster, Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (4): 628–652.
Weick, K.E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing, Reading, MA: Addison – Wesley.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ciborra, C., Willcocks, L. The mind or the heart? it depends on the (definition of) situation. J Inf Technol 21, 129–139 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000062
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000062