Skip to main content
Log in

The real benchmark of DAX index products and the influence of information dissemination: A natural experiment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Asset Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analysing 5 exchange traded funds (ETFs) and 26 index certificates, this is a comprehensive intraday study combining the perspective of information dissemination and pricing quality. We focus on the Volkswagen extreme event day on 28 October 2008, where a breakdown of the futures-cash arbitrage relationship offered the unique opportunity to identify the true benchmark of index-related products free from market microstructure noise. Although product information prospectuses promise to follow the DAX, we discover that the price quote level of DAX futures contracts became the one-on-one benchmark for all ETFs and for nearly all index certificates. We identify deviations between ETFs and their fair value exceeding 4 per cent. This is striking because the creation redemption process is assumed to restrict deviations. Analysing price information dynamics, we find that the revelation of new information to the market does not determine the price quote setting strategy of market makers during the extreme event. Hedging opportunities deliver a substantive argument to support the benchmark position of DAX futures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Further articles that analyse the pricing characteristics of index products are, for example, Chen et al (2009), who observe a reduced cash-futures pricing efficiency after the introduction of penny pricing, or Rompotis (2010b), who focuses on performance and tracking characteristics of Asian ETFs.

  2. Media reports claim that a short squeeze has led to the extraordinary rise of Volkswagen shares. Our data set does not permit the identification of short squeeze-based trades. However, the existence of a short squeeze would lead to an increased demand in Volkswagen shares, and prices are expected to rise. Analysing the number of shares as well as share prices on 28 October 2008, we observe extensively traded Volkswagen shares when prices reached their peak (for example, when 1 822 444 shares were traded between 9:30 and 10:00, prices averaged €955.34, while share prices decreased to €681.50 between 16:00 and 16:30, when 271 014 shares were traded), indicating the existence of a short squeeze.

  3. On 24 October 2008, the trading day before Porsche’s announcement, the closing value of Volkswagen shares accounted for €210.85. Price peaks of up to more than €1005 were recorded on 28 October 2008.

  4. Funke et al (2009) describes the consequences of the price jump of Volkswagen shares on DAX index weights.

  5. Institutional investors and market makers trade over the counter at Net Asset Values, which represent fair fund values determined at the end of a trading day.

  6. Our data did not permit us to use the prices of index certificates.

  7. Because product adjustment factors (see Formula 2) are constant during the day, they are not necessarily required for the regression analyses estimated in the sections ‘Robustness of the results’ and ‘Conclusions’.

  8. Further examples are, for example, Lauterbach and Wohl (2001), who study noise as well as the correction process of prices, or Hansen and Lunde (2006), who analyse noise in high frequency data.

  9. Index certificate Cert 4 is selected as a reference product.

  10. DAX futures prices are discounted on a daily basis to make the two markets comparable.

  11. The Hasbrouck results remain qualitatively robust including different lags. A Granger causality analysis (not reported), as described in the section ‘Robustness of the results’, shows that the DAX futures drive the DAX the days surrounding the Volkswagen extreme event, while the reverse direction is valid on 28 October 2008.

References

  • Alexander, C. and Barbosa, A. (2008) Hedging index exchange traded funds. Journal of Banking & Finance 32 (2): 326–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou, A. and Garrett, I. (1993) To what extent did stock index futures contribute to the October 1987 stock market crash? Economic Journal 103 (427): 1444–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandi, F.M. and Russell, J.R. (2006) Seperating microstructure noise from volatility. Journal of Financial Economics 79 (3): 655–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, M.E., MacKinlay, A.C. and Terker, B. (1989) Order imbalances and stock price movements on October 19 and 20, 1987. Journal of Finance 44 (4): 827–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollersev, T. (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31 (3): 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. (1978) Testing for Autocorrelation in Dynamic Linear Models. Australian Economic Papers 17, pp. 334–355.

  • Chakravarty, S. (2001) Stealth-Trading: Which traders’ trades move stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics 61 (2): 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W.-P., Chou, R.K. and Chung, H. (2009) Decimalization and the ETFs and futures pricing efficiency. Journal of Futures Markets 29 (2): 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bondt, W.F.M. and Thaler, R. (1985) Does the stock market overreact? Journal of Finance 40 (3): 793–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E., Gruber, M., Comer, G. and Li, K. (2002) Spiders: Where are the Bugs? Journal of Business 75: 453–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, C. and Menkhoff, L. (2011) Does the ‘Bund’ dominate price discovery in euro bond futures? examining information shares. Journal of Banking & Finance 35 (5): 1057–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funke, C., Johanning, L. and Michel, G. (2009) Kurskapriolen der VW-Aktie: Auswirkungen auf den DAX und das aktive Fondsmanagement. Vallendar, Germany: Department of Capital Market Research, Otto Beisheim School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, L. (1978) Testing against general autoregressive and moving average error models when the regressors include lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 46 (6): 1293–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, C. (1988) The foreign exchange market: A random walk with a dragging anchor. Economica 55 (220): 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C.W.J. (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37 (3): 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P.R. and Lunde, A. (2006) Realized variance and market microstructure noise. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 24 (2): 127–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. (1986) A transaction data study of weekly and intradaily patterns in stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics 16 (1): 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. (1989) The October 1987 S&P 500 stock-futures basis. Journal of Finance 44 (1): 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck, J. (1993) Assessing the quality of a security market: A new approach to transaction-cost measurement. Review of Financial Studies 6 (1): 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck, J. (1995) One security, many markets: Determining the contributions to price discovery. Journal of Finance 50 (4): 1175–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasbrouck, J. (2003) Intraday price formation in US equity index markets. Journal of Finance 58 (6): 2375–2399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautsch, N., Hess, D. and Veredas, D. (2011) The impact of macroeconomic news on quote adjustments, noise, and informational volatility. Journal of Banking & Finance 35 (10): 2733–2746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, G. and Kandel, S. (1987) Mean-variance spanning. Journal of Finance 42 (4): 873–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johensen, S. (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59 (6): 1551–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirilenko, A., Kyle, A.S., Samadi, M. and Tuzun, T. (2011) The flash crash: The impact of high frequency trading on an electronic market, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1686004, accessed 29 October 2011.

  • Lauterbach, B. and Wohl, A. (2001) A note on price noises and their correction process: Evidence from equal-payoff government bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance 25 (3): 597–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malliaris, A.G. and Urrutia, J.L. (1992) The international crash of October 1987: Causality tests. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27 (3): 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizrach, B. and Neely, C.J. (2008) Information shares in the US treasury market. Journal of Banking & Finance 32 (7): 1221–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W. and West, K. (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55 (3): 703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peiers, B. (1997) Informed traders, Intervention, and price leadership: A deeper view of the microstructure of the foreign exchange market. Journal of Finance 52 (4): 1589–1614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rompotis, G.G. (2009) Interfamily competition on index tracking: The case of the vanguard ETFs and index funds. Journal of Asset Management 10 (4): 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rompotis, G.G. (2010a) Does premium impact exchange-traded funds’ returns? Evidence from iShares. Journal of Asset Management 11 (4): 298–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rompotis, G.G. (2010b) Investing overseas from home: The case of Asian ishares. Journal of Asset Management 11 (4): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, S.G. (2002) Price leadership in the spot foreign exchange market. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 37 (3): 425–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlusche, B. (2009) Price formation and futures markets: Exchange traded funds versus. Index futures. Journal of Derivatives 17 (2): 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidhammer, C., Lobe, S. and Röder, K. (2011) Intraday pricing of ETFs and certificates replicating the German DAX index. Review of Managerial Science 5 (4): 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. (1963) A simplified model for portfolio analysis. Management Science 9 (2): 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. (1964) Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance 19 (3): 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (1986) Modelling Financial Time Series, New York: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For their comments and suggestions, we would like to thank editor, an anonymous referee, and participants of the 20th Anuual Meeting of the German Finance Association (DGF) 2013, and Campus for Finance Research Conference (Otto Beisheim School of Management) 2013. All errors and omissions are our responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendices

Appendix A

Table A1

Table A1 Influence of relative price differences between the DAX and the DAX futures on relative price differences between the DAX and pooled DAX spot products, applying ETF prices and ETF midquotes

Appendix B

Table B1

Table B1 Features of the leading equity indices around the world

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidhammer, C., Lobe, S. & Röder, K. The real benchmark of DAX index products and the influence of information dissemination: A natural experiment. J Asset Manag 15, 129–149 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2014.13

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2014.13

Keywords

Navigation