Skip to main content
Log in

Life Insurance Ownership by Italian Households: A Gender-Based Differences Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse, for men and women, the microeconomic determinants of life insurance purchases. Indeed, only a few papers have tried to justify rigorously the gender-based differences in life insurance ownership. On the basis of survey data collected by the Bank of Italy in 2012 (the Survey on Income and Households), we estimate the propensity to buy and the willingness to pay for a life insurance contract. We examine the differences between two types of contracts, that is, traditional life and term life insurance and show that, in all cases, women are less likely to be insured than are men. The demand for insurance is highly correlated with income, family structure and employment status. Geographical variables within Italy significantly affect the demand too. We introduce novel variables that measure the financial status of households and their proximity to the financial market or, similarly, their familiarity with financial market opportunities. These determinants turn out to be significant and affect demand almost as much as traditional variables. To study policy implications, we calculate the probabilities of having either traditional life or term insurance, under several scenarios for the determinants of demand. Again, financial market proximity plays a key role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. MetLife (2012).

  2. Auerbach and Kotlikoff (1991) find that somewhere between 30 and 40 per cent of middle-aged American wives in need of life insurance protection are poorly insured.

  3. See Outreville (2013) for a survey.

  4. See Zietz (2003) for a survey.

  5. Kreinin et al. (1957).

  6. Hammond et al. (1967).

  7. Gandolfi and Miners (1996).

  8. See Hanewald and Kluge (2014) for a recent study.

  9. See Outreville (2014).

  10. Yaari (1964 and 1965).

  11. Hakansson (1969).

  12. Lewis (1989).

  13. Li et al. (2007).

  14. See Lewis (1989), Outreville (1996) and Beck and Webb (2003), among others.

  15. Sen (2008).

  16. Anderson and Nevin (1975); Ferber and Lee (1980); Gandolfi and Miners (1996).

  17. Outreville (2014).

  18. Hammond et al. (1967); Duker (1969); Anderson and Nevin (1975); Ferber and Lee (1980); Burnett and Palmer (1984); Fitzgerald (1987); Gandolfi and Miners (1996); Chen et al. (2001).

  19. Truett and Truett (1990); Browne and Kim (1993); Feyen et al. (2013).

  20. Beck and Webb (2003).

  21. Hwang and Gao (2003); Hwang and Greenford (2005).

  22. Hammond et al. (1967); Ferber and Lee (1980); Burnett and Palmer (1984); Gandolfi and Miners (1996).

  23. Outreville (1996); Beck and Webb (2003); Esho et al. (2004); Park and Lemaire (2011).

  24. Truett and Truett (1990).

  25. Millo and Carmeci (2015).

  26. Bayer et al. (2009).

  27. Schlesinger (1981); Szpiro (1985).

  28. Outreville (2015).

  29. Hanewald and Kluge (2014).

  30. Jianakoplos and Bernasek (1998).

  31. Guiso and Paiella (2006 and 2008).

  32. Ania (2013).

  33. The question RISKFIN used is the following: “In managing your financial investments, would you say you have a preference for investments that offer”: (1) a very high returns, but with a high risk of losing part of the capital; (2) a good return, but also a fair degree of losing part of the invested capital; (3) a fair return, with a good degree of protection for the invested capital; (4) low returns, with no risk of losing the invested capital.

  34. See Outreville (2015).

  35. Showers and Shotick (1994).

  36. Fitzgerald (1989) suggests that the demand for life insurance depends on the relative age of husband and wife and introduces a quadratic function of age and the difference between the husband’s and the wife’s ages. This information is unfortunately not available in the survey.

  37. Bernheim et al., (2003).

  38. Hurd (1987).

  39. We do not distinguish between households in which the man or the woman has the highest income of the household. Non-monetised aspects of household participation are not captured in the survey and are very often provided by women.

  40. See Prast et al. (2015).

  41. See Insured Retirement Institute (IRI) (2013).

References

  • Andersen, D.R. and Nevin, J.R. (1975) ‘Determinants of young marrieds’ life insurance purchasing behavior: An empirical investigation’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 42 (3): 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANIA (Associazione Nazionale fra le Imprese Assicuratrici) (2013) L’assicurazione Italiana 2012–2013, Associazione Nazionale fra le Imprese Assicuratrici Roma, Italy, from www.ania.it/it/index.html, accessed 23 February 2016.

  • Auerbach, A.HJ. and Kotlikoff, L.J. (1991) ‘The adequacy of life insurance purchases’, Journal of Financial Intermediation 1 (3): 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, P.J., Bernheim, B.D. and Scholz, J.K. (2009) ‘The effects of financial education in the workplace: Evidence from a survey of employers’, Economic Inquiry 47 (4): 605–624, (This paper has been quoted many times in the literature as NBER Working paper no w5655-1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T. and Webb, I. (2003) ‘Economic, demographic, and institutional determinants of life insurance consumption across countries’, World Bank Economic Review 17 (1): 51–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B.D., Forni, L., Gokhale, J. and Kotlikoff, L.J. (2003) ‘The mismatch between life insurance holdings and financial vulnerabilities: Evidence from the health and retirement study’, American Economic Review 93 (1): 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M.J. and Kim, K. (1993) ‘An international analysis of life insurance demand’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 60 (4): 616–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, J.J. and Palmer, B.A. (1984) ‘Examining life insurance ownership through demographic and psychographic characteristics’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 51 (3): 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R., Wong, K.A. and Lee, H.C. (2001) ‘Age, period, and cohort effects on life insurance purchases in the US’, Journal of Risk and Insurance 68 (2): 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duker, J.M. (1969) ‘Expenditure for life insurance among working-wife families’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 36 (5): 525–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esho, N., Kirievsky, A., Ward, D. and Zurbruegg, R. (2004) ‘Law and the determinants of property-casualty insurance’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 71 (2): 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, R. and Lee, L.C. (1980) ‘Acquisition and accumulation of life insurance in early married life’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 47 (4): 713–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyen, E., Lester, R. and Rocha, R. (2013) ‘What drives the development of the insurance sector? An empirical analysis based on a panel of developed and developing countries’, Journal of Financial Perspectives 1 (1): 1–27, available online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (1987) ‘The effect of social security on life insurance demand by married couples’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 54 (1): 86–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (1989) ‘A taste for bequests and well-being of widows: A model of life insurance demand by married couples’, Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (2): 206–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandolfi, A.S. and Miners, L. (1996) ‘Gender-based differences in life insurance ownership’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 63 (4): 683–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L. and Paiella, M. (2006) ‘The role of risk aversion in predicting individual behavior’, in P.A. Chiappori and C. Gollier (eds.) Insurance: Theoretical Analysis and Policy Implications, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L. and Paiella, M. (2008) ‘Risk aversion, wealth and background risk’, Journal of the European Economic Association 6 (6): 1109–1150, [This paper has been quoted many times in the literature as a Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Discussion Paper 2001-2728].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, N.H. (1969) ‘Optimal investment and consumption strategies under risk, and uncertain lifetime, and insurance’, International Economic Review 10 (3): 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J.D., Houston, D.B. and Melander, E.R. (1967) ‘Determinants of household life insurance premium expenditure: An empirical investigation’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 34 (3): 397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanewald, K. and Kluge, F. (2014) The impact of family structure on risk attitudes and financial decisions during the financial crisis, CEPAR: ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing, working paper 2014/03.

  • Hurd, M.D. (1987) ‘Savings of the elderly and desired bequests’, American Economic Review 77 (3): 298–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, T. and Gao, S. (2003) ‘The determinants of the demand for life insurance in an emerging economy—The case of China’, Managerial Finance 29 (5/6): 82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, T. and Greenford, B. (2005) ‘A cross-section analysis of the determinants of life insuranceconsumption in Mainland China, Hong-Kong and Taiwan’, Risk Management and Insurance Review 8 (1): 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insured Retirement Institute (IRI) (2013) ‘Women and financial advising career: perspectives and prospects’, from www.irionline.org/resources/resources-detail-view/women-and-financial-advising-careers-perspectives-and-priorities, accessed 6 May 2013.

  • Jianakoplos, N.A. and Bernasek, A. (1998) ‘Are women more risk averse?’ Economic Inquiry 36 (4): 620–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreinin, M.E., Lansing, J.B. and Morgan, J.N. (1957) ‘Analysis of life insurance premiums’, Review of Economics and Statistics 39 (1): 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Moshirian, F., Nguyen, P. and Wee, T. (2007) ‘The demand for life insurance in OECD countries’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 74 (3): 637–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, F.D. (1989) ‘Dependents and the demand for life insurance’, American Economic Review 79 (3): 452–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • MetLife (2012) Women’s Views on Family Financial Obligations: A Survey of Intergenerational Findings of Baby Boomers and Generations X and Y, New-York: MetLife Mature Market Institute, NY, February.

  • Millo, G. and Carmeci, G. (2015) ‘A sub-regional panel data analysis of life insurance consumption in Italy’, Journal of Risk and Insurance 82 (2): 317–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Outreville, J.F. (1996) ‘Life insurance markets in developing countries’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 63 (2): 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Outreville, J.F. (2013) ‘The relationship between insurance and economic development: 85 empirical papers for a review of the literature’, Risk Management and Insurance Review 16 (1): 71–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Outreville, J.F. (2014) ‘Risk aversion, risk behavior, and demand for insurance: A survey’, Journal of Insurance Issues 37 (2): 158–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outreville, J.F. (2015) ‘The relationship between relative risk aversion and the level of education: A survey and implications for the demand for life insurance’, Journal of Economic Surveys 29 (1): 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S.C. and Lemaire, J. (2011) The impact of culture on the demand for non-life insurance, Wharton School working paper IRM 2011-02, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Prast, H., Torricelli, C., Rossi, M. and Sansone, D. (2015) ‘Do women prefer pink? The effect of a gender stereotypical stock portfolio on investing decisions’, Journal of Economic Policy (Politica Economica) 3: 377–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, H. (1981) ‘The optimal level of deductibility in insurance contracts’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 48 (2): 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. (2008) An analysis of life insurance demand determinants for selected asian economies and India, working-paper 36/2008, Madras School of Economics, India.

  • Showers, V.E. and Shotick, J.A. (1994) ‘The effects of household characteristic on demand for insurance: A tobit analysis’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 61 (3): 492–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szpiro, G.G. (1985) ‘Optimal insurance coverage’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 52 (4): 705–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truett, D.B. and Truett, L.J. (1990) ‘The demand for life insurance in Mexico and the United States: A comparative study’, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 57 (2): 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, M. (1964) ‘On the consumer’s lifetime allocation process’, International Economic Review 5 (3): 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, M. (1965) ‘Uncertain lifetime, life insurance and the theory of the consumer’, Review of Economic Studies 32 (2): 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zietz, E.N. (2003) ‘An examination of the demand for life insurance’, Risk Management and Insurance Review 6 (2): 159–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Federico Petri for constructive research assistantship on the first drafts of the paper and acknowledge financial support from Collegio Carlo Alberto.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1

Table A1 Definition of variables and descriptive statistics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luciano, E., Outreville, J. & Rossi, M. Life Insurance Ownership by Italian Households: A Gender-Based Differences Analysis. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 41, 468–490 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2016.7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2016.7

Keywords

Navigation