Skip to main content

The Best Defense?

The Problem with Bush’s “Preemptive” War Strategy

  • Chapter
Interventions
  • 111 Accesses

Abstract

In December 1837 British military forces based in Canada learned that a private American ship, the Caroline, was ferrying arms, recruits, and supplies from Buffalo, New York, to a group of anti-British rebels on Navy Island on the Canadian side of the border. On the night of December 29, British and Canadian forces together set out to the island to destroy the ship. They did not find the Caroline berthed there, but they tracked it down in U.S. waters. While most of the crew slept, the troops boarded the ship, attacked the crew and passengers, and set it on fire. They then towed and released the Caroline into the current headed toward Niagara Falls, where it broke up and sank. Most on board escaped, but one man was apparently executed and several others remained unaccounted for and presumed dead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 48.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Works Cited

  • Betts, Richard K. 1982. Surprise Attack: Lessons for Defense Planning. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Richard K. 2002. “The Soft Underbelly of American Primacy: Tactical Advantages of Terror.” Political Science Quarterly 17(1) (spring): 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, George W. 2002a. “Preface.” The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, D.C.: Office of the President. September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, George W. 2002b. “Remarks at Graduation Exercise of the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York.” June 1. White House Transcript. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/06/20020601–3.html

  • Cheney, Dick. 2002. “In Cheney’s Words: The Administration Case for Removing Saddam Hussein.” New York Times. August 27. A8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Gordon A. 1955. The Politics of the Prussian Army, 1640–1945. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Neta C. 2003. “Just War Theory and the U.S. Counterterror War.” Perspectives on Politics 1(1): 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dao, James. 2002. “Threats and Responses: Perspectives; Powell Defends a First Strike as Iraq Option.” New York Times. September 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1983. “To Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch.” In Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History and Morals, 107–43. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Security Strategy of the United States of America. 2002. Washington, D.C.: Office of the President. September,http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.pdf.

  • National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction. 2002. December, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/12/WMDStrategy.pdf .

  • Rice, Condoleezza. 2002. “Wriston Lecture: President’s National Security Strategy.” October 1. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumsfeld, Donald H. 2001. “Remarks at Stakeout Outside ABC TV Studio.” October28. www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct2001/tl0292001_tl028sd3.html .

  • Sanger, David E. 2002. “Beating Them to the Prewar.” New York Times. September 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, David E., and James Dao. 2002. “North Korea Says It Regains Access to its Plutonium.” New York Times. December 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenon, Philip, and Eric Schmitt. 2002. “At U.S. Nerve Center, Daily Talks on the Worst Fears.” New York Times. December 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewmaker, Kenneth E., ed. 1983. The Papers of Daniel Webster: Diplomatic Papers, Volume 1, 1841–1843. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Defense. 2001. Report of the Quadrennial Defense Review. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. September 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 2000. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Elizabeth A. Castelli Janet R. Jakobsen

Copyright information

© 2004 Elizabeth A. Castelli and Janet R. Jakobsen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crawford, N.C. (2004). The Best Defense?. In: Castelli, E.A., Jakobsen, J.R. (eds) Interventions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981561_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics