Abstract
Recent theological and philosophical meta-narratives paint the Puritans as the impetus behind a massive shift in history highlighting the individualistic nature of the spiritual life they promoted. This shift in emphasis from a communal to a more personal piety ultimately led to individualism in ethics, which, in the opinion of these thinkers, inevitably lead to the individualism that plagues our current culture. Most famous among these broad stroke meta-narratives of the Puritans is that of sociologist Max Weber. In Weber there is a sense that ‘inner worldly asceticism’ led to the individualism found later in Western society mentioned above.1 A more contemporary philosopher, Charles Taylor, in his book A Secular Age consistently comes back to a Protestant, and at times explicitly Puritan, explanation of individualism in spirituality.2 In one sense, it is hard to deny the claims of these historical narratives given by Weber, Taylor and others. There seems to be at least a strong precedent for tracing the changes in broader historical and theological modernity to these sixteenth and seventeenth-century thinkers. However, as I will show in this chapter, this is not the full story. The moral and spiritual life promulgated by the Puritans utilised the same ancient, patristic and medieval traditions that contemporary sociologists, philosophers and theologians are attempting to revive;3 that is, a tradition of classical ethics that emphasises the right ordering of the emotions of an individual person in the development of virtue that extends to, and is drawn from, those within a political and ecclesial community.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Talcott Parsons (trans.), 2nd edn (New York: Routledge, 2001).
See Charles Taylor, A Secular Age (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007), 80, 129, 165, 230, 266.
See, for example, Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (University of Notre Dame Press, 1984);
Alasdair MacIntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (University of Notre Dame Press, 1988);
Jean Porter, The Recovery of Virtue: The Relevance of Aquinas for Christian Ethics (Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1990);
Jean Porter, Nature as Reason: A Thomistic Theory of the Natural Law (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005).
For an account of some of the differences between Aristotle and Aquinas on the passions, see Eleonore Stump, ‘The Non-Aristotelian Character of Aquinas’s Ethics: Aquinas on the Passions’ in Sarah Coakley (ed.), Faith, Rationality, and the Passions (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).
See, for example, Augustine, Confessions, Henry Chadwick (trans.) (Oxford University Press, 2008), 1.1.1, 4.12.18. See also Augustine, Expositions of the Psalms, John E. Rotelle (ed.), Maria Boulding (trans.), 6 vols (Brooklyn: New City Press, 2000).
For a recent look at Baxter with regard to community and ethics, see James Calvin Davis, ‘Pardoning Puritanism: Community, Character, and Forgiveness in the Work of Richard Baxter’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 29(2) (2001): 283–306.
I show this in more detail in Nathaniel A. Warne, ‘Metaphysics, Emotions and the Flourishing Life’ in Douglas James Davies and Nathaniel A. Warne (eds), Emotions and Religious Dynamics (Farnham: Ashgate, 2014), 75–94.
For a very clear and lengthy analysis of the cognitive aspect of the soul and its relation to the rational soul in Aristotle, see Kristján Kristjánsson, Aristotle, Emotions, and Education (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), 20–25.
For an interesting discussion of moderation in Reformation England, see Ethan H. Shagan, The Rule of Moderation: Violence, Religion and the Politics of Restraint in Early Modern England (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 7–29.
Aristotle, ‘The Nicomachean Ethics’ in Jonathan Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, revised by J.O. Urmson Ross, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, 1984), 1106b29–35.
See Fenner, A Treatise of the Affections, 4–5, 7; Alec Ryrie, Being Protestant in Reformation Britain (Oxford University Press, 2013), 17–20.
Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Fathers of English Dominican Province (trans.) (Notre Dame: Ava Maria Press, 1948), I–II 3.2 (hereinafter ST).
Ibid., II–II 23.1. For a more in-depth look at ‘communication’ with the divine, see J. Bobik, ‘Aquinas on Communicatio, the Foundation of Friendship and Caritas’, Modern Schoolman, 65 (1986): 1–19.
Paul Wadell, Friendship and the Moral Life (University of Notre Dame Press, 1989), 122.
Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Aristotle’s ‘Nicomachean Ethics’, C.J. Litzinger (trans.) (Notre Dame: Dumb Ox Books, 1993).
For more on the medieval break with Aristotle on friendship, see Daniel Schwartz, Aquinas on Friendship (Oxford University Press, 2007), 43–5; Aquinas, ST, II–II 26.
Steve Summers, Friendship: Exploring its Implications for the Church in Postmodernity (London: T & T Clark, 2009), 88.
William W. Young, The Politics of Praise: Naming God and Friendship in Aquinas and Derrida (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), 8.
Aelred of Rievaulx (1109–67) addressed this problem of unequal friends by following Cicero in claiming that reciprocity is essential to true friendship, but charity demands that we extend benevolence even to those untrustworthy enemies we cannot entrust our secrets to. Aelred agrees with Aquinas that charity should extend to all, but that is not the same thing as saying that friendship should extend to all. See Aelred of Rievaulx, On Spiritual Friendship, Marsha L. Dutton (ed.), Lawrence C. Braceland (trans.) (Collegeville: Cistercian Publications, 2010).
M.M. Knappen, ‘The Puritan Character as Seen in the Diaries’ in Two Elizabethan Puritan Diaries (Gloucester: American Society of Church History, 1966), 15.
Francis J. Bremer, Puritanism (Oxford University Press, 2009), 61.
For more on the Puritan practice of conference, see Joanne J. Jung, Godly Conversation: Rediscovering the Puritan Practice of Conference (Grand Rapids: Reformation Heritage Books, 2011).
Patrick Collinson, The Religion of Protestants: The Church in English Society 1559– 1625 (Oxford University Press, 1984), 271.
Ibid., 99–113; Rosalind Hursthouse, On Virtue Ethics (Oxford University Press, 1999).
One point where the Puritan discussion of virtue is distinctive is an emphasis on the workplace specifically in the doctrine of calling or vocation. According to Lee Hardy, this is a place where Catholics had to adopt Protestant perspectives. Lee Hardy, The Fabric of This World: Inquiries into Calling, Career Choice, and the Design of Human Work (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990), 44.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Nathaniel Warne
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Warne, N. (2016). Emotions and the Development of Virtue in Puritan Thought: An Investigation of Puritan Friendship. In: Ryrie, A., Schwanda, T. (eds) Puritanism and Emotion in the Early Modern World. Christianities in the Trans-Atlantic World, 1500–1800. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137490988_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137490988_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-69655-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49098-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)