Skip to main content

Poetry in Motion: The Case of Insider and Outsider Offenders

  • Chapter
The Criminal Act

Abstract

Marcus Felson is not only an exceptional scholar, a great colleague, and a good friend, but he is also a man who is very free with his ideas. This chapter focuses on just one of the many ideas that Marcus has given us over the years that we have known him. We picked this idea in particular because it fuses together two of the subjects that we know are dear to his heart. The first subject, which we are sure will be mentioned on numerous occasions throughout this book, is guardianship. The second is how temporal patterns of crime can reveal clues as to the possible causes of crime or their prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andresen, M. A., Frank, R., & Felson, M. (2013). Age and the distance to crime. Criminology and Criminal Justice DOI: 10.1177/1748895813494870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Felson, M. (2010). The impact of co-offending. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, M. P., & Bowers, K. J. (2013). A comparison of methods for temporal analysis of aoristic crime. Crime Science, 2, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudains, P., Braithwaite, A., & Johnson, S. D. (2013). Target choice during extreme events: A discrete spatial choice model of the 2011 London riots. Criminology, 51, 251–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beavon, D. J., Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1994). The influence of street networks on the patterning of property offenses. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 115–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernasco, W., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). How do residential burglars select target areas? A new approach to the analysis of criminal location choice. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasco, W., & Block, R. (2009). Where offenders choose to attack: a discrete choice model of robberies in Chicago. Criminology, 47, 93–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2011). Contrasting hotspots: Did the opportunists make the heat? In N. Tilley & G. Farrell (Eds.), The reasoning criminologist: Essays in honour of Ronald V. Clarke. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1981). Notes on the geometry of crime. In P. J. Brantingham & P. L. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental Criminology. Prospect Heights IL, Waveland Press, 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clare, J., Fernandez, J., & Morgan, F. (2009). Formal evaluation of the impact of barriers and connectors on residential burglars’ macro-level offending location choices. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, T., & Blake, L. (2006). Daylight and darkness targeting strategies and the risks of being seen at residential burglaries. Criminology, 44, 431–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G., & Pease, K. (1994). Crime seasonality: Domestic disputes and residential Burglary in Merseyside 1988–90. British Journal of Criminology, 34, 487–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M., & Poulsen, E. (2003). Simple indicators of crime by time of day. International Journal of Forecasting, 19, 595–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., Leaman, A., Stansall, P., & Bedford, M. (1976). Space syntax. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 3, 147–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, D. K., Eisner, M. P., & Wiebe, D. J. (2013). Evaluating the impact of flexible alcohol trading hours on violence: an interrupted time series analysis. PloS One, 8, e55581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. D., Bernasco, W., Bowers, K. J., Elffers, H., Ratcliffe, J., Rengert, G., & Townsley, M. (2007). Space-time patterns of risk: a cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. J. (2010). Permeability and burglary risk: are cul-de-sacs safer? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. (2013). How guardianship dynamics may vary across the street network: A case study of residential burglary. In S. Ruiter, W. Bernasco, W. Huisman, & G. Bruinsma (Eds.), Liber amicorum voor Henk Elffers. Amsterdam: NSCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, J., Johnson, S. D., & Tilley, N. (2014). Offenses around stadiums: A natural experiment on crime attraction and generation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J. H. (2002). Aoristic signatures and the spatio-temporal analysis of high volume crime patterns. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J. H. (2004). The hotspot matrix: A framework for the spatio-temporal targeting of crime reduction. Police Practice and Research, 5, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossmo, D. K. (1999). Geographic profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Bowers, K.J., & Johnson, S. D. (2006). Understanding bag theft within licensed premises in Westminster: Identifying initial steps towards prevention. Security Journal, 19, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsley, M. (2008). Visualising space time patterns in crime: The hotspot plot. Crime Patterns and Analysis, 1, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsley, M., & Sidebottom, A. (2010). All offenders are equal, but some are more equal than others: Variation in journey’s to crime between offenders. Criminology, 48, 897–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsley, M., Birks, D., Bernasco, W., Ruiter, S., Johnson, S. D., White, G., & Baum, S. (2014). Burglar Target Selection A Cross-national Comparison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uittenbogaard, A., & Ceccato, V. (2012). Space-time Clusters of Crime in Stockholm, Sweden. Review of European Studies, 4, 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Kate Bowers and Shane D. Johnson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowers, K., Johnson, S.D. (2015). Poetry in Motion: The Case of Insider and Outsider Offenders. In: Andresen, M.A., Farrell, G. (eds) The Criminal Act. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137391322_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics