Abstract
Management and leadership literatures have frequently stood charged with naive, unprincipled faddism and an atheoretical basis for judgements (e.g. Micklethwait and Wooldridge, 1997). This chapter provides a counter to this charge. It reports some of the outcomes of research which was undertaken from September to December 2002, at the Companhia de Electricidade de Macau (CEM) — the company which provides electricity to Macau.1 The research used interviews, questionnaires, the Organizational Culture Inventory (Cooke and Lafferty, 1989; Szumal, 1998), documentary analysis, case study and observational data to gather a picture of the organizational cultures at CEM. The chapter first reports some key features which were found at CEM, and then ‘theorizes’ these, in part with reference to the local Chinese cultural characteristics. Complexity theory is seen to be very fitting in analyzing the situation at CEM, and CEM provides a very powerful example of complexity theory at work in an organization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
April, K. (1997), An Investigation into the Applicability of New Science, Chaos Theory, and Complexity Theory to Leadership, and Development of Guiding Principles for the Modern Leader and Organisation, Research Report, Cape Town: Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town.
Ashby, W. R. (1981), An Introduction to Cybernetics, 3rd Edition ), New York: Harper and Row.
Bak, P. and Chen, K. (1991), Self-Organized Criticality, Scientific American, January, Vol. 264, pp. 46–53.
Berlie, J. (2001), Macau: a Multi-Community Society, Paper presented at the Conference, Macau on the Threshold of the Third Millennium, Instituto Ricci de Macau, 15th December.
Bond, M. H. (1994), Beyond the Chinese Face: Insights from Psychology, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Bond, M. H. and Hwang, K. H. (1986), ‘The social psychology of the Chinese People’, in M. H. Bond (Ed.), The Psychology of the Chinese People, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–66.
Casti, J. (1997), Would Be World, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Cohen, J. and Stewart, I. (1995), The Collapse of Chaos, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Companhia de Electricidade de Macau (CEM) (1999), Performance Management System, CEM Policy 27th July, 1999, Macau: Companhia de Electricidade de Macau.
Companhia de Electricidade de Macau (CEM) (2000), 2000 Relatório Annual (Annual Report), Macau: Companhia de Electricidade de Macau.
Cooke, R. A. and Lafferty, J. C. (1989), The Organizational Culture Inventory, Michigan: Human Synergistics International.
Faure, G. O. and Ding, Y. F. (2003), ‘Chinese culture and negotiation: Strategies for handling stalemates’, in I. Alon (Ed.), Chinese Culture, Organizational Behaviour and International Business Management, Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 85–98.
Fullan, M. (2001), Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hatch, M. J. (1997), Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hau, K. T. and Salili, F. (1996), ‘Achievement goals and causal attributions of Chinese students’, in S. Lau (Ed.), Growing up the Chinese Way, Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, pp. 121–45.
Hawkins, J. N., Zhou, N. and Lee, J. (2001), ‘China: balancing the collective and the individual’, in W. Cummings, M. T. Tatto and J. Hawkins (Eds.), Values Education for Dynamic Societies: Individualism or Collectivism, Hong Kong and Australia: Comparative Education Research Centre and Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd., pp. 191–206.
Ho, I. T. (2001), ‘Are Chinese teachers authoritarian?’, in D. A. Watkins and J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese Learner: Psychological and Pedagogical Perspectives, Hong Kong and Australia: Comparative Education Research Centre and Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd., pp. 99–114.
Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Johnson, K. B. (1999), The Development of Progressive and Sustainable Human Complex Adaptive Systems: Institutions, Organizations and Communities (URL: http://www.wam.umd.edu/-nafikiri/webcomplex.htm, retrieved 26th June 2001).
Johnson, S. (2001), Emergence, London: Allen Lane, The Pengu in Press.
Karr, B. (1995), Complexity Theory and Rhetorical Invention (URL: http://english.ttu.edu/courses/5361/papers/paper1_karr_420.html, retrieved 26th June 2001).
Kauffman, S. A. (1995), At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Kauffman, S. A. (1996), Investigations: The Nature of Autonomous Agents and the Worlds They Mutually Create, Lecture 1 from the series: Search for a Possible ‘Fourth Law’ of Thermodynamics for Non-Equilibrium Systems, URL: http://www.santafe/sfi/People/kauffman/Lecture-1.html, retrieved 12th November 2000.
Kelly, S. and Allison, M. A. (1999), The Complexity Advantage: How the Science of Complexity Can Help Your Business Achieve Peak Performance, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lau, D. C. (1992), Confucius: The Analects, Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
Lewin, R. (1993), Complexity: Life on the Edge, London: Phoenix.
Lewin, R. and Regine, B. (2000), The Soul at Work: Listen, Respond, Let Go: Embracing Complexity Science for Business Success, New York: Simon and Shuster.
Marsick, V. (2000), ‘Learning Organizations’, cited in V. Marsick, J. Bitterman and R. Van Der Veen (2001), From the Learning Organization to Learning Communities toward a Learning Society, Information series no. 382. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career and Vocational Education, ED-99-CO-0013, Ohio State University, Columbus: Ohio, URL: http://ericacve.org/docs/marsick/marsick3.pdf, retrieved, 4th February 2001.
McMaster, M. D. (1996), The Intelligence Advantage: Organizing for Complexity, Newton, Massachusetts: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A. (1997), The Witch Doctors, London: Mandar in Paperbacks.
Morrison, K. R. B. (1998), Management Theories for Educational Change, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Morrison, K. R. B. (2002), School Leadership and Complexity Theory, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Redding, G. and Wong, G. Y. Y. (1986), ‘The psychology of Chinese organizational behaviour’, in M. H. Bond (Ed.), The Psychology of the Chinese People, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, pp. 267–95.
Rozman, G. (Ed.) (1991), The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Salili, F. (1996), ‘Accepting personal responsibility for learning’, in D. A. Watkins and J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological and Contextual Influences, Hong Kong and Australia: Comparative Education Research Centre and Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd., pp. 85–105.
Senge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday.
Stacey, R. D. (2000), Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics, 3rd Edition, Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D. and Shaw, P. (2000), Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking?, London: Routledge.
Stewart, M. (2001), The Co-Evolving Organization, Rutland, UK: Decomplexity Associates Ltd, URL: http://www.decomplexity.com/Coevolving%20Organization%20VU.pdf, retrieved 22nd March 2002.
Szumal, J. L. (1998), The Organizational Culture Inventory Interpretation and Development Guide, Michigan: Source Publishing LLC.
Waldrop, M. M. (1992), Complexity: the Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Watkins, D. A. and Biggs, J. B. (2001), ‘The paradox of the Chinese learner and beyond’, in D. A. Watkins and J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese Learner: Psychological and Pedagogical Perspectives, Hong Kong and Australia: Comparative Education Research Centre and Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd., pp. 3–23.
Wheatley, M. (1999), Leadership and the New Science: Discovering Order in a Chaotic World, 2nd Edition, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Wickens, P. (1995), The Ascendant Organization, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Wu, D. Y. H. (1996), ‘Parental control: psychocultural interpretations of Chinese patterns of socialization’, in S. Lau (Ed.), Growing up the Chinese Way, Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, pp. 1–28.
Youngblood, M. (1997), Life at the Edge of Chaos, Dallas, Texas: Perceval Publishing.
Yuan, D. Y. (1997), ‘Age-sex profiles of Asian migrants in Macau’, in R. Ramos, D. Rocha, R. Wilson and D. Y. Yuan (Eds.), Macau and its Neighbours in Transition, University of Macau and Macau Foundation, pp. 429–35.
Zohar, D. (1997), Rewiring the Corporate Brain, San Francisco: Berrett-Koechler Publishers Inc.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Keith Morrison
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morrison, K. (2007). Complexity Theory and the Electricity of Life: A Chinese Perspective. In: April, K.A., Shockley, M.L. (eds) Diversity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627529_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627529_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-27979-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62752-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)