Abstract
This chapter offers an analysis of a variety of texts from British art cinema to mainstream cinema and finally examines television as a way of productively opening up British media to questions of class. To begin with, I examine the work of Mike Leigh, Peter Greenaway, and Derek Jarman. All three have become central to the canon of British art cinema and yet critical work on them has a tendency to erase any troubling class questions in their work. The critical tendency has been to steer clear of treating them as middle-class auteurs, and instead treats their work as offering universal or existential themes, or as echoing “radical” postmodern/poststructuralist concerns that as we have seen, also evade the problem of class. The section on mainstream cinema will briefly examine the class narrative in the Harry Potter movies, as well as Stephen Frears’s Dirty Pretty Things. In both cases these two highly successful mainstream productions offer ways of seeing how class is managed and positioned for a popular audience. Turning to television I examine the class dynamics of various “make-over” and “lifestyle” programs that have increased in popularity during the period, as well as examining the troubling class and gender aspects of the political drama The Amazing Mrs. Pritchard. Some of the concerns that have been raised will then be explored by looking at how the working class has been presented in various television comedies such as I’m Alan Partridge and The Office.
The working-class… is a group that is in itself, as a group within the social edifice, a nongroup, in other words, one whose position is in itself contradictory; they are a productive force. Society (and those in power) needs them in order to reproduce themselves and their rule, but nonetheless, they cannot find a proper place for them.
—Slavoj Žižek1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Slavoj Žižek, “Against the Populist Temptation,” Critical Inquiry 32, no. 3 (Spring 2006): 551.
Mike Leigh, Naked and Other Screenplays (London: Faber, 1995), xi.
Ray Carney, The Films of Mike Leigh (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 4–6.
John Hill, British Cinema in the 1980s (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999), 195.
Paula Willoquet-Maricondi and Mary Alemany-Galway, Peter Greenaway’s Postmodern/Postructuralist Cinema (London: Scarecrow Press, 2001), 207.
Paul Dave, Visions of England: Class and Culture and Contemporary Cinema (Oxford and New York: Berg, 2006), 89.
Scott Malcomson, review of The Draughtsman’s Contract by Peter Greenaway, British Film Institute; BBC Channel 4 Source: Film Quarterly 37, no. 2 (Winter, 1983–1984): 34.
Rowland Wymer, Derek Jarman (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005), 113.
See D. A. Miller, The Novel and The Police (California: University of California Press, 1992).
Su Holmes and Deborah Jermyn, Understanding Reality Television (London and New York: Routledge, 2004), 173.
Walters has commented that Partridge “probably remained too large to be considered naturalistic, even if those around him could be.” Ben Walters, The Office: A Critical Reading of the Series (London: BFI, 2005), 103.
Copyright information
© 2009 Lawrence Driscoll
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Driscoll, L. (2009). A Class Act: Representations of Class in British Cinema and Television 1979–2008. In: Evading Class in Contemporary British Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622487_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622487_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37903-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62248-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)