Abstract
Nature-philosophy originated in Germany towards the end of the eighteenth century; it emerged as a reaction to the reliance on rational analysis and mechanistic explanations which had come to be associated with the French philosophes of the Enlightenment. As we have seen, Lamarck thought of himself as a mechanist and though we may find the appellation inappropriate it was certainly appropriate when applied to many of his contemporaries, and especially to Holbach, whose System of Nature had been published in 1770. To the nature-philosophers this kind of approach to the search for understanding of the world seemed misguided because it dismissed, or at best ignored, the spiritual aspect of both man and nature, an aspect which they believed to be far more important than the material and corporeal. They did not entirely reject the validity of mechanistic explanations but, as far as they were concerned, such explanations were necessarily incomplete. It followed that they did not think that any investigation based on the presumption that the sole realities were matter and motion could be adequate. For them the existence of a higher spiritual power was a fundamental presupposition which did not need to be established by argument; they therefore saw no need to resort to natural theology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Timothy Lenoir, The Strategy of Life, Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston and London, 1982, p. 215.
Erik Nordenskiöld, The History of Biology, Tudor Publishing, New York, 1928, p. 286.
Jacob Boehme, The Signature of All Things, introduced by Clifford Bax, James Clarke, Cambridge and London, 1969, pp. 5–6.
Immanuel Kant, Prolegomena, trans. P.G. Lucas, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1971, p. 31.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Theory of Colours, trans. C.L. Eastlake, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., and London, 1970, p. xxxviii.
T.M. Knox, Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1952, pp. ix–x.
A.G. Morton, A History of Botanical Sciences, Academic Press, London, 1981, p. 380.
Lorenz Oken, Elements of Physiophilosophy, The Ray Society, London, 1847, p. 1.
Jennifer Trusted, Physics and Metaphysics: Theories of Space and Time, Routledge, London and New York, 1991, p. 88.
Alexander Gode-von Aesch, Natural Science in German Romanticism, AMS Press, New York, 1966, p. 145.
William Coleman, Biology in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977, p. 25.
Peter Ackroyd, Dickens, Sinclair-Stevenson, London, 1990, p. 449.
Frederick Gregory, Scientific Materialism in Nineteenth Century Germany, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 1977, p. 12.
William Coleman, Biology in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge University Press, 1977, p. 151.
Peter J. Bowler, The Non-Darwinian Revolution, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 1988, p. 72.
Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin, Michael Joseph, London, 1991, p. 539.
Ernst Haeckel, Monism as Connecting Religion and Science, 1894, in Darwin to Einstein. Primary Sources on Science and Belief, eds N.G. Coley and V.M.D. Hall, Longman, Harlow, and Open University Press, 1980, p. 5.
Ernst Haeckel, The History of Creation, trans. E.K. Lancaster, 1876, excerpts from Chapter 13 in Coley and Hall, op. cit., p. 216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2003 Jennifer Trusted
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trusted, J. (2003). Idealism and Materialism. In: Beliefs and Biology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597679_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597679_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-1222-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59767-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)