Skip to main content

Customer Propositions for Global Brands

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 6425 Accesses

Abstract

In my research and analysis of diverse global brands, I have observed a surprisingly simple handful of customer propositions. In general, the most successful fall into one of five categories, which I refer to as value, mass, premium, prestige, and fun brands. Each of these targets a different global segment defined by the segment’s universal needs, ranging from the biggest value per dollar to the most fun per dollar. The chapter highlights the differences among the five types of global brands, their distinct positioning, and their unique challenges. Of course, within these five types, brand managers seek to differentiate their offerings from others in the multinational corporation’s portfolio and from competitors in the space. Sometimes managers draw from the characteristics of the other four categories, and so the five types blur at the edges. In fine-tuning and repositioning your global brand proposition, you can increase your strategic options by understanding each of these categories, the customers they serve, the needs they fulfill, the challenges they face, and the value they deliver to the corporation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Examples of the new campaign can be found at:</ExternalRef> and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AmKP9VE2Ms and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F411acOyIzw; accessed September 23, 2016.

  2. 2.

    Neil, Dan (2015), “Kia Sorento: The SUV for the Dispassionate Investor,” Wall Street Journal, September 5, p. D12.

  3. 3.

    Millward Brown (2015), BrandZ Report of Top 100 Most Valuable Brands.

  4. 4.

    Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E.M. (2014), “Huawei: Taking a Chinese Brand from B2B to B2C amidst Political Resistance,” The Case Centre Case #514-043-1.

  5. 5.

    Bland, Ben and Andres Schipani (2014), “A Peruvian Upstart Takes on Asia,” Financial Times, July 22, p. 10; Bland, Ben (2014), “Soft Drinks Battle Rages in Indonesia,” Financial Times, November 6, p. 18.

  6. 6.

    Sources include Milne, Richard (2015), “IKEA Store Planners Think Outside the Big Box,” Financial Times, December 5, p. 14; Chaudhuri, Saabira (2015), “IKEA’s Favorite Design Idea: Shrink the Box,” Wall Street Journal, June 18, p. B10; http://cmuscm.blogspot.com/2013/02/ikeas-low-price-strategy.html; accessed February 10, 2016.

  7. 7.

    Slywotzky, Adrian J. (2007), The Upside, New York: Crown.

  8. 8.

    http://www.samsungvillage.com/blog/2015/08/24/samsung-design-awards-idea-2015/; accessed February 11, 2016.

  9. 9.

    Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E.M. and Inge Geyskens (2014), “Manufacturer and Retailer Strategies to Impact Store Brand Share: Global Integration, Local Adaptation, and Worldwide Learning,” Marketing Science, 33 (January-February), pp. 6–26.

  10. 10.

    Lamey, Lien, Barbara Deleersnyder, Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp, and Marnik G. Dekimpe (2012), “The Effect of Business-Cycle Fluctuations on Private-Label Share: What Has Marketing Conduct Got to Do with It?” Journal of Marketing, 76 (January), pp. 1–19

  11. 11.

    Fair share loss means that the parent brand loses sales volume proportional to its share of the market. For example, if the parent brand has 40 % market share by volume, fair share loss means that 40 % of the downward-stretch version comes from the parent brand. Cannibalization exceeding fair share is the norm rather than the exception due to brand spillover.

  12. 12.

    For more information on Sand River, see Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E.M. (2014), “Sand River: Branding a Chinese Natural Resource,” The Case Centre Case #514-065-1.

  13. 13.

    Dou, Eva and Yang Jie (2016), “An iPhone Built for China?” Wall Street Journal, March 23, p. B5.

  14. 14.

    “The 50 Worst Cars of All Time”, Time. September 7, 2007; http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/completelist/0,29569,1658545,00.html; accessed October 16, 2015.

  15. 15.

    Consumer Reports (2016), “Best & Worst New Cars,” April.

  16. 16.

    http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/07/08/lvmh-to-buy-control-of-loro-piana-for-2-6-billion/?_r=0; accessed June 24, 2016.

  17. 17.

    http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-04-03/top-tenth-of-1-percenters-reaps-all-the-riches; accessed November 17, 2014.

  18. 18.

    Sylvers, Eric and Jeff Bennett (2015), “Ferrari Tunes Up for IPO,” Wall Street Journal, October 19, p. B3; Driebusch, Corrie and Eric Sylvers (2015), “Ferrari Gets Fast IPO Start,” Wall Street Journal, October 21, p. B3; Financial Times (2015), “Ferrari: Bourse Power,” October 24, p. 16; Sylvers, Eric (2016), “Ferrari Outlook Tramples Shares,” Wall Street Journal, February 3, p. B4.

  19. 19.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch; http://www.swatchgroup.com/en/group_profile/history; both accessed February 14, 2016.

  20. 20.

    Felsted, Andrea and Hannah Kuchler (2015), “Instagram: Retail’s Holy Grail,” Financial Times, June 19, p. 7.

  21. 21.

    Based on Buck, Tobias (2014), “A Better Business Model,” Financial Times, July 27, p. 6; The Economist (2012), “Fashion Forward,” March 24, pp. 63–64.

  22. 22.

    http://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/xj-x351-53/our-car-being-used-british-royalty-86050/; accessed October 17, 2015.

  23. 23.

    Based on Kapferer, Jean-Noel (2012), The New Strategic Brand Management, Sterling, VA: Kogan Page, 5th edition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steenkamp, JB. (2017). Customer Propositions for Global Brands. In: Global Brand Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94994-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics