Skip to main content

Euroscepticism in Belgium: Issue-Voting Against the Odds

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Eurosceptic 2014 European Parliament Elections

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

Abstract

The 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections saw unprecedented support for eurosceptic parties. This chapter aims to examine what message voters intended to send by voting for radical parties in Belgium. Drawing on the literature on citizens’ attitudes toward Europe, we analyze to what extent this surge of support for eurosceptic parties was about Europe. We rely on data from the 2014 PartiRep survey and test four models on the Belgian case. We show that despite strong depoliticization of European Union (EU) issues, Europe now matters even in Belgium. Citizens who voted for a radical and eurosceptic party did so not as a protest against the government or because of utilitarian or identity-related considerations, but to express anti-EU sentiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/atyourservice/en/20150201PVL00053/Post-election-survey-2014 (webpage consulted May 2016).

  2. 2.

    These separate analyses showed no relevant differences with the analysis presented in 3.

  3. 3.

    As their response to the question: ‘In politics, we often speak of the ‘left’ and the ‘right’. Could you position yourself on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 meaning ‘left’, 5 ‘at the center’, and 10 ‘right’? We recode 10 and 0 to 5, 9 and 1 to 4, 8 and 2 to 3, 3 and 7 to 2, 4 and 6 to 1 and 5, ‘in the center’, to 0.

  4. 4.

    The five items included are trust in political parties, the regional (Flemish/Walloon) government, the federal government, the federal parliament and politicians. Cronbach’s alpha = 0.922.

  5. 5.

    As mentioned, European citizenship, included in model 3, may also be considered to fit this explanation.

References

  • Arts, K., Heerweg, D., & Swyngedouw, M. (2009). Sources of Euroscepticism: Utilitarian interest, social distrust, national identity and institutional distrust. World Political Science Review, 5(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. (1998). When in doubt, use proxies. Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies, 31(5), 569–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, K., & Guthman, K. (2013). Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007–2011. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, G. (2015). He’s worse than me. The Eurosceptic parties at the turning point. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 8(1), 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brack, N., & Startin, N. (2015). Euroscepticism, from the margins to the mainstream. International Political Science Review, 36(3), 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruter, M. (2005). Citizens of Europe? The emergence of a mass European identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (2002). Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration? European Union Politics, 3(4), 387–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deschouwer, K., & Hoon, L. (2015). Are you being served? Eurosceptic voters in Europhilic Belgium (original title: Multi-level voting when elections coincide: The May 2014 Elections in Belgium). Conference paper presented at the 2015 Council for European Studies Conference, Paris, July 8–10, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vreese, C., & Boomgaarden, H. (2005). Projecting EU Referendums: Fear of immigration and support for European integration. European Union Politics, 6(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, C. E. (2007). Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale? How European integration affects national elections. European Union Politics, 8(3), 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, C. E. (2010). EU issue voting: Asset or liability? How European integration affects parties’ electoral fortunes. European Union Politics, 11(1), 89–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, C., & Edwards, E. (2009). Taking Europe to its extremes. Extremist parties and public Euroscepticism. Party Politics, 15(5), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, C., & van Keersbergen, K. (2007). Interests, identity and political allegiance in the European Union. Acta Politica, 42(2–3), 307–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichenberg, R. C., & Dalton, R. J. (1993). Europeans and the European Community: The dynamics of public support for European integration. International Organization, 47(4), 507–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezrow, L., De Vries, C., Steenbergen, M., & Edwards, E. (2011). Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters? Party Politics, 17(3), 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. N., Marsh, M., & McLaren, L. (1994). Uncorking the bottle: Popular oppositions to European unification in the wake of Maastricht. Journal of Common Market Studies, 32(4), 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, M. (1998). Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. The Journal of Politics, 60(2), 333–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garry, J., Marsh, M., & Sinnott, R. (2005). ‘Second-order’ versus ‘Issue-voting’ effects in EU referendums evidence from the Irish nice treaty referendums. European Union Politics, 6(2), 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Reino, M., & Llamazares, I. (2013). The populist radical right and European integration: A comparative analysis of party–voter links. West European Politics, 36(4), 789–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S., & Marsh, M. (2007). Punishment or protest? Understanding European parliament elections. The Journal of Politics, 69(2), 495–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (2005). The political system of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (1999). Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: Cognitive constraints and partisan responses. European Union Politics, 35(1), 69–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B. (2005). When Europe matters: The impact of political information on voting behaviour in EU referendums. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 15(1), 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. (2015). The 2014 European parliament elections: Divided in unity? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(S1), 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B., & Wittrock, J. (2011). The second-order election model revisited: An experimental test of vote choices in European Parliament elections. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B., Spoon, J. J., & Tilley, J. (2009). A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 European parliament elections. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2005). Calculation, community and cues. Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics, 6(4), 421–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., Huo, J. J., & Marks, G. (2007). Does occupation shape attitudes on Europe? Benchmarking validity and parsimony. Acta Politica, 42(2–3), 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehrberg, J. (2015). The demand side of support for radical right parties. Comparative European Politics, 13, 553–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelbel, C., Van Ingelgom, V., & Verhaegen, S. (2016). Looking for the European voter: Split-ticket voting in the Belgian regional and European elections of 2009 and 2014. Politics and Governance, 4(1), 116–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, A., & Freeman, G. (2005). Support for extreme right-wing parties in Western Europe: Individual attributes, political attitudes, and national context. Comparative European Politics, 3, 261–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loveless, M., & Rohrschneider, R. (2011). Public perceptions of the EU as a system of governance. Living Reviews in European Governance, 6(2), 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers, M., & Jaspers, E. (2010). A longitudinal study of Euroscepticism in the Netherlands: 2008 versus 1990. European Union Politics, 12(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers, M., & Scheepers, P. (2007). Explanation of political Euroscepticism at the individual and national level. European Societies, 6(4), 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers, M., Gijsberts, M., & Scheepers, P. (2002). Extreme right‐wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 41(3), 345–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, L. (2007). Explaining mass-level Euroscepticism: Identity, interests, and institutional distrust. Acta Politica, 42(2–3), 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, L. (2002). Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat? Journal of Politics, 64(2), 551–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2014, June 11). Electoral winners and political losers in the right-wing Eurosceptic camp. OpenDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/can-europemake-it/cas-mudde/electoral-winners-and-political-losers-in-rightwing-euroscepticcamp (webpage consulted May 2016).

  • Serricchio, F., Tsakatika, M., & Quaglia, L. (2013). Euroscepticism and the global financial crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, E. R. (2004). The European Union at the ballot box? European integration and voting behavior in the new member states. Comparative Political Studies, 37(5), 590–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treib, O. (2014). The voter says no, but nobody listens: Causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1541–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werts, H., Scheepers, P., & Lubbers, M. (2012). Euro-scepticism and radical right-wing voting in Europe, 2002–2008: Social cleavages, socio-political attitudes and contextual characteristics determining voting for the radical right. European Union Politics, 14(2), 183–205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 9.4 Binary logistic regression for casting a Eurosceptic vote in the regional elections
Table 9.5 Binary logistic regression for casting a Eurosceptic vote in the federal elections
Table 9.6 Frequency table: gender
Table 9.7 Frequency table: occupational status
Table 9.8 Frequency table: education
Table 9.9 Cronbach’s alpha for sum scales: European citizenship, positive attitudes toward immigration and trust in national political institutions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brack, N., Hoon, L. (2017). Euroscepticism in Belgium: Issue-Voting Against the Odds. In: Hassing Nielsen, J., Franklin, M. (eds) The Eurosceptic 2014 European Parliament Elections. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58696-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics