Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nail dryer devices: a measured spectral irradiance and labelling review

  • Paper
  • Published:
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The popularity of nail beauty has increased during the last few years in Spain, as well as in other countries. Nowadays there are a large number of nail dryer devices in the market with ultraviolet (UV) fluorescent lamps, light emitting diodes (LED) or a combination of both. The different spectral emissions of each individual nail dryer device require particular nail polishes, which are polymerized by specific wavelengths and a controlled exposure time to achieve the desired results. We have measured and analyzed the emission of 28 nail dryer devices currently in use in Spanish beauty centers. The emission of each individual nail dryer device showed a particular spectral distribution and maximum intensity, especially those with fluorescent lamps or LED/UV combinations. About 30% of the devices emitted more UV-A radiation than that received in Barcelona at solar noon in summer. Nevertheless, in all cases the erythemal irradiance was low, similarly to ambient values at solar noon in winter or when the solar altitude is low. The erythemal doses corresponding to a typical session were, therefore, lower than those received from sunlight at summer midday at equivalent exposure times. The biological irradiances for photoaging (skin sagging and elastosis) showed high variability depending on the device, especially for fluorescent lamps. Since the emission of LED-based devices is centered in the visible region, erythemal and photoaging irradiances were low. An analysis of the labelling showed that 85% of the devices had a visible label, although 23% contained some errors, according to the EN 60335-1 guideline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. T. N. Nilsen, M. Hannevik and M. B. Veierod, Ultraviolet exposure from indoor tanning devices: a systematic review, Br. J. Dermatol., 2016, 174, 730–740, DOI: 10.1111/ bjd.14388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Sola, D. Baeza, M. Gómez and J. Lorente, Ultraviolet spectral distribution and erythema-weighted irradiance from indoor tanning devices compared with solar radiation exposures, J. Photochem. Photobiol., 2016, 161, 450–455, DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.06.014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Boniol, P. Autier, P. Boyle and S. Gandini, Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis, Br. Med. J., 2012, 345, e4757, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e4757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. CENELEC, European Standard EN 60335-2-27:2010, Household and similar electrical appliances - Safety - Part 2-27: Particular requirements for appliances for skin exposure to ultraviolet and infrared radiation, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. RD 1002/2002, Spanish Royal order that regulates the sale and use of sunbeds, BOE Official Publication 243, 2002 (September 27, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Pagano, A review of gel nail technologies, Cosmet. Toiletries, 2015, 130, 40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. F. MacFarlane and C. A. Alonso, Occurrence of nonmelanoma skin cancers on the hands after UV nail light exposure, Arch. Dermatol., 2009, 145, 447–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Markova and M. Weinstock, Risk of skin cancer associated with the use of UV nail lamp, J. Invest. Dermatol., 2012, 133, 1097–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. C. Dowdy and R. M. Sayre, Photobiological safety evaluation of UV nail lamps, Photochem. Photobiol., 2013, 89, 961–967.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. IESNA Photobiology Committee, ASNI/IESNA RP-27.3-07, Recommended Practice for Photobiological Safety for Lamps and Lamps Systems - Risk Group Classification and Labeling. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. L. Diffey, The risk of squamous cell carcinoma in women from exposure to UVA lamps used in cosmetic nail treatment, Br. J. Dermatol., 2012, 167, 1175–1178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. L. R. Shipp, C. A. Warner, F. A. Rueggeberg and L. S. Davis, Further investigation into the risk of skin cancer associated with the use of UV nail lamps, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2014, 150, 775–776.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Curtis, P. Tanner, C. Judd, B. Childs, C. Hull and S. Leachman, Acrylic nail curing UV lamps: high-intensity exposure warrants further research of skin cancer risk, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2013, 69, 1069–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Yagci, S. Jockusch and N. J. Turro, Photoinitiated polymerization: Advances, challenges and opportunities, Macromolecules, 2010, 43, 6245–6260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Moseley, UV measurements related to artificial tanning units, Working Group 4 of the Thematic Network for Ultraviolet Measurements, 2000, UVNews, 6 (Download at http://metrology.tkk.fi/uvnet/source/partC.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  16. CIE, Erythema reference action spectrum and standard erythema dose, Commision Internationale de l'Éclairage, CIE S007E, 1998, CIE Central Bureau, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Bisset, D. P. Hannon and T. Orr, Wavelength dependence of histological, physical and visible changes in chronically UV-irradiated hairless mouse skin, Photochem. Photobiol., 1989, 50, 763–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. L. H. Kligman and R. M. Sayre, An action spectrum for ultraviolet induced elastosis in hairless mice: quantification of elastosis by image analysis, Photochem. Photobiol., 1991, 53, 237–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Sola and J. Lorente, Contribution of UVA irradiance to the erythema and photoaging effects in solar and sunbed exposures, J. Photochem. Photobiol., 2014, 143, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization, Solar UV Index, a practical guide, ISBN 92 4 159007 6, Geneva, Switzerland.

  21. D. Schoon, P. Bryson and J. McConnell, Do UV nail lamps emit unsafe levels of ultraviolet light?, http://www.schoon-scientific.com/downloads/UV-Nail-Lamps-Facts.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. M. Girard, S. Francesconi, M. Pozzebon, D. Graindorge, P. Rochette, R. Drouin and E. Sage, UVA-induced damage to DNA and proteins: direct versus indirect photochemical processes, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2011, 261, 012002.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Sage, P. M. Girard and S. Francesconi, Unravelling UVA-induced mutagenesis, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2012, 11, 74–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the collaboration of all facilities allowing the measurement of nail lamp devices.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Futuro Tecnológico Español, Velázquez 15, Madrid, Spain

    David Baeza

  2. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University San Pablo CEU, Campus Montepríncipe, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain

    David Baeza

  3. Group of Meteorology, Department of Applied Physics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Yolanda Sola

  4. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Health, University San Pablo CEU, Campus Montepríncipe, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain

    Luis Alberto del Río

  5. Electrical Safety Area of DEKRA Testing and Certification, S.A.U., Málaga, Spain

    Rafael González

Authors
  1. David Baeza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yolanda Sola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luis Alberto del Río
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rafael González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Baeza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baeza, D., Sola, Y., del Río, L.A. et al. Nail dryer devices: a measured spectral irradiance and labelling review. Photochem Photobiol Sci 17, 592–598 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7pp00388a

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c7pp00388a

Search

Navigation