Abstract
Political reputation models featureforward-looking, rational voters whore-elect incumbents based on their estimateof an incumbent's ability level. Fiscalpolicy is one of the ways an incumbentestablishes a reputation and therebysignals this ability level to voters. Thereputation-building framework implies thatterm limits should affect fiscalperformance; a term-limited incumbentplaces less value on reputation-buildingthan an incumbent eligible for re-electiondoes. We examine differences in fiscalperformance in democratic countries underalternative executive term limit regimes. Our results generally agree with the priorfindings of Besley and Case (1995a) whoanalyzed gubernatorial term limits in theAmerican States. We provide new evidencethat the fiscal effects of term limitsdiffer under a two-term rule versus asingle-term rule.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alesina, A. and Tabellini, G. (1990). A positive theory of deficits and government debt. Review of Economic Studies 57: 403–414.
Banks, J. and Sundaram, R. (1993). Long-lived principals, short-lived agents. Working Paper. University of Rochester.
Besley, T. and Case, A.C. (1995a). Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices?: Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 769–798.
Besley, T. and Case, A.C. (1995b). Incumbent behavior: Vote seeking tax setting and yardstick competition. American Economic Review 85: 22–45.
Besley, T. and Coate, S. (1998). Sources of inefficiency in a representative democracy: A dynamic analysis. American Economic Review 87: 139–156.
Crain, W.M. and Tollison, R.D. (1977). Attenuated property rights and the market for governors. Journal of Law and Economics 20: 205–211.
Crain, W.M. and Tollison, R.D. (1993). Time inconsistency and fiscal policy: Empirical analysis of U.S. states, 1969–89. Journal of Public Economics 51: 153–159.
Easterly, W. and Levine, R. (1997). Africa's growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1203–1250.
Glazer, A. (1989). Politics and the choice of durability. American Economic Review 79: 1207–1213.
Kydland, F.E. and Prescott, E.C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy 85: 473–492.
Lott, J.R., Jr. and Davis, M.L. (1992). A critical review and extension of the political shirking literature. Public Choice 74: 461–484.
Lott, J.R., Jr. and Reed, R.W. (1989). Shirking and sorting in a model of finite-lived politicians. Public Choice 61: 75–96.
McArthur, J. and Marks, S.V. (1988). Constituent interest vs. legislator ideology: The role of political opportunity cost. Economic Inquiry 26: 461–470.
Perrson, T. and Svensson, L. (1989). Why stubborn conservatives run deficits: Policy with time-inconsistent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104: 325–345.
Poterba, J.M. and Von Hagen, J. (Eds.). (1990). Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy 106: 997–1032.
Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review 80: 21–36.
Romer, C. (1986). Is stabilization of the postwar economy a figment of the data? American Economic Review 76: 314–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, J.M., Crain, W.M. Effects of Term Limits on Fiscal Performance: Evidence from Democratic Nations. Public Choice 119, 73–90 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000024183.74743.13
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000024183.74743.13