Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Becoming a better teacher: A case of changing the pedagogical knowledge and beliefs of law professors

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two instructors, given the lowest ratings by students in theschool of law at a research university in Israel, were interviewed,rated by students, and videotaped in classes twice: before and afterthey went through a treatment for improving instruction. Throughout theintervention period, several of their students were also interviewedregarding their instruction. Ratings by students of the same course inthe years previous to, and following, the treatment were also recorded.An analysis of the pre-treatment data identified three general factorsthat diminished students' ability to pay attention to and understandtheir teaching, thus causing their teaching to be perceived by studentsas poor. These three factors were: personal characteristics andaptitudes that negatively affect classroom behavior; lack ofsufficient pedagogical knowledge, and damaging thinking and beliefsregarding instruction and students. The four-month intensive treatmentshowed success in modifying and changing for the better most of thedamaging factors and in increasing instructional effectiveness. Thesignificant increase in student satisfaction from instruction thatresulted from the intervention was maintained for at least eight monthsafter the end of treatment. A principal conclusion is that for improvinginstruction of teachers perceived as poor by students, it is necessaryto modify not only the teachers' classroom behaviors but also theirpersonal characteristics and their beliefs about teaching and students– especially those that damage the effectiveness of theirinstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, J., Garrison, D. & Magnusson, K. (1996). The teaching and learning transaction in higher education: A study of promoting excellent teaching. Teaching in Higher Education 1(1): 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayless, O.L. & Moody, B.S. (1984). The Speech Communication Methods Course in Secondary Teacher Preparation Programs in Arkansas. Journal of Communications Studies 2(1): 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, J. & Skeff, K.M. (1988). Developing the motivation for improving university teaching. Innovative Higher Education 12(2): 114–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R.T., Boberg, Q., O'Connell, C. & Pellino, G. (1980). Project for Faculty Development Program Evaluation: Final Report. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Study of Higher Education, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. & McDonald, R. (1981). Educational Development through Consultancy. Surrey, England: Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashin, W.E. & Downey, R.G. (1995). Disciplinary differences in what is taught and in students' perceptions of what they learn and of how they are taught. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 64: 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chism, N.V.N. & Sanders, D. (1986). the place of practice-centered inquiry in a faculty development program. In M. Svinicki, J. G. Kurfiss & J. Stone, eds, To Improve the Academy, Vol. 5, pp. 56–64. Stillwater: OK: New Forums Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C.M. & Peterson, P.L. (1986). Teachers thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock, ed, Handbook of Research on Teaching, third ed., pp. 255–296. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P.A. (1990). Bringing research into practice, Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice, Vol. 43, pp. 123–132. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, D.R. (1985). Applying research on teacher clarity. Journal of Teacher Education 36(2): 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, R.C. & Robinson, B.M. (1994). Oral English proficiency requirements for ITAs in U.S. colleges and universities: An issue in speech communication. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration (JACA) 2: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin, M.J. (1995). Concepts of teaching and teaching excellence in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development 14(1): 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin, M.J. & Precians, R.P. (1992). Award-winning university teachers' concepts of teaching. Higher Education 24(4); 483–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdle, S., Murray, H.G. & Rhuston, P.J. (1985). Personality, classroom behavior, and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 77(4): 94–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, B.L. & Erickson, G.R. (1980). Working with faculty teaching behaviors. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1: 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W.E. & Guymon, R.E. (1978, March). Clarity of explanation: A powerful indicator of teacher effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

  • Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research 38(1): 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1986). The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesis of research. Research in Higher Education 24(2): 139–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K.A. (1989). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external (neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education 30(2): 137–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M., Brown, W., Ralph, N., Shukraft, R., Bloom, M. & Sanford, N. (1979). Academic Culture and Faculty Development. Berkeley, CA.

  • Grossman, P.L. (1995). Teachers' knowledge. In L.W. Anderson, ed, The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education, 2nd ed., pp. 20–24. Oxford, England: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanges, P.J., Schneider, B. & Niles, K. (1990). Stability of performance: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 75(6): 658–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N. (1985). A study of the organization and clarity of mathematics lessons. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology 16(1): 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N. (1993). Attitudes towards instruction of faculty in mathematics and the physical sciences: Discipline-and situation specific teaching patterns. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 24(4): 579–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N. (1995). The department-wide approach to improving faculty instruction in higher education: A qualitative evaluation. Research in Higher Education 36(4): 377–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N. (1997). Teaching in a research university: Professors' conceptions, practices, and disciplinary differences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Hativa, N. (1998a). Effective University Teaching, Hebrew ed. Tel Aviv: Ramot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N. (1998b). Lack of clarity in university teaching: A case study. Higher Education 36(3): 353–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N. (1998–1999). 1. Engaging Students: Actively Engaging Students; Getting Students to Think. 2. Getting Student Attention: Attention-getting Teacher Behavior; Attentiongetting Content. 3. Simplifying: Teaching in Two Cycles; Structuring and Looking Back. 4. Adapting to Students: Evaluating Students' Knowledge; Adjusting to Students' Diversity. 5. Classroom Environment. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N., Barak, R. & Simhi, E. (1998). Exemplary university teachers: Knowledge and beliefs regarding effective instruction, and classroom behavior. Paper presented at the EARLI SIG on Higher Education, Leiden, Holland (ED 430961).

  • Hativa, N. & Raviv, A. (1996). University instructors' ratings profiles: Stability over time, and disciplinary differences. Research in Higher Education 37(3): 341–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, C.V. (1981). A further investigation of teacher clarity: The observation of teacher clarity and the relationship between clarity and student achievement and satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.

  • Hines, C.V., Cruickshank, D. & Kennedy, J.J. (1985). Teacher clarity and its relationship to student achievement and satisfaction. American Educational Research Journal 22(1): 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (1979). Physics Interface. Higher Education Research Office, University of Auckland.

  • Kelly, N. & Kelly, B. (1982, November). Backgrounds, teaching styles of award winning professors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association, Albuquerque, NM.

  • Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction 7(3): 255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, M.L. (1981). Combined effect of two teacher clarity variables on student achievement. Journal of Experimental Education 50(1): 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, M.L. & Smith, L.R. (1981). College student ratings and teacher behavior: An experimental study. Journal of Social Studies Research 5(1): 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenze, L.F. & Dinham, S.M. (1994). Examining pedagogical content knowledge of college faculty new to teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.

  • Levinson-Rose, J. & Menges, R.J. (1981). Improving college teaching: A critical review of research. Review of Educational Research 51(3): 403–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K.G. (1988). Individual consultation: Its importance to faculty development programs. In E.C. Wadsworth, ed, Professional and Organizational Development in Higher Education. A Handbook for New Practitioners, pp. 75–80. Stillwater OK: New Forums Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research 11(3): 253–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. & Bailey, M. (1993). Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education 64(1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H.W. & Roche, L. (1993). The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal 30(1): 217–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher 17(2): 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaleb, J.L. & White, J.A. (1980). Critical dimensions in evaluating teacher clarity. Journal of Classroom Interaction 15(2): 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W.J. (1994). Teaching Tips, 9th ed. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miltz, R.J. (1971). Development and evaluation of a manual for improving teachers' explanations. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1972, 32, 5474A. (University Microfilm No. 72–11,697).

  • Murray, H.G. (1984). The impact of formative and summative evaluation of teaching in North American universities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 9(2).

  • Murray, H.G. (1997a). Classroom teaching behaviors and student instructional ratings: How do good teachers teach? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Murray, H.G. (1997b). Effective teaching behaviors in the college classroom. In R.P. Perry & J.C. Smart, eds, Effective Teaching in Higher Education: Research and Practice, pp. 171–203. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H.G., Rushton, P.J. & Paunonen, S.V. (1990). Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(2): 250–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, J.D. & Wulff, D.H. (1988). Consultation using a research perspective. In K.G. Lewis, ed, Face to Face. Stillwater, Oklahoma: New Forums Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1980). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology 67(1): 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahilly, T.J. & Saroyan, A. (1997). Characterizing poor and exemplary teaching in higher education. Implications for faculty development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Saroyan, A. & Snell, L.S. (1997). Incorporating theories of teacher growth and adult education in a faculty development program. In D. DeZure, ed, To Improve the Academy, Vol. 16, pp. 93–116. Stillwater, OK: New Forms Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. (1987). Learning to Teach. Washington: American Association of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.R. & Land, M.L. (1980a). Student Perception of Teacher Clarity (ED183105).

  • Smith, L.R. & Land, M.L. (1980b). Student perception of teacher clarity in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 11(2): 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.A. (1995). Reflecting critically on our efforts to improve teaching and learning. In E. Neal, ed, To Improve the Academy, Vol. 14, pp. 5–25. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.A. & Geis, G.L. (1996). Professors as clients for instructional development. In L. Richlin, ed, To Improve the Academy, Vol. 15, pp. 129–153. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, J.S. & Lowther, M.A. (1990). Planning Introductory College Courses: Influences on Faculty (ED330277). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theall, M. & Franklin, J. (1991). Using ratings for teaching improvement. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 48, pp. 83–96. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A.G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D.A. Grouws, ed, Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, pp. 127–130. NY: MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. & Fraser, B.J. (1989). An investigation of exemplary physics teaching. Physics Teacher 27(3): 144–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, B. (1995). Improving teaching across the academy: Gleanings from research. In E. Neal, ed, To Improve the Academy, Vol. 14, pp. 27–42. Stillwater, Oklahoma: New Forums Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, M. & Lenze, F.L. (1991). Instructional interventions: A review of the literature on efforts to improve instruction. In J.C. Smart, ed, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 7, pp. 294–333. Bronx, NY: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.C. (1986). Improving faculty teaching: Effective use of student evaluations and consultants. Journal of Higher Education 57(2): 196–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S.M., Shulman, L.S. & Richert, A.E. (1987). '150 different ways' of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead, ed, Exploring Teachers' Thinking, pp. 104–124. London: Cassell Educational Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. & Shaw, D.G. (1999). Profiles of effective college and university teachers. The Journal of Higher Education 70(6): 670–687.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tel Aviv University, PO Box 39040, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel

    Nira Hativa

Authors
  1. Nira Hativa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hativa, N. Becoming a better teacher: A case of changing the pedagogical knowledge and beliefs of law professors. Instructional Science 28, 491–523 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026521725494

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026521725494

Search

Navigation