Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Guest Editorial: Computational Vision at Brown

  • Editorial Board
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, S. and Laidlaw, D.H. 2002. Toward a framework for assembling broken pottery vessels. In Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 945-946.

  • Andrews, S., Tsochantaridis, I., and Hofmann, T. 2003. Support vector machines for multiple-instance learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS*15), MIT Press (to appear).

  • Bakircioglu, M., Grenander, U., Khaneja, N., and Miller, M.I. 1998. Curve matching on brain surfaces using induced Frenet distance metrics. Human Brain Mapping, 6 (5):329-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmelli, L., Taubin, G., and Bernardini, F. 2002 Space-optimized texture maps. In Proceedings of Eurographics 2002, Germany.

  • Barzohar, M. and Cooper, D.B. 1996. Automatic finding of main roads in aerial images by using geometric-stochastic models and estimation. IEEE Trans. On PAMI, 18(7):707-721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardini, F., Martin, I., Mittleman, J., Rushmeier, H., and Taubin, G. 2002. Building a digital model of Michelangelo's Florentine Pieta. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, January/ February 2002.

  • Bienenstock, E. and Doursat, R. 1994. A shape-recognition model using dynamical links. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 5:241-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienenstock, E., Geman, S., and Potter, D. 1997. Compositionality, MDL priors, and object recognition. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9, M.C. Mozer, M.I. Jordan, and T. Petsche (Eds.), MIT Press, pp. 838-844.

  • Black, M.J. and Anandan, P. 1996. The robust estimation of multiple motions: Parametric and piecewise-smooth flow fields. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, CVIU, 63(1):75-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.J. and Fleet, D.J. 2000. Probabilistic detection and tracking of motion discontinuities. International Journal of Computer Vision, 38(3):231-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.J., Fleet, D.J., and Yacoob, Y. 2000. Robustly estimating changes in image appearance. Computer Vision and Image Processing, 78(1):8-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.J. and Yacoob, Y. 1997. Recognizing facial expressions in image sequences using local parameterized models of image motion. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 25(1):23-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.J. and Jepson, A. 1998. EigenTracking: Robust matching and tracking of articulated objects using a view-based representation. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 26(1):63-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, B.S., Intrator, N., Shouval, H., and Cooper, L.N. 1998. Receptive field formation in natural scene environments: Comparison of single cell learning rules. Neural Computation. 10(7):1797-1813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blane, M., Lei, Z., Civi, H., and Cooper, D.B. 2000. The 3L algorithm for fitting implicit polynomial curves and surfaces to data. IEEE Trans. On PAMI, 22(3):298-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D.B., Willis, A., Andrews, S., Baker, J., Cao, Y., Han, D., Kang, K., Wong, W., Leymarie, F.F., Orriols, X., Velipasalar, S., Vote, E.L., Joukowsky, M.S., Kimia, B.B., Laidlaw, D.H., and Mumford, D. 2001. Assembling virtual pots from 3D measurements of their fragments. In Proc. Of the Virtual Reality Archaeology and Cultural heritage Symposium (VAST), Athens, Greece, Nov. 2001.

  • Cooper, D.B., Willis, A., Andrews, S., Baker, J., Cao, Y., Han, D., Kang, K., Kong, W., Leymarie, F., Orriols, X, Velipasalar, S., Vote, E., Joukowsky, M., Kimia, B.J., Laidlaw, D.H., and Mumford, D. 2002. Bayesian virtual pot-assembly from fragments as problems in perceptual-grouping and geometric-learning. In Proceedings of ICPR, vol. 3, pp. 30297-30302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domini, F. and Braunstein, M.L. 1998. Recovery of3D structure from motion is neither Euclidean nor affine. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24:1273-1295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domini, F. and Caudek, C. 1999. Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25:426-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domini, F., Caudek, C., and Proffitt, D.R. 1997. Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23:1111-1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domini, F., Caudek, C., and Richman, S. 1998. Distortions of depthorder relations and parallelism in structure from motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 60:1164-1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domini, F., Vuong, Q., and Caudek, C. 2002. Temporal integration in structure from motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28:816-838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchon, A.P. and Warren, W.H. 2002. A visual equalization strategy for locomotor control: Of honeybees, humans, and robots. Psychological Science, 13:272-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchon, A., Warren, W.H., and Kaelbling, L.P. 1998. Ecological robotics. Special issue of Adaptive Behavior, 6:473-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, S. and Intrator, N. 2000. Coarse coding of shape fragments + retinotopy representation of structure. Spatial Vision, 13:255-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa, E.K. and Welch, L. 1997. Recruitment mechanisms in speed and fine-direction discrimination tasks. Vision Research, 37(22):3129-3144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, I., Hayward, W.G., Tarr, M.J., Anderson, A., Skudlarski, P., and Gore, J.C. 2002. BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition. Neuron, 34(1):161-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S. and Geman, D. 1984. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE-PAMI, 6:721-741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, D., Geman, S., Graffigne, C., and Dong, P. 1990. Boundary detection by constrained optimization. IEEE-PAMI, 12:609-628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, D., Geman, S., and McClure, D.E. 1992. Anonlinear filter for film restoration and other problems in image processing. CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 54:281-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., and Doursat, R. 1992. Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Computation, 4:1-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S., Manbeck, K., and McClure, D.E. 1993. A comprehensive statistical model for single-photon emission tomography. In Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications R. Chellappa and A. Jain (Eds.) Academic Press, Boston, pp. 93-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S., Manbeck K., and McClure, D.E. 1993. A comprehensive statistical model for single photon emission computed tomography. In Markov Random Fields: Theory and Application, R. Chellappa and A. Jain (Eds.), Academic Press (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich), pp. 93-130.

  • Geman S. and McClure, D.E. 1987. Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 52.

  • Geman, S., Potter, D.F., and Chi, Z. 2002. Composition systems. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, LX:707-736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidas, B. 1989. A renormalization group approach to image processing problems. IEEE Transactions PAMI, 11(2):164-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidas, B., Almeida, M., and Robertson, C. 2000. Tracking of moving objects in cluttered enviroments via Monte Carlo filter. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2000), Barcelona, Spain, pp. 175-179.

  • Gidas, B. and Geman, D. 1991. Image analysis and computer vision. Spatial Statistics and Image Processing, National Research Council, National Academy Press, pp. 1-36.

  • Gidas, B., Gomes, F. C., and Robertson, C. 2002. Model-based tracking of moving objects in cluttered enviroments. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, LX(4):737-771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidas, B. and Mumford, D. 2001. Stochastic models for generic images. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, LIX(1):85-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenander, U. and Miller, M.I. 1998. Computational anatomy: An emerging discipline. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, LVI(4):617-694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenander, U., Miller, M.I., and Srivastava, A. 1998. Hilbert-Schmidt lower bounds for estimators on matrix Lie groups for ATR. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 20(8):790-802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenander, U. and Srivastava, A. 2001. Probably models for clutter in natural images. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 23(4):424-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, C., Crisco, J.J., and Laidlaw, D.H. 2002. Fitting manifold surfaces to 3D point clouds. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 124(1):136-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, A. and Mundy, J.L. 1991. Benchmark evaluation of a model-based object recognition system. In Proc. 3rd International Conference on Computer Vision, 1990, Reprinted in Computer Vision: Advances and Applications, R. Kasturi and R. Jain (Eds.) IEEE Computer Society Press.

  • Hofmann, T. 2001. Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Machine Learning Journal, 42(1):177-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, T., Puzicha, J., and Buhmann, J.M. 1998. Unsupervised texture segmentation in a deterministic annealing framework. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20 (8):803-818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intrator, N. and Edelman, S. 1997. Learning low dimensional representations of visual object with extensive use of prior knowledge. Network, 8(3):283-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, K., Tarel, J.-P., Fishman, R., and Cooper, D.B. 2001. A linear dual-space approach to 3D surface reconstruction from occluding contours using algebraic surfaces. In Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. On Computer Vision, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 198-204.

  • Kearns, M., Warren, W.H., Duchon, A., and Tarr, M. 2002. Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task. Perception, 31:349-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimia, B.B. To Appear. On the role of medial geometry in human vision. Journal of Physiology, 2003.

  • Kimia, B.B., Tannenbaum, A.R., and Zucker, S.W. 1992. On the evolution of curves via a function of curvature, I: The classical case. JMAA, 163(2):438-458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimia, B.B., Tannenbaum, A.R., and Zucker, S.W. 1995. Shapes, shocks, and deformations, I: The components of shape and the reaction-diffusion space. IJCV, 15(3):189-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunsch, H., Geman, S., and Kehagias, A. 1995. Hidden Markov random fields. Ananals of Applied Probability, 5:577- 602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutliroff, G. 2002. Approximation in an Adaptive Cosine Basis and Its Application to Image Compression, Ph.D. Thesis, Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, May 2002. Available at www.dam.brown.edu/people/gershom.

  • Laidlaw, D.H., Fleischer, K.W., and Barr, A.H. 1998. Partial-volume Bayesian classification of material mixtures in MR volume data using voxel histograms. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17(1):74-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. S. and Mumford, D., to appear. Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. J. of the Optical Society of America (submitted).

  • Lee, A.B., Pedersen, K.S., and Mumford, D. 2003. The nonlinear statistics of high-contrast patches in natural images. Int. J. Comp. Vision. 54(1/2/3):83-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. and Warren, W.H. 2000. Perception of heading during rotation: Sufficiency of dense motion parallax and reference objects. Vision Research, 40:3873-3894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macevoy, S.P. and Paradiso, M.A. 2001. Lightness constancy in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 98:8827-8831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, N. and Welch, L. 1997. The effect of inducer polarity and contrast on the perception of illusory figures. Perception, 26:1431-1443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M., Christensen, G., Amit, Y., and Grenander, U. 1993. Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 90(24):11944-11948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, D. 2002. Pattern theory: The mathematics of perception. In Proceedings of ICM 2002, vol. 1, Beijing.

  • Mumford, D. 2003. The shape of objects in two and three dimensions, Gibbs Lecture. Notices of the Amer. Math. Soc., to appear.

  • Mumford, D. and Gidas, B. 2001. Stochastic models for generic images. Quarterly Appl. Math., 59:85-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, J.L. 1995. Object recognition: The search for representation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 994.

  • Mundy, J.L. 1998. Object recognition based on geometry: Progress over three decades. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, of the Royal Society, 356:1213-1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, J.L. and Zisserman, A. 1992. Applications of Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision. MIT Press.

  • Paradiso, M.A. 2002. Neuronal and perceptual correspondence in primary visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12:155-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puzicha, J., Hofmann, T., and Buhmann, J.M. 1999. Histogram clustering for unsupervised segmentation and image retrieval. Pattern Recognition Letters, 20:899-909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A.F. and Paradiso, M.A. 1999. Neural correlates of brightness in the responses of neurons in the retina, LGN, and primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 19:6145-6156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, C.A., Forsyth, D.A., Zisserman, A., and Mundy, J.L. 1993. Extracting projective structure from single perspective views of 3-d point sets. In Proc. 4th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision.

  • Sebastian, T., C risco, J., and Kimia, B. 2003. Segmentation of carpal bones for accurate measurement of 3D in vivo carpal kinematics. Medical Image Analysis, 7(1):21-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian, T., Klein, P., and Kimia, B.B. 2003. Recognition of shapes by editing their shock graphs. PAMI. Under minor revision.

  • Sheinberg, D.L., Logothetis, N.K. 1997. The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94:3408-3413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheinberg, D.L. and Logothetis, N.K. 2001. Noticing familiar objects in real world scenes: The role of temporal cortical neurons in natural vision. Journal of Neuroscience, 21:1340-1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheinberg, D.L. and Logothetis, N.K. 2002. Perceptual learning and the development of complex visual representations in temporal cortical neurons. In Perceptual Learning, M. Fahle and T. Poggio (Eds.), MIT Press, 95-124.

  • Siddiqi, K., Kimia, B.B., Tannenbaunm, A.R., and Zucker, S.W. 2001. On the psychophysics of the shape triangle. Vision Research, 41(9):1153-1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarel, J.-P. and Cooper, D.B. 2000. The complex representation of algebraic curves and its simple exploitation for pose estimation and invariant recognition. IEEE Trans. On Pattern. Anal. and Machine Learning, 22(7):663-674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, M.J. and Cheng, Y.D. 2003 Learning to see faces and objects. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1):23-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, M.J. and Gauthier, I. 2000. FFA: A Flexible Fusiform Area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nature Neuroscience, 3(8):764-769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, M.J. and Warren, W.H. 2002. Virtual reality in behavioral neuroscience and beyond. Nature Neuroscience Supplement, 5:1089- 1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, M.J., Williams, P., Hayward, W.G., and Gauthier, I. 1998. Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint-dependent. Nature Neuroscience, 1(4):275-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubin, G. 2002. BLIC: Bi-level isosurface compression. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2002, Boston.

  • Taubin, G., Gueziec, A., Horn, W., and Lazarus, F. 1998. Progressive forest split compression. Siggraph'98, Orlando, FL.

  • Taubin, G. and Rossignac, J. 1998. Geometric compression through topological surgery. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 17(2).

  • van Dam, A., Laidlaw, D.H., and Simpson, R.M. 2002. Experiments in immersive virtual reality for scientific visualization. Computers and Graphics, 26(4):535-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • von der Malsburg, C. and Bienenstock, E. 1987. A neural network for invariant pattern recognition. Europhysics Letters, 4:121- 126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, W.H. In press. Optic flow. In The Visual Neurosciences, ed L. Chalupa and J. Werner (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Warren, W.H., Kay, B.A., Duchon, A.P., Zosh, W., and Sahuc, S. 2001. Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nature Neuroscience, 4:213-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, L., MacLeod, D.I.A., and McKee, S.P. 1997. Motion interference: Perturbing perceived direction. Vision Research, 37(19):2725-2736.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Brown University, Box 1910, Providence, RI, 02912, USA

    Michael J. Black

  2. Division of Engineering, Brown University, Box D, Providence, RI, 02912, USA

    Benjamin B. Kimia

Authors
  1. Michael J. Black
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin B. Kimia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Black, M.J., Kimia, B.B. Guest Editorial: Computational Vision at Brown. International Journal of Computer Vision 54, 5–11 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023788516099

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023788516099

Search

Navigation