Skip to main content
Log in

Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the mid-1990s, the Internet rapidly changedfrom a venue used by a small number ofscientists to a popular phenomena affecting allaspects of life in industrialized nations. Scholars from diverse disciplines have taken aninterest in trying to understand the Internetand Internet users. However, as a variety ofresearchers have noted, guidelines for ethicalresearch on human subjects written before theInternet's growth can be difficult to extend toresearch on Internet users.In this paper, I focus on one ethicalissue: whether and to what extent to disguisematerial collected online in publishedaccounts. While some people argue thatvulnerable human subjects must always be madeanonymous in publications for their ownprotection, others argue that Internet usersdeserve credit for their creative andintellectual work. Still others argue thatmuch material available online should betreated as ``published.'' To attempt to resolvethese issues, I first review my own experiencesof disguising material in research accountsfrom 1992 to 2002. Some of the thorniestissues emerge at the boundaries betweenresearch disciplines. Furthermore, manyhumanities disciplines have not historicallyviewed what they do as human subjects research. Next, I explore what it means to do humansubjects research in the humanities. Inspiredby issues raised by colleagues in thehumanities, I argue that the traditional notionof a ``human subject'' does not adequatelycharacterize Internet users. A useful alternatemental model is proposed: Internet users areamateur artists. The Internet can be seen as aplayground for amateur artists creatingsemi-published work. I argue that thisapproach helps make some ethical dilemmaseasier to reason about, because it highlightskey novel aspects of the situation,particularly with regard to disguisingmaterial. Finally, I conclude by proposing aset of practical guidelines regardingdisguising material gathered on the Internet inpublished accounts, on a continuum from nodisguise, light disguise, moderate disguise, toheavy disguise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Barthes. Death of the Author. Image Music Text, pp. 142–148. Hill and Wang, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Berman and A. Bruckman. The Turing Game: Exploring Identity in an Online Environment. Convergence, 7(3): 83–102, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Bruckman. Identity Workshop: Social and Psychological Phenomena in Text-Based Virtual Reality. Unpublished manuscript, 1992 (available at http://www.cc.gatech.edu/∼asb/papers/identity-workshop.{ps,rtf}).

  • A. Bruckman. Cyberspace is Not Disneyland: The Role of the Artist in a Networked World. Commissioned by the Getty Art History Information Program, 1995 (available at http://www.cc.gatech.edu/∼asb/papers/getty/disneyland.html). Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Office for Protection from Research Risks, Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects, November 13, 2001 (available at http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm).

  • J. Dibbell. A Rape in Cyberspace. The Village Voice, December 21st, 1993, pp. 36–42.

  • J. Dibbell. My Tiny Life: Crime and Passion in a Virtual World. Henry Holt and Company, New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Eysenback and J.E. Till. Ethical Issues in Qualitative Research on Internet Communities. BMJ, 323: 1103–1105, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark S. Frankel and Sanyin Siang. Ethical and Legal Aspects of Human Subjects Research on the Internet: A Report of a Workshop June 10-11, 1999. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), November, 1999 (available at http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/sfrl/projects/intres/report.pdf).

  • D. Hebdige. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. Routledge, London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Herring. Linguistic and Critical Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication: Some Ethical and Scholarly Considerations. The Information Society, 12: 153–168, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Hudson and A. Bruckman. IRC Français: The Creation of an Internet-Based SLA Community. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(2): 109–134, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.G. Johnson. Computer Ethics, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, JN, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. King. Researching Internet Communities: Proposed Ethical Guidelines for the Reporting of Results. The Information Society, 12: 119-127, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Litman. Digital Copyright. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Mitchell (personal communication, April 2001).

  • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, 1979 (available at http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/mpa/belmont.php3).

  • R. Oldenburg. The Great Good Place. Paragon House, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Papert. Situating Constructionism. In I. Harel and S. Papert, editors, Constructionism, pp. 1–12. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Pritchard. Searching for ‘Research Involving Human Subjects’. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 23(3): 5–12, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Radway. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Reid. Informed Consent in the Study of On-Line Communities: A Reflection on the Effects of Computer-Mediated Social Research. The Information Society, 12: 169–174, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman. Interviewing as Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Teachers College Press, New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPJ Code of Ethics. Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), 1996 (zavailable ast http://www.spj.org/ethics_code.asp).

  • S. Turkle. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Simon & Schuster, New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Waskul and M. Douglass. Considering the Electronic Participant: Some Polemical Observations on the Ethics of On-Line Research. The Information Society, 12: 129–139, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.K. Wimsatt and M.C. Beardsley. The Intentional Fallacy. The Verbal Icon, pp. 3–18. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, KY, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruckman, A. Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 4, 217–231 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021316409277

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021316409277

Navigation