Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research on Importance and Interest: Implications for Curriculum Development and Future Research

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research has found that interest is related to attention, deeper processing, the use of effortful strategies, feelings of enjoyment, and learning. However, some strategies for creating interest in text materials may interfere with the learning of important information. In this paper, I describe results of a study that used qualitative verbal report measures to identify text characteristics that are most positively and most negatively associated with interest, as well as quantitative measures to investigate how those characteristics are related to learning. Results have implications for curriculum development by contributing to our understanding of how writers of informational text can make important information interesting. The paper concludes with suggestions for pedagogical practice and for future research that may further our understanding of interest and how it might be enhanced in classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P. A. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. In Maehr, M. L., and Pintrich, P. R. (eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Vol. 10, JAI Press, Greenwhich, CT, pp. 213–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., and Jetton, T. L. (1996). The role of importance and interest in the processing of text. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 8: 89–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., and Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 87: 559–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., and Jetton, T. J. (1994a). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Rev. Educ. Res. 64: 201–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., and Schulze, S. K. (1994b). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. Am. Educ. Res. J. 31: 313–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., and Wade, S. E. (2000). Contexts that promote interest, self-determination, and learning: Lasting impressions and lingering questions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 16: 349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvermann, D. E., Young, J. P., Green, C., and Wisenbaker, J. M. (1999). Adolescents' perceptions and negotiations of literacy practices in after-school read and talk clubs. Am. Educ. Res. J. 36: 221–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J.G., Reder, L. M., and Simon, H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educ. Res. 29: 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Shirey, L. L., Wilson, P. T., and Fielding, L. G. (1984). Interestingness of children's reading material, Technical Report No. 323, Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M., and Loxterman, J. A. (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Res. Q. 26: 251–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., and Worthy, J. (1995). Giving a text voice can improve students' understanding. Reading Res. Q. 30: 220–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M. R. (1955). Relationship between interest and reading comprehension. J. Educ. Res. 49: 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Van Dusen, L., Gulgoz, S., and Glynn, S. M. (1989). Instructional texts rewritten by five expert teams: Revisions and retention improvements. J. Educ. Psychol. 81: 226–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., and Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Dev. 49: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., and Smiley, S. S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying texts. Child Dev. 49: 1076–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. C. (1995). Dissolving the Boundaries: Planning for Curriculum Integration in Middle and Secondary Schools, Appalachia Educational Laboratory, Charleston, WV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., and Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Rev. Educ. Res. 63: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crismore, A. (1984). The rhetoric of textbooks: Metadiscourse. J. Curriculum Stud. 16: 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow—The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 43–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. In Boydston, J. A. (ed.), Essays on Philosophy and Psychology (1912- 1914), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardville, pp. 153–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, T. M., Higgins, L., Mehlenbacher, B., Cochran, C., Wallace, D., Hill, C., Haugen, D., McCaffrey, M., Burnett, R., Sloane, S., and Smith, S. (1989). Models for the design of text. Reading Res. Q. 24: 434–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1999). The Disciplined Mind: What All Students Should Understand, Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R., Alexander, P., Gillingham, M., Kulikowich, J., and Brown, R. (1991). Interest and learning from text. Am. Educ. Res. J. 28: 643–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R., Billingham, M., and White, J. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cogn. Instr. 6: 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1996). Social Linguistics and Literacies, 2nd edn., Taylor & Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glencoe/McGraw-Hill (1999). Mathematics: Applications and Connections, Course 1, McGraw-Hill, Westerville, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, E. T., and Sadoski, M. (1995). Commentary: The perils of seduction. Distracting details or incomprehensible abstractions? Reading Res. Q. 30: 500–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., and Cox, K. E. (2001). Classroom conditions for motivation and engagement in reading. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 13(3): 281–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harp, S. F., and Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. J. Educ. Psychol. 89: 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, D., and Allison, J. (1996). Promoting inquiry-oriented discussions using multiple texts. Lively discussions!: Fostering Engaged Reading, International Reading Association, Newark, DL, pp. 106–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 60: 549–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., and Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness—A neglected variable in discourse processing. Cogn. Sci. 10: 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., and Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts. Reading Res. Q. 23: 465–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Rev. Educ. Res. 70(2): 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetton, T. L., and Alexander, P. A. (2001). Interest assessment and the content area literacy environment: Challenges for research and practice. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 13(3): 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1980). Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway? Poetics 9: 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., and van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychol. Rev. 85: 363–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A., Hidi, S., and Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp.3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S., Winograd, P., and Bridge, C. (1989). The effects of reader and text characteristics on imagery reported during and after reading. Reading Res. Q. 24: 353–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, C., de Castell, S., and Luke, A. (1983). Beyond criticism: The authority of the school text. Curriculum Inquiry 13: 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. J. (1979). Organizational patterns in prose and their use in reading. In Kamil, M. L., and Moe, A. J. (eds.), Reading Research: Studies and Applications.Twenty-eighthYearbook of the National Reading Conference.

  • Meyer, B. J., Brandt, D. M., and Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Res. Q. 16: 72–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. J. Educ. Psychol. 85: 424–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R., and Babu, N. (1993). Critical thinking as critical discourse. In Norris, S. P. (ed.), The Generalizability of Critical Thinking: Multiple Perspectives on an Educational Ideal, Teachers College Press, New York, pp. 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 361–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In Sansone, C., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (eds.), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance, Academic Press, New York, pp. 375–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A., and Wozniak, R. H. (1985). Effect of interest on attentional shift, recognition, and recall in young children. Dev. Psychol. 21: 624–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In Spiro, R., Bruce, B., and Brewer, W. (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M. (2001). Resolving the effects of concreteness on interest, comprehension, and learning important ideas from text. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 13(3): 261–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., and Avila, E. (1995). Concreteness effects in text recall: Dual coding or context availability? Reading Res. Q. 30: 278–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., and Fritz, J. B. (1993). Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. J. Educ. Psychol. 85: 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., and Quast, Z. (1990). Reader response and long-term recall for journalistic text: The roles of imagery, affect, and importance. Reading Res. Q. 25: 256–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. (1979). Interestingness: Controlling inferences. Artif. Intell. 12: 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educ. Psychol. 26: 299–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1992). Topic interest and levels of comprehension. In Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A. (eds.), The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 151–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Sci. Stud. Reading 3: 257–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U., and Krapp, A. (1996). Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learn. Indiv. Differ. 8(2): 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (1998). Processing and recall differences among seductive details. J. Educ. Psychol. 90: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Bruning, R., and Svoboda, C. (1995). Sources of situational interest. J. Reading Behav. 27: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewall, G. T. (1988). American history textbooks:Where do we go from here? Phi Delta Kappan 69: 552–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirey, L. L., and Reynolds, R. E. (1988). Effect of interest on attention and learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 80: 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, T. (1984). Horace's Compromise: The Dilemma of the American High School, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, S. S., Oakley, D. D., Worthen, D., Campione, J. C., and Brown, A. L. (1977). Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation. J. Educ. Psychol. 69: 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivey, N. (1997). The Constructivist Metaphor: Reading, Writing, and the Making of Meaning, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, R. J., Soter, A., O'Flahavan, J. F., and McGinley, W. (1989). The effects of reading and writing upon thinking critically. Reading Res. Q. 24: 134–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 64: 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, H., and Woodward, A. (1989).Why students aren't learning very much from textbooks. Educ. Leadership47: 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. E., and Adams, B. (1990). Effects of importance and interest on recall of biographical text. JRB J. Literacy22: 331–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. E., Alexander, P. A., Schraw, G., and Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). The perils of criticism: Response to Goetz and Sadoski. Reading Res. Q. 30: 512–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. E., Buxton, W., and Kelly, M. (1999). Using think alouds to examine reader- text interest. Reading Res. Q. 34: 194–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. E., and Moje, E. B. (2000). The role of text is classroom learning. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. D., Pearson, P. D., and Barr, R. (eds.), Handbook of Reading Research III, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 609–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. E., Schraw, G., Buxton, W., and Hayes, M. (1993). Seduction of the strategic reader: Effects of interest on strategies and recall. Reading Res. Q. 28: 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S., Thompson, A., and Watkins, W. (1994). The role of belief systems in authors' and readers' constructions of texts. In Garner, R., and Alexander, P. A. (eds.), Beliefs About Text and Instruction With Text, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 265–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. E., and Trathen, W. (1989). The effect of self-selected study methods on learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 81: 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. Am. Educ. Res. J. 28: 495–519.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

    Suzanne E. Wade

Authors
  1. Suzanne E. Wade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wade, S.E. Research on Importance and Interest: Implications for Curriculum Development and Future Research. Educational Psychology Review 13, 243–261 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016623806093

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016623806093

Search

Navigation