Abstract
The paper considers the past development of the research universityin the United States and argues that one way to guide future changeis to embrace a new cultural model. Using Emory University as acase study, along with the more general perspectives offered through aclose study of eleven other private US universities and data assimilatedfrom members of the Association of American Universities (AAU), we proposethat the development of universities resembles the evolution of somecities from village, to metropolis, to global city. The global citymodel, characterised by flexible systems and an open culture, couldbenefit many universities. In describing the next phases of change,our essay discusses these characteristics as they have emerged insome of today's evolving universities.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adler, P.S. & Borys, B. (1996). Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive, Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 61-89.
Bender, T. (ed.) (1998). The University and the City: From Medieval Origins to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bender, T. & Schorske, C.E. (eds) (1998). American Academic Culture in Transformation: Fifty Years, Four Disciplines. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bess, J.L. (1992). Collegiality: Toward a Clarification of Meaning and Function. In J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 8. New York: Agathon, 1-36.
Breneman, D.W. (2002). For Colleges, This is Not Just Another Recession, The Chronicle of Higher Education (June 14), 1-9.
Chopp, R.S. (2001). Beyond the Founding Fratricidal Conflict: Scholarship of Religion and a Renewed Public Academy. Presidential Address to the American Academy of Religion. Denver, Colorado, November 17.
Chopp, R.S., Frost, S.H. & Jean, P.M. (2001). What's Old is New Again: Alternative Strategies for Supporting Faculty, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning (November/December), 43-46.
Clark, B. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in a Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cohen, M.D. & March, J.G. (1974). Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cole, J. (1993). Balancing Acts: Dilemmas of Choice Facing Research Universities, Daedalus 122(4), 1-36.
Frost, S.H. (1998). Using Scholarship: Lessons for Practice at One University. Research in Higher Education 19(2), 219-234.
Frost, S.H. & Jean, P.M. (2000). Making More of Faculty Culture: An Experiment in Building Intellectual Community, Tertiary Education and Management 6(3), 227-243.
Frost, S.H., Jean, P.M., Teodorescu, D. & Brown, A.B. (2001). Intellectual Initiatives at a Research University: Origins, Evolutions, and Challenges. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Richmond, Virginia, November.
Frost, S.H. & Teodorescu, D. (2001). Teaching Excellence: How Faculty Guided Change at a Research University, Review of Higher Education 24(4), 397-415.
Hearn, J. (1993). Strategy and Resources: Economic Issues in Strategic Planning and Management in Higher Education. In J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 6. New York: Agathon, 212-281.
Hirschhorn L. (1997). Reworking Authority: Leading and Following in the Post-modern Organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Keller, G. (1983). Academic Strategy: The Management Revolution in American Higher Education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press and the American Association for Higher Education.
Kerr, C. (1963). The Uses of the University. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
O'Brien, G.D. (1998). All the Essential Half-Truths about Higher Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to Lead in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Readings, B. (1996). The University in Ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rudolph, F. (1962). The American College and University: A History. New York: Vintage Books.
Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: The New Press.
Sassen, S. (2000). Cities in a World Economy, 2nd edn. Sociology for a New Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive University Structures: An Analysis of Adaptation to Socioeconomic Environments of US and European Universities, Higher Education Series 54. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Veysey, L. (1965). The Emergence of the American University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weick, K. (1976). Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems, Administrative Science Quarterly 21, 1-19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frost, S., Chopp, R. & Pozorski, A.L. Advancing Universities: The Global City as Guide for Change. Tertiary Education and Management 10, 73–86 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TEAM.0000012244.33336.29
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TEAM.0000012244.33336.29