Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Invasive Ants on Prospective Ant Mutualists

  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ants are recognized for their abilities both to engage in mutualistic interactions with diverse taxa, and to invade and dominate habitats outside their native geographic range. Here, we review the effects of invasive ants on three guilds of mutualists: ant-dispersed plants, ant-tended arthropods, and ant-tended plants. We contrast how those three guilds are affected by invasions, how invasive ants differ from native ants in their interactions with those guilds, and how the seven most invasive ant species differ amongst themselves in those interactions. Ant-dispersed plants typically suffer from interactions with invasive ants, a result we attribute to the small size of those ants relative to native seed-dispersing ants. Effects on the ant-tended arthropods and plants were more frequently positive or non-significant, although it is unclear how often these interactions are reciprocally beneficial. For example, invasive ants frequently attack the natural enemies of these prospective mutualists even in the absence of rewards, and may attack those prospective mutualists. Many studies address whether invasive ants provide some benefit to the partner, but few have asked how invasives rank within a hierarchy of prospective mutualists that includes other ant species. Because ant invasions typically result in the extirpation of native ants, this distinction is highly relevant to predicting and managing the effects of such invasions. Interspecific comparisons suggest that invasive ants are poorer partners of ant-dispersed plants than are most other ants, equally effective partners of ant-tended arthropods, and perhaps better partners of ant-tended plants. Last, we note that the invasive ant taxa differ amongst themselves in how they affect these three mutualist guilds, and in how frequently their interactions with prospective mutualists have been studied. The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, appears particularly likely to disrupt all three mutualistic interactions, relative to the other six invasive species included in this review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew CW, Sterling WI and Dean DA (1982) Influence of cotton nectar on red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera-Formicidae) and other predators. Environmental Entomology 11: 629–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali AD, Reagan TE and Flynn JL (1984) Influence of selected weedy and weed-free sugarcane habitats on diet composition and foraging activity of the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environmental Entomology 13: 1037–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose DP and Livingstone D (1979) Bio-ecology of Lophocephala-guerini lap (Reduviidae, Harpactorinae) a coprophagous reduviid from the Palghat Gap, India. Journal of Natural History 13: 581–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1988) Dispersal distance as a bene t of myrmecochory. Oecologia 75: 507–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN and Morrison SC (1998) Myrmecochory in Australia's seasonal tropics: effects of disturbance on distance dispersal. Australian Journal of Ecology 23: 483–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach CE (1991) Direct and indirect interactions between ants (Pheidole megacephala), scales (Coccus viridis) and plants (Pluchea indica). Oecologia 87: 233–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker TC, Van Vorhis Key SE and Gaston LK (1985) Bait-preference tests for the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Journal of Economic Entomology 78: 1083–1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett BR (1961) The influence of ants upon parasites,predators and scale insects. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 54: 543–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzman MS and Daane KM (2001) Host-handling behaviors in parasitoids of the black scale:a case for ant-mediated evolution. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 237–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley Jr JW, Su TH, McEwen FL and Gerling D (1982) Field investigations on the interrelationships of the big-headed ant,the gray pineapple mealybug,and pineapple mealybug wilt disease in Hawaii. Proceedings, Hawaiian Entomological Society 24: 51–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie AJ and Culver DC (1981) The guild of myrmecochores in the herbaceous flora of West Virginia forest. Ecology 62, 107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie AJ and Lyons N (1975) Seed dispersal in Viola (Violaceae):adaptations and strategies. American Journal of Botany 62: 714–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley BL (1976) Plants bearing extrafloral nectaries and the associated ant community: interhabitat differences in the reduction of herbivore damage. Ecology 57: 815–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond W and Slingsby P (1984) Collapse of an ant-plant mutualism:the Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis ) and myrmecochorous Proteaceae. Ecology 65: 1031–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner OH (1931) Relation of ants to aphid control. California Cultivator 77: 488–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman MA, Gardner WA, Ipser RM and Diffie SK (2001) Ground-dwelling ant species attracted to four food baits in Georgia. Journal of Entomological Science 36: 461–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow CM (1991) Are ant–aphid associations a tritrophic interaction?Oleander aphids and Argentine ants. Oecologia 87: 514–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley R (1987) Interactions involving plants, Homoptera and ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 111–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley R and Gullan P (1991) More aggressive ant species (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) provide better protection for soft scales and mealybugs (Homoptera:Coccidae, Pseudococcidae). Biotropica 23: 282–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Butz Huryn VM (1997) Ecological Impacts of introduced honeybees. Quarterly Review of Biology 72: 275–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CAM (1994) Homoptera associated with the ants Crematogaster clariventris, Pheidole megacephala and Tetramorium aculeatum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on cocoa in Ghana. Bulletin of Entomological Research 84: 313–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney SE, Byerley MB, Farrar JP and Holway DA (2002) Does size matter? Invasive argentine ants and the breakdown of seed dispersal mutualisms in California, p 94. Abstracts, 87th Annual Meeting, Ecological Society of America. Tucson, Arizona

  • Carney SE, Byerley MB and Holway DA (2003) Invasive argentine ants (Linepithema humile )do not replace native ants as seed dispersers of Dendromecon rigida (Papaveraceae) in California, USA. Oecologia 135: 576–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman RE and Bourke AFG (2001) The influence of sociality on the conservation biology of social insects. Ecology Letters 4: 650–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry RH and Nuessly GS (1992) Distribution and abundance of imported red re ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) in Florida sugarcane elds. Environmental Entomology 21: 167–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian CE (2001) Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities. Nature 413: 635–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark DB, Guayasamin C, Pazmino O, Donoso C and Paez de Villacis Y (1982) The tramp ant Wasmannia auropunctata: Autoecology and effects on ant diversity and distribution on Santa Cruz island, Galapagos. Biotropica 14: 196–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke SR and DeBarr GL (1996) Impacts of red imported re ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) on striped pine scale (Homoptera:Coccidae) populations. Journal of Entomological Science 31: 229–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke SR, DeBarr GL, and Berisford CW (1989) The life history of Toumeyella pini (Homoptera:Coccidae) in Loblolly pine seed orchards in Georgia. Canadian Entomologist 121: 853–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton SG and Robertson HG (1988) Complex interactions between mutualisms: ants attending homopterans protect fig seeds and pollinators. Ecology 69: 1302–1305

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius ML and Grace JK (1997) Influence of brood on the nutritional preferences of the tropical ant species, Pheidole megacephala and Ochetellus glaber (Mayr). Journal of Entomological Science 32: 421–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudjoe AR, Neuenschwander P and Copland MJW (1993) Interference by ants in biological control of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti (Hemiptera: Psuedococcidae) in Ghana. Bulletin of Entomological Research 83: 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman JH (1991) Host-plant mediation of insect mutualisms: variable outcomes in herbivore–ant interactions. Oikos 61: 138–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman JH, Compton SG, Zachariades C, Ware AB, Nefdt RJC and Rashbrook VK (1998) Geographic and taxonomic distribution of a positive interaction: ant-tended homopterans indirectly benefit figs across southern Africa. Oecologia 116: 373–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsten DL, Zuparko RL, Hajek AE, Rowney DL, Dreistadt SH (1999) Long-term sampling of Eucallipterus tiliae (Homoptera: Drepanosiphidae) and associated natural enemies in a northern California site. Environmental Entomology 28: 845–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1997) The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61: 153–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1998) Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants:a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecological Entomology 23: 484–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Delabie JHC, da Enacrnacao AMV and Cazola IM (1994) Relations between the little re ant,Wasmannia auropunctata, and its associated mealybug,Planococcus citri, in Brazilian cocoa farms. In: William DF (ed) Exotic Ants: Biology, Impact and Control of Introduced Species, pp 91–103, Westview Press, Boulder,Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Fuente MAS and Marquis RJ (1999) The role of anttended extrafloral nectaries in the protection and bene t of a Neotropical rainforest tree. Oecologia 118: 192–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean A, Ngnegueu PR and Bourgoin T (1996) Trophobiosis between ants and Peregrinus maidis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha, Delphacidae). Sociobiology 28: 111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean A, Ngnegueu PR, Durand JL and Bourgoin T (1997) The influence of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), particularly tramp species, on the proliferation of a maize pest. Sociobiology 30: 85–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean A, Orivel J, Durand JL, Ngnegueu PN, Bourgoin T and Gibernau M (2000) Interference between ant species distribution in different habitats and the density of a maize pest. Sociobiology 35: 175–189

    Google Scholar 

  • De Souza ALB, Delabie JHC and Fowler HG (1998) Wasmannia spp. (Hym. Formicidae) and insect damages to cocoa in Brazilian farms. Journal of Applied Entomology 122: 339–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutcher JD, Estes PM and Dutcher MJ (1999) Interactions in entomology: aphids, aphidophaga, and ants in pecan orchards. Journal of Entomological Science 34: 40–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood R and Fraser AM (1999) Associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants in Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 24: 503–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel W, Fischer MK, Wackers FL and Volkl W (2001) Interactions between extrafloral nectaries, aphids and ants: are there competition effects between plant and homopteran sugar sources? Oecologia 129: 577–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson J (1971) The displacement of native ant species by the introduced argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr. Psyche 78: 257–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Eubanks MD (2001) Estimates of the direct and indirect effects of red imported fire ant on biological control in field crops. Biological Control 21: 34–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Eubanks MD, Blackwell SA, Parish CJ, Delamar ZD and Hull-Sanders H (2002) Intraguild predation of beneficial arthropods by red imported fire ants in cotton. Environmental Entomology 31: 1168–1174

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders SE (1945) Coincident infestations of Aonidiella citrina and Coccus hesperidium, a result of ant activity. Journal of Economic Entomology 38: 711–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleet RR and Young BL (2000) Facultative mutualism between imported re ants (Solenopsis invicta) and a legume (Senna occidentalis). Southwestern Naturalist 45: 289–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluker SS, Huddleston EW and Beardsley JW (1968) Some effects of big-headed ant on populations of the pink sugarcane mealybug. Journal of Economic Entomology 61: 474–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer BD and van den Bosch R (1973) Biological control of the walnut aphid in California: the interrelationship of the aphid and its parasite. Environmental Entomology 2: 561–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas L, Galetto L, Bernadrello G and Paoli ASS (2000) Ant exclusion and reproduction of Croton sarcopetalus (Euphorbiaceae). Flora 195: 398–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez C and Espadaler X (1998) Myrmecochorous dispersal distances: a world survey. Journal of Biogeography 25: 573–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez C and Oliveras J (2003) Can the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile Mayr) replace native ants in myrmecochory? Acta Oecoligica 24: 47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez C, Pons P and Bas JM (2003) Effects of the Argentine ant Linepithema humile on seed dispersal and seedling emergence of Rhamnus alaternus. Ecography 26: 532–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Hernandez H, Johnson MW and Reimer NJ (1999) Impact of Pheidole megacephala (F) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on the biological control of Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Biological Control 15: 145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM (1972) Comparative ecology of four tropical ant species. Insectes Sociaux 19: 195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn DA and Wheeler DE (2002) Seasonal foraging activity and bait preferences of ants on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica 34: 348–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines IH and Haines JB (1978) Pest status of the crazy ant, Anoplolepis longipes (Jerdon) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in the Seychelles. Bulletin of Entomological Research 68: 627–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms KR and Vinson SB (2002) Coexistence of native ants with the red imported re ant,Solenopsis invicta. American Midland Naturalist 46: 396–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ (2001) Synergisms among habitat fragmentation, livestock grazing, and biotic invasions in southwestern Australia. Conservation Biology 15: 1522–1528

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman BD, Andersen AN and Hill GJE (1999) Impact of an introduced ant on native rain forest invertebrates: Pheidole megacephala in monsoonal Australia. Oecologia 120: 595–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B and Wilson EO (1990) The Ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtcamp WN, Grant WE and Vinson SB (1997) Patch use under predation hazard: Effect of the red imported re ant on deer mouse foraging behavior. Ecology 78: 308–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Holway DA (1998) Effect of argentine ant invasions on ground-dwelling arthropods in northern California riparian woodlands. Oecologia 116: 252–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND and Case TJ (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 181–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook AW and Porter SD (1990) Destruction of harvester ant colonies by invading re ants in south-central Texas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Southwestern Naturalist 35: 477–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz CC (1981) Analysis of how ant behaviors affect germination in a tropical myrmecochore Calathea microcephala (P. & E) Koernicke (Marantaceae): microsite selection and aril removal by neotropical ants, Odontomachus, Pachycondyla, and Solenopsis (Formicidae). Oecologia 51: 47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz CC (1991) Light environments, stage structure, and dispersal syndromes of Costa Rican Marantaceae. In: Huxley CR and Cutler DF (eds) Ant–Plant Interactions, pp 463–485. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz CC and Beattie AJ (1980) Ant dispersal of Calathea (Marantaceae) seeds by carnivorous ponerines (Formicidae)in a tropical rain forest. American Journal of Botany 67: 321–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz CC and Schemske DW (1984) Effects of ants and an ant-tended herbivore on seed production of a neotropical herb. Ecology 65: 1369–1378

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz CC and Schemske DW (1986) Seed dispersal of a neotropical myrmecochore–variation in removal rates and dispersal distance. Biotropica 18: 319–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Human KG and Gordon DM (1996) Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species. Oecologia 105: 405–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Human KG and Gordon DM (1997) Effects of Argentine ants on invertebrate biodiversity in Northern California. Conservation Biology 11: 1242–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Human KG, Weiss S, Weiss A, Sandler B and Gordon DM (1998) Effects of abiotic factors on the distribution of the invasive argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environmental Entomology 27: 822–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn GC and Beardsley JW (1996) Effects of Pheidole megacephala (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on survival and dispersal of Dysmicoccus neobrevipes (Homoptera: Psuedococcidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 89: 1124–1129

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaakeh W and Dutcher JD (1992) Foraging preferences of red imported fire ants (Hymneoptera: Formicidae) among three species of summer cover crops and their extracts. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 389–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan I and Eubanks MD (2002) Disruption of cotton aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae)–natural enemy dynamics by red imported re ants. Environmental Entomology 31: 1175–1183

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitching RL (1987) Aspects of the natural history of the lycaenid butterfly Allotinus major in Sulawesi. Journal of Natural History 21: 535–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW and Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 83–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Koptur S (1979) Facultative mutualism between weedy vetches bearing extrafloral nectaries and weedy ants in California. American Journal of Botany 66: 1016–1020

    Google Scholar 

  • Koptur S (1992) Extrafloral nectary-mediated interactions between insects and plants. In: Bernays EA (ed) Insect–Plant Interactions,Vol 4, pp 81–129. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Koptur S and Truong N (1998) Facultative ant-plant interactions:Nectar sugar preferences of introduced pest ant species in South Florida. Biotropica 30: 179–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Krushelnycky PD and Reimer NJ (1998) Bait preference by the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Haleakala National Park, Hawaii. Environmental Entomology 27: 1482–1487

    Google Scholar 

  • Lach L (2003) Invasive ants:unwanted partners in ant-plant interactions? Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90: 91–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza J (1991) Response of re ants (Formicidae: Solenopsis invicta and S. geminata) to arti cial nectars with amino acids. Ecological Entomology 16: 203–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza J, Vargo EL, Pulim S and Chang YZ (1993) Preferences of the fire ants Solenopsis invicta and S. geminata (Hymneoptera: Formicidae) for amino acid and sugar components of extrafloral nectars. Environmental Entomology 22: 411–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen KJ, Vega FE, Moya-Raygoza G and Nault LR (1991) Ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) associated with the leafhopper Dalbulus quinquenotatus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on Gamagrasses in Mexico. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 84: 498–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupin YD (1984) Changes in the native fauna of the Galapagos Islands following invasion by the little red re ant, Wasmannia auropunctata. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 21: 229–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer JD (1985) Recolonization by ant of rehabilitated mineral sand mines on North Stradbroke Island, Queensland, with particular reference to seed removal. Australian Journal of Ecology 10: 31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Markin GP (1970) Foraging behavior of the Argentine ant in a California citrus grove. Journal of Economic Entomology 63: 740–744

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlynn TP (1999) Non-native ants are smaller than related native ants. American Naturalist 154: 690–699

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain DK (1983) Ants,extra floral nectaries,and herbivory on the passion vine Passiflora incarnata. American Midland Naturalist 110: 433–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaud JP and Browning HW (1999) Seasonal abundance of the brown citrus aphid, Toxoptera citricida (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its natural enemies in Puerto Rico. Florida Entomologist 82: 424–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno DS, Haney PB and Luck RF (1987) Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon as barriers to argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) foraging in citrus tress. Journal of Economic Entomology 80: 209–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill WL (1977) Red imported fire ant foraging in a greenhouse. Environmental Entomology 6: 416–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill WL (1978) Red imported fire ant predation on the alfalfa weevil and pea aphid. Journal of Economic Entomology 71: 867–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness JH (2003) Contrasting exotic Solenopsis invicta and native Forelius pruinosus ants as mutualists with Catalpa bignonioides, a native plant. Ecological Entomology 28: 247–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness JH (2004) Forest edges and fire ants alter the seed shadow of an ant-dispersed plant. Oecologia 138: 448–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness JH, Bronstein JL, Andersen AN and Holland JN (2004)Ant body size predicts the dispersal distance of antadapted seeds:implications of small-ant invasions. Ecology 85 (in press)

  • Newell W and Barber TC (1913) The Argentine Ant. Bur. Entomological Bulletin 122: 1–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson JC, Rolph Kay CA, Buschman LL and Whitcomb WH (1977) The presence of Spissistilus festinus as a factor affecting egg predation by ants in soybeans. Florida Entomologist 60: 193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Offenberg J (2001) Balancing between mutualism and exploitation:the symbiotic interaction between Lasius ants and aphids. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 49: 304–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira PS, Rico-Gray V, Diaz-Castelazo C and Castillo-Guevara C (1999) Interactions between ants, extrafloral nectaries, and insect herbivores in Neotropical sand dunes: herbivore deterrence by visiting ants increases fruit set in Opuntia stricta (Cactaceae). Functional Ecology 13: 623–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PA and Sherk CJ (1991) To control mealybugs, stop honeydew-seeking ants. California Agriculture 45: 26–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce NE, Braby MF, Heath A, Lohman DJ, Mathew J, Rand DB and Travassos MA (2002) The ecology and evo lution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annual Review of Entomology 47: 733–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontin AJ (1978) The numbers and distribution of subterranean aphids and their exploitation by the ant Lasius flavus (Fabr.). Ecological Entomology 3: 203–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter SD and Savignano DA (1990) Invasion of polygyne fire ants decimates native ants and disrupts arthropod communities. Ecology 71: 2095–2106

    Google Scholar 

  • Quilichini A and Debussche M (2000) Seed dispersal and germination patterns in a rare Mediterranean island endemic (Anchusa crispa Viv., Boranginaceae). Acta Oecologica 21: 303–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer NJ, Cope ML and Yasuda G (1993) Interference of Pheidole megacephala (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with the biological control of Coccus viridis (Homoptera: Coccidae) in coffee. Environmental Entomology 22: 483–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust MK, Reierson DA, Paine E and Blum LJ (2000) Seasonal activity and bait preferences of the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 17: 201–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW (1980) The evolutionary signi cance of extrafloral nectar production by Costus woodsonii (Zingiberaceae): an experimental analysis of ant production. Journal of Ecology 68: 959–967

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D and Von Holle S (1999) Positive interactions of non-indigenous species:invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1: 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Stechman DH, Volkl W and Stary P (1996) Ant attendance as a critical factor in the biological control of the banana aphid Pentalonia nigronervosa Coq. (Hom.Aphidae) in Oceania. Journal of Applied Entomology 120: 119–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein MB, Thorvilson HG and Johnson JW (1990) Seasonal changes in bait preference by red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera:Formicidae). Florida Entomologist 73: 117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling WL, Jones D and Dean DA (1979) Failure of the red imported fire ant to reduce entomophagous insect and spider abundance in a cotton agroecosystem. Environmental Entomology 8: 976–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyn JJ (1954) The effects of the cosmopolitan brown house ant (Pheidole megacephala F) on citrus red scale (Aonidiella aurantii Mask) at Letaba. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 17: 252–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles JH and Jones RH (2001) Top-down control by the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta). American Midland Naturalist 146: 171–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez AV, Bolger DT and Case TJ (1998) Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in coastal southern California. Ecology 79: 2041–2056

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudd JH and Sudd ME (1985) Seasonal changes in the response of wood ants (Formica lugubris) to sucrose baits. Ecological Entomology 10: 89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedders WL, Reilly CC, Wood BW, Morrison RK and Lofgren CS (1990) Behavior of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in pecan orchards. Environmental Entomology 19: 44–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant LE and Porter SD (1991) Comparison of diets of two fire ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): solid and liquid components. Journal of Entomological Science 26: 450–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA and Case TJ (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 5948–5953

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega SJ and Rust MK (2001) The Argentine ant–a significant invasive species in agricultural, urban and natural environments. Sociobiology 37: 3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson SB and Scarborough TA (1989) Impact of the imported fire ant on laboratory populations of cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii) predators. Florida Entomologist 72: 107–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson SB and Scarborough TA (1991) Interactions between Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Rhopalosiphum maidis (Homoptera: Aphididae), and the parasitoid Lysiphlebus testaceipes Cresson (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 84: 158–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward PS (1987) Distribution of the introduced Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) in natural habitats of the lower Sacramento valley and its effects on the indigenous ant fauna. Hilgardia 55: 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn JO (1984) Mutualism between a cynipid gall wasp and ants. Ecology 65: 654–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Way MJ (1963) Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing Homoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 8: 307–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Way MJ, Javier G and Heong KL (2002) The role of ants, especially the fire ant, Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in the biological control of tropical upland rice pests. Bulletin of Entomological Research 92: 431–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetterer JK (1997) Ants on Cecropia in Hawaii. Biotropica 29: 128–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetterer JK, Miller SE, Wheeler DE, Olson CA, Polhemus DA, Pitts M, Ashton IW, Himler AG, Yospin MM, Helms KR, Harken EL, Gallaher J, Dunning CE, Nelson M, Litsinger J, Southern A and Burgess TL (1999) Ecological dominance by Paratrechina longicornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), an invasive tramp ant, in Biosphere 2. Florida Entomologist 82: 381–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetterer JK, Wetterer AL and Hebard E (2001) Impact of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, on the native ants of Santa Cruz Island, California. Sociobiology 38: 709–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Zettler JA, Spira TP and Allen CR (2001) Ant–seed mutualisms: can red imported re ants sour the relationship? Biological Conservation 101: 249–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Zettler JA, Robinson BA, Allen CR and Spira TP (2003) Ants reduce oviposition success of Gulf Fritillaries on Passiflora incarnata. Abstracts, 88th Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America, Savannah, Georgia

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ness, J., Bronstein, J. The Effects of Invasive Ants on Prospective Ant Mutualists. Biological Invasions 6, 445–461 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BINV.0000041556.88920.dd

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BINV.0000041556.88920.dd

Navigation