Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling of rare plant species richness by landscape variables in an agriculture area in Finland

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multivariate linear regression model is proposed for predicting and mapping rare vascular plant species richness in Finnish agricultural landscapes according to landscape variables. The data used in developing the model were derived from a floristic inventory from 105 0.5 km × 0.5 km grid squares. Using a stepwise multiple regression technique, four landscape variables were found to explain 71.8% of the variability in the number of rare plant species. The results suggest that the local `hotspots' of rare plants (squares with ≥5 rare taxa) are mainly found in heterogeneous river valleys, where extensive semi-natural grasslands and herb-rich forests occur on the steep slopes. According to other similar studies, intermediate human disturbance increases the number of rare species in agricultural landscapes. It appears that empirical models based on landscape variables derived from digital maps can provide relatively accurate surrogates for extensive field surveys and fine-scale observations on the distributions of rare taxa in agricultural landscapes. Potential reasons for the performance of the model and the ecology and habitats of the species concerned are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo, R. V. 1981. Problems in the measurement of evenness in ecology. Oikos 37, 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon, M., Harper, J. L. & Towsend, C. R. 1996. Ecology: individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornette, G. & Amoros, C. 1996. Disturbance regimes and vegetation dynamics: role of floods in riverine wetlands. J. Vege. Sci. 7: 615–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S. T. & Elston, D. A. 1993. Empirical models for the spatial distribution of wildlife. J. Appl. Ecol. 30: 478–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, D. H., Riitters, K. & Orvis. K. 1997. A multi-scale analysis of landscape statistics. Landsc. Ecol. 12: 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Climatological Statistics in Finland 1961- 1990. 1991. Supplement of meteorological yearbook of Finland. Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, 125 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre, M. D. & Rushton, S.P. 1989. Quantification of conservation criteria using invertebrates. J. Appl. Ecol. 26: 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A. 1997. Landscape structure and breeding bird distribution in a sub-Mediterranean agro-ecosystem. Landsc. Ecol. 12: 365–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 632 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Q. & Yang, X. (1997). A relationship between spatial processes and a partial patchiness index in a grassland landscape. Landsc. Ecol. 12: 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K. J. 1994. Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K. J. 1996. Species richness: measure and measurement. Pp. 77–113. In: Gaston, K. J. (ed.), Biodiversity. A biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. 1992. Multivariate data analysis. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 544 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämet-Ahti, L., Suominen, J., Ulvinen, T. & Uotila, P. 1998. Retkeilykasvio (Field Flora of Finland). Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botanical museum, Helsinki, 656 pp. (in Finnish with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen, Risto 1997. Can richness patterns of rarities be predicted from mesoscale atlas data? A case study of vascular plants in the Kevo Reserve. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis A II 96. University of Turku, 1–19.

  • Hill, N. M. & Keddy, P. A. 1992. Prediction of rarities from habitat variables: coastal plain plants on Nova Scotian lakeshores. Ecology 73: 1852–1859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M. A. 1994. Biological diversity. The coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 681 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, I. A. & Fahrig, L. 1997. Response of generalist and specialist insect hebivores to landscape spatial structure. Landsc. Ecol. 12: 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnunen, H., Järveläinen, K., Pakkala, T. & Tiainen, J. 1996. The effect of isolation on the occurence of farmland carabids in a fragmentated landscape. Ann. Zool. Fennici 33: 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolström, M. & Pitkänen, S. 1999. Effects of forest management on alpha diversity of ground vegetation in boreal forests: a model approach. Boreal Environ. Res. 4: 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontula, T., Lehtomaa, L. & Pykälä, J. 1999. Rekijokilaakson maankäytön historia, kasvillisuus ja kasvisto. Finnish Environment, in press. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki (in Finnish with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotiranta, H., Uotila, P., Sulkava, S. & Peltonen, S-L. 1998. Red Data Book of East Fennoscandia. Ministry of the Environment, Finnish Environment Institute, Finnish Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, 351 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C. R. & Usher, M. B. 1981. Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biol. Cons. 21: 79–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarical, K. & Marks, B. J. 1994. Fragstats, spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Version 2.0. Forest Science Department, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 67 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, S. & Lavorel, S. 1994. Predicting richness of native, rare and exotic plants in response to habitat and disturbance variables across a variegated landscape. Cons. Biol. 8: 521–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. I. 1986. Predicting rare plant distribution patterns in the southern Appalachians of the south-eastern U.S.A. J. Biog. 13: 293–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. S., Brooks, R. P. & Croonquist, M. J. 1997. Effects of landscape pattern on biotic communities. Landsc. Ecol. 12: 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natuhara, Y. & Imai, C. 1999. Prediction of species richness of breeding birds by landscape-level factors of urban woods in Osaka prefecture, Japan. Biodiv. Cons. 8: 239–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. O. 1989. How to make biological surveys go further with generalised linear models. Biol. Cons. 50: 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. O. 1991. Examples of the use of Generalised linear models in analysis of survey data for conservation evaluation. Pp. 54–63. In: Margules, C. R. & Austin, M. P. (eds), Nature conservation: Cost effective biological surveys and data analysis. CSIRO, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, C., Grelsson, G., Johansson, M. & Sperens, U. 1988. Can rarity and diversity be predicted in vegetation along river banks? Biol. Cons. 44: 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain biodiversity. BioScience 33: 700–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, S. & Usher, M. B. 1998. Biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: the groud beetle communities of woody uncultivated habitats. Biodiv. Cons. 7: 1549–1561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, J. R., Quinn, R. M., Lawton, J. H., Eversham, B. C. & Gibbons, D.W. 1993. Rare species, the coincidennce of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rassi, P., Kaipiainen, H., Mannerkoski, I. & Stå hls, G. 1992. Uhanalaisten eläinten ja kasvien seurantatoimikunnan mietintö (English abstract: report on the monitoring of threatened animals and plants in Finland). Ministry of Environment, Helsinki.

  • Rossi, E. & Kuitunen, M. 1996. Ranking of habitats for the assesment of ecological impact in land use planning. Biol. Cons. 77: 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmida, A. & Wilson, M. V. 1985. Biological determinants of species diversity. J. Biogeog. 12: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suominen, J. & Hämet-Ahti, L. 1988. Ihmistoiminnan varhaisesta vaikutuksesta Suomen kasvistoon. (Early impact of man on the flora of Finland). Memoranda Societa Fauna Flora Fennica 64: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G. 1989. Landscape Ecology: The Effect of Pattern on Process. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 171–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. S. & Miller, R. I. 1988. Topographic models of vascular plant richness of the southern Appalachian high peaks. J. Ecol. 76: 192–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth, T. 1998. Modelling floristic species richness on a regional scale: a case study in Switzerland. Biodiv. Cons. 7: 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luoto, M. Modelling of rare plant species richness by landscape variables in an agriculture area in Finland. Plant Ecology 149, 157–168 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026531400356

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026531400356

Navigation