Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Race and Marital History as Correlates of Women's Access to Family-Friendly Employee Benefits

  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a nationally representative sample of young women surveyed intermittently since 1968 (N = 2030), this study assessed the effects of race and marital history on access to family-friendly employee benefits between 1978 and 1995. Accounting for such factors as work history, total number of employers for whom the respondent has worked, education level, and number of children, race was found to act as a suppressor variable. White women were found to work for more years for employers providing family-friendly benefits even though Black women worked for more years in full-time jobs. Results suggested that systematic biases relegated Black women to lower-paying full-time jobs without family-friendly benefits more so than was the case for White women. Policy implications regarding affirmative action are discussed. No relationship was found between marital history and access to jobs with family-friendly benefits when taking into account other sociodemographic and employment-related characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldous, J. (1990). Specification and speculation concerning the politics of workplace family policies. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 355-367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. (1997). Parential benefit policies and the gendered division of labor. Social Service Review, 71, 51-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berstein, A. (1997). Inside or outside? The politics of family and medical leave. Policy Studies Journal, 25(1), 87-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenborn, D. (1986). A pro-family workplace. Youth Policy, 10(8), 20-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. D., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (Eds.). (1997). Gender & family issues in the workplace. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, R. K. (1995). Gender and race: Employment opportunity and the American economy, 1969-1991. Families in Society, 76, 239-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, R. K. (1999). Grandmothers and coresident grandchildren. Families in Society, 80, 120-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, R. K. (2000). Trends and correlates of coresidency among Black and White grandmothers and their grandchildren: A panel study, 1967-1992. In B. Hayslip & R. S. Goldberg-Glen (Eds.), Grandparents raising grandchildren: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical perspectives (pp. 351-367). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, R. K., & Dolinsky, A. (1998). Determinants of health care insurance coverage among Afro-American and Anglo-American women. International Association of Management Journal, 10(2), 33-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattan, P. (1998). The effect of working wives on the incidence of poverty. Monthly Labor Review, 121(3), 22-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Human Resource Research. (1997). NLS of young women's users' guide 1997. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Human Resource Research. (1999). NLS handbook 1999. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemerinsky, E. (1997). Making sense of the affirmative action debate. In J. Higham (Ed.), Civil rights & social wrongs (pp. 86-101). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chira, S. (1998). A mother's place: Choosing work and family without guilt or blame. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. A. (1990). 1989 employee benefits address family concerns. Monthly Labor Review, 113(6), 60-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, S. (1995). The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993: A survey of the Act's history, purposes, provisions, and social ramifications. Drake Law Review, 44(1), 51-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, G. E. (Ed.). (1996). The affirmative action debate. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Report of the President. (1998a). Table B-36, p. 324. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Report of the President. (1998b). Table B-39, p. 327. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elison, S. K. (1997). Policy innovation in a cold climate: The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Journal of Family Issues, 18(1), 30-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, H., Henig, J., & Hamnett, C. (1998). Shrinking the state: The political underpinnings of privatization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, M. A., O'Farrell, B., & Allen, L. R. (Eds.). (1991). Work and family: Policies for a changing workforce. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller-Thompson, E., Minkler, M., & Driver, D. (1997). A profile of grandparents raising grandchildren in the United States. The Gerontologist, 37, 406-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, L., & Stepanski, E. J. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayghe, H. V. (1990). Family members in the work force. Monthly Labor Review, 113(3), 14-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayghe, H. V. (1993). Working wives' contributions to family incomes. Monthly Labor Review, 116(8), 39-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedger, D. (1992). Benefits in state and local governments address family concerns. Monthly Labor Review, 115(3), 32-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., & Deich, S. G. (1994). Recent U.S. child care and family legislation in comparative perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 15, 424-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudis, P. M. (1977). Commitment to work and wages: Earnings differences of Black and White women. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 4, 123-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., Essex, M. J., Clark, R., Klein, M. H., & Byrd, J. E. (1996). Parental leave: Policy and research. Journal of Social Issues, 52(3), 91-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, E. E. (Ed.). (1998). Handbook of U.S. Labor Statistics (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Bernan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. A. (Ed.). (1995). Gender inequality at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, C. J. (1997). Women, work, and caregiving: How do these roles affect women's well-being? Journal of Women & Aging, 9(3), 27-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, S. B., & Kahn, A. J. (1981). Child care, family benefits and working parents. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, S. B., & Kahn, A. J. (1987). The responsive workplace: Employers and a changing labor force. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, S. B., & Kahn, A. J. (1989). Family policy: Has the United States learned from Europe? Policy Studies Review, 8, 581-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman S. B., & Kingston, P. W. (1982). Employer responses to the family responsibilities of employees. In S. B. Kamerman & C. D. Hayes (Eds.), Families that work (pp. 144-208). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (1998). Toward understanding family leave policy in public organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22(1), 71-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppelman, A. (1996). Antidiscrimination law & social equality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitan, S. A., & Gallo, F. (1990). Work and family: The impact of legislation. Monthly Labor Review, 113(3), 34-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F. (1998). The new dollars and dreams: American incomes and economic change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrick, J. (1995). The end of affluence: The causes and consequences of America's economic dilemma. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M. R. (1997). Party politics and family policy: The case of the family and medical leave act. Journal of Family Issues, 18(1), 55-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, R. L., & Fogarty, B. A. (1988). Balancing parenthood and employment: Factors affecting company receptiveness to family-related innovations in the workplace. Family Relations, 37, 189-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. H., & Pavalko, E. K. (1996). Family, work, and access to health insurance among mature women. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37, 311-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. A. (1992). Time-off benefits in small establishments. Monthly Labor Review, 115(3), 3-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., & Schmitt, J. (1998). The state of working America, 1998-99 (An Economic Policy Institute Book). Ithaca, NY: IRL Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P. (1992). Women's two roles: A contemporary dilemma. New York: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntaner, C., & Parsons, P. E. (1996). Income, social stratification, class, and private health insurance: A study of the Baltimore metropolitan area. International Journal of Health Services, 26, 655-671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K. S. (1993). Declining fortunes: The withering of the American dream. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. K. (1997). When mothers work: Loving our children without sacrificing our selves. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potuchek, J. L. (1997). Who supports the family? Gender and breadwinning in dualearner marriages. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raabe, P. H., & Gessner, J. C. (1988). Employer family-supportive policies: Diverse variations on the theme. Family Relations, 37, 196-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women's inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, L. S. (1985). Employee benefits and social welfare: Complement and conflict. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 479, 101-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharlach, A. E., & Grosswald, B. (1997). The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Social Service Review, 71, 335-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. (1998). Introduction: What went right? Why the Clinton Administration did not alter the conservative trajectory in federal policy. In C. Y. H. Lo & M. Schwartz (Eds.), Social policy and the conservative agenda. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seccombe, K. (1993). Employer sponsored medical benefits: The influence of occupational characteristics and gender. The Sociological Quarterly, 34, 557-580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seccombe, K., Clarke, L. L., & Coward, R. T. (1994). Discrepancies in employer-sponsored health insurance among Hispanics, Blacks, and Whites: The effects of socio-demographic and employment factors. Inquiry, 31, 221-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, S. (1995). Characteristics of the part-time work force and part-time employee participation in health and pension benefits. Journal of Labor Research, 16, 239-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, N. J. (1992). Black women and White women in the professions. New York: Routeledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (1994). Race and culture: A world view. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (1995). The vision of the anointed: Self-congratulation as a basis for social policy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spain, D., & Bianchi, S. M. (1996). Balancing act: Motherhood, marriage, and employment among American women. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalter-Roth, R. M., & Hartmen, H. I. (1991). Science and politics and the “dual vision” of feminist policy research: The example of family and medical leave. In J. S. Hyde & M. J. Essex (Eds.), Parental leave and child care: Setting a research and policy agenda (pp. 41-65). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (1997). Free markets and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trzcinski, E. (1994). Family and medical leave, contingent employment, and flexibility: A feminist critique of the U.S. approach to work and family policy. Journal of Applied Social Science, 18(1), 71-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor (1993). 20 facts on women workers. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor (1998, August). Employer-sponsored childcare benefits. Issues in Labor Statistics, Summary 98-9. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel, J. (1997). Working mothers then and now: A cross-cohort analysis of the effects of maternity leave on women's pay. In F. D. Blau & R. G. Ehrenberg (Eds.), Gender & family issues in the workplace (pp. 92-126). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, J. (1994). What do working women want? American Demographics, 16(9), 36-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, D. A. (1994). The work and retirement decisions of older women: A literature review. Social Security Bulletin, 57(1), 3-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, J. R. (1990). American families: 75 years of change. Monthly Labor Review, 113(3), 4-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, B. D. (1997). The divorce culture. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiatrowski, W. J. (1988). Comparing employee benefits in the public and private sectors. Monthly Labor Review, 111(12), 3-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiatrowski, W. J. (1990). Family-related benefits in the workplace. Monthly Labor Review, 113(3), 28-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiatrowski, W. J. (1994). Employee benefits for union and nonunion workers. Monthly Labor Review, 117(2), 34-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisendale, S. K. (1997). The White House and Congress on child care and family leave policy: From Carter to Clinton. Policy Studies Journal, 25(1), 75-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O. (1993) Typologies, scales, and class analysis: A comment on Halaby and Weakliem. American Sociological Review, 58, 31-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O., & Cho, D. (1992). The relative probability of class boundaries to cross-class friendships: A comparative study of the United States, Canada, Sweden and Norway. American Sociological Review, 57, 85-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zill, N., & Nord, C. W. (1994). Running in place: How American families are faring in a changing economy and an Individualist Society. Washington, DC: Child Trends.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caputo, R.K. Race and Marital History as Correlates of Women's Access to Family-Friendly Employee Benefits. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 21, 365–385 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026480621340

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026480621340

Navigation