Abstract
The use of the contingent valuation method to generate estimates of existence value for input to cost benefit analysis requires that individuals have utility functions defined over the relevant arguments. The validity of the assumption that the required utility functions generally exist has been questioned. It has been argued that some individuals will respond on the basis of lexicographic preference orderings. It has also been argued that some individuals do not consider that market, or individual willingness to pay, criteria are appropriate where existence value type issues are at stake. The paper considers survey evidence bearing upon these arguments. It is concluded that the evidence is consistent with the view that it is incorrect to proceed on the assumption that individuals generally satisfy the assumptions required for the existence of existence values for use in cost benefit analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABARE (1991), Valuing Conservation in the Kakadu Conservation Zone: Submission to the Resource Assessment Commission, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
Arrow, K., R. Solow, E. Leamer, P. Portney, R. Radner and H. Schuman (1993), 'Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation', Federal RegisterVol. 58, No. 10, pp. 4601–4614, Washington DC.
Bennett, J. W. (1984), 'Using Direct Questioning to Value the Existence Benefits of Preserved Natural Areas', Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 28, 136–152.
Blamey, R. K. (1994), 'Consumer versus Citizen Responses in Environmental Valuation Surveys: Clarification and Empirical Evidence'. Mimeo, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra.
Blamey, R. K., M. Common and J. Quiggin (1995), 'Respondents to Contingent Valuation Surveys: Consumers or Citizens?', Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 39, 263–88.
Blamey, R. K. and M. Common (1994), 'Sustainability and the Limits to Pseudo Market Valuation', in J. C. J. M. van den Bergh and J. van der Straaten, eds, Concepts and Methods for Sustainable Development: Critique and New Approaches, Island Press, New York.
Blamey, R. K. and M. Common (1995), 'Symbols and Attitude Expression in Contingent Valuation Responses', First Conference of the Australia New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics, Coffs Harbour.
Brennan, G. and L. Lomasky (1993), Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J. (1980), Economics and Consumer Behaviour, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Edwards, S. F. (1986), 'Ethical Preferences and the Assessment of Existence Values: Does the Neoclassical Model Fit?', Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 15, 145–159.
Edwards, S. F. (1992), 'Rethinking Existence Values', Land Economics 68, 120–122.
Hanley, N. and Spash, C. (1992), Cost Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
Kirchg¨ assner, G. and W. W. Pommerehne (1993), 'Low-Cost Decisions as a Challenge to Public Choice', Public Choice 77, 107–115.
Mitchell, R. and R. Carson (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington D.C.
Quiggin, J. (1991), 'Referendums and Pseudo-Referendums in Contingent Valuation'. Mimeo, Department of Economics, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra.
Reid, I. (1993), 'An Investigation into the Appropriateness of Consumer Demand Theory as the Basis of Contingent Valuation'. Honours Thesis, School of Resource and Environmental Management, Australian National University, Canberra.
Sagoff, M. (1988), The Economy of the Earth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Spash, C. L. and N. D. Hanley (1995), 'Preferences Information and Biodiversity Preservation', Ecological Economics 12, 191–208
Stevens, T. H., J. Echeverria, R. J. Glass, T. Hager and T. A. More (1991), 'Measuring the Existence Value of Wildlife: What Do CVM Estimates Really Show?', Land Economics 67, 390–400.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Common, M., Reid, I. & Blamey, R. Do Existence Values for Cost Benefit Analysis Exist?. Environmental and Resource Economics 9, 225–238 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026400715300
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026400715300