Abstract
Three main theses are proposed. The first is that the idea of a quantum or minimal unit is not peculiar to quantum theory, since it already occurs in the classical theories of elasticity and electrolysis. Second, the peculiarities of the objects described by quantum theory are the following: their basic laws are probabilistic; some of their properties, such as position and energy, are blunt rather than sharp; two particles that were once together continue to be associated even after becoming spatially separated; and the vacuum has physical properties, so that it is a kind of matter. Third, the orthodox or Copenhagen interpretation of the theory is false, and may conveniently be replaced with a realist (though not classicist) interpretation. Heisenberg's inequality, Schrödinger's cat and Zeno's quantum paradox are discussed in the light of the two rival interpretations. It is also shown that the experiments that falsified Bell's inequality do not refute realism but the classicism inherent in hidden variables theories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballentine, L.E. (ed.): 1988, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics since the Bell Inequalities: Selected Reprints, American Association of Physics Teachers, College Park MD.
Bell, J.S.: 1987, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
Bohm, D.: 1952, ‘A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden Variables”’, Physical Review 85, 166–179; 180–193.
Bohm, D.: 1957, Causality and Chance in Modern Physics, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Bohr, N.: 1958, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, Wiley, New York.
Bridgman, P.W.: 1927, The Logic of Modern Physics, Macmillan, New York.
Bunge, M.: 1959, Causality: The Place of the Causal Principle in Modern Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. Dover reprint, 1979.
Bunge, M.: 1967, Foundations of Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
Bunge, M.: 1973, Philosophy of Physics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston.
Bunge, M.: 1985, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 7, Philosophy of Science and Technology, Part I: Formal and Physical Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston.
Bunge, M. and Kálnay, A.J.: 1983, ‘Solution to Two Paradoxes in the Quantum Theory of Unstable Systems’, Nuovo Cimento 77B, 1–9.
Cini, M.: 1983, ‘Quantum Theory of Measurement Without Quantum Collapse’, Nuovo Cimento 73B, 27–56.
Clauser, J.F. and Shimony, A.: 1978, ‘Bell's Theorem: Experimental Tests and Implications’, Reports of Progress in Theoretical Physics 41, 1881–1927.
de la Peña Auerbach, L.: 1969, ‘New Formulation of Stochastic Theory and Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Mathematical Physics 10, 1620–1630.
d'Espagnat, B.: 1981, A la recherche du réel: Regard d'un physicien, 2nd edn, Gauthier-Villars, Paris.
Einstein, A.: 1948, ‘Quantum Theory and Reality’, Dialectica 2, 32–324.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N.: 1935, ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Reality be Considered Complete?’, Physical Review 47, 777–780.
George, A. (ed.): 1953, Louis de Broglie: Physicien et penseur, Albin Michel, Paris.
Heisenberg, W.: 1958, Physics and Philosophy, Harper & Brothers, New York.
Jammer, M.: 1966, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
Leite-Lopes, J., and Paty, M. (eds): 1977, Quantum Mechanics: A Half Century Later, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston.
Pauli, W.: 1961, Aufsätze und Vorträge über Physik und Erkenntnistheorie, Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig.
Schilpp, P.A. (ed.): 1949, Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, The Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston IL.
von Neumann, J.: 1955 [1932], Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
Wheeler, J.A. and Zurek, W.H. (eds): 1983, Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bunge, M. Twenty-Five Centuries of Quantum Physics: From Pythagoras to Us, and from Subjectivism to Realism. Science & Education 12, 445–466 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025336332476
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025336332476