Skip to main content
Log in

Conflict between two inshore fisheries: for whelk (Buccinum undatum) and brown crab (Cancer pagurus), in the southwest Irish Sea

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landings from the whelk fishery in the southwest Irish Sea rose from 63 t in 1990 to 6587 t in 1996 although landings declined to 2919 tonnes in 1998. Whelk are caught in pots baited with a combination of dogfish Scyliorhinus spp and brown crab Cancer pagurus. The input of bait crab is estimated at 7.2% of whelk landed. Most of the crab comes from southeast Ireland where some of it is a by-product of the claw fishery; some is targeted as bait crab, and this includes sub-size or recently moulted individuals. Fishing effort has been increasing on brown crab for human consumption also and there is concern about the sustainability of the crab fishery. Alternative bait trials examined a number of readily available fish species, some of them offals, whose attractiveness was evaluated by reference to crab and dogfish: whitefish (whiting and cod), pelagic species (mackerel and scad) and blue mussel. An artificial bait ration which included some crab meat, but 60% less than its natural equivalent, proved as effective as natural bait crab. A bait which consisted of a single species was less successful than two species fished together and some of the combinations (notably of whitefish) performed very effectively. Pelagic species performed poorly. The trade in brown crab for human consumption will always produce some form of discards which should be used; extending its use in an artificial bait is desirable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennet, D. B., 1974. The effects of pot immersion on catches of crabs Cancer pagurus L and lobsters Homarus gammarus (L) J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer 35: 332–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, P. C. & R. C. Bayer, 1987. Temporal changes in release rates and quality of lobster (Homarus americanus) feeding attractants from herring (Clupea harengus) baits. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 13: 13–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, A., C. Gilling, G. Hughes, S. J. Hawkins & R. D. M. Nash, 1990. The viability of establishing a whelk fishery in Manx waters. A report submitted to the Isle of Man Government, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, by the University of Liverpool, 73 pp.

  • Fahy, E, E. Masterson, D. Swords & N. Forrest (in press), A second assessment of the whelk fishery in the south west Irish Sea with particular reference to its history of management by size limit.

  • Fahy, E., G. Yalloway & P. Gleeson, 1995. Appraisal of the whelk Buccinum undatum fishery of the southern Irish Sea with proposals for a management strategy Irish Fisheries Investigations B(42): 26 pp.

  • Franco, J.M., A. Bjordal & S. Løkkeborg, 1987. Synergistic effects of different baits on the same hook in the longline fishery for hake (Merluccius merluccius) and torsk (Brosme brosme) ICES C.M.1987/B:39.

  • Hancock, D. A., 1974. Attraction and avoidance in marine invertebrates – their possible role in developing an artificial bait J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer 35(3): 328–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Harada, K., 1989. Feeding attractants for aquatic animals – VI. Attractant structure – activity and application to fishery. Seitai Kagaku/Ecol. Chem. 9(4): 55–69. Canadian translation of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 5518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kideys, A. E., 1991. The ecology of the common whelk, Buccinum undatum L off Douglas, Isle of Man, with particular reference to its ecological energetics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool.

  • Lapointe, V. & B. Sainte-Marie, 1992. Currents, predators and the aggregation of the gastropod Buccinum undatum around bait. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 85: 345–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães-Neto, E. de O., R. H. de Queiroz. & M. Ogawa, 1996. Baits for lobster fishing. I – Tests of acceptance. Arq. Cin. Mar. Fortaleza 30(1/2): 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martel, A., D. H. Larrivée, K. R. Klein & J. H. Himmlman, 1986. Reproductive cycle and seasonal feeding activity of the neogastropod Buccinum undatum. Mar. Biol. 92: 211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuinn, I. H, L. Gendron & J. H. Himmelman, 1988. Area of attraction and effective area fished by a whelk (Buccinum undatum) trap under variable conditions. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 45: 2054–2060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. E. & W. F. van Heukelem, 1988. Threshold levels of crab chemoreception for amino acids and results of field tests using three amino acids as attractants in artificial bait J. Shellfish Res. 7(1): 127

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, T. D. & P. G. Moore, 1992. The behavioural ecology of epibenthic scavenging invertebrates in the Clyde Sea area: laboratory experiments on attractions to bait in moving waters, underwater TV observations in situ and general conclusions Mar. Biol. Ecol. 159: 15–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, K., M. J. Kaiser, P. G. Moore & R. N. Hughes, 1997. Consumption of fisheries discards by benthic scavengers: utilization of energy subsidies in different marine habitats J. anim. Ecol. 66: 884–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainte-Marie, B. 1991. Whelk (Buccinum undatum) movement and its implications for the use of tag-recapture methods for the determination of baited trap fishing parameters Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 48: 751–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Youm, M.-G., Y.-J. Choi, S.-J. Kang, B.-D. Choi & C.-W. Cho, 1990. Attraction activities of fish to the baits – II Identification of chemical attractants for sea eels, Astroconger myriaster, in their natural habitats. Bull. Korean Fish. Tech. Soc. 26(4): 126–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Youm, M.-G., 1991. Catching rate of trap due to the various baits Bull. Korean Fish. Tech. Soc. 27(4): 1–6 83 Appendix 1. Details of bait trials Date Bait GPS co-ordinates Depth Number Soak time trial North South East West (m) of pots (h) 15-Sep-97 Crab /dogfish 52 18 370 52 16 950-6 10 740-6 11 950 28–40 358 48 16-Oct-97 Crab/whitefish 52 18 350 52 16 830-6 11 690-6 12 690 26–38 391 24 25-May-98 Dog/whitefish 52 28 695 52 26 620-6 11 332-6 16 412 16–19 273 24 15-Sep-98 Crab/pelagics 52 26 485 52 24 613-6 12 952-6 14 642 23–28 359 24 16-Sep-98 Dogfish/pelagics 52 26 485 52 24 622-6 13 048-6 14 642 24–28 210 24 23-Nov-98 Crab/mussel 52 28 332 52 27 316-6 14 319-6 15 440 14–18 358 24 25-Nov-98 Dogfish/mussel 52 28 372 52 27 316-6 14 319-6 15 440 15–18 240 24 23-Mar-99 Crab/artificial bait crab 52 26 954 52 23 035-6 15 050-6 16 031 16–19 298 48 14-May-99 Crab & dog/art. crab & dog 52 28 335 52 26 798-6 11 515-6 13 489 13–19 239 24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fahy, E. Conflict between two inshore fisheries: for whelk (Buccinum undatum) and brown crab (Cancer pagurus), in the southwest Irish Sea. Hydrobiologia 465, 73–83 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014544925248

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014544925248

Navigation