Skip to main content
Log in

Toxicity Studies in a Tobacco Industry Biological Treatment Plant

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tobacco industry wastewater contains some toxic contaminantswhich inhibit the microbial consortium in biological treatmentplants. Investigations carried out showed that the most important sources of these toxic contaminants are nicotine,flavoring chemicals containing glycogen and alcohol, absorbableorganic halogens (AOX), and pesticides from tobacco leaves. Shock loadings of these toxic contaminants inhibit the bacterialactivity during biological treatment. Input of wastewater containing such toxic substances causes decreases in bacteria numbers and reduce the treatment efficiency in the treatmentplant. Viable numbers of floc forming, total and faecal coliform bacteria which are living in a biological treatmentunit (i.e. Biopac) were monitored. Conventional short-term bioassays and enrichment toxicity tests were performed to determine potential toxicity. If the ratio of bacteria numbersgrowing in the enrichment medium compared to control is between0.8 and 1.2, it may be assumed that toxic substances are absent.If this ratio exceeds 1.2, it may be assumed that growth stimulating substances are present. If this ratio is below 0.8,this indicates the presence of toxic substances. The results ofenrichment toxicity studies showed that enough nutrients canstimulate the bacterial growth, or known/unknown sources of toxicity can be inhibit the microbial growth. Furthermore, results of chemical coagulation/flocculation test experimentsshowed that chemical treatment is effective at reducing toxicityand is proposed for biological treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhtar, M.: 1993, ‘Utilization of plant origin (tobacco) waste material for the control of plant-parasitic nematods’, Bioresource Technology 46(3), 255–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA-AWWA-WPCF: 1992, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed., Washington D.C., U.S.A.

  • Bick, I. R. C.: 1985, Alkoloids, in the Chemistry of Natural Products, R.H. Thomson (ed.), New York, U.S.A., pp. 298–386.

  • Borgerding, M. F. and Leyden, C.: 1999, Determination of Nicotine in Tobacco, Tobacco Processing Environments and Tobacco Products, Nicotine and related compounds.

  • Chiu-Yang Chen and Jun-Nen Chen: 1999, ‘Toxicity assessment of industrial wastewater by microbial testing method’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 39, 10–11, 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civilini, M., Domenis, C., Sebastianutto, N. and Bertoldi, M.: 1997, ‘Nicotine Decontamination of Tobacco Agro-Industrial Waste and its Degradation by Microorganisms’, Waste Management and Research 15, 349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. B. and Stanley, J.: 1964, ‘Process for Selective Extraction of Alkoloid’, United States Patent, No. 3.319.435.

  • De Lucas, A., Canizares, P., Garcia, M. A., Gomez, J. and Rodrigez, J. F.: 1998, ‘Recovery of nicotine from aqueous extracts of tobacco wastes’, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 37(12), 4783–4791.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFG, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, VCH, Verlagsgessellschaft mbH, D-6940 Weinheim: 1992, Manual of Pesticide Residue Analysis, Vols. 1 and 2, Method S-19, Hans-Peter Thier and Hans Zeumer (eds), Working Group Analysis, ISBN 3-527-27010-8, Federal Republic of Germany, pp. 317–322.

  • Dokuz Eylül University Report: 1994, ‘Increase the Treatment Efficiency in a Tobacco Industry Wastewater Treatment Plant in İzmir’, Turkey’.

  • Dugan, P. R. and Lundgren, D. C.: 1968, ‘Isolation of activated sludge microorganisms’, Appl. Microbiol. 8, 357–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorrod, J. W. and Jacob, P.: 1999, ‘Analytical Determination of Nicotine and Related Compounds and their Metabolites’, Part: Environments and Tobacco Products, ISBN: 0-444-50095-2, Elsevier, 732 p.

  • Gravely, L. E., Geiss, V. L. and Newton, R. P.: 1977, ‘Process for Maximizing the Growth and Nicotine Degrading Activity of Microorganisms’, United States Patent No. 4.011.141.

  • Ireland, M. S., Larson, T. M. and Moring, T. M.: 1980, ‘Nicotine Transfer Process’, United States Patent No. 4.215.706.

  • Kaesler, R. L., Herricks, E. E. and Crossman, J. S.: 1978, Use of Indices of Diversity and Hierarchical Diversity in Stream Surveys, Biological Data in Water Pollution Assessment, Quantitative and Statistical Analysis, ASTM STP 652, K. L. Dickson, Jhon Cairns and J. Livingston (eds), American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 92–112.

  • Lenkey, A. A.: 1989, ‘Nicotine Removal Process and Product Thereby; Mixing with Alkaline Agent in Aerobic Environment’, United States Patent No. 4.848.373.

  • Meher, K. K., Panchwagh, A. M., Rangrass, S. and Gollakota, K. G.: 1995, ‘Biomethanation of Tobacco Waste’, Environmental Pollution 90(2), 199–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf and Eddy: 1991, Wastewater Engineering, Treatment, Disposal and Reuse,3rd ed., McGraw-Hill International Editions.

  • Moghissi, A. A.: 1994, ‘Tobacco Industry’, Editorial, Environment International, V.20, No. 4., pp. 427–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munari, M.: 1986, ‘Quantitative Determination of Nicotine Content in Protein Extracted from Tobacco’, Tobacco Journal International 2, 128–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, W. E. and Browley, P. T.: 1992, Pesticides-Tobacco-Toxicity, Department of Biology and Entomology, NCSU, Web 3–95.

  • Pelezar, M. T. and Chan, E. C. S.: 1972, Laboratory Experiences in Microbiology, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company.

  • Pielou, E. C.: 1975, Ecological Diversity, Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp. 1–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishna, P.: 1986, ‘Studies on the Production of Biogas from Non-edible Oil Cakes’, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. Biochemistry, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincan, J., De Lucas, A., Garcia, M. A., Garcia, A., Alvarez, A. and Carnicer, A.: 1998, ‘Preliminary study on the supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of nicotine from tobacco wastes’, Separation Sciences and Technology 33(3), 411–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T. A., Joiner, B. L. and Ryan, B. F.: 1982, Minitab Manual, The Pennsylvania State University, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. A. and Blume, D. E.: 1981, ‘Quantitation of Major Tobacco Alkaloids by High Performance Liquid Chromatography’, Journal of Chromatography 205, 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, N. I. and Lewis, R. J.: 1989, Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, New York U.S.A., pp. 2486–2487.

  • Simpkin, T. J.: 1988, ‘The diversity of activated sludge microbial communities as described by the fundamental niche concept’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 20, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. and Weaver; W.: 1949, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slabbert, J. L. and Venter, E. A.: 1999, ‘Biological assay for aquatic toxicity testing’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 39(10–11), 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchobanoglous, G. and Eliassen, R.: 1969, ‘The Indirect Cycle of Water Reuse’, Water Wastes Eng. 6(2).

  • Tchobanoglous, G. and Schroeder, E. D.: 1985, Water Quality: Characteristics, Modeling, Modification, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1991, Approved Test Procedures for Organic Chemicals, EPA Method 625(1–19), Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, 45268.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sponza, D.T. Toxicity Studies in a Tobacco Industry Biological Treatment Plant. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 134, 137–164 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014111616875

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014111616875

Navigation