Abstract
Most of the social-psychological literature assumes that prosocial behavior is part of the basic human repertoire and only when certain conditions become unfavorable, will the natural prosocial tendency fail (Latane & Darley, 1970). Only few researchers have addressed the general tendency toward bystanding behavior,2 its relation to perpetrating behavior, trying to overcome it in victimizing scenes by activating the bystander and thereby reducing the potential for victimization (Staub, 1996). The present analysis suggests several psychosocial constructs that can account for bystanding behavior. Several factors (such as length of exposure, fragmentation of the planning and execution of the crime) are highlighted—in order to differentiate between low, middle range and high-level bystanding behavior. Finally, ten examples of bystanding behavior during the Holocaust are presented, suggesting that only a careful analysis of the context and its interaction with the persons involved may help us work through and perhaps prevent the potential negative aspects of bystanding behavior in future criminal acts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality, Harper and Row, New York.
Bagby, J. (2000). Justifications for state bystander intervention statutes: Why crime witnesses should be required to call for help. Indiana Law Rev. 33: 571–591.
Barnett, V. J. (1999). Bystanders: Conscience and Complicity in the Holocaust, Praeger, Westport, CT.
Bar-On, D. (1989). Legacy of Silence: Encounters With Children of the Third Reich, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bar-On, D. (1999). The Indescribable and the Undiscussible: Reconstructing Human Discourse After Trauma, Central European University Press, Budapest, Hungary.
Bar-On, D., and Charny, I. W. (1992). The logic of moral argumentation of children of the Nazi era. Int. J. Group Tens. 22(1): 3–20.
Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Cohen, R. (in press). Silencing objections: Social constructions of indifference. Hum. Rights Rev.
Dressler, J. (2000). Some brief thoughts (mostly negative) about Bad Samaritan laws. Santa Clara Law Rev. 40: 971–989.
Felman, S., and Laub, D. (1992). Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History, Routledge, New York.
Friedlander, S. (1980). When Memories Come Back (in Hebrew), Adam, Jerusalem.
Goldhagen, D. (1997). Hitler's Willing Executioners, A. Knopf, New York.
Hallie, P. (1979). Lest Innocent Blood be Shed: The Story of the Village of Le Chambon and How Goodness Happened There, Harper and Row, New York.
Henry, F. (1984). Victims and Neighbors: A Small Town in Germany Remembered, Bergin and Garvey, South Hadley, MA.
Hilberg, R. (1985). The Destruction of European Jews, Holmes and Meier, New York.
Hofling, C. K., Brotzman, E., Dalrymple, S., Graves, N., and Pierce, C. (1966). An experimental study of nurse-physician relations. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 143: 171–180.
Langer, L. (1992). Holocaust Testimonies: Ruins of Memory, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Latane, B., and Darley, J. (1970). The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't he Help? AppeltonCenturyCrofts, New York.
Lerner, M. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior. J. Soc. Iss. 31(3): 1–19.
Levine, M. (1999). Rethinking bystander nonintervention: Social categorization and the evidence of the witnesses and the James Bulger murder trial. Hum. Rel. 52: 1133–1155.
Lifton, R. J. (1986). The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide, Basic Books, New York.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View, Harper and Row, New York.
Miller, J. (1990). One be One, by One, Touchstone, New York.
Nahmod, S. (1999). The duty to rescue and the exodus metanarrative of the Jewish law. Arizona J. Int. Comp. Law 126: 751–773.
Nisbett, R. E., and Ross, M. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Oliner, S., and Oliner, P. (1988). The Altruistic Personality, Free Press, New York.
Opotow, S. (2001). Reconciliation in times of impunity: Challenges for social justice. Soc. Just. Res. 14(2): xxx-xxx.
Pardun, J. T. (1998). Comment: Good Samaritan laws: A global perspective. Loyala of Los Angeles Int. Comp. Law J. 40: 591–609.
Patterson, D. (1996). When Learned Men Murder: Essays on the Essence of Higher Education, Phi Delta Alpha Educational Foundation, Bloomington, IN.
Rittner, C., Smith, S. D., and Steinfeldt, I. (2000). The Holocaust and the Christian World, Kuperard, London.
Rubin, J. (1985). Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts: A Social Psychological Analysis, Springer, New York.
Rummel, R. J. (1992). Power kills. Absolute power kills absolutely. Internet Holoc. Genoc. 38: 1–12.
Searle, J. (1970). Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, London.
Staub, E. (1989). The Roots of Evil: The Origin of Genocide and Other Group Violence, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Staub, E. (1996). Activating the bystander, helping victims and the creation of caring. J. Peace Psychol. 2(3): 189–200.
Tec, N. (1986). When Light Pierces Darkness, Oxford University Press, New York.
Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., and McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20(5): 454–463.
Wiesel, E. (1977). Freedom of conscience: A Jewish commentary. J. Ecumen. Stud. 14: 638–649.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bar-On, D. The Bystander in Relation to the Victim and the Perpetrator: Today and During the Holocaust. Social Justice Research 14, 125–148 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012836918635
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012836918635