Abstract
In a national study of juvenile correctional facilities, the perceived environment of 22 juvenile boot camps was compared to the perceived environment of 22 traditional facilities. Self-report surveys completed by 4,121 juveniles recorded information on demographics, risk factors, and perceptions of the facility's environment. Compared to juveniles in traditional correctional facilities, boot camp residents consistently perceived the environment as significantly more controlled, active, and structured, and as having less danger from other residents. Boot camp juveniles also perceived the environment as providing more therapeutic and transitional programming. Overall, from the perspective of the juveniles, boot camps appear to provide a more positive environment conducive to effective rehabilitation considering almost allof the conditions measured. A major concern is that in both types of facilities, juveniles perceived themselves to occasionally be in danger from staff (rated as rarely to sometimes).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ajdukovic, D. (1990). Psychosocial climate in correctional institutions: Which attributes describe it? Environment and Behavior, 22, 420-432.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen F. T (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
Bottcher, J., Isorena, T., & Belnas, M. (1996). LEAD: A boot camp and intensive parole program: An impact evaluation, second year findings. State of California, Department of the Youth Authority, Research Division.
Clawson, H., Coolbaugh, K., & Zamberlan, C. (1998). Further evaluation of Cleveland's juvenile boot camp: A summary report. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, D.C.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cowles, E.,& Castellano, T. (1995). “Boot camp”drug treatment and aftercare intervention: An evaluation review (NCJ 153918). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 397-334.
Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (1989). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: Reconsidering the “nothing works” debate. In L. Goodstein & D. MacKenzie (eds.), The American prison: Issues in research and policy. New York: Plenum Press.
Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (1994). The correctional program evaluation inventory. Unpublished Manuscript, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Gendreau, P., & Goggin, C. (1997). Correctional treatment: Accomplishments and realities. In P. Van-Voorhis, M. Braswell, & D. Lester (Eds.), Correctional counseling and rehabilitation. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Paprozzi, M. (1996). A review of research for practitioners. Federal Probation, 60, 64-70.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 401-433.
Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. (1987). Revivication of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4, 349-408.
Gimbel, C., & Clawson, H. (1998). Further evaluation of Cleveland juvenile boot camp. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the American Society of Criminology, Washington, D.C.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Chicago: Aldine.
Johnson, G., & Hunter, R. M. (1995). Evaluation of specialized drug offender program. In R. R. Ross & B. Ross (eds.), Thinking Straight. Ottawa: Cognitive Center.
Johnson, R., & Toch, H. (1982). The pains of imprisonment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Knott, C. (1995). The STOP programme: Reasoning and rehabilitation in a British setting. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing re-offending: Guidelines from research and practice. New York: Wiley.
Lipsey, M. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. Cook et al. (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lipton, D., & Pearson, F. S. (1996). The CDATE Project: Reviewing research on the effectiveness of treatment programs for adult and juvenile offenders. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, Illinois.
Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., & Swan, E. S. (1996). Review of outcome data with MRT: Seven year recidivism results. Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Review, 5, 1-7.
Logan, C. H. (1993). Criminal justice performance measure for prisons. In Performance measures for the criminal justice system (pp. 19-60). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Lutze, F. (1998). Are shock incarceration programs more rehabilitative than traditional prisons? A survey of inmates. Justice Quarterly, 15, 547-556.
MacKenzie, D. L. (1997). Criminal justice and crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter, & S. Bushway (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works? What doesn't? What's promising? (pp. 9-1-9-76) Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
MacKenzie, D. L., & Brame, R. (1995). Shock incarceration and positive adjustment during community supervision. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 111-142.
MacKenzie, D. L., Brame, R., McDowall, D., & Souryal, C. (1995). Boot camp prisons and recidivism in eight states. Criminology, 33, 327-357.
MacKenzie, D. L., & Hebert, E. E. (1996). Correctional boot camps: A tough intermediate sanction. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
MacKenzie, D. L., & Parent, D. (1992). Boot camp prisons for young offenders. In J. Byrne, A. Lurigio, and J. Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 103-122). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
MacKenzie, D. L., & Souryal, C. (1995). A “Machiavellian” perspective on the development of boot camp prisons: A debate. University of Chicago Roundtable.
MacKenzie, D. L., Styve, G. J., & Gover, A. R. (1998). Performance based standards for juvenile corrections. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 28-35.
Marlowee, D. H., Marin, J. A., Schneider, L. I., Vaitkus, M. A., & Bartone, P. (1988). A look at Army Training Centers' TheHuman Dimensions of Leadership and Training. Washington, DC: Department of Military Psychiatry, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.
Meachum, L. M. (1990). Boot camp prisons: Pros and cons. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Society of Criminology, Baltimore, Maryland.
Moos, R. H. (1971). Differential effects of the social climates of correctional institutions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 7, 71-82.
Moos, R. H. (1974). Correctional Institutions Environment Scale manual. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychological Press.
Morash, M. & Rucker, L. (1990). A critical look at the ideal of boot camp as a correctional reform. Crime and Delinquency, 36, 204-222.
Peters, M. (1996a). Evaluation of the impact of boot camp for juvenile offenders: Cleveland interim report. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Peters, M. (1996b). Evaluation of the impact of boot camp for juvenile offenders: Denver interim report. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Peters, M. (1996c). Evaluation of the impact of boot camp for juvenile offenders: Mobile interim report. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Raupp, E. (1978). Toward positive leadership for initial entry training. A report to the task force on initial entry training leadership. Fort Monroe, VA: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command.
Steinhart, D. (1993, January/February). Juvenile boot camps: Clinton may rev up and old drill. Youth Today.
Wright, K. N. (1985). Developing the Prison Environment Inventory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 257-277.
Wright, K. N. (1991). A study of individual, environmental, and interactive effects in explaining adjustment to prison. Justice Quarterly, 8, 217-242.
Wright, K. N., & Goodstein, L. (1989). Correctional environments. In L. Goodstein & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.), The American prison: Issues in research and policy. New York: Plenum Press.
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons (1993). Prison social climate survey: staff version and resident version. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (1994). Conditions of confinement: Juvenile detention and correctional facilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Zachariah, J. K. (1996). An overview of boot camp goals, components and results. In D. MacKenzie & E. Hebert (Eds.), Correctional boot camps: A tough intermediate sanction. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Zamble, E., & Porporino, F. (1990). Coping, imprisonment and rehabilitation: Some data and their implications. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 53-70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Styve, G.J., MacKenzie, D.L., Gover, A.R. et al. Perceived Conditions of Confinement: A National Evaluation of Juvenile Boot Camps and Traditional Facilities. Law Hum Behav 24, 297–308 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005532004014
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005532004014