Skip to main content
Log in

Audit Failure and the Crisis of Auditing

  • Articles
  • Published:
European Business Organization Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Legislators have been using audit and financial crises as excuses to introduce additional regulation into an industry that is already over-regulated. This practice is questioned here because of the ability of the free market to punish audit failures, the dynamism shown by participants in relation to the voluntary adoption of new self-regulatory policies and the high costs and dubious effectiveness of the new regulations adopted. A more prudent approach that would give the market time to discover the efficient mix of services, quality safeguards and firm structures is advised. Current regulatory tendencies, the main element of which is mandatory auditing, risk condemning financial auditing to triviality and increasingly ineffective regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arruñada, Benito. 1999a. The Economics of Audit Quality: Private Incentives and the Regulation of Audit and Non-Audit Services. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arruñada, Benito. 1999b. ‘The Provision of Non-Audit Services by Auditors: Let the Market Evolve and Decide’. International Review of Law and Economics 19: 513–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arruñada, Benito. 2000. ‘Audit Quality: Attributes, Private Safeguards and the Role of Regulation’. The European Accounting Review 9: 205–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arruñada, Benito. and Cándido Paz-Ares. 1997. ‘Mandatory Rotation of Company Auditors: A Critical Examination’. International Review of Law and Economics 17: 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demski, Joel S. 2003. ‘Corporate Conflicts of Interest’. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 17: 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. 2004. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on statutory audit of annual accounts and consolidated accounts and amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC, Brussels, 16 March 2004, COM (2004) 177 final, available at: <http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/company/audit/index.htm>, last visited on 18 July 2004.

  • Jensen, Michael C. and William H. Meckling. 1976. ‘Theory of Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, Jo Lynne and Stephen C. Del Vecchio. 2004. ‘Ripple Effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’. The CPA Journal 74: 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • US General Accounting Office. 2003. Public Accounting Firms: Mandated Study on Consolidation and Competition, Report to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the House Committee on Financial Services, Washington DC, July 2003, available at: <http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-03-864>, last visited on 18 July 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benito Arruñada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arruñada, B. Audit Failure and the Crisis of Auditing. Eur Bus Org Law Rev 5, 635–643 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752904006354

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752904006354

Keywords

Navigation