Abstract
The purpose of this study was to look at both the impact of workplace pregnancy and post-partum discrimination on women as well as the way in which these women negotiated their perceived discrimination. This research was an exploratory study that used qualitative data analysis. Twenty-one women who were part of parent list serves in the New York metro area who self-identified as having experienced pregnancy or post-partum discrimination were interviewed. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Though many of the interviewees were aware of laws designed to protect them, most of the women reported that they felt that seeking legal recourse would ruin their careers and were worried about supporting their families. Many found new jobs after the discrimination or transferred within large companies. All reported feeling betrayed by the discrimination, noting that they felt they had had relationships with their employers and that they did not see the discrimination coming. This analysis suggests that during this vulnerable time, expecting women to bear the onus of reporting their discrimination is a hardship and both stronger oversight for existing laws and new laws to better protect women having children are needed. Findings from this study can also be used to inform policy advocacy designed to improve the treatment of pregnant and post-partum women in both organizational and government policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A Better Balance (2016). Pregnant Workers Fairness. Retrieved from https://www.abetterbalance.org/our-campaigns/pregnant-workers-fairness/.
Americans with Disabilities Amendments of Act 2008, P.L. 110-325, S. 3406.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017). Employment status of mothers with own children under 3 years old by single year of age of youngest child and marital status, 2015-2016 annual averages. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved from at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/famee.t06.htm.
California Assembly Bill 5 (2020). Retrieved from https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB5.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8), 139–167 Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8.
Cunningham, J., & Macan, T. (2007). Effects of applicant pregnancy on hiring decisions and interview ratings. Sex Roles, 57(7–8), 497–508.
Engel, D. (2016). The myth of the litigious society: why we don’t sue. By David Engel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Epifanio, M. S., Genna, V., De Luca, C., Roccella, M., & La Grutta, S. (2015). Paternal and maternal transition to parenthood: the risk of postpartum depression and parenting stress. Pediatric reports, 7(2), 5872. https://doi.org/10.4081/pr.2015.5872.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2015). Enforcement guidance: pregnancy discrimination and related issues. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/pregnancy_guidance.cfm#IC.
Fox, A. B., & Quinn, D. M. (2015). Pregnant women at work: the role of stigma in predicting women’s intended exit from the workforce. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(2), 226–242.
Kira, I. A., Omidy, A. Z., Fawzi, M., Rice, K. G., Fawzi, M., Lewandowski, L., & Bujold-Bugeaud, M. (2015). Are the negative mental health effects of gender discrimination (GD) salient across cultures? Does self-esteem mediate these effects: GD as a continuous traumatic stress and the pathways to its negative dynamics? Psychology, 6(01), 93–116.
Little, L. M., Smith, M. V., Hinojosa, A. S., & Nelson, D. L. (2015). Professional image maintenance: how women navigate pregnancy in the workforce. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 8–37.
Mäkelä, L. (2012). A narrative approach to pregnancy-related discrimination and leader-follower relationships. Gender, Work and Organization, 19(6), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00544.x.
Masser, B., Grass, K., & Nesic, M. (2007). ‘We like you, but we don’t want you’—the impact of pregnancy in the workplace. Sex Roles, 57(9/10), 703–712.
Morgan, W. B., Walker, S. S., Hebl, M. M., & King, E. B. (2013). A field experiment: reducing interpersonal discrimination toward pregnant job applicants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 799–809.
National Partnership for Women and Children (2016). By the Numbers: Women Continue to Face Pregnancy Discrimination in the Workplace An Analysis of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Charges (Fiscal Years 2011–2015). Retrieved from http://www.nationalpartnership.org/research-library/workplace-fairness/pregnancy-discrimination/by-the-numbers-women-continue-to-face-pregnancy-discrimination-in-the-workplace.pdf.
National Women’s Law Center and a Better Balance (2013). It shouldn’t be a heavy lift: fair treatment for pregnant workers. Available on-line at http://www.nwlc.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/pregnant_workers.pdf.
Nedelsky, J. (2011). Laws relations: a relational theory of self, autonomy, and law. United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Nedelsky, J. (2012). Relations of freedom and law’s relations. Politics & Gender, 8(2), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X12000219.
Padgett, D. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), P.L. 95-555, 92 Stat. 2076 (October 31, 1978).
Saldana, J., Leavy, P. & Beretvas, N. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com.
Scheiber, N. & Conger, K. (2019). Uber and Lyft drivers gain labor clout, with help from an app. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/business/uber-lyft-drivers.html.
Strier, R. (2007). Anti-oppressive research in social work: a preliminary definition. The British Journal of Social Work, 37, 857–871.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2019). Pregnancy Discrimination Charges.
Wofford, C.B. (2017). The effect of gender and relational distance on plaintiff decision making in the litigation process. 51 Law & Doc’y Rev. 966.
Wolf, E. J., & Schnurr, P. P. (2016). Developing comprehensive models of the effects of stress and trauma on biology, brain, behavior, and body. Biological Psychiatry, 80(1), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.04.016.
Young V. UPS, 135 S. Ct. 1338 (2015); 2015 U.S. Lexis 2121 (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
There were no conflicts of interest. I received a small Adelphi University grant after I had completed the interviews and the transcription to reimburse my expenses.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palley, E. Pregnancy and Post-partum Discrimination: Voices of Survivors. J of Pol Practice & Research 1, 55–76 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42972-020-00005-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42972-020-00005-y