Abstract
Collaborative science brings together diverse stakeholders to share knowledge and form networks that in turn can be foundational to policies and practices to increase socio-ecological resilience. In this article, we present results from a collaborative science project that employed collaborative learning methods to develop a network of local, regional, state and academic stakeholders. These stakeholders had little social interaction prior to the project and represented a diversity of views, positions and responsibilities. They shared in common a concern for the effects of climate change on a coastal socio-ecological system and the desire to reduce vulnerabilities and enhance resilience. Through ethnographic and survey methods, we found that collaborative science and learning promoted the exchange of cultural and environmental knowledge and expertise among individuals who previously had no sustained interaction. Stakeholders perceived these exchanges as worthwhile in that they allowed individuals to express viewpoints and share knowledge and expertise, which was seen to have the potential to increase socio-ecological resilience. Our results suggest that social networks can emerge from collaborative science and learning projects and can become formally organized and help foster opportunities to enhance socio-ecological resilience.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Maryland’s Department of Natural Resources’ Maryland Coastal Atlas provides detailed maps indicating shoreline erosion via shoreline change between 1841 and 1999. http://gisapps.dnr.state.md.us/coastalatlas/iMap-master/basicviewer/index.html.
The ICRA was funded by Maryland Sea Grant (SA72581450-N).
This research is funded by the NOAA Coastal and Ocean Climate Adaptations Program (COCA) (NA17OAR4310248).
References
Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström J (2005) Social–ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309(5737):1036–1039
Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environ Change 15:77–86
Barnes ML, Bodin Ö, Guerrero AM, McAllister RJ, Alexander SM, Robins G (2017) The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 22(4):16
Bodin O, Ramirez-Sanchez S, Ernstson H, Prell C (2011) A social relational approach to natural resource governance. In: Bodin O, Prell C (eds) Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–28
Boesch DF, Atkinson LP, Boicourt WC, Boon JD, Cahoon DR, Dalrymple RA et al (2013) Updating Maryland’s sea-level rise projections: special report of the Scientific and Technical Working Group to the Maryland Climate Change Commission. University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, p 22
Carpenter SR, Arrow KJ, Barrett S, Biggs R, Brock WA, Crépin A et al (2012) General resilience to cope with extreme events. Sustainability 4(12):3248–3259
Chapin FS, Knapp CN (2015) Sense of place: a process for identifying and negotiating potentially contested visions of sustainability. Environ Sci Policy 53:38–46
Church JA, White NJ (2011) Sea-level rise from the late 19th to the early 21st century. Surv Geophys 32(4–5):585–602
Church JA, Clark PU, Cazenave A, Gregory JM, Jevrejeva S, Levermann A, Merrifield MA, Milne GA, Nerem RS, Nunn PD, Payne AJ, Pfeffer WT, Stammer D, Unnikrishnan AS (2013) Sea level change. In: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Crona B, Hubacek K (2010) Social network analysis in natural resource governance. Ecol Soc 15(4)
Crona B, Ernstson H, Prell C, Reed M, Hubacek K (2011) Combining social-network approaches with social theories to improve understanding of natural resource governance. In: Bodin O, Prell C (eds) Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 44–72
Cvitanovic C, Cunningham R, Dowd A-M, Howden M, van Putten EI (2017) Using social network analysis to monitor and assess the effectiveness of knowledge brokers at connecting scientists and decision-makers: an Australian case study. Environ Policy Gov 27:256–269
Daniels SE, Walker GB (2001) Working through environmental conflict: the collaborative learning approach. Praeger Publishers, Westport CT
Feurt CB (2008) Collaborative learning guide for ecosystem management. Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology (CICEET)
Ford JD, Smit B, Wandel J, MacDonald J (2006) Vulnerability to climate change in Igloolik, Nunavut: what we can learn from the past and present. Polar Rec 42(2):127–138
Forester J (2018) Ecological wisdom through deliberative improvisation: theory and practice in challenging cases. J Urban Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.04.003
Freeman Linton (1979) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1:215–239
Hay JE, Forbes DL, Mimura N (2013) Understanding and managing global change in small islands. Sustain Sci 8(3):303–308
Innes Judith E (1995) Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice. J Plan Educ Res 14:183–189
Johnson Katherine J (2016) Doctoral dissertation. Resilience to climate change: an ethnographic approach. University of Maryland, College Park
Johnson KJ, Needelman BA, Paolisso M (2017) Vulnerability and resilience to climate change in a rural coastal community. In: Responses to disasters and climate change (vol 5, No 14). Routledge in association with GSE Research, pp 5–14
Johnson KJ, Feurt C, Paolisso M (2018) Collaborative science and learning as tools for climate change adaptation planning. Int J Clim Change Impacts Responses 10(1). http://on-climate.com
Lazrus H (2012) Sea change: island communities and climate change. Annu Rev Anthropol 41:285–301
Maclean K, Cuthill M, Ross H (2014) Six attributes of social resilience. J Environ Plan Manag 57(1):144–156
Maryland Department of Natural Resources (2008) Somerset County, Maryland: Rising Sea Level Guidance. http://maryland.coastsmart.org/wp-content/themes/checkmate/documents/SomersetSLRGuidance.pdf. Accessed 17 Sept 2012
Masterson VA, Stedman RC, Enqvist J, Tengö M, Giusti M, Wahl D, Svedin U (2017) The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: a review and research agenda. Ecol Soc 22(1):49
Moser SC, Davidson MA, Kirshen P, Mulvaney P, Murley JF, Neumann JE, Petes L, Reed D (2014) Ch. 25: Coastal Zone Development and Ecosystems. In: Melillo JM, Terese TC, Richmond, Yohe GW (eds) Climate change impacts in the United States: the Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, pp 579–618. https://doi.org/10.7930/j0ms3qnw
Najjar RG, Pyke CR, Adams MB, Breitburg D, Hershner C, Kemp M et al (2010) Potential climate-change impacts on the Chesapeake Bay. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 86(1):1–20
Needelman B, Paolisso M, Land S, Leisnham P, Baldwin A, Johnson K, Wainger L, McMurray A, Dindinger J (2015) Integrating socio-ecological research and collaborative learning to promote Marsh and community resilience: final project report 9/1/12-6/30/15. College Park, MD
NOAA Science Collaborative Project Stakeholder Interviews (2014) Semi-structured interviews conducted by Katherine Johnson. Project Data Archive Files
NOAA Science Collaborative Project Workshop January (2016) Stakeholder workshop notes. Project Data Archive Files
Prell Christina, Hubacek Klaus, Reed Mark (2009) Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 22(6):501–518
Prell C, Reed M, Racin L, Hubacek K (2010) Competing structure, competing views: the role of formal and informal social structures in shaping stakeholder perceptions. Ecol Soc 15(4):34
Qualtrics (2015 [2005]) Provo, UT (USA) Software platform hosted and used with permission from 2015 to 2016 through the University of Maryland, College Park. http://www.qualtrics.com
Ross H, Cuthill M, Maclean K, Jansen D, Witt B (2010) Understanding, enhancing and managing for social resilience at the regional scale: opportunities in North Queensland. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004
Susskind L, Camacho AE, Schenk T (2012) A critical assessment of collaborative adaptive management in practice. J Appl Ecol 2012(49):47–51
Titus JG, Anderson KE, Cahoon DR, Gesch DB, Gill SK, Gutierrez BT, Thieler ER, Williams SJ (2009) Coastal sensitivity to sea level rise: a focus on the mid-Atlantic Region (U.S. Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.1)
U.S. Census Bureau (2015) American FactFinder—results. Community facts. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=CF. Accessed 17 Sept 2012
Wainger L, McMurray A, Paolisso M, Johnson K, Needelman B (2017) Coastal community values for Marsh-dependent socioecological services revealed through a systematic qualitative approach. Agric Resour Econ Rev 46(2):338–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2017.15
Yin J, Griffies SM, Stouffer RJ (2010) Spatial variability of sea level rise in twenty-first century projections. J Clim 23(17):4585–4607
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Estuarine Research Reserve Science Collaborative Program (Grant Number: 018245-001). In addition, we would like to thank project stakeholders for the time they graciously offered to be a part of this collaboration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paolisso, M., Prell, C., Johnson, K.J. et al. Enhancing socio-ecological resilience in coastal regions through collaborative science, knowledge exchange and social networks: a case study of the Deal Island Peninsula, USA. Socio Ecol Pract Res 1, 109–123 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-019-00010-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-019-00010-w