Abstract
Cristina Lafont has written a searching and thought-provoking philosophical work on the nature of deliberation in modern democracy. Much of the book is a critique of recent efforts to ground the activity of deliberation in democracy in the light of two sobering and challenging obstacles to the implementation of deliberative democracy in modern society. One challenge arises from the observation of the pluralism of opinion and value in modern democracy. Good faith disagreement on principles and values is wide ranging in modern societies and seems to undermine most kinds of consensus aside from the most abstract agreement. A second challenge arises from the division of labor in society and stems from the observation that citizens are often quite ignorant of politics in modern society. They often seem to base their decisions on slim grounds. In what follows, I cannot pretend to do justice to this rich and engrossing book. I will discuss the central concepts of self-government and blind deference first and point to a difficulty that I think lies at the heart of Lafont’s approach. I will then discuss her arguments against deep pluralism and suggest how I think they miss the target and how I think one ought to reply fully to pluralism. I will also take up her arguments against lottocracy, which I think are good ones. But I will argue that they are not sufficient to demonstrate why we should not be lottocrats. I will then conclude with some remarks about what is necessary to respond to the problems lottocracy is meant to respond to.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Bartels L (2010) Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Christiano T (1996) The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. Westview Press, Boulder
Christiano T (2008) The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Christiano T (2012) Rational Deliberation among Experts and Citizens. In: Mansbridge J, Parkinson J (eds) Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Christiano T (2019) Democracy, Participation and Information: Complementarity between Political and Economic Institutions. San Diego Law Rev 56
Downs A (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row, New York
Fishkin J (2019) Democracy When The People Are Thinking. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gilens M (2014) Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Guerrero A (2014) Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative. Philos & Public Aff 42:135–178
Lafont C (2020) Democracy without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lupia A (2016) Uninformed: Why People Know So Little About Politics And What We Can Do About It. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rawls J (2001) The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Somin I (2014) Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Walzer M (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Basic Books, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christiano, T. The Possibility of Democratic Participation. Jus Cogens 2, 101–110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-020-00020-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-020-00020-3