Influence of organic inputs with mineral fertilizer on maize yield and soil microbial biomass dynamics in different seasons in a tropical acrisol

The practice of co-applying chemical fertilizers (CF) with organic inputs (OIs) as a soil amendment is still low in Ghana, although it has the potential to improve crop yield and soil productivity. In a two-year study, we evaluated the effects of co-applying contrasting OIs with and without CF on maize yield and soil chemical and microbial composition. Aboveground biomasses of Centrosema pubescens (CEN), Pueraria phaseoloides (PUE), and Zea mays (MZE) were amended to an acrisol at 4 t ha−1 season−1. The combined treatments (CEN+, PUE+, and MZE+) were fertilized with basal NPK 15:15:15 at 40 kg N ha−1, followed by topdressing with [(NH4)2SO4] at 50 kg N ha−1. Sole OI inputs (CEN, PUE, and MZE) did not receive any CF inputs. The controls (CON− and CON+) received 0 and 90 kg N ha−1 season−1. The results showed that either sole OIs except for MZE or its combination with CF improved grain yield compared to the CON. Grain yield ranged from 2.1 t ha−1 to 2.6 t ha−1 in the first season versus 0.8 t ha−1 to 1.7 t ha−1 in the second. The MZE+ and CEN+ treatments showed the highest mean grain yields and were similar to CON+. Although CF addition to OIs improved grain yield in all treatments, negative interaction was observed for CEN and PUE as opposed to a positive interaction in the MZE treatment. Co-application of CF with OIs on dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen (DOC) and (EON) dynamics depended on seasonal soil moisture and sampling time. Moreover, co-application of CF with OIs enhanced microbial biomass in CEN but showed minimal and suppressive effects on MZE and PUE amendments, respectively. Overall, the increased grain yield in MZE+, CEN+ and CON+ was attributable primarily to the CF addition. Thus, long term evaluations are recommended for sustainable utilization of MZE and CEN given their minimal responses in the short term in the presence of CFs.


Introduction
The use of organic input (OI) resources for soil productivity management in small-scale farm holdings remains a promising alternative to chemical fertilizers (CF) in Ghana. This is because, prices of CFs is high for an average Ghanaian farmer, even though it continues to be the most widely used fertilization input in the country. Hence, most farmers are compelled to continuously apply CFs at significantly low application rates (Omari et al. 2017), partly resulting in significant low soil fertility levels.
The use of OI as a soil amendment is still low in Ghana, although most farmers recognize its benefits to soils (Boakye-Danquah et al. 2014;Omari et al. 2018a). While farmers' knowledge of OI management is low, the challenge of organic resource availability in some localities and drudgery associated with its application lingers (Omari et al. 2018a). Sole OI applications are unable to meet the timely crop nutrient needs (Gentile et al. 2008), although numerous studies have strongly asserted its significant contributions to the success of the green revolution in Africa (Vanlauwe et al. 2010;Chivenge et al. 2011a). Moreover, the effects of OIs on crop yield might change according to the climate, soil type or season in which they are applied (Ge et al. 2010;Abera et al. 2012;Wei et al. 2016). A practical strategy is to co-apply OI with CFs (Kanonge et al. 2015;Vanlauwe et al. 2010;Yang et al. 2015), amidst the challenge of organic resource availability coupled with farmers' inability to quantify the recommended fertilization rates. The combined application of CFs with OIs is known to supply the immediate and subsequent crop nutrient needs with improvement in overall soil productivity (Chivenge et al. 2011a). Additionally, the burden on farmers in the purchase of CFs may be reduced.
However, till date, most OIs have not been well explored as potential soil amendments (Asante et al. 2017), and studies in that regard have often been sole OI applications with utmost emphasis on crop yield. For example, few reports exist on the use of Centrosema pubescens Benth., a ubiquitous weed resource in Ghana as a soil amendment. Additionally, such soil-related trials have predominantly been based on the resultant soil nutrient contents with limited information on soil microbial dynamics, which play a useful role in soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition, nitrogen (N) cycling and soil aggregates formation (Kamaa et al. 2011). In this respect, results of such studies which primarily focus on the above and below-ground plant parameters in separate experiments may appear less convincing in the quest to recommend potential OIs to farmers to improve soil fertility.
It is well recognized that soil microbial composition plays an active role in soil N dynamics. The availability of N from OIs will depend on the existence and activities of microbial organisms. For example, fungi and bacteria are known to exhibit different N demands and thereby influence the decomposition of various organic materials (Keiblinger et al. 2010;Sinsabaugh et al. 2010). Additionally, studies elsewhere have shown that fertilization regimes influence soil bacterial populations (Shen et al. 2010;Kamaa et al. 2011). In both studies, it was reported that bacterial community structure in chemical fertilization treatment was significantly smaller compared to organic manure or organic manure plus CF treatments. Moreover, it has been well acknowledged that enhanced microbial activity partially connote improved crop yield (Kamaa et al. 2011;Partey et al. 2014;Omari et al. 2016).
The objective of this study was to assess the effects of short-term repeated application (2 seasons) of contrasting OIs in combination with or without CF on maize yield and microbial biomass in a tropical arable soil. The innovativeness of this study is the field trials in Ghanaian conditions simultaneously focussing on crop yield and soil microbial dynamics following contrasting OI input with or without CFs.

Site description
A field study was carried out at the Forest and Horticultural Crops Research Center (FOHCREC), University of Ghana-Kade (6°8ʹ48ʺN, 0°53ʹ58ʺW; 170 m above sea level (a.s.l.)) in the Eastern region of Ghana. The site receives bimodal mean annual precipitation of 1300-1500 mm, allowing for two cropping seasons in a year. The area has a mean annual temperature of 26 °C (Fig. 1). The soil in the study area is an Acrisol (FAO/ISRIC/ISSS 1998), characterized by a fine granular structure with friable consistency (Adjei-Gyapong and Asiamah 2002). Table 1 shows the basic soil properties of the study site. The area is notable for plantation crop production predominantly oil palm, rubber and cocoa. The first season trial was conducted during the long rainy season (March-July, 2016), while the second trial spanned from September 2016 to January 2017. The field for the study had previously been cultivated with maize.

Collection and preparation of organic materials
The OIs used in this study were aboveground biomasses (stalk, twig, petioles, leaves, and stems) of Butterfly pea [C. pubescens Benth.], Tropical Kudzu [Pueraria phaseoloides (Roxb.) Benth.], and Maize stover [Zea mays L.], henceforth referred to as CEN, PUE and MZE, respectively. These are readily available but largely underutilized organic materials, which were collected from farmers' field around the study site and sun-dried to their constant weights. Subsamples of each sample were oven-dried at 60 °C for 72 h, ball-milled to powder and analyzed for litter quality in triplicates. The quality characteristics comprised polyphenols, available phosphorus (P), available potassium (K), total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) ( Table 2), as explained in our previous research (Omari et al. 2016).

The experimental procedure, design, and management
The site was first cleared of weeds, followed by debris removal and tilling to a depth of 20 cm. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with four replications per treatment involving OIs as the main plot factor and mineral fertilizer application as a sub-plot factor. The main plot factor comprised OI application, namely; CEN, PUE, MZE, and control. The main plot measured 8 m by 6 m, while the subplot was 4 m by 6 m. At the onset of the rains in both seasons (6 weeks before sowing), the aboveground biomasses of each sun-dried OIs were chopped into smaller units (< 10 mm) and hand incorporated to a soil depth of 15 cm at a rate of 4 t ha −1 . In the sub-plots with CF, N was applied as NPK 15:15:15 and [(NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ] at 90 kg N ha −1 per growing season. The amount was split applied at 40 kg N ha −1 as NPK 15:15:15, 2 weeks after sowing. This  fall (1983-2014) and mean temperature  in the study area  The control (CON−) received no resource input. Buffer plots of (1.5 m) were left between the blocks to minimize cross-border effects. The test crop (Zea mays), Obaatanpa variety, was sown three seeds per hill and later thinned to two at a spacing of 80 cm × 40 cm. All seeds were sown by hand drill into 5 cm depth rows. Each plot was regularly hand weeded to minimize any impact of weed pressure on maize performance. All agronomic practices were carried out based on the local practices except the use of herbicides which was only employed at the initial land preparation stage. Maize biomass was determined two times; at tassel and physiological maturity stage. The total dry weight biomass of six record plants per plot of the test crop was determined at tassel. At physiological maturity stage, twelve maize stands per plot were sampled at random using the simple random technique (Gomez and Gomez 1984). The whole maize straw (5 cm from the topsoil) were chopped into smaller units (< 50 mm), oven-dried at 105 °C for 72 h to attain constant dry weight. Grain yields were determined at 12% moisture content.

Soil samplings and analyses
Soil samplings were done before treatment application, at tassel and immediately after harvesting. Soil sampling was done at 0−15 cm depth from up to ten points in each plot, bulked and kept frozen at − 20 °C before analyses. Bulked samples were first passed through a 2 mm mesh, before transporting under the ice to Tokyo for further biochemical measurements. Soil TC and TN were analyzed by dry combustion using a CN analyzer (Sumika Chemical Analysis Service Ltd., Osaka, Japan). Soil pH was measured in water suspensions at a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:2.5 using Beckman PKG-260 pH meter (Beckman Coulter Instruments Inc., Fullerton, USA). For the particle size distribution, 10 g soil sample was first digested with 100 ml hydrogen peroxide, followed by the determination of sand, silt and clay proportions with laser diffraction particle size analyzer (SALD-2300, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The SOM was estimated by loss on ignition method (Nelson and Sommers 1996), after exposing 5 g soil sample at 550 °C in an Electric muffle furnace (FUL 230 FA, Advantech Toyo Co., Ltd, Tokyo Japan). Soil mineral N (NH 4 + -N and NO 3 − -N) was quantified by first extracting 10 g of moist soil with 100 mL of 2 M KCl solution. The NH 4 + -N and NO 3 − -N contents in the filtrate were subsequently measured with the UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV mini 1240, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) by following procedures described by Parsons et al. (1984) and US EPA (1983), respectively. Available P content in soil was measured using the Truog-soluble P method (Truog 1930). The modified fumigation-extraction method was used to evaluate the microbial biomass in soil (Hobbie 1998). Briefly, soil samples marked for fumigation were exposed to alcohol-free chloroform for 72 h in airtight flasks, while non-fumigated samples were kept frozen. Dissolved organic C (DOC) in the fumigated and non-fumigated samples were first extracted with 0.5 M K 2 SO 4 and analyzed with TOC-L (TOC-L CPH, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Additionally, the dissolved organic N (EON) in the same solution was measured with TNM-L analyser (TOC-L CPH, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) following procedures as described by Ros et al. (2009). Microbial biomass C and N (MBC and MBN) in soil were calculated from the difference between fumigated and non-fumigated samples by converting the dissolved organic C & N to MBC and MBN, respectively. The calibration value for MBC was 0.45 (Joergensen 1996), while that of MBN was 0.54, according to Brookes et al. (1985). All soil analyses were conducted in four replicates.

Calculation of interactive effects of inputs on yield
The interactive effects of OIs and CF inputs, which represent the extra yield obtained following the combined application of OIs and N fertilizers compared with the sum of the two when added separately (Vanlauwe et al. 2001) was calculated for each treatment as defined in Vanlauwe et al. (2001).
Where Y COM stands for the yield of combined treatment, Y CON stands for the yield of no input control treatment, Y OIS stands for the yield of sole organic residue treatment, and Y IF stands for the yield of mineral fertilizer treatment (positive control).

Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed with SAS software (Statistical Analysis System, version 9.0). Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the differences between contrasting OIs with or without CFs and their interaction on mineral N and microbial composition of the resultant soil. Mean differences among the treatments were compared using the Tukey's Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test at P < 0.05.

Straw and grain yield-differences among treatments in both seasons
CF with or without OIs significantly (P < 0.05) increased straw yield at tassel and harvest in both growing seasons (Table 3). Higher values in straw yield were recorded in the first season compared to the second season at both sampling times. The combined application of OIs with CF resulted in 40-88% higher aboveground biomass yield compared to sole OIs in both seasons. In the first season, CEN+ and PUE+ showed the highest average aboveground biomass yield of 6.0 t ha −1 and 5.7 t ha −1 and were 25% and 90% higher than the control with or without N fertilizer (CON+, CON−) treatments, respectively. In the second season, CON+ and CEN+ had higher average biomass yield, with values ranging from 2.7 t ha −1 to 4.3 t ha −1 and 3.3 t ha −1 to 3.8 t ha −1 from tassel to harvest, respectively.
Grain yield ranged from 2.1 t ha −1 to 2.6 t ha −1 in the first season compared to 0.8 t ha −1 to 1.7 t ha −1 in the second season (Table 4). Mean grain yield in the first season was 84% higher compared to the second season. The combined treatments significantly showed higher average maize grain yield response compared to the sole OI amendments. In the first season, yield increases in the CEN+, MZE+, and CON+ treatments were 2.6 t ha −1 , 2.5 t ha −1 and 2.4 t ha −1 , respectively and were about 20% higher compared to CON-. However, in the second season, MZE+ showed significantly greater grain yield value of 1.7 t ha −1 and was almost twice higher than CON-. The average grain yield among the combined treatments was in the order MZE+ > CEN+ > PUE+. Moreover, the average maize yield response following CF addition was highest in MZE, followed by CON, PUE, and CEN (Table 5). It increased from 16.0 to 52.9% for MZE, 12.5 to 43.8% for CON, 8.3-18.8% for PUE and 7.7-20.0% for CEN from the first to second seasons, respectively.  Negative interaction was observed for CEN and PUE with CF, while MZE with CF resulted in enhanced maize grain yield response in both seasons (Fig. 2). The interactive effects of co-applying CF with OIs on grain yield were more pronounced in the second season compared to the first. The CEN and PUE showed a significant negative shift from − 0.09 to − 0.28 and − 0.07 to − 0.30 from first to the second season, respectively. In case of MZE, the interactive effects increased from 0.09 to 0.26 from the first to the second season.

Soil carbon and nitrogen contents
Treatment application resulted in greater EON in the first season compared to the second at tassel and harvest (Table 6). At tassel, while treatment application during the first season resulted in significant differences in EON content, no statistical significance was observed in the second. At harvest, during the first season, CEN+ and CEN− showed higher significant EON values of 110.6 mg kg −1 and 106.0 mg kg −1 , respectively while the least was observed in CON+. Moreover, at harvest during the second season, the highest and lowest EON values were recorded in MZE+ and MZE− treatments, respectively. In contrast to the EON, the addition of OIs, alone or with CF increased the average mineral N in the second season compared to the first (Fig. 3a). However, at harvest, values reported in the first season were almost twice higher compared to the second season, i.e. average of 274.9 mg kg −1 against 172.7 mg kg −1 for the first and second seasons, respectively (Fig. 3b). At tassel, the highest mineral N was observed in PUE+ and CON+ during the first and second seasons, respectively. Moreover at harvest, while CEN+ showed the highest mineral N of 336.5 mg kg −1 in the first season, PUE+ showed the highest mineral N of 193.7 mg kg −1 in the second season.
Irrespective of treatment type, the first season recorded higher mean DOC of 496.6 mg kg −1 compared to 336.8 mg kg −1 in the second season at tassel (Table 7). An inverse trend was however observed at harvest, where twice higher values were recorded in the second season relative to the first season. At tassel, sole OI application showed higher DOC content compared to their respective combinations with CF. For example, CEN-, MZE-, and PUE-had an average DOC of 448.1 mg kg −1 , 424.2 mg kg −1 , and 420.2 mg kg −1 , respectively and were higher than their corresponding combined applications with CF. This translated into higher soil DOC/EON ratios in the sole OI treatments compared to their corresponding combined treatments at tassel. The highest average DOC content at tassel was in sole CEN-treatment while the lowest, which was similar to MZE+ and PUE+, was observed in CEN+. However, at harvest during the second season, the trend reversed for all OI amendments, except MZE where no significant changes were observed. The PUE+ amendment recorded the highest average DOC of 387.9 mg kg −1 while the least was in CEN− treatment.

Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen
The addition of OIs or in combination with CF had significant effects on MBC at tasselling and at harvest in both growing seasons (Fig. 4). Soil MBC ranged from 1.1 g kg −1 to 2.2 g kg −1 from tassel to harvest, respectively in the first season. In the second season, MBC ranged from 0.4 g kg −1 to 1.9 g kg −1 from tassel to harvest, respectively. At tassel, CF addition to OIs did not enhance MBC contents except in CEN amendment during the second season (Fig. 4a). The CON+ treatment showed the highest MBC of 2.2 g kg −1 in the first season. However, in the second season, the highest MBC of 1.4 g kg −1 was observed in the CEN+ treatment. At harvest, the influence of CF application with OIs on soil MBC was seen in CEN and PUE during the second season (Fig. 4b). While CF addition suppressed MBC content in PUE, a significant improvement was observed in CEN treatment. In the first season, PUE+ and PUE-showed the highest MBC while, in the second season, CON-showed the highest MBC of 1.9 g kg −1 and was four times higher compared to CON+. Treatments application had significant influences on MBN at all sampling times, except at tassel during the first season (Fig. 5). Similar to soil MBC, the average MBN values observed in the first season was higher than that in the second season, regardless of treatment type. While CF addition to OIs showed significant increases in MBN at harvest, no significant effects were observed at tassel. In the first season at harvest, high MBN of 157.5 mg kg −1 was observed in MZE+ and was almost thrice higher compared to MZE− (Fig. 5b). In the second season, the highest MBN of 155.3 mg kg −1 was observed in the CEN+ treatment.
The results of the ANOVA are summarized in Table 8. The results showed significant independent and interaction effects on grain and straw yield for the factors "OIs," "CFs," and "Seasons" (P < 0.05), except for non-significant OI × CFs × Seasons interaction (P > 0.05) on straw yield. Similarly, EON and mineral N revealed significant independent and interaction effects among the factors "OIs," "CFs," and "Seasons." However, soil DOC showed no interaction among the factors "OIs," "CFs," and "Seasons," except for a significant organic input × seasons interaction. Moreover, there was significant OIs × CFs × Seasons interaction on soil microbial biomass.

Effects of treatments and seasonal differences on maize straw and grain yield
Seasonal rainfall amount and distribution directly accounted for the maize grain yield and aboveground biomass disparities between the two seasons. As shown in the results, cumulative rainfall amount of 460 mm was received in the second season (September-January) as against 750 mm in the first (March-July). This created limiting moisture conditions in the second season, which possibly hindered the impacts of OIs on maize yield although they have been reported to possess greater residual benefits on crop yield (Diacono and Montemurro 2010;Chivenge et al. 2011b).
The P and K contents in the OIs were significantly low. Thus, N input differences from the OIs presents the most likely reasons for the observed disparities in maize growth and yield among the treatments. This indicates that the increased yields in MZE+ and CEN+ treatments relative to their corresponding sole OIs were likely due to the higher resource N inputs. Among the combined treatments, maize grain yield and interactive effects differed in both seasons, presumably due to the synergy from their combination as exhibited in N release pattern or moisture retention abilities.
The MZE residue, given its low N but high CN ratio decomposes slowly relative to the high-quality CEN and PUE. Hence, the immediate N need of maize plant at the initial growth period was met by the CF while the MZE inputs supplemented subsequent N needs. The relatively high decomposition rate in the high-quality PUE amendment suggests that probably more than enough mineral N was available during plant growth and might have been lost through leaching or denitrification during peaks in rainfall. The present results suggest for the sole application of either PUE or CEN, because extra CF addition would have minimal impacts on crop yield. This result is in accord with several reports elsewhere employing high-quality OIs with CFs. For example, Vanlauwe et al. (2001) observed negative interactive effects on maize yield following the combined application of Mucuna pruriens with CFs. Additionally, similar responses on maize grain yield were observed by Chivenge et al. (2009) andGentile et al. (2011) when litter from high-quality Tithonia diversifolia was applied in combination with CF in fertile soil. In contrast to the supposed excess mineral N in PUE with CF amendments, lowest crop yield values observed for low-quality MZE is attributed to N limitation caused by nutrient immobilization as a result of its high CN ratio.
Moisture dynamics played a significant role in the observed yield interactive effects. The low-quality MZE with CF presented more significant benefits on maize yield in low rainfall or dry climates. On the other hand, the sole application of high-quality PUE and CEN in moist climates reasonably improved N utilization efficiency in maize. Thus, the benefit of CF addition to OIs is not only dependent on residue quality but also the prevailing soil moisture content in which the resources are amended.

Chemical fertilizer and organic input on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics
High rainfall amount of 750 mm received during the first season enhanced litter mineralization and N release to maize plants. Moreover, the statistically similar soil EON and mineral N contents from CEN and PUE amendments at most samplings as a function of the small maize grain yield increase following CF addition emphasize the need for the sole application of high-quality OIs for enhanced N utilization efficiency (Palm et al. 2001;Gentile et al. 2011). This may, however, be practicable in relatively fertile soil in the short term. The sole CEN and PUE treatments, characterized by low polyphenols, showed higher N recovery compared to MZE-, contradicting the claim that polyphenols have no Organic input (OI) *** * ns * *** *** *** Chemical fertilizer (CF) ns ns ns *** *** *** *** Season (SE) *** *** *** *** *** *** *** OI × CF *** *** ns *** ns *** * OI × SE *** *** ns *** *** *** *** CF × SE ns ns * *** ns *** ** OI × CF × SE *** ** ns *** * *** ns significant influence on N mineralization in field conditions (Chivenge et al. 2011b). Adequate soil moisture in the first season enhanced early phase microbial activity, resulting in the loss of soluble C forms. This subsequently led to a significant reduction in DOC content at harvest in the same season. In contrast, the observed water unavailability in the second season resulted in reduced microbial activity, leading to an increased C forms from tassel to harvest. These observations agree with the general understanding that adequate soil moisture regimes are essential factors for litter decomposition and C sequestration (Brady and Weil 2008).
The initial DOC increase in the sole OI treatments as opposed to losses in the combined amendments suggest enhanced litter decomposition as a result of CF addition. This observation is explained by the fact that the early phase decomposition of OIs after CF addition triggered assimilation of DOC by soil microbes for energy and synthesis. Similarly, Chivenge et al. (2011a) observed higher C losses following CF co-application with OIs. On the other hand, CF addition to OI resulted in increased DOC stocks in the combined treatments at harvest due to higher C inputs from roots and aboveground portions of the maize plant. In a long term study, Wei et al. (2016) and Bedada et al. (2014) also observed higher SOM and DOC contents respectively, following combined application of OIs with CFs compared to solely applied OIs. The present study thus suggests that soil moisture and time factor, which distinguished tassel from harvest in the present study, played a significant role in the influence of CF on OI decomposition. Hence, future studies should invest in long-term evaluations of the present OIs, alone or in combination with CFs to unravel their potential C and N contribution to the soil.

Treatment effects on soil microbial biomass content
Adequate rainfall amount received during the first season enhanced the activities of microbes and thus facilitated their access to substrates (Schjønning et al. 2003;Dungait et al. 2012;Manzoni et al. 2012). Although CF either as 0 or 90 kg N ha −1 showed no significant effects on soil microbial biomass, its co-application with OIs resulted in varying microbial biomass pools. The microbial biomass responses varied with OI type and sampling times, reiterating the influence of climatic variables and litter chemistry on microbial biomass dynamics (Brady and Weil 2008;Omari et al. 2018b).
The effect of CF alone or its combination with OIs on microbial biomass was more evident at harvest, especially during the second season characterized by low soil moisture. This observation is likely, because the low soil moisture concentrated the CF constituents, resulting in traces which suppressed soil microbial activities. Similarly, Muema et al. (2016) ascribed a 35% decrease in ammonia-oxidizing archaea abundance to rhizosphere pH reduction due to the sole application of CF or its combination with OIs. Also, the opposing responses in microbial biomass content in CEN and PUE following co-application with CF reflects differences in their inherent residue quality characteristics. The allelochemicals of CEN and PUE may likely have formed different complexes with CF which enhanced or suppressed microbial biomass pools, respectively. Moreover, at most sampling times, while CF application with CEN improved microbial biomass, solely applied CEN suppressed soil microbial biomass. This supports the earlier claim that CF addition to OIs could potentially alter its allelopathic abilities.

Conclusion
The present results confirmed the positive synergistic effect of combined application of CFs with OIs on maize yield and soil properties. As inferred from the results, the impact of CF input on maize yield and soil properties differed with season and quality of OIs. CF addition with low-quality MZE residues synergistically enhanced maize yield comparable to CON+. However, negative interactive effects, characterized by more significant responses in the second season, were observed in the high-quality CEN and PUE amendments. Thus, from the present study, it would be much beneficial to encourage amendments of low-quality organic resources with additional CFs in dry climates. Similarly, amendment of high-quality OIs such as CEN in moist climates is recommended to reduce N use inefficiency. The DOC and EON dynamics following CF addition to OIs were dependent on seasonal soil moisture differences and time of sampling. Chemical application to OIs revealed opposing responses on soil microbial biomass. For instance, CF application to CEN triggered microbial activity, whereas its co-application with MZE and PUE suppressed soil microbial biomass. Although CF with MZE or CEN represents the most effective combination for improved maize yield, the observed response was mainly ascribed to the effects of CF addition. Thus, while the present study encourages the use of CEN and MZE residues with CF among farmers to enhance soil and crop productivity, long-term trials would be required to unravel the best strategy to manage such resources, for agro-ecosytems sustainability.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/.