Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of 2D and 3D slope stability problems using limit equilibrium technique-based Bishop’s simplified method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formulation of slope stability was formerly considered in two-dimensional (2D) assuming a plane strain condition to be valid. The utilization of a 2D formulation for slope stability problems is often advantageous in terms of computational efficiency and logical reasoning when the cross section exhibits symmetry along the longitudinal direction. However, when the slope's cross section undergoes changes or when unsymmetrical loading conditions occur along the longitudinal direction, the assumption of a plane strain condition becomes invalid. In such scenarios, a three-dimensional (3D) slope stability analysis becomes essential to obtain accurate solutions. In the case of a 2D analysis, the failure mass is typically subdivided into slices, whereas in a 3D analysis, columns are employed to discretize the failure mass. The present study focuses on conducting a comparative analysis of 2D and 3D slope stability using Bishop's simplified method. A visual basic applications code-based spreadsheet platform was developed for 2D slope incorporating the generalized limit equilibrium method, including Bishop’s method, whereas Scoops-3D was used to perform 3D slope stability analysis. It is observed that 2D slope analysis usually yields a more conservative estimate of the FOS compared to 3D analysis. Various intermediate parameters such as normal force and the slice base angle have been investigated along the failure surface for both 2D and 3D slope analysis. The comparison of these parameters helps understand the intricate differences between 2 and 3D slope stability solution procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data regarding this study will made avaiable on request.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mr. Brijbhan Rao (First Author): Conceptualization, Analysis, and Writing of the manuscript. Dr. Avijit Burman (Second and Corresponding Author): Conceptualization, Analysis, overall supervision. Dr. Lal Bahadur Roy (Third Author): Conceptualization and Overall Supervision. Mr. Sumit Kumar (Forth Author): Analysis and Writing of the manuscript. Mr. Amit Kumar (Fifth Author): Analysis and Writing of the manuscript. Dr. Shiva Shankar Choudhary (Sixth Author): Conceptualization and Overall Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avijit Burman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rao, B., Burman, A., Roy, L.B. et al. Comparative analysis of 2D and 3D slope stability problems using limit equilibrium technique-based Bishop’s simplified method. Multiscale and Multidiscip. Model. Exp. and Des. 7, 1169–1184 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-023-00278-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-023-00278-2

Keywords

Navigation