Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coupling SWAT and bathymetric data in modelling reservoir catchment hydrology

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A physically based model; Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and bathymetric data were integrated to simulate and evaluate the water balance of the Brimsu Reservoir from 2002 to 2018. The simulated water balance describes the changes in water storage of the reservoir as a hydrological component that is dependent on inflows (precipitation, runoff) and outflows (evaporation, infiltration, discharge and water consumption). In the absence of storage capacity data, a bathymetric survey was conducted to determine the capacity of the reservoir. The result showed that there has been a reduction of about 27.6% in gross capacity of the reservoir. The SWAT model indicates a satisfactory performance for both calibration (NSE = 0.66, Bias = − 5.0% and R2 = 0.86) and validation (NSE = 0.63, Bias = − 10.4% and R2 = 0.82) periods. The monthly water budget revealed that 30.50% and 69.50% of the total inflow within the catchment constitute direct precipitation and runoff respectively while 32.50%, 12.50%, 34.40% and 20.60% of total outflow represents evaporation, seepage, spillage and water consumed. Though the average final-to initial-volume ratio of 1.15 indicates that the reservoir is not emptying, and water is withdrawn from the reservoir at a sustainable rate, yet water from the reservoir does not yield the treatment plant’s design capacity of 29,500 m/day. Overall, the model demonstrated a good performance by providing quantitative information to serve as a guide for stakeholders to make better decisions in planning and managing the Brimsu Reservoir.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maliehe, M., & Mulungu, D. M. (2017). Assessment of water availability for competing uses using SWAT and WEAP in South Phuthiatsana catchment, Lesotho. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 100, 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koopman, J. F., Kuik, O., Tol, R. S., van der Vat, M. P., Hunink, J. C., & Brouwer, R. (2019). Distributing water between competing users in the Netherlands. In Economy-Wide Modeling of Water at Regional and Global Scales (pp. 159–192). Springer, Singapore.

  3. Zhang, Y., Zhong, P. A., Chen, J., Bing, J., Xu, D., & Wang, M. (2017). Impacts of climate change and human activities on the three gorges reservoir inflow. Water, 9(12), 957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, T. J., & Miller, S. N. (2013). Using the Soil and Water Assessmnent Tool (SWAT) to assess land use impact on water resources in an East African watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 486, 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. World Commission of Dams (2000). Dams and development: A new framework decision-making: The Report of World Commission on Dams. London Earthscan.

  6. Gleick, H. P. (2003). Global freshwater resources; soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science, 302(5650), 1524–1528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnold, J., Di Luzio, M., Srinivasan, R., & Winchell M. (2010). ArcSwat interface for SWAT 2009 user’s guide. Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas 76502.

  8. Stehr, A., Debels, P., Romero, F., & Alcayaga, H. (2008). Hydrological modelling with SWAT under conditions of limited data availability: Evaluation of results from a Chilean case study. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53(3), 588–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Srinivas, G., & Gopal, M. N. (2017). Hydrological modeling of Musi river basin, India and sensitive parameterization of stream flow using SWAT CUP. Journal of Hydrogeology and Hydrologic Engineering, 6, 2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9647.1000153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh, V., Jain, S. K., & Tyagi, J. (2010). Simulation of runoff and sediment yield for a Himalayan watershed using SWAT model. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2(3), 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kidane, M., Tolessa, T., Bezie, A., Kessete, N., & Endrias, M. (2019). Evaluating the impacts of climate and land use/land cover (LU/LC) dynamics on the Hydrological Responses of the Upper Blue Nile in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Spatial Information Research, 27(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Posthumus, E. D. J. (2017). Water Balance Modelling of the Tandjari Reservoir in Burkina Faso. Graduate thesis and dissertation, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Netherlands

  13. Gyamfi, C., Ndambuki, J. M., & Salim, R. W. (2016). Hydrological responses to land use/cover changes in the Olifants Basin, South Africa. Water, 8(12), 588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Akayuli, C. F., Asenso-Gyambibi, D., Owusu, J., & Owusu-Adade, K. (2007). Geotechnical survey, dredgeability of soil sediments and siltation volume of Brimsu water reservoir. Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 12(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.4314/jast.v12i1.17474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Binlinla, K. J., Voinov, A., & Oduro, W. (2014). Analysis of human activities in and around protected areas (Pas): Case of Kakum conservation area in Ghana. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 6(7), 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems, and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2019). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003 . NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. https://doi.org/10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. Accessed 05 Feb 2019

  17. Food and Agriculture Organization (2005). Digital Soil Map of the World and Derived Soil Properties of the World; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy

  18. Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H., Wu, X., Wang, J., & Nadiga, S. (2010). The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91(8), 1015–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gyamfi, C., Ndambuki, J. M., & Salim, R. W. (2016). Simulation of sediment yield in a semi-arid River Basin under changing land use: An integrated approach of hydrologic modelling and principal component analysis. Sustainability, 8(11), 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yeung, C. W. (2005). Rainfall-runoff and water-balance models for management of the Fena Valley Reservoir, Guam. U.S. Department of the Interior. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2004–5287.

  21. Abbaspour, C. K., Vaghefi, A. S., & Srinivasan, R. (2017). A guideline for successful calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Soil and Water Assessment. A Review of Papers from 2016 International SWAT Conference.

  22. Shrestha P. K. (2017). SWAT Calibration Helper - for Monthly Simulations v1.0. Research Gate.

  23. Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ross, C.W., Prihodko, L., Anchang, J., Kumar, S., Ji, W., & Hanan, N. P. (2018). Global Hydrologic Soil Groups (HYSOGs250m) for Curve Number-Based Runoff Modeling. ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1566

  25. Golmohammadi, G., Prasher, S., Madani, A., Rudra, R. (2014). Evaluating three hydrological distributed watershed models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT. Department of Bioresources Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H9X 3V9, Canada; 20–39; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology1010020 hydrology ISSN 2306–5338.

  26. Fowe, T., Karambiri, H., Paturel, J., Poussin, J., & Cecchi, P. (2015). Water balance of small reservoirs in the Volta basin: A case study of Boura reservoir in Burkina Faso.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.006

  27. Rwanga, S. S., & Ndambuki, J. M. (2017). Accuracy assessments of land use/land cover classification using remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of Geosciences, 8, 611–622. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.84033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mensah-Essilfie, I. (2013). Groundwater Quality within Kwesiprah, Cape Coast, Central Region, Ghana. Department of Theoretical and Applied Biology, KNUST—GHANA.

  29. Costa, M. H., Botta, A., & Cardille, J. A. (2003). Effect of large-scale changes in land cover on the discharge of the Tocantis River, Southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Hydrology, 283(1), 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors duly acknowledge the funding support from the Regional Water and Environmental Sanitation Centre, Kumasi (RWESCK), an African Centre of Excellence under the auspices of the World Bank and Government of Ghana. GWCL Central Regional office and the entire Brimsu headwork crew are much appreciated for their immeasurable support and guidance during the field work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana

    E. A. Kwarteng, C. Gyamfi, F. O. K. Anyemedu, K. A. Adjei & G. K. Anornu

  2. Regional Water and Environmental Sanitation Centre Kumasi (RWESCK), KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana

    E. A. Kwarteng, C. Gyamfi, F. O. K. Anyemedu, K. A. Adjei & G. K. Anornu

Authors
  1. E. A. Kwarteng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Gyamfi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. O. K. Anyemedu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. A. Adjei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. K. Anornu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Gyamfi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwarteng, E.A., Gyamfi, C., Anyemedu, F.O.K. et al. Coupling SWAT and bathymetric data in modelling reservoir catchment hydrology. Spat. Inf. Res. 29, 55–69 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00337-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00337-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation