Abstract
In this paper, technical, economic and environmental assessments are carried out for power supply chain by using timber and wood waste (T&WW) gasification in Iceland. The Icelandic municipalities were clustered into 35 subgroups based on various number of households/ inhabitants. Different expenses were taken into consideration, like capital, installation engineering, operation and maintenance costs and the interest rate of the investment. Regarding revenues, they come from the electricity sale and the fee paid by the Icelandic municipalities for waste collection and disposal. The economic feasibility was conducted based on the economic indicators of net present value (NPV) and discounted payback period (DPP), bringing together three different scenarios, with interest rates of 8% for Scenario 1, 10% for Scenario 2 and 13% for Scenario 3. The environmental analysis was also performed relied on the environmental impacts of global warming (GWP), acidification (AP) and eutrophication (EP) potentials. The results show that changing the interest rate does not have significant impact on NPV and DPP for all studied scenarios. NPV is positive for the municipalities with more than 150 inhabitants or for a gasification plant with the capability to generate greater than 45 kW. Moreover, electricity generation based on T&WW gasification would lead to a GWP of 13 tonCO2eq (Subgroup 1) to 469 tonCO2eq (Subgroup 35), AP of 173.6 tonSO2eq (Subgroup 1) to 6187.2 tonSO2eq (Subgroup 35) and EP potential of 331.9 tonNO3eq (Subgroup 1) to 11,827.7 tonNO3eq (Subgroup 35), yearly.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brunner PH, Morf LS, Rechberger H (2004) Thermal waste treatment-A necessary element for sustainable waste management. na,
Chongqing Fengyu Electric Co. L (2019). https://feng-yu.com/.
Explained ES (2019) https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Electricity_and_heat_statistics&oldid=443526. Acceseed 12 Dec, 2019
Freeman M, O’Dowda W, Plasynskia S, Walbertb G. Biomass cofiring R&D and demonstration results for handling, combustion, heat transfer, and emissions issues for coal-fired boilers. Carbon 55:48.47
GreenVinci Biomass Energy Co. L (2019) https://www.greenvinci.com/. Acceseed 12 Dec, 2019
Halldorsson TI, Auðunsson GA, Guicharnaud R, Dýrmundsson ÓR, Hansson SÖ, Hreinsson K Contamination of livestock due to the operation of a small waste incinerator: a case incident in Skutulsfjörður, Iceland, in 2010. In: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 2012. vol 1. BioMed Central, p S4
Labs AP (2019) https://www.allpowerlabs.com/. Acceseed 12 Dec, 2019
Leckner B (2015) Process aspects in combustion and gasification Waste-to-Energy (WtE) units. Waste Manag 37:13–25
Luz FC, Rocha MH, Lora EES, Venturini OJ, Andrade RV, Leme MMV, del Olmo OA (2015) Techno-economic analysis of municipal solid waste gasification for electricity generation in Brazil. Energy Convers Manag 103:321–337
Mohapatra S (2013) Technological options for treatment of municipal solid waste of Delhi. Int J Renew Energy Res (IJRER) 3:682–687
Nguyen TLT, Hermansen JE, Nielsen RG (2013) Environmental assessment of gasification technology for biomass conversion to energy in comparison with other alternatives: the case of wheat straw. J Cleaner Prod 53:138–148
Niðurstöður úr mælingum á díoxínum í jarðvegi (2011). Umhverfisstofnun
Ofori-Boateng C, Lee KT, Mensah M (2013) The prospects of electricity generation from municipal solid waste (MSW) in Ghana: a better waste management option. Fuel Process Technol 110:94–102
Omari AM, Kichonge BN, John GR, Njau KN, Mtui PL (2014) Potential of municipal solid waste, as renewable energy source: a case study of Arusha, Tanzania. Int J Renew Energy Technol Res 3(6):1–9
Orkusetur (2019) https://orkusetur.is/reiknivelar/raforka/raforkuverd/. Accessed 12 Dec, 2019.
Paengjuntuek W, Boonmak J, Mungkalasiri J (2015) Environmental assessment of integrated biomass gasification fuel cell for power generation system. Int J Environ Sci Dev 6:445
Porcu A, Sollai S, Marotto D, Mureddu M, Ferrara F, Pettinau A (2019) Techno-economic analysis of a small-scale biomass-to-energy BFB gasification-based system. Energies 12:494
Porteous A (2005) Why energy from waste incineration is an essential component of environmentally responsible waste management. Waste Manag 25:451–459
Qingdao Kexin New Energy Technology.Co. L (2019) https://qd-kexin.en.alibaba.com/. Accessed 02 Dec, 2019
Safarian S, Bararzadeh M (2012) Exergy analysis of high-performance cycles for gas turbine with air-bottoming. J Mech Eng Res 5:38–49
Safarian S, Khodaparast P, Kateb M (2014) Modeling and technical-economic optimization of electricity supply network by three photovoltaic systems. J Solar Energy Eng 136:024501
Safarian S, Richter C, Unnthorsson R (2019a) Waste biomass gasification simulation using aspen plus: performance evaluation of wood chips, sawdust and mixed paper wastes. J Power Energy Eng 7:12–30
Safarian S, Saboohi Y, Kateb M (2013) Evaluation of energy recovery and potential of hydrogen production in Iranian natural gas transmission network. Energy Policy 61:65–77
Safarian S, Sattari S, Hamidzadeh Z (2018) Sustainability assessment of biodiesel supply chain from various biomasses and conversion technologies. BioPhys Econ Resource Qual 3:6
Safarian S, Sattari S, Unnthorsson R, Hamidzadeh Z (2019b) Prioritization of bioethanol production systems from agricultural and waste agricultural biomass using multi-criteria decision making. Biophys Econ Resource Qual 4:4
Safarian S, Unnthorsson R (2018) An assessment of the sustainability of lignocellulosic bioethanol production from wastes in Iceland. Energies 11:1493
Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C (2019c) Performance analysis and environmental assessment of small-scale waste biomass gasification integrated CHP in Iceland. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117268
Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C (2020a) Performance analysis and environmental assessment of small-scale waste biomass gasification integrated CHP in Iceland. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117268
Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C (2020b) Simulation of small-scale waste biomass gasification integrated power production: a comparative performance analysis for timber and wood waste. Int J Appl Power Eng (IJAPE) 09:147–152
Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C (2020c) Simulation of small-scale waste biomass gasification integrated power production: a comparative performance analysis for timber and wood waste. Int J Appl Power Eng (IJAPE). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijape.v9.i2.pp%25p
Safarian S, Unnþórsson R, Richter C (2019d) A review of biomass gasification modelling. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 110:378–391
Safarianbana S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C (2019) Development of a new stoichiometric equilibrium-based model for wood chips and mixed paper wastes gasification by ASPEN Plus. In: ASME 2019 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
Samadi SH, Ghobadian B, Nosrati M (2019) Prediction and estimation of biomass energy from agricultural residues using air gasification technology in Iran. Renew Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.109
Sara HR, Enrico B, Mauro V, Vincenzo N (2016) Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production using biomass gasification-a small scale power plant study. Energy Procedia 101:806–813
Shandong Rotex Machinery. CL (2019) https://www.woodpellets-machine.com/aboutus. Accessed 12 Dec, 2019
Sundberg M, Guðmundsson J, Guðmundsson M (2010) Biofuel production in Iceland: survey of potential raw materials and yields to 2030 Mannvit Engineering, Reykjavik
Tiger Machinery Group Co. L (2019) https://www.tigermg.com/. Accessed 02 Dec, 2019
Acknowledgements
This paper was a part of the project funded by Icelandic Research Fund (IRF), (in Icelandic: Rannsoknasjodur) and the Grant Number is 196458–051.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Safarian, S., Unnthorsson, R. & Richter, C. Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Power Supply Chain by Using Waste Biomass Gasification in Iceland. Biophys Econ Sust 5, 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-020-00073-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-020-00073-4