Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological crisis and green capitalism: toward a climatization of extractive industries?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European mining revival strategy correlates with the agenda of transition to a “green” and “climate-friendly” economy. In this article, we focus on the climatization of extractive discourses and practices in Europe, France, and Andalusia in order to show the changes in discourses while noting the continuity of practices. While discourse justifying the mining revival is circulating within Europe, the operationalization of extractive reindustrialization is materializing in different ways across the Member States, revealing specific constraints and dynamics at a regional level. In Spain, for example, more than a dozen mining projects have been launched since the late 2000s, particularly in Andalusia, where reindustrialization has been associated with greening and climatization. In France, where ecologization and reindustrialization have been integrated into a discourse on securing sovereignty, none of the projects submitted over the last decade have been successful, which highlights the difficulty of reconciling greening, climatization, and extractive reindustrialization. We show that the climatization of the extractive industries in Europe largely remains a discursive process that does little to transform mining practices and activities—other than by contributing to legitimizing their redevelopment, under certain conditions which we highlight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data and supplementary material are available on request to the corresponding author.

Notes

  1. The current elaboration of a “Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials” (which was in the process of being adopted by the European Commission between March and June 2023) confirms this trend: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_1661

  2. First: mining and climate. Second: responsible mining, social license to operate, social acceptability, corporate social responsibility, sustainable mining, climate-smart mining. Finally: climate, climate action, climate change, climate crisis, ecological crisis, decarbonization, low carbon, net zero emission, net zero carbon, decarbonization and low carbon, climate and decarbonization, ecological modernization, climate mitigation.

  3. “But we can do all this and still engage in responsible mining. It’s high time the environmentalists also give some thought to our material inheritance and recognized that we must try to enhance it, lest we bequeath to future generations poverty along with beauty.” In Allen Overton JR, J. (1976). Governmentally Imposed Limitations on Mining in the United States. Nat. Resources Law, 9, 541.

  4. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy; The Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum; The Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration; The Society of Mining Professors; The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy; and The Asociación Iberoamericana de Enseñanza Superior de la Minería

  5. Sustainable development, equity, participatory decision-making, accountability and transparency, the precautionary principle, efficiency, and polluter responsibility

  6. To date, climate-smart mining initiatives have been launched in Guinea and Côte d’Ivoire (Forest Smart mining Pilots), Mali and Burkina Faso (RE Integration into Mines), the Democratic Republic of Congo (Cobalt Value chain assessment), South Africa (elaboration of a CSM Roadmap), Madagascar (CSM Roadmap and pilot), Indonesia (CSM Pilot), Serbia (CSM Pilot), Georgia and Armenia (Tailings retreatment), within the framework of a “south-south knowledge exchange” program between South American and African partners, in Chile (Anglo’s Los Bronces mine, El Soldado and Chagres projects), in the USA (Rio Tinto’s Kennecott project in Utah), in Finland (Anglo’s “Forest Smart” Mining), and in Canada (Rio Tinto’s airborne survey over northern Saskatchewan’s Wollaston Copperbelt)

  7. https://www.riotinto.com/about/innovation/smart-mining

  8. https://www.riotinto.com/news/stories/five-things-low-carbon-future

  9. Innovative, Non-Invasive and Fully Acceptable Exploration Technologies: https://www.infactproject.eu/

  10. Vision and Roadmap for European Raw Materials. Research and Innovation Roadmap 2050. A Sustainable and Competitive Future for European Raw Materials: http://veram2050.eu/

  11. Among the 13 “Research & Innovation” measures for the minerals and metals industries, eight recommendations are based on a promise of technical or technological improvement and four on improving knowledge and the ability to produce and evaluate data.

  12. “The idea was never to be an operator, it was an exploration company” (Interview, BRGM).

  13. Ministère du Redressement productif (2013). Une nouvelle France industrielle

  14. “L’avenir de la France dans l’industrie minière, selon Emmanuel Macron,” Les Echos, August 23, 2015

  15. https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/investir-dans-france-2030-remise-au-gouvernement-du-rapport-varin-sur-securisation

  16. National Council for Industry, Press kit: signing of the strategic contract for the Mining and Metallurgy Sector 2018–2022, French Government, January 18, 2019

  17. International Copper Study Group, The World Copper Factbook 2021, 68 p., https://icsg.org/

  18. Junta de Andalucía, “El resurgimiento de la minería andaluza (II): claves locales que transforman nuestra filosofía de vida,” Noticias, 06/06/2021

  19. Interview with a representative of the Region of Andalusia, October 2019

  20. In 2013, the unemployment rate reached 35% of the active population and 65% for those under 25 years of age (compared to 25% and 55% respectively on a national scale). Source: National Institute of Statistics

  21. Junta de Andalucía, Estrategia minera de Andalucía 2020, 2016, p. 56

  22. Agreement of June 1, 2021 of the Government Council of the Region of Andalusia

  23. The text was eventually approved on the 31st of July of 2023.

  24. Press release by the Region of Andalusia: “La Junta presenta a los Next Generation un proyecto minero de 3.100 millones para la Faja Pirítica,” 04/04/2021

  25. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/recovery-plan-europe_en

  26. https://www.aminer.es/

  27. Interview with a member of the board of AMINER, April 2022

  28. Interview with a civil servant of the Mining Department of the Region of Andalusia, October 2021

  29. MINER has contributed to the creation of a national association that has for instance participated in the discussions around the “Roadmap for Sustainable Management of Mineral Raw Materials” (see above). In the spring of 2020, AMINER obtained the status of an “essential” activity in the mining industry, to protect it from the disruptions caused by health restrictions (quoted interview with a member of its board).

  30. https://www.ismc-iberiamine.com/es/nosotros/. This cluster particularly supports the development of investment projects for “sustainable mining” in order to apply for European grants.

  31. Interview with the project manager of a construction and mining subcontractor in Andalusia, August 2022

  32. Atalaya Mining (2021). Proyecto para tramitación de concesión derivada de permiso de investigación Valverde n°14.920. Procedimiento AAU. Documento 1. Proyecto técnico ambiental, pp. 39 and 42-43

  33. Endesa press release: “Endesa y Atalaya Mining avanzan en su alianza con la firma de un acuerdo de suministro de energía a largo plazo para la mina de Riotinto,” 01/07/2022

  34. Interview with Atalaya Mining’s Sustainability Officer, February 2022

  35. https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/un-global-compact-finding-solutions-global-challenges

  36. Interview with Atalaya Mining’s Environmental Department Manager, March 2022

  37. According to the carbon footprint public registry of the Ministry of Ecological Transition: https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/cambio-climatico/temas/mitigacion-politicas-y-medidas/organizaciones-proyectos.aspx

  38. “How can I be sure, even if I have made this product [copper concentrate] sustainable, that from the end of my cycle [of production], from the beginning of another cycle, these sustainability criteria are followed? […] I’m a bit lost, I don’t know if the concentrate is sold directly to the smelter, if there is an intermediary…” (quoted interview with Atalaya Mining’s Environmental Department Manager).

References

  • Abraham, Y.-M., & Murray, D. (Eds.). (2015). Creuser jusqu’où? Extractivisme et limites à la croissance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, T., & Chevalier, T. (2021). Les méthodes mixtes pour la science politique : Apports, limites et propositions de stratégies de recherche. Revue Française de Science Politique, 71(3), 365–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenas Posadas, C. (2016). Poder, economía y sociedad en el sur. Historia e instituciones del capitalismo andaluz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arenas Posadas, C. (2017). Riotinto: El declive de un mito minero (1954-2003). Revista de Historia Industrial, 26(69), 109–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aykut, S. C., & Maertens, L. (2021). The climatization of global politics: Introduction to the special issue. International Politics, 58(4), 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazilian, M. D. (2018). The mineral foundation of the energy transition. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(1), 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A., Abdulai, A.-G., Humphreys Bebbington, D., Hinfelaar, M., & Sanborn, C. A. (2018). Governing extractive industries: Politics, histories, ideas. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boissonade, J., Barbier, R., Bauler, T., Fortin, M.-J., Fournis, Y., Lemarchand, F., & Raufflet, E. (2016). Mettre à l’épreuve l’acceptabilité sociale. [VertigO] La Revue Électronique en Sciences de l’Environnement, 16(1).

  • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2011). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, A. (2022). The value of a whale. In On the illusions of green capitalism. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buu-Sao, D. (2021). Faire advenir la « mine durable » en Europe? Discours institutionnels et impératif de relance minière, de l’Union Européenne à l’Andalousie. Gouvernance, 18.

  • Cavanagh, C. J., & Benjaminsen, T. A. (2017). Political ecology, variegated green economies, and the foreclosure of alternative sustainabilities. Journal of Political Ecology, 24(1).

  • Cayre, P., & Pierron, R. (2016). Introduction: Sous l’apparence d’une conversion « écologique » générale, des évolutions d’ampleur et d’intensité contrastées. Formation Emploi, 135, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chailleux, S. (2021). La trajectoire du renouveau minier dans la presse écrite française (2009-2019). Gouvernance, 18.

  • Chailleux, S. (2022). La trajectoire de la politique minière française: Gestion de l’après-mine, sécurisation des ressources et ré-exploration du sous-sol. In S. Chailleux, S. Le Berre, & Y. Gunzburger (Eds.), Ressources minérales et transitions: Trajectoire politique du sous-sol français au 21ème siècle. Peter Lang.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chailleux, S., & Arnauld de Sartre, X. (2018). L’acceptabilité ou la recherche d’une nouvelle légitimité pour l’aménagement. [Report of the UMR 5319 Passages].

    Google Scholar 

  • Combes, M. (2010). Réflexions sur le « capitalisme vert ». Mouvements, 63(3), 99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission Européenne (2019). Le pacte vert pour l’Europe (The European green deal) (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2019) 640 final).

  • Commission Européenne (2021). Forging a climate-resilient Europe—The new EU strategy on adaptation to climate change (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2021) 82 final).

  • del Mármol, C., & Vaccaro, I. (2020). New extractivism in European rural areas. How twentieth first century mining returned to disturb the rural transition. Geoforum, 116, 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado Cabeza, M. (2016). Los megaproyectos como forma de apropiación de riqueza y poder en Andalucía. In M. D. Cabeza & L. De Moral (Eds.), Los megaproyectos en Andalucía. Relaciones de poder y apropiación de riqueza (pp. 11–47). Aconcagua libros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drebenstedt, C. (2014). The responsible mining concept – Contributions on the interface between science and practical needs. In C. Drebenstedt & R. Singhal (Eds.), Mine planning and equipment selection (pp. 3–24). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, A., & Jakobsen, J. (2020). The violent technologies of extraction: Political ecology, critical agrarian studies and the capitalist worldeater. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores Caballero, M. (2007). La nacionalización de las minas de Río Tinto y la formación de la Compañía Española: Los orígenes del Polo de Promoción Industrial de Huelva. Universidad de Huelva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M.-J., & Fournis, Y. (2014). Dossier « Territoires en transition environnementale » – Vers une définition ascendante de l’acceptabilité sociale: Les dynamiques territoriales face aux projets énergétiques au Québec. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 22(3), 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschi, D., & Kahn, J. (1999). The economic implications for sustainable mining. Analise Economica, 17(31).

  • Galin, R., & Gaillaud, J.-F. (2020). La politique française des matières premières minérales non énergétiques. Annales des Mines - Responsabilité et Environnement, 99(3), 84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunzburger, Y., Jébrak, M., Marcoux, E., Piguet, J.-K. (2022). Dans quelle mesure le sous-sol français peut-il répondre à nos besoins en matières premières minérales? In S. Chailleux, S. Le Berre & Y. Gunzburger (Eds) Ressources minérales et transitions. Trajectoire politique du sous-sol français au 21ème siècle. Peter Lang.

  • Han Onn, A., & Woodley, A. (2014). A discourse analysis on how the sustainability agenda is defined within the mining industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homobono, N., & Vignolles, D. (2019). Analyse de la vulnérabilité d’approvisionnement en matières premières des entreprises françaises. Conseil général de l’économie, de l’industrie, de l’énergie et des technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3-4), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juste de Ancos, R. (2023). La gran transformación del poder económico: Puertas giratorias, capital y consejeros en la red de empresas españolas cotizadas. Revista Española de Sociología, 32(2), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J., Parsons, R., & Moffat, K. (2012). Exploring the concept of a social licence to operate in the Australian minerals industry: Results from interviews with industry representatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, R. (1984). L’acceptabilité sociale: Une problématique. Revue Française de Gestion, 46, 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, B., & Merlin, J. (2021). Investissement, anticipation, planification: La politique temporelle des activités extractives. Gouvernance, 18.

  • Massé, P. (2021). Gouverner les critiques du renouveau minier français: L’insuffisance des référentiels environnemental et territorial? Gouvernance, 18.

  • Montebourg, A. (2013). La bataille du Made in France. Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. W. (2016). The rise of cheap nature. In J. W. Moore (Ed.), Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism (pp. 78–115). PM Press.

  • Niquet, V. (2011). La Chine et l’arme des terres rares. Revue Internationale et Stratégique, 84(4), 105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinson, G. (2019). 2. Penser par cas, penser par comparaison. Études urbaines et pratique des monographies comparées. In D’une ville à l’autre (pp. 43–66). La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitron, G. (2018). La guerre des métaux rares: La face cachée de la transition énergétique et numérique. Les Liens Qui Libèrent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prudham, S. (2009). Pimping climate change: Richard Branson, global warming, and the performance of green capitalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(7), 1594–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raufflet, E. (2014). De l’acceptabilité sociale au développement local résilient. VertigO, 14(2).

  • Rodriguez, A. (2016). L’alternative Arnaud Montebourg. Cherche midi.

  • Rodríguez Illana, M. (2021). Andalucía, basurero del Estado español. Hojas Monfíes.

  • Sa Vilas Boas, M. H. (2012). Écrire la comparaison lorsque les données sont asymétriques. Une analyse de l’engagement dans les dispositifs participatifs brésiliens. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, 19(1), 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The environment: From surplus to scarcity. Oxford University Press Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrijen, D. (2022). Territoires et prospection minières, l’impossible compromis? Comparaison des conflits autour des permis exploratoires de Loc- Envel (Côtes- d’Armor) et La Fabrié (Tarn). In Ressources minérales et transitions: Trajectoire politique du sous-sol français au 21ème siècle (pp. 297–322). Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I., & Boutilier, R. G. (2011). Social license to operate. In SME mining engineerieng handbook (pp. 1779–1790). Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, I., Boutilier, R. G., & Black, L. (2012). Corporate social responsibility – The social license to operate a mine. The International Resource Journal.

  • Topçu, S. (2013). La France nucléaire. In L’art de gouverner une technologie contestée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tost, M., Hitch, M., Chandurkar, V., Moser, P., & Feiel, S. (2018). The state of environmental sustainability considerations in mining. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 969–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Environment, & International Resource Panel (2019). Global resources Outlook 2019. Natural resources for the future we want. [Report of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme].

  • UN Environment Programme. (2020). Sustainability reporting in the mining sector. In Current status and future trends. UN Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallenhorst, N., & Theviot, A. (2020). Les récits politiques de l’Anthropocène. Articulation du politique en Anthropocène et de l’Anthropocène en politique. Raisons Politiques, 77(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group. (2017). The growing role of minerals and metals for a low carbon future (No. 117581). World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group. (2020). Minerals for climate action: The mineral intensity of the clean energy transition. World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zittoun, P. (2013). La fabrique politique des politiques publiques: Une approche pragmatique de l’action publique. Presses de Sciences Po.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code availability

Not applicable.

Funding

Doris Buu-Sao is benefiting from a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellowship (MINPOL project n° 40227, 2021-2023) for her research on mining renewal in Andalusia. Sébastien Chailleux has received funding from the French government’s Investissements d’Avenir via E2S UPPA junior chair POLSOL (2018-2023). Sylvain Le Berre has received funding from INRAE via the project TRAPOMA (2022-2023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The preparation of the material, the collection and analysis of the data were carried out by each of us and pooled collectively for this article. The manuscript was written and approved collectively. That is why we are signing this article in alphabetical order.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvain Le Berre.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buu-Sao, D., Chailleux, S. & Le Berre, S. Ecological crisis and green capitalism: toward a climatization of extractive industries?. Rev Agric Food Environ Stud (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-023-00201-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-023-00201-w

Keywords

Navigation