Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Indian Urban Workers’ Labour Market Transitions

  • Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Labour Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies gross labour market flows and determinants of labour market transitions for urban Indian workers using a panel dataset constructed from Indian Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) data for the period 2017–18 to 2019–20. Longitudinal studies based on the PLFS have been hampered by data problems that prevent a straightforward merging of the 2017–18 and 2018–19 data releases. In this paper, we propose and validate a matching procedure based on individual and household characteristics that can successfully link almost all records across these 2 years. We use the constructed dataset to document a number of stylised facts about gross worker flows and to estimate the effects of different individual characteristics and work histories on probabilities of job gain and loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Given that each person is followed over four quarters, age in years should not change by more than 1. However, examination of the reported age distribution shows significant bunching around multiples of 2 and 5 which suggests imprecise reporting of age. Since the purpose of this step is only to prevent incorrect linking, we keep a wider acceptance range for reported age.

  2. The self-employment category includes unpaid family workers whose incomes are recorded as zero and whose income can only increase when they move to another state.

References

  • Abdul-Razak, S. and S. Sahoo. 2021. Using the rotational panel data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey: A cautionary tale. Available at SSRN.

  • Abowd, J.M. and A. Zellner. 1985. Estimating gross labor-force flows. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 3 (3): 254–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, H.J., and J.D. Hamilton. 2021. Measuring labor-force participation and the incidence and duration of unemployment. Review of Economic Dynamics 44: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O.J., P. Diamond, R.E. Hall and K. Murphy. 1990. The cyclical behavior of the gross flows of US workers. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1990 (2): 85–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burda, M. and C. Wyplosz. 1994. Gross worker and job flows in Europe. European Economic Review 38 (6): 1287–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSO. 2008. National industrial classification (all economic activities). Government of India: Central Statistical Organisation.

  • Davis, S.J., R.J. Faberman and J. Haltiwanger. 2006. The flow approach to labor markets: New data sources and micro-macro links. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (3): 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S.J. and J. Haltiwanger. 1992. Gross job creation, gross job destruction, and employment reallocation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (3): 819–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S.J., J.C. Haltiwanger and S. Schuh. 1998. Job creation and destruction. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, A. and J. Singh. 2021, Dropping out, being pushed out or can’t get in? Decoding declining labour force participation of Indian women. Ashoka University Economics Discussion Paper 65.

  • Elsby, M.W., B. Hobijn and A. Şahin. 2013. Unemployment dynamics in the OECD. Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (2): 530–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enevoldsen, N. 2022. Twitter thread. https://twitter.com/NilsEnevoldsen/status/1520967332654624768.

  • Feng, S. and Y. Hu. 2013. Misclassification errors and the underestimation of the US unemployment rate. American Economic Review 103 (2): 1054–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, S. and G. Ramey. 2009. The cyclicality of separation and job finding rates. International Economic Review 50 (2): 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, F.A. and J.A. Tessada. 2012. Sudden stops, financial frictions, and labor market flows: Evidence from Latin America. Journal of Development Economics 97 (2): 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.E. 2005. Job loss, job finding, and unemployment in the US economy over the past fifty years. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 20: 101–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.E. and M. Kudlyak. 2019. Job-finding and job-losing: A comprehensive model of heterogeneous individual labor-market dynamics. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 25625.

  • Manski, C.F. 2009. Identification for prediction and decision. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, R. and P. Nath. 2022. A dynamic analysis of women’s labour force participation in urban India. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 33 (4): 766–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A., P.K. Shrivastav and G.P. Singh. 2022. Livelihood volatility in the urban labour market. Economic & Political Weekly 57 (35): 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A. and Y. Tsujita. 2016. Issues in upward mobility: Study based on longitudinal data from Delhi slums. Habitat International 53: 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSSO. 2016. Periodic Labour Force Survey: Instructions to field staff, vol. I. Government of India: National Sample Survey Office.

  • Rogerson, R. and R. Shimer. 2011. Search in macroeconomic models of the labor market. In Handbook of labor economics, vol. 4, ed. O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, 619–700. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., S. Sahoo and S. Klasen. 2019. Employment transitions of women in India: A panel analysis. World Development 115: 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimer, R. 2005. The cyclical behavior of equilibrium unemployment and vacancies. American Economic Review 95 (1): 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimer, R. 2012. Reassessing the ins and outs of unemployment. Review of Economic Dynamics 15 (2): 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yassine, C. 2015. Job accession, separation, and mobility in the Egyptian labor market over the past decade. In The Egyptian labor market in an era of revolution, ed. R. Assaad and C. Krafft, 218–240. Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study and preparing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jyotirmoy Bhattacharya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

I am grateful to the two anonymous referees, seminar participants at Centre for Sustainable Employment (Azim Premji University) and Ambedkar University Delhi, and to Ishan Anand and Anamitra Roychowdhury for very helpful comments. An earlier version of this paper was circulated as the working paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05482.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhattacharya, J. Indian Urban Workers’ Labour Market Transitions. Ind. J. Labour Econ. 66, 471–494 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-023-00434-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-023-00434-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation