Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Approach to Model and Optimize Qualities of Castings Produced by Differential Pressure Casting Process

  • Published:
International Journal of Metalcasting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study attempts to promote the quality of differential pressure casting component by two-stage optimization, orthogonal virtual casting and BP neural network. In the first stage, the critical parameters determined by the numerical model of casting procedure indicate that the qualities of castings, including casting solidification time, secondary dendrite spacing and porosity, are highly affected by the die temperature, pouring temperature and cooling medium temperature. In the second stage, the input–output relationship developed by utilizing BP neural network is found to be statistically adequate and yielded better prediction accuracy. Artificial fish swarm algorithm (AFSA) performs multi-directional search in multi-dimensional space simultaneously and performs desirability function approach. The results of nonlinear neural network-based models and the performance of artificial fish swarm algorithm optimization technique are summarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.H. Raj, R.S. Sharma, S. Srivastava et al., Modeling of manufacturing processes with ANNs for intelligent manufacturing. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 40(6), 851–868 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Mokhtari Homami, A. Fadaei Tehrani, H. Mirzadeh et al., Optimization of turning process using artificial intelligence technology. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 70(5–8), 1205–1217 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Bi, K. Meruva, Modeling and prediction of fatigue life of robotic components in intelligent manufacturing. J. Intell. Manuf. 30, 2575–2585 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Sen, M. Mia, U.K. Mandal et al., GEP and ANN-based tool wear monitoring: a virtually sensing predictive platform for MQL-assisted milling of Inconel 690. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 105, 395–410 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Li, et al., Development status of casting technology of aluminum alloy castings for automotive chassis safety. China Foundry Activity Week (2015)

  6. J. Jorstad, D. Apelian, Pressure assisted processes for high integrity aluminum castings. Int. J. Metalcast. 2(1), 19–39 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Tian, D. Yang, M. Jiang et al., Accurate simulation of complex temperature field in counter-pressure casting process using A356 aluminum alloy. Int. J. Metalcast. 15, 259–270 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00456-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Q. Yan, H. Yu, Z. Xu et al., Effect of holding pressure on the microstructure of vacuum counter-pressure casting aluminum alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 501(2), 352–357 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Tang, W. Liu, Y. Chen et al., Hot deformation behavior of a differential pressure casting Mg-8Gd-4Y-Nd-Zr alloy. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 26, 383–391 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Vossel, N. Wolff, B. Pustal, A. Bhrig-Polaczek, Influence of die temperature control on solidification and the casting process. Int. J. Metalcast. 14, 907–925 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-019-00391-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Raji, R.H. Khan, Effects of pouring temperature and squeeze pressure on Al-8%Si alloy squeeze cast parts. AU JT. 9(4), 229–237 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.G.C. Manjunath, P. Krishna, M.B. Parappagoudar, Modeling of squeeze casting process using design of experiments and response surface methodology. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 28, 167–180 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. X. Zhang, H. Zhang, Z. Zhang et al., Process parameter prediction of differential pressure vacuum casting based on support vector machine. Key Eng. Mater. 621, 633–638 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K.T. Akhil, S. Arul, Optimization of squeeze casting process parameters using Taguchi in LM13 matrix B4C reinforced composites. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 310, 012–029 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Pan, Z. Lei, J. Zhou et al., Optimization of service life of die casting die based on ProCAST software and orthogonal experimental design. Spec. Cast. Nonferr. Alloys. 138, 611–614 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. P.G.C. Manjunath, P. Krishna, M.B. Parappagoudar, An intelligent system for squeeze casting process—soft computing based approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 86(9–12), 1–15 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.G.C. Manjunath, A.K. Shettigar, M.B. Parappagoudar, A systematic approach to model and optimize wear behaviour of castings produced by squeeze casting process. J. Manuf. Process. 32, 199–212 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J.K. Kittur, P.G.C. Manjunath, M.B. Parappagoudar, Modeling of pressure die casting process: an artificial intelligence approach. Int. J. Metalcast. 10, 70–87 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Krimpenis, P.G. Benardos, G.C. Vosniakos et al., Simulation-based selection of optimum pressure die-casting process parameters using neural nets and genetic algorithms. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 27(5–6), 509–517 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J.K. Rai, A.M. Lajimi, P. Xirouchakis, An intelligent system for predicting HPDC process variables in interactive environment. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 203(1), 72–79 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Pan, C. Steve, M. Daan et al., Examination and simulation of silicon macrosegregation in A356 wheel casting. Met. Open Access Metall. J. 8(7), 503 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Borlepwar, S. Biradar, Study on reduction in shrinkage defects in HPDC component by optimization of localized squeezing process. Int J. Metalcast. 13, 915–922 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-018-00295-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Fan, S.L. Cockcroft, D.M. Maijer et al., Porosity prediction in A356 wheel casting. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 50(5), 2421–2435 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Sui, Z. Cui, R. Wang et al., Effect of cooling process on porosity in the aluminum alloy automotive wheel during low-pressure die casting. Int. J. Metalcast. 10, 32–42 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-015-0008-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Yavuz, O. Ertugrul, Numerical analysis of the cooling system performance and effectiveness in aluminum low-pressure die casting. Int. J. Metalcast. 15, 216–228 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00446-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Ruff, T.E. Prucha, J. Barry, D. Patterson, Pressure counter pressure casting (PCPC) for automotive aluminum structural components. SAE Trans. 110, 360–365 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.A. Spittle, M. Almeshhedani, S.G.R. Brown, The Niyama function and its proposed application to micro-porosity prediction. Cast Met. 7(1), 51–56 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. F. Chiesa, J. Mammen, L.F. Smiley, Use of solidification modeling to predict porosity distribution in Al A356 industrial castings. AFS Trans. 106, 98–68 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. C.H. Pequet, M. Rappaz, Modeling of porosity formation during the solidification of aluminium alloys using a mushy zone refinement method. Modeling of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes IX. Aachen, Germany. 71–79 (2000)

  30. U. Feurer, R. Wunderlin, Metal Solidification (DGM Fachber, Stuttgart, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. Li, H. Li, H. Xu, et al., Research on the Secondary Dendrite Arm Spacing of Aluminum Alloy Cylinder Head Based on MAGMA Software. Green Foundry and Sustainable Development—(25th) Chongqing China Foundry Annual Conference Proceedings (2015)

  32. C. Chen, X. Su, D. Zhou et al., Optimization of process parameters of differential pressure casting for aluminum alloy steering knuckle. Hot Work. Technol. 49(13), 54–57 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. Tao, C. Ou, J. Xu, J. Yao, Numerical simulation and experimental study on differential pressure casting of aluminum steering knuckle. Spec. Cast. Nonferr. Alloys 35(12), 1260–1264 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. P.G.C. Manjunath, P. Krishna, M.B. Parappagoudar, Modellingand multi-objectiveoptimisation of squeeze casting process usingregressionanalysis and genetic algorithm. Aust J Mech Eng. 14, 1–17 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. J.K. Kittur, M.N. Choudhari, M.B. Parappagoudar, Modeling and multi-response optimization of pressure die casting process using response surface methodology. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 77(1–4), 211–224 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Jiangsu Postdoctoral Research Foundation (Grant No. 2020Z410), Jiangsu Industry and University Cooperation Project (Grant No. BY2019006) and General Project of Natural Science Research in Universities of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. 19KJB460005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoping Su.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, D., Kang, Z., Yang, C. et al. A Novel Approach to Model and Optimize Qualities of Castings Produced by Differential Pressure Casting Process. Inter Metalcast 16, 259–277 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00596-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00596-6

Keywords

Navigation