Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of groundwater resources potential using Improved Water Quality Index (ImpWQI) and entropy-weighted TOPSIS model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainable Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of groundwater resources has increased in the recent decades, so groundwater quality assessment and identification of pollutants has great importance in areas where groundwater is a main water resource. The aim of this study is to assess the suitability of groundwater in Malayer basin, Iran, using Improved Water Quality Index (ImpWQI) and Technique for Order reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) model. Determining the weight of each parameter is the most important part of TOPSIS method, thus, Entropy method was employed to assign weight of hydrogeochemical parameters. Nine parameters of groundwater quality, including K+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, SO42−, Cl, HCO3, pH, and TDS, in 39 sampling points in September 2018 were considered as inputs. The results indicated that groundwater contains a lot of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and its hardness is high. The results showed that the ImpWQI values range between 32.953 and 100.556. Moreover, seven samples belong to “Excellent” category, 31 samples belong to “Good” category, and one sample belongs to “Medium” category. Generally, groundwater has higher quality in highlands and based on entropy method, and HCO3 and SO42− have the highest and lowest weights with values of 0.132 and 0.089, respectively. The values of entropy-weighted TOPSIS range from 0.102 to 0.979, and in the upstream of the basin, the value of this index is higher than downstream, central parts and the outlet. The correlation of these two indices indicated that the rankings based on both methods are significantly correlated (p < 0.01) with a value of R2 equal to 0.94. According to the findings, application of GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) models provides acceptable results and can be adopted in the management of groundwater resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data available within the article.

References

  • Amiri V, Rezaei M, Sohrabi N (2014) Groundwater quality assessment using entropy weighted water quality index (EWQI) in Lenjanat, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 72:3479–3490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aouiti S, Azaza FH, El Melki F, Hamdi M, Celico F, Zammouri M (2020) Groundwater quality assessment for different uses using various water quality indices in semi-arid region of central Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:46669–46691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11149-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RM, McClelland NI, Deininger RA, Tozer RG (1970) A water quality index—do we dare? Water Sewage Works 117(10):339–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Khosravi K, Karimi M, Busico G, Khozani ZS, Nguyen H, Mastrociccoe M, Tedescoei D, Cuocoe E, Kazakish N (2020) Enhancing nitrate and strontium concentration prediction in groundwater by using new data mining algorithm. Sci Total Environ 715:136836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Huang Q, Lin Y, Fang Y, Qian H, Liu R, Ma H (2019) Hydrogeochemical characteristics and quality assessment of groundwater in an irrigated region, Northwest China. Water 11(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehghan Rahimabadi P, Masoudi R, Abdolshahnejad M, Hojjati Marvast E (2022) Groundwater suitability in Tashk-Bakhtegan and Maharloo basin, Iran. ECOPERSIA 10(4):257–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinpashoh Y (2022) Clustering of observation wells of Khoy plain aquifer from the view of water quality using the K-means. Hydrogeology 7:25–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Docheshmeh Gorgij A, Kisi O, Moghaddam AA, Taghipour A (2019) Groundwater quality ranking for drinking purposes, using the entropy method and the spatial autocorrelation index. Environ Earth Sci 76(7):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Fanghui Y, Li C (2019) Improved entropy weighting model in water quality evaluation. Water Resour Manag 33(6):2049–2056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making, pp 58–191

  • Islam ARMT, Ahmed N, Bodrud-Doza M, Chu R (2017) Characterizing groundwater quality ranks for drinking purposes in Sylhet district, Bangladesh, using entropy method, spatial autocorrelation index, and geostatistics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:26350–26374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jalali M, Kolahchi Z (2008) Groundwater quality in an irrigated, agricultural area of northern Malayer, western Iran. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 80(1):95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jozaghi A, Alizadeh B, Hatami M, Flood I, Khorrami M, Khodaei N, Ghasemi Tousi E (2018) A comparative study of the AHP and TOPSIS techniques for dam site selection using GIS: a case study of Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran. Geosciences 8(12):494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karunanidhi D, Aravinthasamy P, Subramani T, Muthusankar G (2021) Revealing drinking water quality issues and possible health risks based on water quality index (WQI) method in the Shanmuganadhi River basin of South India. Environ Geochem Health 43(2):931–948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Wu J, Qian H (2012) Groundwater quality assessment based on rough sets attribute reduction and TOPSIS method in a semi-arid area, China. Environ Monit Assess 184(8):4841–4854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Yang T, Huang CS, Xu CY, Shao Q, Shi P, Wanga X, Cuia T (2018) An improved approach for water quality evaluation: TOPSIS-based informative weighting and ranking (TIWR) approach. Ecol Indic 89:356–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, He X, Guo W (2019) Spatial groundwater quality and potential health risks due to nitrate ingestion through drinking water: a case study in Yan’an City on the Loess Plateau of northwest China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 25(1–2):11–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Logeshkumaran A, Magesh N, Godson PS, Chandrasekar N (2015) Hydro-geochemistry and application of water quality index (WQI) for groundwater quality assessment, Anna Nagar, part of Chennai City, Tamil Nadu, India. Appl Water Sci 5(4):335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahammad S, Islam A, Shit PK (2022) Geospatial assessment of groundwater quality using entropy-based irrigation water quality index and heavy metal pollution indices. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20665-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskooni EK, Naseri-Rad M, Berndtsson R, Nakagawa K (2020) Use of heavy metal content and modified water quality index to assess groundwater quality in a semiarid area. Water 12(4):1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minh HVT, Avtar R, Kumar P, Tran Q, Ty TV, Behera HC, Kurasaki M (2019) Groundwater quality assessment using fuzzy-AHP in an Giang Province of Vietnam. Geosciences 9(8):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naghibi SA, Dashtpagerdi MM (2017) Evaluation of four supervised learning methods for groundwater spring potential mapping in Khalkhal region (Iran) using GIS-based features. Hydrogeol J 25(1):169–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nsabimana A, Li P, Wang Y, Alam SK (2022) Variation and multi-time series prediction of total hardness in groundwater of the Guanzhong Plain (China) using grey Markov model. Environ Monit Assess 194(12):899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peiyue L, Hui Q, Jianhua W (2011) Hydrochemical formation mechanisms and quality assessment of groundwater with improved TOPSIS method in Pengyang County Northwest China. J Chem 8(3):1164–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravindra B, Subba Rao N, Dhanamjaya Rao EN (2022) Groundwater quality monitoring for assessment of pollution levels and potability using WPI and WQI methods from a part of Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02689-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostami AA, Isazadeh M, Shahabi M, Nozari H (2019) Evaluation of geostatistical techniques and their hybrid in modelling of groundwater quality index in the Marand Plain in Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:34993–35009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Septiariva I, Suryawan IWK (2021) Development of water quality index (WQI) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) for assessment around suwung landfill, Bali Island. J Sustain Sci Manag 16(4):137–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shad R, Khorrami M, Ghaemi M (2017) Developing an Iranian green building assessment tool using decision making methods and geographical information system: case study in Mashhad city. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:324–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KR, Dutta R, Kalamdhad AS, Kumar B (2019) Information entropy as a tool in surface water quality assessment. Environ Earth Sci 78(1):15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song T, Pu H, Schonfeld P, Zhang H, Li W, Peng X, Hue J, Liue W (2021) GIS-based multi-criteria railway design with spatial environmental considerations. Appl Geogr 131:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas Y, Oliver DH, Raj AS, Chandrasekar N (2013) Evaluation of groundwater quality in and around Nagercoil town, Tamilnadu, India: an integrated geochemical and GIS approach. Appl Water Sci 3(3):631–651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ukah B, Ameh P, Egbueri J, Unigwe C, Ubido O (2020) Impact of effluent-derived heavy metals on the groundwater quality in Ajao industrial area, Nigeria: an assessment using entropy water quality index (EWQI). Int J Energy Water Resour 4(3):231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Wu J, Wang Y, Ji Y (2019) Finding high-quality groundwater resources to reduce the hydatidosis incidence in the Shiqu County of Sichuan Province, China: analysis, assessment, and management. Expos Health 12:307–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edn, vol 38, WHO chronicle, vol 4

  • Xu P, Feng W, Qian H, Zhang Q (2019) Hydrogeochemical characterization and irrigation quality assessment of shallow groundwater in the Central-Western Guanzhong Basin, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(9):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahya MN, Gökçekuş H, Ozsahin D, Uzun B (2020) Evaluation of wastewater treatment technologies using TOPSIS. Desalin Water Treat 177:416–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Wang Y (2020) The cloud model based stochastic multi-criteria decision making technology for river health assessment under multiple uncertainties. J Hydrol 581:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Xu P, Qian H (2020) Groundwater quality assessment using improved water quality index (WQI) and human health risk (HHR) evaluation in a semi-arid region of northwest China. Expos Health 12:487–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by PDR, MB, SNM, HK, and HA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by PDR, MB, SNM, and HK, and HA commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Khosravi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dehghan Rahimabadi, P., Behnia, M., Nasabpour Molaei, S. et al. Assessment of groundwater resources potential using Improved Water Quality Index (ImpWQI) and entropy-weighted TOPSIS model. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 10, 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-023-00988-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-023-00988-y

Keywords

Navigation