Nanoengineering Metal–Organic Frameworks and Derivatives for Electrosynthesis of Ammonia

Highlights Recent advances in the metal–organic framework (MOF)-related catalysts for electrochemical ammonia synthesis protocols under ambient reaction conditions are summarized and discussed. The design and fabrication of efficient electrocatalysts from MOF for the reduction of N2 and NO3− are systematically analyzed. Based on the current advances, the ongoing challenges and promising perspectives are highlighted.


Introduction
Ammonia, which has been applied in fertilizers to protect the world's population from the global food crisis in the twentieth century, may save the world again from today's climate change crisis by serving as a green fuel.However, the current NH 3 industry, which uses a catalytic conversion from N 2 and H 2 at high temperatures and pressures (the Haber-Bosch process), is far from green [1].Consequently, the production of green ammonia under mild conditions has become a major focus in low-carbon, green energy research.
Heterogeneous catalysis has attracted extensive attention in the fields of chemistry [2], energy [3], environmental protection [4], and so forth [5].Among all the catalytic processes, the electrocatalytic transformation of abundant small molecules or ions (N 2 and NO x ) into value-added products, such as NH 3 , has been considered a very promising alternative to the current industrial methodologies and a smart approach to tackling intractable environmental issues and the energy crisis [6].With renewable energy as the power supply, transportable fuels (e.g., NH 3 ) and chemicals that are obtained from renewable feedstocks (e.g., H 2 from water splitting, N 2 ) can be tuned by varying the bias potential under ambient conditions.In addition, large-scale industrial applications might be facilitated by using compact and modular electrochemical reactors.However, these electrochemical conversions are limited by the unavoidably large overpotentials for the adsorption and bond cleavage of the intrinsically inert small molecules and the migration of multiple electrons that are required by the subsequential reduction and possible coupling reactions.Furthermore, the competing hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) simultaneously occurs in aqueous electrolytic solutions, impairing the catalytic selectivity and faradaic efficiency (FE) of the electrocatalytic conversion of simple molecules [7].To overcome the kinetic barriers and sluggish reaction dynamics, diverse approaches have been employed to precisely construct nanomaterials with specific electrocatalysis functions.
In general, the diffusion of substrates and products, the transfer of electrons, and reactions at the electrode/electrolytic solution interface are three critical sections of a typical electrocatalytic process [8].Therefore, the transport of charges and the catalytic capability of active sites strongly influence the resulting performance of the catalysts.Consequently, maximum catalytic reactivity can be achieved by modulating the electronic structure and manipulating the surface of the catalytic materials, mimicking homogeneous catalysis in microscopic reaction environments.
Due to their special metal-ligand, periodic networks with metal ions/cluster as nodes and organic ligands as linkers, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with dispersed monoatomic active sites exhibit unique quasi-molecular catalytic performance in heterogeneous catalysis [9].Permanent porosity and chemical and thermal stability of the crystalline MOF networks can be ensured by strong metal-ligand bonds.By judicious selection of the building blocks and appropriate reaction conditions, it is possible to achieve rational design and engineering of the frameworks.Owing to their controllable morphology, high surface area, designable porosity, tunable pore size, and flexible electronic structure, MOFs have not only exhibited extraordinary performance in gas storage and separation [10,11], energy storage [12][13][14][15][16], microwave adsorption [17][18][19], sensors [20,21] and magnetic and molecular recognition [22] but have also received extensive attention to directly activate and convert kinetically inert, simple molecules [23,24] over the last few years.In addition to their direct use as electrocatalysts, hybrid supports, or functional tuners, MOF materials can also be used as electrocatalyst precursors or templates for further fabrication of conductive and stable nanoporous carbon materials (NPC) [25].The subsequent pyrolysis of the MOFs under various conditions can lead to the formation of highly dispersed nanoparticles or single-atom catalysts (SACs), resulting in enhanced electrocatalytic performance [26].
In recent years, the progress of MOF-based catalysts has been demonstrated by many experimental results, and several comprehensive reviews have been published in the field of electrocatalysis.For example, Zhang and coworkers summarized the progress of MOF-derived electrocatalytic materials, focusing on the characterization of active catalytic sites, catalytic performance, and mechanisms in various types of electrochemical catalysis, such as HER, oxygen evolution reaction (OER), oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), CO 2 RR, and NRR [27].Meanwhile, Xu and colleagues reported on recent advances in the fabrication of MOF-derived SACs and their applications in electrocatalysis [28].Li and co-workers demonstrated the similarities shared by CO 2 RR and NRR catalyzed by earth-abundant electrocatalysts (including MOFs), such as the intrinsic chemical inertness of CO 2 and N 2 , the 1 3 multiple-electron transfer process with slow kinetics for reduction, and the competing HER as a side reaction [29].Meanwhile, Tang and Ge reviewed the recent advances of MOF-related materials in the CO 2 RR process [30].Huo and Zhang suggested that the defects in MOFs are the main features to enhance the NRR performance [31].Since ammonia synthesis is of great importance in the development of modern civilization, we envisaged that a comprehensive review of the electrosynthesis of NH 3 by MOF-related catalysts would be meaningful and timely [32].
With our continuous interest in the electrochemical synthesis of NH 3 [33][34][35][36][37], this review presents a systematic discussion of the MOFs and MOF-derived materials that are being studied for the electrosynthesis of ammonia from N 2 and NO 3 − .First, the fundamental principles of the electrosynthesis of NH 3 are illustrated.Then, the recent works related to this topic are divided into four main parts according to the role played by the MOFs in the electrocatalytic process.Finally, the existing challenges and main drawbacks of MOF-related electrocatalysts, as well as promising future solutions and new paths, are analyzed and proposed.The examples of recent work are mainly collected from 2017 onwards.
2 Fundamental Principles for Electrosynthesis of NH 3

Reduction of Dinitrogen Gas
Following recent advances in mild electrochemical NRR, plausible catalytic mechanisms have been proposed based on theoretical and experimental analysis, which not only provide clear clues for understanding the actual reaction pathway but also offer guidance for the rational fabrication of efficient and robust electrocatalysts.The electrocatalytic NRR process generally consists of three main steps: (1) the adsorption and activation of N 2 on the catalytic sites; (2) the hydrogenation process of the activated N 2 intermediates; (3) the desorption of NH 3 from the catalytic sites.
For MOF-based heterogeneous electrocatalysis, two major NRR mechanisms are proposed in accordance with the protonation and bond-breaking modes of *N 2 intermediate, including associative and dissociative pathways.In the dissociative pathway, the cleavage of the N≡N bond takes place upon the adsorption of the N 2 molecule (Fig. 1a) [38].After three consecutive protonation, the NH 3 molecule is generated and further released from the catalytic site.It is worth mentioning that the bond-breaking process requires extremely high energy, due to which the Haber-Bosch process has to be conducted under harsh conditions, thus not popular in electrocatalysis under mild conditions.In the associative pathway, the bond cleavage proceeds with the protonation process simultaneously, yielding a series of N x H y intermediates.In accordance with the order of hydrogenation, the associative path is further divided into distal and alternating routes.In the distal path, the protonation and reduction happen on the distal nitrogen atom first (Fig. 1b) [39].After the generation and release of distant NH 3 , the nitrogen atom bound on the catalyst surface begins to form the second NH 3 in a similar route.Regarding the alternative path, protons are introduced successively onto the two nitrogen atoms and the two NH 3 molecules are formed in turn (Fig. 1c) [40].

Reduction of Nitrate Ion
In the electrochemical reduction of nitrate ions, there are two observed products so far, i.e., N 2 and NH 3 , and the possible mechanistic pathway are complicated, including multiple-electron-transfer and diverse nitrogen-containing intermediates from + 5 to − 3 valence states [41].Theoretical and experimental results suggest two synthetic routes for NH 3 production: regulation by binding hydrogen atoms and direct reduction from the cathode.About adsorbedhydrogen-mediated pathway, the nitrate ion is subsequently and continuously reduced by the in situ generated *H from pre-reduction of *H 2 O on the catalyst surface (Fig. 1d) [42].The desired NH 3 is produced through a series of intermediates, such as *NO 2 − , *NO, *N, *NH, *NH 2, and so on.It is worth mentioning that the N 2 may be formed through the combination of two *N intermediate.Since the calculated migration barrier of *H is less than that of *N and N-H bond formation is kinetically more favorable than the N-N bond, the preferential generation of NH 3 can be achieved on more photophilic catalytic sites.Regarding the electron-mediated pathway, the NO 3 − is adsorbed and reduced to *NO 2 and *NO successively (Fig. 1e) [43].Subsequently, the NH 3 is obtained through consecutive hydrogenation of *NO intermediate, experiencing *HNO, *H 2 NO, *NH 2 OH, and so on.In addition to the formation of NH 3 , the possible N 2 product may be provided through N-N coupling between intermediates, such as *NO and *NO, *NO and *NH 2 , *N and *N, *HNO and *HNO, and so forth.

Nitrogen Efficiency (NE)
The NE is calculated to evaluate the utilization efficiency of the nitrogen atom in the conversion of nitrogen-containing molecules, especially in the transformation of soluble nitrogen oxides, such as nitrate and nitrite ions.The magnitude is determined by the ratio between the actual amount of nitrogen atoms in the product and those in the reactants.It is notable that due to the insolubility of N 2 gas and NO gas, the concentrations of N 2 and NO are uncertain during the experiments, this parameter cannot be applied in the reduction of N 2 and NO processes.An example equation is shown in the following for the evaluation of NO x − reductions: where ] is the concentration of soluble nitrogen oxides (nitrite ion when x = 2, nitrate ion when x = 3) in a pre-reaction solution (mol L −1 ), [NH 3 ] is the resulting NH 3 concentration (mol L −1 ).

Faradaic Efficiency (FE)
The FE is the parameter for the evaluation of the efficiency of electric charges in electrocatalysis.The higher the FE value presented; the more electrons are effective in the generation of desired products.The following equation is generally adopted for FE calculation in the electrosynthesis of NH 3 : where n is the number of electrons required to generate one NH 3 molecule from substrates (n NRR = 3, n NO3RR = 8), F is Faraday constant (96,485 C mol −1 ), [NH 3 ] is the resulting NH 3 concentration (mol L −1 ), V is the volume of the electrolyte in the cathode chamber (L), and Q is the total charges passed through the electrode (C).

Ammonia Yield Rate
The ammonia yield rate, also simplified as NH 3 yield, is used to evaluate the catalytic activity and stability.The larger magnitude means a greater amount of NH 3 produced per unit of time per unit area.The following equation is commonly used: where [NH 3 ] is the resulting NH 3 concentration (mol L −1 ), V is the electrolyte solution volume in the cathodic chamber (L), t is the NRR time in total, and S is the area of the working electrode (i.e., 2 × 2 cm 2 ).

Detection of Ammonia
The current technologies for electrosynthesis of NH 3 in mild conditions are not yet ready for practical use.One of the biggest obstacles is only a trace amount of NH 3 , or NH 4 + is present in the resulting aqueous electrolytic solution.Therefore, the accurate detection of NH 3 at low concentrations is crucial for the development of technological routes for electrochemical NH 3 generation.To date, a number of detection protocols have been proposed, which can be divided into two main categories-the colorimetric method and the instrumental analysis method [44].

Colorimetric Methods
By measuring and comparing the resulting electrolytic solution, the colorimetric methods are rapid, accurate, and reliable for detecting the concentration of NH 3 , especially at trace levels.Generally, certain reagents can change the color of the NH 3 -containing solution.Pretreatment of the electrolytic solution is required to minimize interference from other ions, so ultrapure water and pre-cleaned apparatus are essential when carrying out experiments.Besides, a standard ×V t×S calibration curve is also needed.The following contents are an introduction to the two common colorimetric methods in more detail: (1) The Nessler's reagent, a solution containing K 2 HgI 4 and KOH, is used in Nessler's method for quantitative detection of NH 3 .In alkaline solutions, the mercury and iodide ions react with NH 3 , which is almost unaffected by the pH value of the testing sample.The resulting reddish brown complex shows a strong absorbance at 420 nm, which is directly proportional to the concentration of NH 3 in a relatively wide range.However, due to the toxic nature of the mercury ions, careful manipulation of the detection is required.
(2) The indophenol blue method (IB) is the reaction of NH 3 with phenol and hypochlorite under alkaline conditions, which is known as the Berthelot reaction.Catalyzed by sodium nitroprusside, the blue indophenol product can be obtained at the end of the reaction, and the intensified color change can be detected by UV-Vis absorption.Notably, a relatively long reaction time is essential, and overestimation happens with a higher concentration of NH 3 .

Instrumental Analysis Methods
Generally, the instrumental analytical methods are more efficient, convenient, sensitive, and stable than the colorimetric methods.And the resulting electrolytic solution can be directly tested without the pre-treatment.The following are examples that have ever been reported for the detection of NH 3 .(1) Ion chromatography (IC) is one of the high-performance liquid chromatography, which can quantitatively detect NH 4 + with acidic eluents and cationic columns in aqueous solutions at a trace level.As the ammonium ion has a similar retention time to the sodium and potassium ions, the results are susceptible to their influences.Therefore, this technique suffers from limited choices of electrolytes.(2) An ammonia-sensitive electrode (ASE) is a combination of a pH electrode and an ammonia sensor.After alkalizing the sample solution, the NH 3 can be detected by ASE when it escapes from the solution and subsequently affects the magnitude of the electric current.Subsequently, the concentration of NH 3 can be obtained after calculation and comparison with a pre-calibrated standard curve.(3) Proton nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 HNMR) is generally applied for the characterization of organic molecules, which also can determine the NH 3 qualitatively and quantitatively.A highresolution NMR instrument and water-eliminated Fourier transform technique can effectively monitor the NH 4 + in an aqueous solution.The amount of the ions can be calculated by the internal standard method.Furthermore, the nitrogen source can also be confirmed through isotopic experiments.

Electrolysis Apparatus
As one of the vital impact factors for efficient electrocatalysis, various electrolysis cells have also been investigated by researchers.To date, two typical types of electrolysis cells were widely used in the electrochemical synthesis of ammonia, including H-type cells and flow cells [45].A typical H-type cell is composed of a cathode chamber for oxidation and an anode chamber for reduction, which is separated by a proton/ion-exchange membrane to prevent the bypass of products but maintain the overall conductivity (Fig. 2a).
In an H-type cell, the reduction reaction can be severely influenced by competing HER from water splitting and limited mass transportation in bulk aqueous solution, while in bulk organic solution, the decrease in electric conductivity is an indispensable challenge for sufficient electrolytic performance.Meanwhile, the aforementioned drawbacks of H-type cells can be mitigated by a flow cell.Composed of separated gaseous and catholyte cathode chamber, generally in the form of a gas diffusion electrode (GDE), the reduction reactions take place in the triple-phase boundary, within which much higher current densities and enhanced efficiencies can be obtained (Fig. 2b).

MOF-related Electrocatalysts for Nitrogen Reduction Reaction
As a naturally abundant nitrogen resource, dinitrogen gas is one of the ideal resources for the synthesis of NH 3 .However, due to the inert nature of N 2 , the transformation from N 2 to NH 3 remains challenging.Electrochemical fixation of N 2 into NH 3 is one of the promising alternatives to replace the energy-intensive Haber-Bosch process.With the aid of electrocatalysts, the N 2 molecules can be adsorbed, activated, and transformed into NH 3 .Plenty of efforts have been taken into developing novel catalysts with efficient and robust performance for the electrosynthesis of NH 3 under ambient conditions.The following context mainly focused on the artificial electrochemical conversion of N 2 to NH 3 catalyzed by MOFs and MOF-derived materials.
The design principles for highly efficient MOF-related electrocatalysts for NRR follow but are not limited to: (1) Modifying the electronic structures to enhance N 2 adsorption and activation, or altering the NRR pathways, such as doping, hybridization, or bimetallic MOFs, etc. (2) Tailoring the porous framework to improve mass transport, e.g., ligand engineering, etc. (3) Enhancing the number of active sites, e.g., increasing the under-coordinated metal sites, or creating ion vacancies, etc. (4) Increasing conductivity to enhance charge transport, such as doping or metal species alteration, etc. (5) Tuning the surface hydrophobicity to suppress the competing HER, e.g., via organic ligands optimization, surface treatment, etc. (6) Hybridizing with other species for synergistic electrocatalytic effects.(7) Manipulating the exposed surface condition of the catalyst, such as particle size to enlarge the effective surface area and the crystal orientations to uncover the highly active crystal surfaces, e.g., through the optimization of synthetic strategies, etc. (8) Optimizing the electrolytes to favor the NRR process, including choices of electrolytes, pH, etc.

MOF-Based Electrocatalysts
With metal nodes and organic linkage, MOFs are recognized as the ideal catalysts that can be precisely manipulated for specific catalytic capacity.Moreover, due to the large surface area and amendable organic functional groups, enhanced catalytic performance can be achieved [46].Furthermore, hybrid with additional catalytic materials, such as pure metallic plates, metal oxides [47], metal chalcogenides [48], MXene [49], graphite [50], and so on, MOFs can tune the reaction pathway and subsequently produce targeted products with their intrinsic hydrophobicity and porous structure.
The following contents are mainly focused on the pristine MOFs and MOF-hybrid composites for electrocatalytic N 2 fixation.

Monometallic MOFs
To date, various monometallic MOFs, including Al, Fe, Co, Cu, Zr, Ce, In, and so on, exhibited their effective catalytic performance for the generation of NH 3 via electrochemical N 2 fixation.Inspired by the high catalytic activity of Fe in Haber-Bosch process, in 2017 Zhao et al. adopted pristine Fe-MOFs as NRR catalysts [51], which was constructed by the Fe 3+ and 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (BTC) and was found to give the highest NH 3 yield rate (7.63 × 10 -3 mmol h −1 cm −2 ) with 1.43% FE at 90 °C in N 2 .Due to MOFs' porous structure and abundant transition metal sites, they can absorb and activate the inert N 2 for electrosynthesis of NH 3 under relatively mild conditions.Later on, MIL-88B-Fe and NH 2 -MIL-88B-Fe were further fabricated and applied to the NRR process by the same research group [52].The -NH 2 group promotes charge transfer to the Fe unsaturated sites and creates a larger effective area.In a neutral electrolytic solution, NH 2 -substituted Fe-MOF promoted the ammonia yield rate up to 4 times higher than that of the original one, achieving 12.45% FE at 0.05 V versus RHE.Apart from Fe-MOFs, the typical Cu-MOF (HKUST-1) was also investigated as an electrocatalyst for NRR [53].The unsaturated Cu could not only be used as an adsorbent site but also be converted into Cu 2 O or Cu (0) during the reduction process, which increased the conductivity of MOF and achieved the ammonia yield up to 46.63 µg h −1 mg cat.−1 with a 2.45% FE at − 0.75 V versus RHE in 0.1 M Na 2 SO 4 .In another Cu-MOF-catalyzed electrochemical NRR work, Zhao et al. adopted the stable self-support JUC-1000/CC as both cathode and anode in an H electrolytic cell [54].Instead of the OER process, the oxidation of sodium gluconate took place at the anode, generating glucaric acid as another valuable product.With this kinetically favorable process, the electrochemical NRR at the cathode was enhanced significantly, generating NH 3 at a high ammonia yield of 24.7 mg h −1 mg cat.−1 with 11.9% FE.The introduction of a new reaction into an anode chamber not only increases the diversity of products but also provides a new direction for the improvement of the electrochemical NRR process.Improving the electrical conductivity of MOF is always challenging.In this regard, efforts have been taken to design and fabricate conductive MOFs.For instance, using hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP) as organic linkages and cobalt as metal nodes, a conductive Co-MOF (Co 3 HHTP 2 ) was constructed for electrocatalytic N 2 fixation to NH 3 [55].In 0.5 M LiClO 4 electrolytic solution, Co 3 HHTP 2 nanoparticles achieve a large NH 3 yield of 22.14 μg h −1 mg cat.−1 and a FE of 3.34% at − 0.40 V versus RHE.
In recent studies, the main group elements exhibited considerable performance as NRR catalysts due to their effectiveness in suppressing hydrogen evolution, which may originate from the intrinsic affinity of the metal v band to the N 2p orbital of N 2 [33].For example, Fu et al. first developed an Al-based porous MOF, MIL-100 (Al), for artificial N 2 fixation through electrocatalysis (Fig. 3a) [56].Because of the strong interaction between the 3p band of Al and the 2p orbital of N, MIL-100 (Al) owns excellent ability for N 2 sorption, presenting remarkable performance in generating NH 3 with 10.6 µg h −1 cm −2 mg cat.
−1 yield rate and FE of 22.6% at an ultralow overpotential in N 2 -saturated alkaline solution (Fig. 3c).Notably, the synergistic effect of the skeleton and Al nodes of MIL-100(Al) was further revealed by comparative experiments (Fig. 3b).The moderated catalytic performance was observed in the NRR process catalyzed by MIL-53(Al) and defective MIL-100(Al).Furthermore, modified with stable superoxide radicals (O 2 •), a defective Zr-MOF (UiO-66-NH 2 ) was applied for electrosynthesis of NH 3 from N 2 as a superior active catalyst [57].In 0.1 M Na 2 SO 4 , the NH 3 was generated at a high yield rate of 52.81 µg h −1 cm −2 mg cat.−1 with 85.21% FE at − 0.39 V versus RHE.The neighboring exposed Zr atoms (Zr-OO• and Zr site) contribute to the incredible catalytic performance through their synergy effect.Besides, the proton adsorption was unfavored by the exposed Zr atoms, which further constrained the hydrogen evolution and hydrazine formation.
In addition to functionalized MOFs, the in situ generated MOFs on commercially available substrates also presented a noteworthy performance in electrochemical N 2 -to-NH 3 conversion.For example, Liu et al. constructed several self-support heterogeneous catalysts through in situ growth of MOFs on the copper mesh, including Cu@Cu-MOF and Cu@Ce-MOF-n (n = 1, 2, and 3) (Fig. 4a) [58].After a thorough examination, the Cu@Ce-MOF-2 rise above others, and an NH 3 yield rate of 14.83 µg h −1 cm −2 with a 10.81% FE was obtained at − 0.2 V versus RHE in 0.1 M KOH (Fig. 4b,  c).The Ce-unsaturated coordination structure on the surface of Ce-MOF provides oxygen vacancies and serves as active sites for the adsorption and activation of N 2 , and the conductive copper mesh promotes sufficient charge transfer, making Cu@Ce-MOF-2 an efficient and stable electrocatalyst.However, the poorly stable Ce-MOF reconstructed into CeO 2 without oxygen vacancies after use.
As an emerging MOF type, two-dimensional (2D) MOF nanosheets show superior catalytic performance due to increased exposed catalytic site, enlarged aspect ratio, enhanced permeability, and improved mass transport.Particularly, Sun and co-workers constructed an ultrathin 2D In-MOF with a thickness of 1.3 nm for the exploration of catalytic performance in NRR at different pH values (1, 7, and 12) (Fig. 4d) [59].In an alkaline electrolytic solution (pH = 12), the maximum NH 3 yield of 79.20 µg h −1 mg cat.−1 was achieved with a 14.98% FE, while moderate results were obtained in acidic and neutral media (Fig. 4e).In-MOFs possess a rigid architecture and exhibit excellent stability at all pH levels.

Bimetallic MOFs
Recently, it has been shown that the NRR activity of MOF coordinated with only one metal site is relatively insufficient, and the performance of NRR is expected to improve with the introduction of additional metals to tailor the electronic structures.More active sites can also be created.The strong synergistic effect between bimetallic MOF makes it one of the most active catalysts in the field of electrocatalytic NRR.For example, Duan et al. prepared a zero-dimensional (0D) bimetallic nickel, iron-MOF with expanded porosity and the diminished particle size facilitating the mass and charge transport, which further improved the NRR activity (Fig. 6a) [62].The DFT calculation emphasized that the iron-dopant minimized the Gibbs free energy in the final cleavage of the N-N bond, affording a FE of 11.5% and an ammonia yield rate of 9.3 mg h −1 mg cat .−1 at − 345 mV versus RHE (Fig. 6b, c).Reducing the particle size to expose more active metal sites, increasing mesoporosity to accelerate the mass transport, and modifying the electronic structure to lower the energy barriers for the NRR process, are very efficient to boost the electrocatalytic performance.Additionally, in order to improve the conductivity of MOF, Li et al. developed a 2D bimetallic Co x Fe MOF nanosheet for the electrosynthesis of NH 3 (Fig. 6d) [63].After extensive research, the as-fabricated MOF nanosheet meets the requirements of both OER and NRR, and Co 3 Fe MOF exhibited the best catalytic performance beyond others (Fig. 6e-h).With the aid of this bifunctional electrode, the NH 3 was generated with a remarkable FE up to 25.64%, and the corresponding NH 3 yield rate of 8.79 µg h −1 mg cat.−1 at − 0.2 V versus RHE.

MOF Hybrid Composites
In the field of electrocatalyst development for the NRR process, noble metal nanoparticles have already demonstrated their high efficiency in the adsorption and activation of N 2 molecules.However, the catalytic robustness always inclines to decrease dramatically attributed to the intrinsic weakness of the metal nanoparticles, which is prone to agglomeration as the reaction proceeds.Developing a proper strategy to well-disperse the metal nanoparticles and alleviate their tendency to agglomerate is an effective way for promoting catalytic efficiency.With rigid skeleton and well-defined pores, MOFs are a suitable substrate for catalytic active metal nanoparticles.Encapsulated in the channels or cavities of MOF structure, the metal nanoparticles are confined against the gathering.Moreover, the residue pores of the composites facilitate the mass transfer, while the competing HER process was restrained by the native hydrophobicity of MOF.Therefore, impregnation with metal nanoparticles can improve the catalytic performance of MOFs in the electrochemical N 2 fixation process.For example, Yang et al. designed a composite of nanoporous gold and ZIF-8 (NPG@ZIF-8) with a core-shell structure (Fig. 7a,  b) [64].As the hydrophobicity of ZIF-8 reduces the proximity of H 2 O molecules to the catalyst, the ammonia yield and FE of NPG@ZIF-8 are significantly increased.At the same time, the micropores inherent in the ZIF structure can adsorb nitrogen on the surface of the catalyst.The core-shell structured metal nanoparticle@MOF composites are promising catalysts for the electrosynthesis of NH 3 under ambient conditions.Furthermore, Lv et al. [65] prepared an Au-Cu alloy nanoparticle that could also facilitate electron transport between reactants and catalyst surfaces by introducing ZIF-8 to improve the limited specific surface area and exposed active sites (Fig. 7c-h).This enabled the catalyst to achieve an unprecedented ammonia yield of 23.3 µg h −1 mg cat .−1 with nitrogen and air as feedstocks and acidic electrolytic solutions in all pH ranges.Moreover, He and co-workers developed a hydrophobic Au@MOF coated with organosilicon (HT-Au@MOF) for NH 3 generation [66].The Au and FE of 60.9% were realized at − 0.3 V versus RHE (Fig. 7k).In the NRR process, the HER was significantly suppressed by the hydrophobicity from the organosilicon layer, and outstanding catalytic properties were achieved attributed to the active Au catalytic site as well as the N 2 aggregation effect of the porous ZIF-8 (Fig. 7l, m).More recently, Wen and co-workers fabricated a UiO-66-based composite with electron-rich PdCu nanoparticles implanted into the cavity and hydrophobic polydimethylsiloxane coating (PdCu@UiO-S@PDMS) [67].The as-prepared MOFhybrid was adopted as an efficient NRR electrocatalyst for the generation of NH 3 .Due to the integration of hydrophobicity, proton supply, and catalytic activity from each component of the PdCu@UiO-S@PDMS, the NH 3 was successively produced with 20.24 µg h −1 mg cat.−1 yield rate and 13.16% FE at − 0.25 V versus RHE in 0.1 M HCl.
In addition to the aqueous electrolytic solutions, the NRR conducted in organic solutions to bypass HER also exhibited superior performance with heterogeneous catalysts.For instance, Lee and colleagues deposited ZIF-71 on an Ag-Au platform using a wet chemical deposition method, fabricating a ZIF-coated Ag-Au electrode (Ag-Au@ZIF) for NH 3 electrosynthesis in dry THF solution with LiCF 3 SO 3 as the electrolyte (Fig. 8a) [68].The significant suppression of competing water electrolysis was realized attributed to the water-repelling effect of the ZIF layer, and the enhanced catalytic performance was achieved due to the porous structure of ZIF that increases the concentration of nitrogen gas and prevents agglomeration of Ag-Au nanoparticles.Continuously, two similar works were proposed by the same group.For the electrocatalytic fixation of N 2 to NH 3 in THF media, a ZIF-encapsulated Pt/Au electrocatalyst has been synthesized and the d-band electronic structure of the bimetallic alloy has been modified, reducing the surface adsorption of a hydrogen atom to improve the NRR performance (Fig. 8b) [69].In dry THF media, the N 2 to NH 3 process catalyzed by Pt/Au@ZIF achieves up to 4 times more FE than bare Pt/Au, obtaining a high FE of > 44% and an NH 3 yield rate of > 161 µg h −1 mg cat.
−1 under ambient conditions.After experimental comparison and theoretical calculation, the originally unfavored N 2 reduction process becomes favored due to the hydrophobic surface, concentrating effect, and electronic modification caused by the ZIF deposit.In another example, the authors confined metallic electrocatalysts in the ZIF-71 structure, fabricating the M@ ZIF platform for high-selective NH 3 production (Fig. 8c) [70].Then, the hydrophobic functionalized oleyamine was installed superficially for water exclusion, and butanol was impregnated into the ZIF structure as a proton supplier.The performance of electrocatalytic N 2 fixation was examined in a dry THF electrocatalytic solution.Notably, different from the other two works, the catalytic efficiency can be affected by the water content, which gradually increases in the interval 0-0.1% v/v and then decreases with the further growth of water.These works enriched the design and synthesis of proper electrocatalysts as well as the choice of electrolyte solutions for electrocatalytic NH 3 synthesis.Recently, thin-layered 2D nanomaterials exhibited their superior catalytic performance in the electrochemical conversion of simple molecules [71].After the hybridization with MOFs, these nanocomposites can elevate the product selectivity and further enhance the catalytic efficiency.For example, Liang et al. prepared ZIF-67 on the Ti 3 C 2 layer by in situ growth method for NH 3 synthesis (Fig. 9a, b) [72].By virtue of the high porosity and large specific surface area of ZIF as well as the excellent electrical conductivity of 2D Ti 3 C 2 , the composite material ZIF-67@Ti 3 C 2 exhibited excellent NH 3 yield of 6.52 μmol h −1 cm −2 and FE of 20.2% at − 0.4 V versus RHE in 0.1 M KOH.Notably, due to the synergistic effect of ZIF-67 and Ti 3 C 2 , the electrocatalytic activity of composite ZIF-67@Ti 3 C 2 for N 2 fixation is significantly higher than individual components, ZIF-67 and Ti 3 C 2 (Fig. 9c).In another work, Xu et al. developed a MIL-101(Fe) modified MoS 3 nanocomposite (MIL-101(Fe)/ MoS 3 ) for artificial N 2 fixation (Fig. 9d) [73].The hybrid material possesses a homogeneous nanolayer of MoS 3 and crystal nanodots of MIL-101(Fe) (Fig. 9e, f).In 0.1 M HCl, the NH 3 transformation from N 2 was achieved with 25.7 µg h −1 mg cat.
−1 yield rate and 36.71%FE at − 0.1 V versus RHE (Fig. 9g).Similarly, Duan and co-workers developed ZIF-71 enveloped ball-like MoS 2 nanoflowers (MoS 2 @ ZIF-71) via layer-by-layer growth strategy for electrocatalytic NRR application (Fig. 9h) [74].Catalyzed by MoS 2 / CP electrode coated with ZIF-71, the NH 3 products were provided in a maximum of 56.69 µg.h −1 mg cat.−1 yield rate and 30.91%FE at − 0.2 V versus RHE in 0.1 M Na 2 SO 4 (Fig. 9i, j).The hydrophobicity of porous ZIF-71 is responsible to concentrate N 2 and suppress HER, and the synergistic effect between MoS 2 and ZIF-71 was intensively confirmed by the control experiments (Fig. 9k).These aforementioned advances put forward innovative strategies for fabricating hybrid composites of 2D nanostructure and MOF, and expanded the choices of promising candidates of electrocatalysts for the NRR process.Furthermore, the carbon-based catalysts containing defects present a positive effect in adsorbing and activating N 2 molecules, thus improving the process of N 2 fixation.The integration of conductivity and catalytic activity of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and N 2 enrichment and hydrophobicity of MOFs make the CNT@MOF composites promising NRR electrocatalysts for practical use.Lv et al. proposed a combined catalytic method of MOF doping CNT or N-doped CNT (NCNT) for electrochemical N 2 fixation [75].The MOF dopant enlarged the water contact angle and N 2 sorption uptake of the material, inferring improved water-repelling ability for rationally restraining HER and N 2 enrichment for promoted N 2 fixation.
Based on the aforementioned works listed in Table 1, pristine MOFs and MOF-hybrid materials are certificated as promising electrocatalysts for efficient artificial N 2 fixation for NH 3 .In the framework, the metals are generally considered to have the ability to adsorb and activate N 2 molecules, while hydrophobic organic linkages are supposed to suppress the competing HER process.Meanwhile, the porous skeletons not only provide sufficient space to accelerate the reduction of N 2 but also offer the opportunity to couple with other functional materials, which facilitates the integration and optimization for better catalytic performance.Additionally, conductive MOFs and 2D MOF nanosheets exhibit their unique promotion effect for electrocatalytic N 2 -to-NH 3 , such as enhanced conductivity, more exposed active sites, and more rapid mass transfer, etc.

MOF-derived Electrocatalysts
MOFs can also be used as pre-catalysts.Through proper pyrolysis or calcination processes, the coordinatively fabricated MOF can be derived into carbon-based nanomaterials with enhanced conductivity and stability, thus further improving the electrocatalytic efficiency.In most cases, the framework can be reserved or slightly shrank with organic linkage decomposed into carbon materials, while the metal residues were converted into metal oxides, metal sulfides, metal carbides, phosphating compounds, selenides, and even single metal atoms as catalytic active sites that were firmly installed on the carbon-based materials.The following contents are mainly focused on the MOF-derived electrocatalysts for NRR, such as porous carbon catalysts, single-atom catalysts, and other nanostructured composites.

Heteroatom-doped Porous Carbon Catalysts
By virtue of abundant origins, fabricable structure, and tunable function, non-metal catalysts have become more and more attractive in various electrochemical transformations [76].Among the reported non-metal catalysts, MOF-derived carbons received much attention due to their merits of high surface area, adjustable porosity, and excellent thermal stability.Most importantly, changing the pyrolysis temperature can adjust the degree of graphitization, which can change the electronic and geometric structure of carbon, and thus improve the performance of NRR.For example, Liu et al. prepared a cost-effective N-doped porous carbon (NPC) by carbonized ZIF-8 and utilized it as electrocatalysts for NH 3 synthesis (Fig. 10a-c) [77].The N 2 adsorption was facilitated by the nitrogen content, and pyridinic and pyrrolic nitrogen were verified as active sites for the fixation of N 2 .
Compared with transition metals, metal-free MOF-derived N-doped carbon significantly inhibited HER activity in the acidic media (0.05 M H 2 SO 4 ), thus promoting the NH 3 yield reached 1.40 mmol g −1 h −1 at − 0.9 V versus RHE.Moreover, similar work was also reported by Mukherjee and colleagues that the ZIF-derived carbon catalyst exhibited encouraging activity and stability for electrochemical N 2 conversion in alkaline media (Fig. 10d-g) [78].The C-ZIF-1100-1 was prepared from the pyrolysis of ZIF-8 precursor at 1100 °C for 1 h, providing the NH 3 with FE up to 10.2% at − 0.3 V versus RHE 0.1 M KOH.Intriguingly, the N 3 site of N-doped carbon formed during high-temperature pyrolysis was claimed to be the catalytic active center for the electrochemical reduction of N 2 .Both examples indicated the ZIF-derived NPC being a low-cost metal-free catalyst for NH 3 generation via N 2 reduction.
In addition to the N-dopants, the NPC materials can be further activated by the introduction of other heteroatoms, providing more active sites for adsorption and reduction of N 2 molecules.For example, Song et al. prepared N, P co-doped porous carbon electrocatalysts from MOF precursors [79].Through the carbonization of MOF-5, dicyandiamide, and triphenylphosphine mixture at 900 °C, NP-C-MOF-5 was fabricated and adopted as the electrocatalyst for electrocatalytic N 2 fixation (Fig. 10h-k).In acidic electrolytic solutions, the NH 3 was obtained with the yields of 1.08 µg h −1 mg cat.The morphology and structure of MAF were maintained in the pyrolyzed N-MPC, and the introduction of sulfur provided an active site for N 2 adsorption and subsequent reduction (Fig. 10l).Experimental results show that S/N-MPC exhibited excellent N 2 -to-NH 3 selectivity and electrochemical stability, offering the NH 3 yield of 45.51 μg h −1 mg cat .−1 and FE of 25.16% at − 0.3 and − 0.2 V versus RHE, respectively (Fig. 10m).Both examples demonstrated that the incorporation of heteroatoms into carbon-based electrocatalysts can improve NRR performance.

Single-atom Catalysts
Single-atom catalysts (SACs) are widely used in various electrocatalytic reduction processes because of their unique electronic structure, uniform low coordination environment, atomically dispersed active sites, and maximum atomic utilization [28].In general, MOF-derived SAC catalysts were constructed through the pyrolysis or carbonization of MOF precursors with metal embedded or installed.The highly dispersive metal atoms can be stabilized by the defect-rich supporting carbon substrates.With the merits of electric conductivity, well-defined porous structure, and quasi-molecular catalytic activity, the as-prepared SAC catalysts presented enhanced performance of electrochemical NRR.Among the many precious metal-based SACs, Ru-based SAC is located at the top of the volcano map, providing more opportunities for NRR.Geng et al. synthesized the nitrogendoped carbon with dispersive Ru single atoms (Ru SAs/N-C) via pyrolysis of ZIF-8 with Ru-dopants and used them as electrocatalysts for the NRR process (Fig. 11a, b) [81].At − 0.2 V versus RHE, the NH 3 was produced with an FE of 29.6% and a record-breaking yield of 120.9 µg h −1 mg cat.
−1 , still the top-ranked NH 3 yield so far (Fig. 11c,d).Furthermore, Tao et al. developed a ZrO 2 /N-doped carbon composite catalyst with single Ru sites (Ru@ZrO 2 /NC) for the electrosynthesis of NH 3 from N 2 [82].Ru ions were encapsulated in UiO-66 by a hydrothermal method and then annealed to generate the Ru@ZrO 2 /NC in N 2 .HAADF-STEM observations confirmed the distribution of single Ru sites on the carbon support, the size of most of the Ru atoms fell in the range of 0.1-0.2nm (Fig. 11e).The formation of atom-dispersed Ru is most likely due to uncoordinated -NH 2 groups stabilizing the precursor and inhibiting Ru aggregation during pyrolysis.At a more negative than − 0.31 V versus RHE, the FE of NH 3 approaches 0 due to competitive HER for Ru@NC, whereas the addition of ZrO 2 significantly promoted the generation of NH 3 at all applied potentials.Catalyzed by the Ru@ZrO 2 /NC, the FE of NH 3 reaches a maximum of about 21% at − 0.11 V versus RHE and the NH 3 yield of 3.665 mg h −1 mg cat.−1 at − 0.21 V versus RHE (Fig. 11f, g).
In addition to Ru SACs, the transition-metal SACs were also demonstrated as effective catalysts for the electrochemical artificial fixation of N 2 .For example, Lü et al. fabricated N-doped carbon frameworks anchored with isolated Fe single atoms (ISAS-Fe/NC) through carbonization and etching of pre-synthesized bimetallic Fe-doped ZIF-8 (Fig. 12a,  b) [83].The as-prepared Fe SAC exhibited superior catalytic performance for the generation of NH 3 , with the NH 3 yield of 62.9 ± 2.7 μg h −1 mg cat .−1 and FE of 18.6 ± 0.8% at − 0.4 V versus RHE in neutral media (Fig. 12c, d).The electrocatalytic stability of ISAS-Fe/NC was verified by a long-term electrolysis test, with slight fluctuation of current density in 24 h (Fig. 12e).This work shed light on the practical use of low-cost transition-metal SACs in environmentally friendly NH 3 synthesis with low energy consumption.Furthermore, the Fe SACs were also developed from the pyrolysis of PCN-222(Fe) precursors (Fe 1 -N-C), reported by Zhang and co-workers (Fig. 12f) [84].The nanorod shape of Fe 1 -N-C was inherited from the MOF precursor, and the atomically dispersed Fe sites were confirmed by the HAADF-STEM image (Fig. 12g-i).At a relatively low overpotential, − 0.05 V versus RHE, the maximum NH 3 yield reached 1.56 × 10 -11 mol cm −2 s −1 with 4.51% FE (Fig. 12j).In another example, Liu et al. prepared a Fe-N/C SAC from the pyrolysis of Fe-TPP/ZIF-8 precursors (Fig. 12k, l) [85].Obtained through ball milling, the precursors were annealed and subsequently fixed on pre-treated carbon papers by Nafion.Then, the electrosynthesis of NH 3 was mediated by the as-fabricated Fe-N/C-CP catalytic electrode, realizing the NH 3 yield of 2.27 μg h −1 mg cat .−1 with 7.67% FE at − 0.2 V versus RHE (Fig. 12m).
Apart from Fe, advances using other transition-metalbased SACs were also proposed for the investigation of electrocatalysts in NRR.For instance, Liu et al. prepared Co-single atom embedded N-doped porous carbon (CSA/ NPC) by annealing the Co-doped ZIF-8 (Fig. 13a) [86].The polyhedral crystal morphology of ZIF can also be observed in the CSA/NPC (Fig. 13b-d).And the NH 3 yield and FE were 0.86 µmol cm −2 h −1 and 10.5%, respectively (Fig. 13e).
The as-prepared CSA/NPC not only has high NRR activity and selectivity but also has good electrochemical stability (Fig. 13f).Furthermore, Gao et al. synthesized a cobalt/ nitrogen-doped porous carbon (Co/NC) electrocatalyst consisting of a single Co site by carbonizing ZIF-67.In 0.1 M KOH, the maximum NH 3 yield was 5.1 μg h −1 mg cat .−1 at − 0.4 V versus RHE, and the FE reached up to 10.1% at − 0.1 V versus RHE [87].In another case, Mukherjee and colleagues prepared an atomically dispersed Ni site electrocatalyst through the pyrolysis of the Ni-Zn bimetallic organic framework (Fig. 13g) [88].With the partial replacement of Zn nodes by Ni during the formation process, the Ni-N x -C coordination structure was formed after annealing (Fig. 13h).Notably, the formation of NH 3 was not limited by the pH of the electrolytic solution, yielding the optimized NH 3 yield of 115 µg cm −2 h −1 at − 0.8 V versus RHE under neutral conditions, and a high FE of 22.9% at − 0.2 V versus RHE under alkaline conditions (Fig. 13i-k).
Compared with precious metals, low-cost semi-metals are also listed as candidate materials for NRR, especially nanoscale Bi.Bi-based NRR electrocatalysts with ideal electronic structure and high-exposure active sites can be prepared through reasonable composite design.Xi et al. prepared hollow titanium nitride nanorods bound by monoatomic Bi and fixed them in NC loaded on carbon cloth (NC/ Bi SAs/TiN/CC) (Fig. 13l) [89].The composite exhibits a versus RHE and a high FE of 24.60% at − 0.5 V versus RHE in 0.1 M Na 2 SO 4 solution (Fig. 13m).In addition, the synergistic effect of Bi-SAs and TiN can simultaneously promote N 2 hydrogenation and inhibit HER (Fig. 13n).Based on the above advances in electrochemical NRR promoted by the MOF-derived SACs, the precisely designed synthetic route of electrocatalysts play a vital role in enhancing energy conversion and NH 3 generation.Thanks to the N-doped porous carbon substrates, the electric conductivity, proton transportation, and stabilization of single metal atoms were guaranteed, thus providing superior catalytic performance for artificial N 2 fixation.

Other MOF-Derived Nanostructures
Apart from the metal SACs, other MOF-derived nanostructures by high-temperature pyrolysis were also proved to be effective electrocatalysts in NRR for NH 3 synthesis, including the carbon materials that dispersed by metal nanoparticles, metal oxides, metal sulfides, and metal phosphides.In general, the morphology of MOF precursors can be maintained  14a) [90].According to the comparison of NRR performance, NC@Ru-5 was verified to be one of the optimal catalyst, providing the highest yield of NH 3 is 16.68 μg h −1 mg cat.. −1 at − 0.4 V versus RHE and that of FE  14b, c).Meanwhile, without the introduction of external metal sources, the Co/C-900 composite was developed by Liu et al. through the direct calcination of ZIF-67 at 900 °C for 1 h in N 2 (Fig. 14d) [91].The Co nodes in ZIF-67 were fully adapted to the Co/C-900 as catalytic active sites.The N 2 reduction was measured using Co/C-900 as the catalysts in 0.1 M KOH, displaying the highest FE of 11.53% and the maximum NH 3 production rate of 4.66 μmol cm −2 h −1 at − 0.3 V versus RHE.Similarly, another MOF-derived Cobased nanomaterial was also proposed by Yin et al. [92].The Co@N-doped carbon materials (Co@NC) were fabricated by ZIF-67 precursor annealing at high temperatures.Under ambient conditions, Co@NC exhibits excellent electrocatalytic performance.At − 0.9 V versus Ag/AgCl, the NH 3 was offered an NH 3 yield of 1.57 × 10 -10 mol s −1 cm −2 with FE up to 21.79%.Furthermore, Wang et al. synthesized an electrocatalyst at the Fe-N3 site using Fe-ZIF-CNT composites as templates (Fig. 14e) [93].In 0.1 M KOH media, this catalyst exhibits enhanced NRR activity with NH 3 production of 34.83 μg h −1 mg cat .−1 , and FE of 9.28% at − 0.2 V versus RHE.In 2021, Wang et al. developed an efficient electrocatalyst for the N 2 -to-NH 3 process by confining Bi NPs into carbon rods (CRs) (Bi NPs@CRs) through annealing of Bi-MOF@CRs (Fig. 14f) [94].In 0.1 M HCl, a high FE of 11.5% and a large NH 3 yield of 20.8 μg h −1 mg cat.−1 for Bi NPs@CRs were obtained at − 0.55 V and − 0.6 V versus RHE, respectively (Fig. 14g).The superior catalytic activity was verified by the comparison with Bi NPs (Fig. 14h), and the stability was further evaluated through the test with 6 cycles (Fig. 14i).More recently, Wu et al. developed an N, P co-doped carbon catalyst with Bi anchored (Bi/NPC) for electrochemical NH 3 generation [95].The synthesis route started from the construction of Bi containing ZIF-8 by selfassembly under ambient conditions, and the Bi/NPC hybrid was yielded after the subsequent pyrolysis and phosphorating.Intriguingly, the N-doped carbon substrate was further modified instead of the formation of BiP.With the synergistic effects of Bi catalytic sites, conductive carbon supports, and P-dopant proton suppliers, superior catalytic performance toward NH 3 synthesis was achieved with 13.58% FE at − 0.4 V versus RHE.The structural tunability and synergistic effect of the bimetal-supported heteroatom-doped carbon catalyst can improve the performance of NRR compared with the single metal-based catalyst.Using ZIF-8 as a precursor, electrorich metal sites can be obtained by thermolysis followed by acid etching.Ma et al. prepared an N-doped hollow carbon polyhedron supported by PdZn nanoparticles by etching, which can increase more electrons for vacancies in Pd-based catalysts and promote N 2 adsorption, thus improving the performance of NRR [96].The FE of NH 3 reaches 16.9%, and compared with PdZn NP in buffer solution, the NH 3 yield of the catalyst after etching is significantly higher (5.28 μg h −1 mg cat.
−1 with a 2.02% FE at − 0.3 V versus RHE.In these works, the synergistic effect of bimetallic active sites was emphasized to be one of the vital factors for enhancing electrochemical N 2 conversion.
Inspired by nitrogenase in nature, molybdenum and ironbased catalysts have drawn extensive attention in the field of NRR.The bimetallic NC nanomaterials from molybdenum or iron precursors show advanced characteristics that benefit the catalytic process, such as bimetallic active sites, synergistic effects, and excellent electrical conductivity.For instance, Zhang et al. prepared bimetallic nanoparticles of Mo-Co by pyrolysis of Mo-Co-ZIF-8 precursor.Compared with the single metal Co/NC, the catalytic activity and selectivity of bimetallic Mo-Co /NC are significantly enhanced, and the ammonia yield and FE are 89.8 µmol h −1 g cat.
−1 and 13.5%, respectively [98].In addition, under the continuous electrolysis of 50000 s, the bimetallic Mo-Co /NC shows good electrochemical stability.Experimental studies have proved that pyridine nitrogen and pyrrole nitrogen are beneficial to NRR, to distinguish the ammonia generated from N 2 rather than N in the precursor.Chen et al. synthesized a nitrogen-free catalyst and obtained porous microspheres of MoFe-PC by pyrolysis of phosphoric acid and bimetallic MOF, which not only included the bimetallic active site but also inherited the porous structure of the MOF precursor [99].MOF-100(Fe)@PVP) as the precursor, using their multicomponent and multi-interface structure to induce electron transfer and improve the electrical conductivity of the hybrid material (Fig. 15a) [101].The authors reported for the first time a POMOFs-derived Fe 1.89 Mo 4.11 O 7 /FeS 2 @C catalyst with acidic potassium sulfate as an electrolytic solution, the FE of Fe 1.89 Mo 4.11 O 7 /FeS 2 @C is as high as 54.7%, with an NH 3 yield rate of 105.3 μg h −1 mg cat.
The Cu nodes of the original MOF were removed during the etching process, thus generating phosphatized Mo dispersed on the P-doped carbon with the octahedral morphology.Afterward, another POMOF-derived for NH 3 electrosynthesis was reported from the same group [103].Based on the host-guest-assisted strategy, the nanostructured bimetallic sulfides, FeS 2 /MoS 2 @RGO were synthesized through the reaction between thiourea and pre-fabricated PMo 12 @MOF-100(Fe)@RGO (Fig. 15e).Due to the integration of electrochemical characteristics of individual components, the hybrid material displayed excellent catalytic performance for NRR, with optimized NH 3 yield of 41.1 μg h −1 mg cat.−1 and maximum FE of 38.6% at − 0.2 V versus RHE (Fig. 15f).The sulfide composite showed sufficient catalytic activity and stability in both acid and alkaline electrolytes, presenting great application value.Transition metal oxides (TMOs) are also promising substitutes for NRR because of their earth abundance and low price [104].MOF-derived TMOs have attracted extensive attention in the field of catalysis.For early stage transition metals, the C-doped TiO 2 /C (C-Ti x O y /C) and C/Y-stabilized ZrO 2 derived from related MOFs were fabricated 1 3 for the electrochemical reduction of N 2 to NH 3 under mild conditions [105,106].For iron group elements, the MOFderived Co 3 O 4 @NC nanocomposites were reported by Luo et al. with high specific surface products and structural stability (Fig. 16a) [107].Co 3 O 4 with oxygen vacancy (V o ) was obtained by pyrolysis, and the synergistic effect with NC improved the performance of NRR.In 0.05 M H 2 SO 4 , it exhibits a high NH 3 yield of 42.58 μg h −1 mg cat.
−1 with 8.5% FE at − 0.2 V versus RHE (Fig. 16b).During the 6 cycles of electrocatalysis, the Co 3 O 4 @NC catalytic stability was ensured with neglectable fluctuation (Fig. 16c).Afterward, the MOF-derived hollow C@NiO@Ni catalyst was developed by the same group, exhibiting excellent NRR performance in 0.1 M KOH with a high NH 3 yield of 43.15 μg h −1 mg cat.−1 and FE of 10.9% at − 0.7 V versus RHE [108].Similarly, Wen and co-workers developed Zn-doped Co 3 O 4 nano-polyhedrons for the electrochemical N 2 fixation (Fig. 16d) [109].After low-temperature oxidation of the Zn/Co bimetallic ZIF precursors, the morphology of ZIF was retained with abundant simultaneously formed V o that acted as the Lewis acid sites (Fig. 16e).With the synergistic effect of V o and electronrich Co sites, the N 2 transformation was promoted, offering an NH 3 yield of 22.71 μg h −1 mg cat.−1 with an 11.9% FE (Fig. 16f).In another case, the promotive effect of V o for electrocatalysis was further verified by Cu-doped CeO 2 NPs on carbon nitride support (CuCeO 2 @NC) [110].Ye et al. fabricated the CuCeO 2 @NC through the annealing of melamine-cooperated CuCe-BTC under a reducing atmosphere (Fig. 16g, h).The maximum FE of 34.6% was provided with a high NH 3 yield of 44.5 μg h −1 mg cat.
−1 (Fig. 16i).Moreover, the N 2 fixation activity was further improved by introducing urea in the neutral electrolytic solution, using the MOF-derived CuO/Cu 2 O@CD-CN/NiF as the electrocatalyst [111].According to these advances in MOF-derived TMO catalysts for NRR, the V o was claimed as the indispensable catalytic site.
In addition to TMO, other transition metal complexes (phosphide, sulfide) have also been widely used in electrocatalysis.For example, Wei et al. reported that ZIF-67-derived cobalt disulfide nanoparticles supported in nitrogen-doped carbon (CoS 2 @NC) for NH 3 synthesis [112].With excellent catalytic activity and electrical conductivity, CoS 2 @NC catalyzed artificial N 2 fixation provided a large NH 3 yield of 17.45 μg h −1 mg cat.
−1 and a high FE of 4.6% at − 0.15 V versus RHE in 0.1 M HCl.Furthermore, Liu et al. developed a highly selective FeNi 2 S 4 / NiS electrocatalyst prepared by electrodeposition of Fe/ Ni MOF-74 on carbon cloth as a precursor and curing at high temperatures [113].The exposed crystal surface of the catalyst and the electronic structure of the d-band of the catalyst was adjusted by changing the stoichiometric ratio of Fe: Ni to enhance the selective adsorption of N 2 .Thus, heterogeneous interfaces with dual activity, which have   [115].This nanoparticle-nanosheet-nanocages hierarchical structure provides abundant active sites for NRR, with an FE of 7.36% at 0 V and maximum NH 3 yields of 10.78 µg h −1 mg cat.
−1 at − 0.4 V versus RHE.Li and co-authors reported a nitrogen-doped carbon nanosheet embedded with Cu 3 P clusters (Cu 3 P/NC) for the electrochemical fixation of N 2 [116].The hybrid was synthesized through a low-temperature pyrolysis-phosphating strategy, with Cu-MOF precursors.Benefiting from the N-dopants that facilitated the electrical conductivity and defect formation as well as the phosphate that tuned the d-band of Cu, the generation of NH 3 was achieved with a 10.4 yield rate and 6.3% FE at − 0.1 V versus RHE.As a result, the green and efficient electrochemical NRR to NH 3 products were further enriched with these advances in MOF-derived metal phosphides.In all, MOF-derived nanostructures and their hybrids were able to be fabricated rationally and precisely with the merits of adjustable structures, abundant compositions, and diverse morphologies originating from the MOF precursors.To date, these materials are undoubtedly one of the promising candidates for electrocatalytic NH 3 synthesis under mild conditions.The related catalysts and their performance are listed in Table 2.

MOF-Related Electrocatalysts for Nitrate Reduction Reactions
To kill two birds with one stone, the electrochemical reduction of nitrate (NO 3 -) is considered a promising strategy to remove NO 3 --containing pollutants in water with the simultaneous NH 3 synthesis under ambient conditions, which is also called electrochemical denitration [117,118].Although extensive investigations have been reported in this field, there are few examples were realized using MOF-based electrocatalysts under mild conditions.Due to the complexity of the plausible mechanism of electrochemical denitration, several advanced works were presented yielding N 2 as the major product.For example, Sun and co-workers proposed an electrochemical conversion of NO 3 − to N 2 , adopting a Fe-Ni bimetallic MOF-derived nanomaterial as the effective electrocatalyst [119].Theoretically, further reduction and protonation are essential for the more valuable NH 3 product.
According to the discussion about the NRR process in the previous section, with porous structure and intrinsic hydrophobicity, MOFs were also presumed to have the ability to exhibit their superior catalytic activity and product selectivity for electrochemical conversion of NO 3 − to NH 3 process under ambient conditions.More recently, the electrochemical conversion of NO 3 − to NH 3 was extensively explored by MOF-related catalysts, and recent advances were listed as follows.

MOF-Based Electrocatalysts
Similar to the MOF-based electrocatalysts for NRR, the precisely designed and delicately synthesized pristine MOFs or MOF-hybrids with proper hydrophobicity, sufficient conductivity, and robust catalytic active sites can tune the NO 3 − reduction for the harvest of NH 3 products.
For example, Lv et al. reported 2D In-MOF electrocatalysts with atomically dispersed active sites, high electron, and proton transport, and confined microporous environments for electrochemical denitration (Fig. 17a) [120].After a thorough exploration of the catalysts and reaction conditions, the NH 3 product was provided with the highest NH 3 yield rate of 92.98 µg h −1 mg cat.−1 (pH = 2) and optimal FE of 56.57% (pH = 3) at − 0.7 V versus RHE.Notably, the competing HER process can be tuned by the pH value of the electrolytic solution (Fig. 17b).With proper pH value, the metal active sites were properly exposed with appropriate ligand dissociation, while excessive ligand dissociation at low pH led to increasing water splitting (Fig. 17c) and no ligand dissociation at high pH caused complete cessation of NH 3 generation (Fig. 17d).In another case that adopted selectivity, a yield rate of 1.84 mg h −1 cm −2 , and an FE of 67.55%.According to the DFT calculation, the metallic Cu filling inside MOF was identified as a catalytic active site and the catalytic performance was improved due to the facilitation of electron transfer by the Cu(111) crystal face.Furthermore, Jiang and co-workers fabricated a series of noble metal nanodots (NDs) encapsulated in Zr-MOFs (M-NDs/Zr-MOF, M = Pd, Ag, or Au) and applied them in the NO 3 RR process as the electrocatalysts (Fig. 17e-h) [122].The NO 3 − to NH 3 catalytic activity was promoted by the confined metal NDs, while the conductivity and mass transport was facilitated with uniform-sized pores and redox-reversible tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) motifs inside the Zr-MOF skeleton.In 0.1 M Na 2 SO 4 with 500 ppm NO 3 − , the highest NH 3 yield was obtained as 287.31 µmol h −1 mg cat.−1 with 58.1% FE at − 1.3 V versus RHE with Pd-NDs/Zr-MOF as the electrocatalyst (Fig. 17i, j).In another investigation using noble-metal-related MOF-hybrid electrocatalysts, Qin and co-workers reported the preparation of a Ru x O y mosaic Ni-MOF composite (RuNi-MOF) and its application in electrochemical NO 3 RR [123].Through solvothermal strategy, a nearly 100% production selectivity for NH 3 was realized, with a maximum yield of up to 274 µg h −1 mg cat.−1 and FE of ~ 73% at − 1.7 and − 1.2 V versus Ag/AgCl, respectively.According to the theoretical calculation, the Ru 3 site was indicated as the main active center for the generation of NH 3 , undergoing a direct electron-mediated pathway.[126].With CuNi-BTC precursors prepared by the solvothermal method, a series of CuNi/NC with different Cu-Ni ratios were fabricated through pyrolysis.Inherited from the MOFs, the CuNi/NC catalysts maintained the octahedral morphology with the CuNi alloy particles enveloped in the nitrogen-doped carbon matrix (Fig. 18a).The conversion of NO 3 − was higher than 80% with Cu/NC and decreased with the addition of Ni, while the values of NH 3 selectivity and FE reached a peak at Cu: Ni = 5:1, obtaining 94.4% and 79.6%, respectively (Fig. 18b-d).
A possible proton-mediated synthetic route of NH The study of MOF-related catalysts for electrochemical denitration is still in its infancy [128].The inspiring works originated from the electrocatalytic reduction process of other molecules, such as carbon dioxide, oxygen, and nitrogen.It is attractive and challenging the investigation of precise design and synthesis of MOF-based or MOF-derived electrocatalysts with efficient catalytic activity and superior product selectivity.Moreover, since NH 3 is valuable in modern industrial civilization and the possible mechanism of NO 3 RR is complicated, further exploration of the NH 3 synthetic pathway with theoretical calculation and in situ characterization is essential for the guidance of practical use.

Conclusion and Perspective
In this review, we have summarized recent works focusing on the development of effective and efficient MOF electrocatalysts for electrochemical NH 3 synthesis.A timeline since 2017 for selected works towards electrosynthesis of ammonia is shown in Fig. 19.According to our analysis of several recent studies, the electrocatalytic performance is determined by the ability of the superficial adsorption, reductive activation, and competitive NH 3 selectivity that can be tuned by proper nanoengineering of the electrocatalysts.The electronic structure and morphology variation of the catalysts plays vital roles in achieving enhanced catalytic capability and superior product selectivity.Hence, fabricating electrocatalysts from MOFs indeed facilitates these electrochemical processes as practical and effective replacements for current industrial processes in synthetic and energy aspects.However, there are still drawbacks that are significant and challenging.First, the development of novel electrocatalysts is still dependent on experience or trial-and-error procedures, which costs a lot of time and energy.Second, the synthetic process and modification strategy often require harsh conditions to obtain the optimized morphology and boost catalytic performance, and reproducibility can be poor.Third, the surface environment may change under catalytic conditions, which can be difficult to predict and detect.Moreover, the N 2 with its intrinsic insolubility and inertness requires extensive exploration to promote the reactivity, while the electrochemical conversion of nitrogen oxides is mainly valuable in waste gas and water treatment which is a drop in the ocean for modern ammonia needs.Therefore, some advanced techniques and methods are required to assist in the fabrication of high-performance MOF-related catalysts for NH 3 synthesis in the future, as discussed below.
1) Machine learning (ML) is one of the significant breakthroughs in computer science these days.In the study of chemistry and material science, ML was adopted as a powerful tool to reasonably predict new molecules or materials for specific applications [129,130].With the help of an established database of nanomaterials, the proper candidates of electrocatalysts for ammonia production can be estimated before experimental corroboration.As a result, it should be feasible to develop functional NH 3 synthesis catalysts from MOFs with the help of ML. 2) Mild synthetic processing is one of the ultimate pursuits in material science.Most of the current synthetic protocols for MOF-derived electrocatalysts in NH 3 synthesis still require harsh conditions, excessive synthesis time and steps, and limited precursor types.Moreover, Fig. 19 A timeline for electrosynthesis of ammonia catalyzed by MOF-related catalysts the existing synthetic protocols of robust MOF-related electrocatalysts are far from large-scale industrial applications.Novel strategies with simple manipulation and mild conditions are under investigation in the field of electrocatalysis [131].Therefore, the development of new synthetic routes using new reaction precursors under mild conditions is important for the sustainable application of electrochemical NH 3 production.3) In situ characterization is a useful tool for understanding specific reaction mechanisms.Due to the complex and diverse reaction processes in the synthesis of NH 3 from N 2 or NO 3 − , in situ characterization should be helpful for the exploration of the reaction mechanism in detail.Through the in situ characterization, the key intermediates can be confirmed, the catalytic process can be understood, the conformational relationships can be clarified, and the synthesis of catalysts can be further guided.Thus, the development of MOF-related electrocatalysts with efficient and active catalytic performance toward the synthesis of NH 3 can be extensively improved.4) Conversion of other N-containing substrates is also an attractive research field in the electrosynthesis of ammonia.As nitrogen element is fully oxidized in NO 3 − ion, other nitrogen oxides with relatively lower oxidation states have a high probability of being reduced to ammonia.There are existing developments of metal-based nanomaterials with extraordinary catalytic performance in the conversion of NO 2 − [132][133][134][135][136] and prediction of 2D MOF-catalyzed electrochemical conversion of NOto-NH 3 through DFT calculation [137].The MOF-based and derived materials are very promising catalysts for promoting the conversion of these NO x particles or ions into NH 3 .
In all, the investigation of NH 3 electrosynthesis under mild conditions is still at a preliminary stage and far from meeting the actual needs [138].Developing comprehensive performance and low-cost electrocatalysts is no doubt the most promising outlet for constructing NH 3 electrosynthesis that can complement or even replace the existing industrial processes.We hope that this review is able to offer inspiration for the rational development of MOF-related electrocatalysts for NH 3 synthesis that would also make significant contributions and breakthroughs in materials science, synthetic chemistry, catalysis, and other fields.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Plausible mechanisms for electrosynthesis of NH 3 .a Dissociative pathway for NRR.b Associative distal pathway for NRR.c Associative alternating pathway for NRR.d Adsorbed-hydrogen-mediated pathway for NO 3 RR.e Direct electroreduction of NO 3 RR

Fig. 2 a
Fig. 2 a An H-type cell in NRR.b A flow cell in NRR with detection methods.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [45].Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society

Fig. 3 a
Fig. 3 a Synthetic strategy for the preparation of MIL-100.b Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves and c ammonia yield and FE at the overpotential (177 mV) for pure Cu foam, MIL-100(Al), defect MIL-100(Al), and MIL-53(Al) electrodes in an N 2 -saturated aqueous solution of 0.1 M KOH.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [56].Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society

Fig. 4 a
Fig. 4 a Synthetic diagram of Cu@Cu-MOF and Cu@Ce-MOF.NRR results of b different catalysts and c Cu@Ce-MOF-2 at different potentials.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [58].Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.d Synthesis and morphological characterization of In-MOF nanosheets.e NRR performance of In-MOFs in pH = 12 aqueous media.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [59].Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry

Fig. 5 a
Fig. 5 a Synthesis of Fe-TCPP MOFs.NRR results of b FE and c NH 3 yield of M-TCPP, at different potentials.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [60].Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry.d Synthetic diagram of hydrophobic PCN-222(Fe) nanosheets for electrocatalytic NRR. e Different hydrophobic molecules and water contact angle of modified PCN-222(Fe).NRR performance of f OPA-PCN-222(Fe) and g different electrocatalysts.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [61].Copyright 2022, Elsevier

Fig. 6 a
Fig. 6 a Synthetic strategy of bimetallic NiFe-MOFs.b FE and NH 3 yields of NiFe-MOF and bulk MOF at different potentials.c DFT calculations of NiFe-MOF and its counterparts.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [62].Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry.d Crystal structures of Co 3 Fe-MOF.e LSV curves of different working electrodes.f NRR properties of Co 3 Fe-MOF.OER electrochemical performances of different working electrodes under ambient conditions g comparison on overpotential at 10 mA cm −2 , Tafel slope, and h Nyquist plots.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [63].Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry

Fig. 7 a
Fig. 7 a Schematic diagram of nanoporous Au@ZIF-8 for NRR.b HAADF-STEM and EDS elemental mappings.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [64].Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH.c, d TEM images, e HRTEM image and f STEM image, and corresponding g Au and h Cu element mapping images of AuCu/ZIF-8 (Au/Cu raw molar ratio 3:7).Reproduced with permission from Ref. [65].Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry.i Schematic diagram of HT Au@MOF composite for NRR.j HRTEM image.k Ammonia yield and FE at different potentials.Digital photos for l Au@MOF and m HT Au@MOF samples.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [66].Copyright 2021, Elsevier

Fig. 8 a
Fig. 8 a Schematic diagram and the cross-sectional SEM image of Ag-Au@ZIF.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [68].Copyright 2018, Science.b Schematic diagram and the cross-sectional SEM image of M@ZIF-OAm.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [70].Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.c Schematic diagram and the cross-sectional SEM image of Pt/Au@ZIF.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [69].Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH

Fig. 10 a
Fig. 10 a Schematic illustration of NPC preparation.b SEM image and c SEM image of NPC-750.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [77].Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.Comparison of morphology and microstructure between d, e ZIF-8 nanocrystal precursors and f, g pyrolyzed C-ZIF-1100-1.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [78].Copyright 2018, Elsevier.h SEM image, i, j TEM images, and k elements mappings of NP-C-MOF-5.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [79].Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.l Elements mappings and m NRR performance of S/N-MPC.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [80].Copyright 2021, Elsevier

Fig. 12 a
Fig. 12 a Schematic synthesis route, b HAADF-STEM image, c-e electrochemical NRR performance of ISAS-Fe/NC.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [83].Copyright 2019, Elsevier.f Schematic synthesis route of Fe 1 -N-C.TEM image of g PCN-222(Fe) precursors and h Fe 1 -N-C.i HAADF-STEM image and j NRR performance of Fe 1 -N-C.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [84].Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry.k Schematic illustration, l HAADF-STEM image, and m NRR performance of Fe-N/C-CPs.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [85].Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society

Fig. 13 a 3 is 14 .
Fig. 13 a Schematic synthesis route and b-c TEM images with different annealing temperatures of CSA/NPC.e FE at different potentials and f duration test of CSA/NPC-750.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [86].Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry.g Schematic of Ni x Zn (1-x) BMOF.h HAADF-STEM image of Ni-N x -C.NRR performance of Ni-N x -C-700-3h i in alkaline media, j in neutral media, and k in acidic media.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [88].Copyright 2020, WILEY.l Schematic illustration and m NRR performance of NC/ Bi SAs/TiN/CC.n NRR performance comparison with related catalysts.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [89].Copyright 2022, WILEY

Fig. 14 a
Fig. 14 a Schematic synthesis route and b, c NRR performance of NC@Ru.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [90].Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry.d Schematic synthesis of Co/C-900.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [91].Copyright 2020, WILEY-VCH.e Schematic illustration of Fe-N/C-CNTs.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [93].Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.f Schematic synthesis and g-i NRR performances of Bi NPs@CRs.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [94].Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society

Fig. 16 a
Fig. 16 a Schematic illustration and b, c NRR performance of Co 3 O 4 @NC.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [107].Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.d Schematic synthesis, e SEM image, and f NRR performance of Zn-Co 3 O 4 .Reproduced with permission from Ref. [109].Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.g Schematic synthesis, h HAADF-STEM element mapping images, and i NRR performance of CuCeO 2 @NC.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [110].Copyright 2021, Elsevier

Fig. 17 a
Fig. 17 a Schematic illustration of the 2D In-MOF crystalline structure.Catalytic cycle of nitrate reduction b at pH =2 or 3, c at pH = 1, and d at pH = 4 or 5, respectively.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [120].Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society.e Schematic structure of M-NDs/Zr-MOF.f HRTEM image, g, h TEM images, and i NO 3 RR performance of Pd-NDs/Zr-MOF.j Comparison of NH 3 yields and FE values of different catalysts at -1.3 V vs. RHE.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [122].Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society 3 was proposed due to the synergistic effect of Cu-Ni for facilitating electron and proton transfer.Furthermore, Zhang et al. proposed a MOF-74-derived Co-doped Fe@Fe 2 O 3 electrocatalyst for NO 3 RR (Fig. 18e) [127].According to the experimental and computational results, the d-band of the Fe-center was modulated by the Co dopants, thus tuning the adsorption energy of intermediates and suppressing the HER process.The enhanced NH 3 generation was shown with a maximum yield of 1505.9 μg h −1 cm −2 at − 0.95 versus RHE and 95.7% NH 3 selectivity as well as FE of 85.8% at − 0.75 V versus RHE in 0.1 M Na 2 SO 4 (Fig. 18f, g).

Fig. 18 a
Fig. 18 a TEM image of CuNi/NC-51.b Conversion rate of NO 3 − .c Selectivity of NH 3 and NO 2 − .d FE of NH 3 over CuNi/NC catalysts.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [126].Copyright 2022, Elsevier.e Synthesis procedure of Co-Fe@Fe 2 O 3 .Comparison of NO 3 RR performance f at different NO 3 concentrations and g at different potentials.Reproduced with permission from Ref. [127].Copyright 2022, National Academy of Sciences

Table 1
The performance of different MOFs and their related products in NRR It is an efficient NRR catalyst with the highest ammonia yield of 34.23 µg h −1 mg cat.−1 and FE of 16.83% at − 0.5 V versus RHE.Cu-Mo bimetallic MOFs were also used as the precursors for fabricating electrocatalysts for N 2 reduction.Furthermore, Ma et al. constructed a composite material with MOF-derived Fe 2 O 3 NPs anchored on MoS 2 nanoflowers (Fe 2 O 3 @MoS 2 ) and used it in the electrochemical N 2 fixation as the catalyst [100].The Fe 2 O 3 NPs were synthesized through the calcination of Fe-MOF and subsequently confined by the in situ generated MoS 2 nanoflowers.Compared to the MoS 2 nanoflowers, enhanced NRR catalytic activity and stability were provided by the Fe 2 O 3 @ MoS 2 composite.Wang et al. designed an electrocatalyst for coupling Fe and Mo as the active component, selected polyoxometalate-based MOF with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PMo 12 @ stronger NRR performance than single FeS 2 or NiS, exhibit ultra-high NH 3 yields up to 128.398 ± 1.32 μg h −1 cm −2 and a high FE of 28.64 ± 0.18% at − 0.30 V versus RHE in alkaline electrolytic solutions.In another case, Wu et al.