Abstract
Cyber dating abuse involves the use of electronic communication technology to direct abuse towards a romantic partner. Research has explored the perpetration of cyber dating abuse through an evolutionary lens, suggesting people use technology to perform mate retention tactics. Namely, previous research has found that mate value discrepancy and intrasexual competition predict the perpetration of cyber dating abuse. However, we do not yet know whether there is a direct relationship between cost-inflicting mate retention tactics and cyber dating abuse. Here, we directly explored whether cost-inflicting mate retention behaviours predict the perpetration of cyber dating abuse across two studies (study 1, n = 132; study 2, n = 124), finding strong support. We also explored the role of the Dark Triad in the perpetration of cyber dating abuse, and contrary to previous literature, we found no support. Our research furthers our understanding of the factors that drive cyber dating abuse from an evolutionary perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
Data available upon request.
Notes
The recruitment method and procedural facets were the same for studies 1 and 2. Psychology students were awarded research credits for taking part in the study. Once they accrue a certain number of credits, they can then use the research participation scheme for their own projects. No incentives were provided for members of the public.
Note: we do not use these terms in a clinical manner.
Although sex was a significant predictor, we did not follow this up with an independent samples t-test, due to the disproportionate men and women who took part in the study.
References
Bhogal, M. S., & Howman, J. M. (2019). Mate value discrepancy and attachment anxiety predict the perpetration of cyber dating abuse. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0172-6
Bhogal, M. S., Rhead, C., & Tudor, C. (2019). Understanding cyber dating abuse from an evolutionary perspective: Further evidence for the role of mate value discrepancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109552
Bhogal, M. S., Tudor, C., & Hira, S. (2021). The role of mating-relevant factors in the perpetration of cyber dating abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211004103
Borrajo, E., Gámez-Guadix, M., Pereda, N., & Calvete, E. (2015). The development and validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among young couples. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.063
Branson, M., & March, E. (2021). Dangerous dating in the digital age: Jealousy, hostility, narcissism, and psychopathy as predictors of cyber dating abuse. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106711.
Brem, M. J., Spiller, L. C., & Vandehey, M. A. (2015). Online mate retention tactics on Facebook are associated with relationship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(16), 2831–2850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514554286
Brewer, G., Bennett, C., Davidson, L., Ireen, A., Phipps, A. J., Stewart-Wilkes, D., & Wilson, B. (2018). Dark Triad traits and romantic relationship attachment accommodation and control. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 202–208.
Brown, C., & Hegarty, K. (2018). Cyber dating abuse measures: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.03.003
Buss, D. M., Shackleford, T. K., & McKibbin, W. F. (2008). The mate retention inventory short form (MRI-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.08.013
Carton, H., & Egan, V. (2017). The dark triad and intimate partner violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 84–88.
Chester, D., & DeWall, C. (2018). The roots of intimate partner violence. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 55–59.
Deans, H., & Bhogal, M. S. (2019). Perpetrating cyber dating abuse: A brief report on the role of aggression, romantic jealousy and gender. Current Psychology, 38(5), 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9715-4
Erik, E., & Bhogal, M. S. (2016). Do the dark triad and self-perceived mate value predict intention to mate poach? Letters on Evolutionary Behavioural Science, 7(2), 1–4.https://doi.org/10.5178/lebs.2016.50
Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
Hughes, S., & Samuels, H. (2021). Dark desires: The Dark Tetrad and relationship control. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110548.
Jonason, P. K., & Davis, M. D. (2018). A gender role view of the dark triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 102–105.
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
Koehn, M. A., Okan, C., & Jonason, P. K. (2019). A primer on the Dark Triad traits. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12198
March, E., Litten, V., Sullivan, D., & Ward, l. (2020). Somebody that I (used) to) know: Gender and dimensions of dark personality traits as predictors of intimate partner violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 110084
Messing, J., Bagwell-Gray, M., Brown, M. L., Kappas, A., & Durfee, A. (2020). Intersections of stalking and technology-based abuse: Emerging definitions conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Family Violence, 35, 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00114-7
Morey, J. N., Gentzler, A. L., Creasy, B., Oberhauser, A. M., & Westerman, D. (2013). Young adults’ use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1771–1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.019
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unravelling the paradoxes of Narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 12(4), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1
Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 441–444.
Pineda, D., Galan, M., Martinez-Martinez, A., Campagne, D. M., & Piqueras, J. A. (2021). Same personality, new ways to abuse: How dark tetrad personalities are connected with cyber intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Online first.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.
Peeters, M., Cillessen, A. H., & Scholte, R. H. (2010). Clueless or powerful? Identifying subtypes of bullies in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1041–1052.
Rasmussen, K. R., & Boon, S. D. (2014). Romantic revenge and The Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.018
Reed, L. A., Tolman, R. M., & Ward, L. M. (2016). Gender matters: Experiences and consequences of digital dating abuse victimization in adolescent dating relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 59, 79–89.
Reed, L. A., Tolman, R. M., & Ward, L. M. (2017). Gender matters: Experiences and consequences of cyber dating abuse victimization in adolescent dating relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 59, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.05.015
Reed, L. A., Ward, L. M., & Tolman, R. M. (2021). The association between stereotypical gender and dating beliefs and cyber dating abuse perpetration in adolescent dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), 5561–5585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518801933
Sauls, D., Zeigler-Hill, V., Vrabel, J. K., & Lehtman, M. J. (2019). How do Narcissists get what they want from their romantic partners? The connections that Narcissistic admiration and Narcissistic rivalry have with influence strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.025
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.894
Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2005.01.018
Smoker, M., & March, E. (2017). Predicting perpetration of intimate partner cyberstalking: Gender and the Dark Tetrad. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 390–396.
Talbot, F., Babineau, M., & Bergheul, S. (2015). Narcissism and self-esteem dimensions as predictors of aggression in intimate partner violence. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, 173(2), 193–196.
Tortoriello, G. K., Hart, W., Richardson, K., & Tullett, A. M. (2017). Do narcissists try to make romantic partners jealous on purpose? An examination of motives for deliberate jealousy-induction among subtypes of narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.052
Weathers, M. R., Canzona, M. R., & Fisher, C. L. (2019). Digital media as a context for dating abuse: Connecting adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies to young adult women’s well-being. Affilia, 34(3), 325–345.
Woodlock, D., Mckenzie, M., Western, D., & Harris, B. (2019). Technology as a weapon in domestic violence: Responding to digital coercive control. Australian Social Work, 73(3), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2019.1607510
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Approved by the psychology department at the host institution.
Consent to Participate
All participants provided informed consent prior to taking part in the research.
Consent for Publication
Consent has been provided by the corresponding author and co-author to publish this article.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhogal, M.S., Wallace, D. Cost-Inflicting Mate Retention Tactics Predict the Perpetration of Cyber Dating Abuse. Evolutionary Psychological Science 8, 1–9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-021-00307-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-021-00307-8