Treatment of Chagas Disease in the United States

Purpose of Review Chagas disease (CD) is endemic to much of Latin America, but also present in the United States (U.S.). Following a lengthy asymptomatic period, CD produces serious cardiac or gastrointestinal complications in 30–40% of people. Less than 1% of the estimated six million cases in the Americas, including 326,000–347,000 in the U.S., are diagnosed. Infected persons are typically unaware and the bulk of clinicians are unfamiliar with current treatment guidelines. This review provides U.S. and other clinicians with the latest knowledge of CD treatment. Recent Findings Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCM) causes severe fibrosis and autonomic damage in the myocardium. Eliminating the parasite through antitrypanosomal therapy with benznidazole, a nitroimidazole derivative or nifurtimox, a nitrofuran compound, potentially prevents heart failure and other sequelae of advanced CCM. Benznidazole, recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for children 2–12 years old, is the first-line therapy; optimal dosages are currently being studied. Antitrypanosomal therapy prevents congenital transmission; produces high cure rates for acute, congenital, and early chronic cases; and improves clinical outcomes in adult chronic indeterminate cases. However, this benefit was not observed in a large clinical trial that included patients with advanced CCM. Summary Treatment with antitrypanosomal drugs can cure CD in acute, congenital, and early chronic cases and provides improved clinical outcomes for chronic indeterminate cases. This treatment should be offered as early as possible, before advanced CCM develops.


Introduction
Over six million people worldwide are infected with Trypanosoma cruzi, the flagellate protozoan which causes American trypanosomiasis or Chagas disease (CD) [1][2][3], but the overwhelming majority are undiagnosed. In most cases, CD is transmitted by hematophagous insects of the subfamily Triatominae, known as kissing bugs in the United States (U.S.) and by many regional names in Latin America, mainly chinches picudas, vinchucas, pitos, barbeiros, chipos, and chinchorros, among others. Triatomines capable of transmitting the parasite are widespread in the Americas, ranging from the southern half of the United States to Argentina and Chile. Certain species became domiciliated in Latin America, in particular favoring houses made of mud, thatch, and adobe which provide abundant hiding and nesting places. Consequently, CD has typically been concentrated among the rural poor of Latin America, though vector transmission in urban areas and the U.S. is also well documented [4,5]. T. cruzi has both sylvatic and domestic transmission cycles. Several species of mammals, including dogs, cats, opossums, armadillos, raccoons, and wood rats, serve as reservoirs. The parasite inhabits the gut of the triatomine. Upon feeding, the triatomine defecates, and the sleeping host unwittingly introduces the infected feces into the bloodstream by scratching the site of the bite. CD can also be transmitted through consumption of food contaminated by triatomine feces, blood transfusion and organ transplant. Moreover, CD can reactivate in cases of immunosuppression. Additionally, the congenital transmission rate in infants born to CD-positive mothers ranges from 2 to 5%, with higher rates for births in endemic settings [6,7]. CD is characterized by acute and chronic phases. The acute phase typically begins 1-2 weeks after infection; symptoms are generally absent or non-specific, similar to a viral illness. Therefore, the acute phase is almost always unrecognized. However, it can occasionally cause fatal myocarditis or meningoencephalitis. During the acute phase, T. cruzi trypomastigotes can be observed swimming freely in the bloodstream.
Following the acute phase, the trypomastigotes transform into amastigotes to hide from the immune response and lodge in deep organ tissue, particularly the heart and digestive tract. The infection enters a chronic indeterminate phase, which, unless antiparasitic treatment is administered, will endure the lifespan of the patient. While 60-70% of patients remain asymptomatic, the remainder will progress to an advanced chronic phase, usually 10-30 years after the initial infection [8,9]. This progression is almost certainly triggered by parasite persistence, which probably acts in concert with tissue damage caused by the immune response [10,11].
T. cruzi exhibits substantial genetic diversity and has been classified into six discrete typing units [12]. This diversity, in combination with other mechanisms including host immune response, may contribute to variability in both the clinical manifestations of CD and responses to antiparasitic treatment [13]. Chronic symptoms are usually cardiac-related, especially when the infection is acquired in North America. Cardiac manifestations fall into four principal categories: progressive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, conduction abnormalities, and thromboembolism [9]. Ventricular tachycardia, both sustained and non-sustained, is frequently observed. Abnormalities in the conduction system, particularly, but not limited to, right bundle branch block and left anterior fascicular block, are characteristic of chronic CD and may serve as early warning signs of clinical progression [9]. Chagas heart disease is frequently fatal with sudden death causing roughly two thirds of mortality [8].
Digestive manifestations are also possible and account for a third of chronic cases in the Southern Cone of South America. The digestive form most often presents as megaesophagus or megacolon, the latter with severe constipation and abdominal distension. Rarely, CD impacts the nervous system, producing nodular encephalitis, peripheral neuropathy, and cerebral masses in immunocompromised patients [14].
incorporation of diagnosis and treatment into the primary care setting. Annually, CD causes over 7000 deaths and a considerable burden in morbidity, more than any other parasitic disease in the Americas [15]. Global annual healthcare costs from CD were estimated at US$627.46 million in 2013 (equivalent to $685.52 million in 2018); Brazil and the United States ranked first and second for annual expenditures [16]. A recent European study indicates screening of Latin American-born patients in primary care would be a highly cost-effective measure [17]. Such screening has yet to be systematically implemented in the United States [18•].
Both provider and patient awareness of CD are extremely low, creating substantial barriers to diagnosis and treatment. In a 2010 survey, 57% of a sample of 1142 U.S. clinicians either had not heard of CD or felt little confidence that their knowledge was up to date [19]. When widespread screening of the blood supply in the U.S. began in 2007, a systematic review describing treatment options for U.S. clinicians was published [20]. Since that time, new international guidelines and the results of several clinical studies have been published.
The purpose of the present article is to familiarize clinicians with the most recent guidelines and therapeutic advances in CD and to share the experience and insights of the Center of Excellence for Chagas Disease (CECD) at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center in Los Angeles, one of the few U.S. providers currently offering treatment for CD.

Screening and diagnosis
U.S. clinicians should screen patients who were born in Latin America, who have spent 9 6 months in a rural area of Latin America, and/or who report exposure to triatomines. In a study of Latin American-born patients in Los Angeles, having lived in housing made of mud, adobe, and thatch, having a family member with CD, and Salvadoran origin were predictors of T. cruzi infection [21]. In the acute phase, CD can be diagnosed through direct observation of T. cruzi in peripheral blood. However, patients will typically need testing in the chronic phase when detection of the parasite is more difficult. Clinical diagnosis relies on positive serology on a minimum of two tests with different antigenic principles [22]. Various assays with a range of performance characteristics are commercially available [23]. For chronic cases, recent Brazilian guidelines recommend using a test with high sensitivity such as a totalantigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or indirect immunofluorescence assay as an initial test, followed by a highly specific method such as an indirect hemagglutination assay [24]. If the two tests are discordant, a Western blot may be used as a tiebreaker.
In the U.S., four commercial immunoassays for clinical use have some level of FDA approval: three ELISAs (Wiener Chagatest ELISA recombinante, Hemagen ELISA, and Ortho T. cruzi ELISA) and one rapid assay (InBios Chagas Detect Plus). Figure 1 illustrates the diagnostic process used by the CECD in Los Angeles, which has screened over 8000 people in the U.S. for T. cruzi since 2007. Assays have shown varying performance characteristics in different settings and patient populations [25], which may be due to T. cruzi genetic diversity [26] and/or geographically patterned variations in immune responses [27]. This is an especially critical point in light of the heterogeneous nature of the Latin American-origin population in the U.S. A World Health Organization comparative evaluation provides performance characteristics for several assays based on a multinational panel [23], while a recent meta-analysis includes summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity for both the Wiener Chagatest ELISA (93.7 and 99.0%, respectively) and the Ortho T. cruzi ELISA (99.2 and 99.1%, respectively). However, the authors caution that a tendency to use only well-defined positive or negative samples in prior research may fuel overestimation of sensitivity and specificity [28]. How assays perform in a particular clinical setting may vary significantly, underscoring the importance of using at least two assays based on different antigenic principles to diagnose T. cruzi infection.

Antitrypanosomal therapy New developments
Benznidazole, a nitroimidazole derivative (N-Benzil 2 Nitro 1-Imidazolacetamide), and nifurtimox, a nitrofuran compound, both developed over 40 years ago, are currently the only drugs available for treating CD.
Benznidazole is often considered the first-line therapy because of its better tolerability, but both drugs produce significant side effects. These nitroheterocyclic drugs inhibit the parasite's ability to replicate DNA, and are effective against the trypomastigote and amastigote forms [29]. Effectiveness is higher for both drugs if administered as soon as possible after infection. Reported cure rates are as high as 96% for congenitally infected infants [30], 76% for acute infections [31], 62% for chronically infected children [32], and 37% for chronically infected adults [33]. Efficacy appears to decrease in proportion to the length of the infection, although treatment success is difficult to measure with current diagnostic tools. It can take years subsequent to treatment before patients with chronic CD become seronegative (serorevert). In one study, the average time to serorevert in 20 successfully treated chronically infected adults was 16 years [33]. Tools relying on parasite DNA detection, principally polymerase chain reaction, are impractical for use in primary healthcare settings and unreliable for verifying cure as results are variable, although parasite DNA detection following treatment is a clear indication of therapeutic failure.
In part due to limited evidence of efficacy, and partly because of increasing frequency and severity of side effects in relation to patient age, treatment decisions have historically hinged on age categories. Evidence in favor of treating congenital cases, acute cases, and children in the early chronic phase is well established [30,34,35]. However, the BENEFIT trial, a multinational randomized study comparing benznidazole and placebo in patients who already had developed advanced CCM, did not find significantly different outcomes [36••]. This makes it essential to initiate antiparasitic treatment as early as possible in acute or indeterminate patients, before the onset of more severe forms of CCM.
It was previously believed that chronic manifestations were due primarily to an overactive immune response and that antiparasitic treatment would therefore be futile in adult patients in the chronic phase. However, long-term studies in Latin America have demonstrated better clinical outcomes for adult patients with chronic CD treated with benznidazole or nifurtimox [33,37], which complements the latest understanding of CD pathology as at least partly triggered by parasite persistence [11]. Recent clinical trials demonstrated benznidazole is highly efficacious at clearing the parasite, as measured by repeatedly negative PCR, in 65-87% of adult patients in the chronic indeterminate phase of the disease [36••, [38][39][40], although a smaller percentage revert to negative serology. Expert consensus now favors making treatment available to adults in the chronic indeterminate phase up to age 50. Antiparasitic treatment likely prevents or delays severe complications from chronic CD. For women of childbearing age, antiparasitic treatment has been proven to eliminate the possibility of congenital transmission [41][42][43].

Recommendations and contraindications
Current treatment recommendations take into account the phase of the disease and age of the patient (Table 1). Acute and congenital cases, reactivations, and children in the chronic indeterminate phase should be offered antiparasitic treatment with benznidazole. Nifurtimox should be used in the event the patient is not able to tolerate benznidazole, or if benznidazole is unavailable within the health system. Adults in the indeterminate phase or with minimal cardiac involvement up to age 50 should be offered treatment. There is not sufficient evidence supporting effectiveness of treatment in older adults; however, treatment may be considered on a case-by-case basis for adults over 50 without contraindications or advanced cardiac involvement [24]. Even though a majority of patients in the indeterminate phase will remain asymptomatic, currently, there is no way to predict which patients will progress to the determinate form of the disease. Therefore, treating all patients without contraindications remains the best means of preventing CD-related mortality and morbidity.
Treatment with benznidazole and nifurtimox is contraindicated during pregnancy due to limited evidence on safety. Although the current Brazilian consensus guidelines do not recommend treatment during breastfeeding [24], it is not contraindicated in the Argentinian guidelines [44] as some research indicates absorption of benznidazole or nifurtimox through breastmilk does not pose a risk to infants [45,46]. Other contraindications are renal or hepatic insufficiency and moderate to severe cardiac dysfunction. Because of impaired absorption, patients with difficulty swallowing due to severe megaesophagus may require corrective interventions prior to antiparasitic treatment [20]. Figure 2 details the overall treatment process at the CECD. Prior to treatment, all patients should receive a complete blood count with differential, tests of renal and hepatic function and, for women of childbearing age, a pregnancy test. To gauge severity of cardiac involvement, patients should also receive at minimum an electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. A chest X-ray and 24-h Holter are also recommended in most international guidelines [24,44,47]. Kuschnir  Definitions of classes from the Brazilian consensus: I-conclusive evidence supporting treatment, II-conflicting evidence or views, IIa-evidence and consensus favors treatment, IIb-treatment considered optional due to lack of definitive supporting evidence and conflicting views, III-conclusive evidence or consensus that treatment is not effective. Definitions of evidence levels: A-data from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses of randomized trials; B-data from only one randomized trial or several non-randomized observational studies; C-supported by consensus of expert opinion prospective study found that adult patients in Kuschnir groups 0, I, and II who were treated with benznidazole had significantly lower risk of dying, progressing to a higher grade of severity, or developing new electrocardiographic abnormalities compared with untreated patients; the median length of follow-up was 9.8 years [37]. However, treatment is typically not indicated for patients with advanced heart failure (Kuschnir group III) based on the results of the BENEFIT trial [36••].

Dosage
The recommended adult dosage for benznidazole is 5 mg/kg divided into two daily doses, not exceeding 300 mg in 1 day for 60 days. The recommended dose for children is 5-7 mg/kg daily divided into two doses. Benznidazole is ideally taken after meals to avoid gastrointestinal discomfort. For nifurtimox, the adult dosage is 8-10 mg/kg daily divided into three daily doses and administered over 60 days. [The length of treatment was previously  recommended as 90 days, but this has been reduced in recent international guidelines [24,44].] Children should receive 10-15 mg/kg day divided into three daily doses.

Treatment monitoring and side effects
Because both benznidazole and nifurtimox produce side effects in the majority of patients, biweekly monitoring with readministration of the baseline laboratory studies (complete blood count with differential, hepatic, and renal function testing) is recommended. While historically 20-25% of patients have discontinued treatment secondary to adverse effects (AEs), a program of close surveillance and intervention can reduce this rate considerably. The BENEFIT trial was able to reduce discontinuation secondary to AEs to only 13.4% of 1429 patients treated with benznidazole, despite an older cohort with a mean age of 55.4. (Morillo et al 2015) In a cohort of 2075 patients treated with benznidazole by Médecins sans Frontières/Doctors without Borders in Bolivia, in which patients were monitored weekly by clinical staff, only 10.2% discontinued therapy [28]. The most common AEs caused by benznidazole are skin disorders, which affect 26.3-52.9% of patients [49][50][51][52][53]. However, the majority of these reactions are mild and do not necessitate treatment interruption. While some observe that dermatological issues appear mainly in the first 2 weeks of treatment [29], other studies suggest these AEs can occur at any point [49]. Other reported side effects are digestive intolerance, anorexia, headache, and leukopenia. Dysesthesia is a potential outcome related to total accumulated dose which is occasionally observed as patients near the end of treatment. In a study of 30 patients treated with benznidazole at the CECD in Los Angeles, 47-50% experienced rash, headache, anorexia, and/ or peripheral neuropathy [50]. However, subsequent reductions in the dosing regimen based on new international guidelines have resulted in an improvement in the side effect profile [54].
Nifurtimox produces more frequent and varied AEs than benznidazole, but the majority are mild. The most common AEs from nifurtimox are nausea, anorexia, abdominal pain, insomnia, headache, and amnesia [55][56][57]. In a CECD study of 53 patients treated with nifurtimox, there were frequent AEs (a mean of 8.2 affecting 100% of patients), but 9 90% were mild and 79.2% of patients were able to complete treatment [57].
If a patient reports AEs, various actions can be taken. Many AEs are mild and will resolve spontaneously. For AEs of moderate severity, the dose can be reduced by 50% and uptitrated if patient tolerance improves. Alternatively, therapy can be temporarily discontinued and then reintroduced at a lower dosage. If a patient presents with a moderate to severe AE in the latter stages of treatment, discontinuation may be the best alternative. In the Argentinian guidelines, 30 days is deemed sufficient duration to consider treatment complete [44]. If a patient presents with a severe AE, immediate discontinuation is essential. In such cases, after a period of discontinuation and normalization of laboratory studies, nifurtimox may be offered as an alternative therapy. In a small sample of patients who discontinued benznidazole following hypersensitive reactions, nifurtimox was well tolerated [58].
Following treatment, negative serology is still the best way to ascertain a cure. Nonetheless, adults with chronic indeterminate CD may not have a negative serology until 9 10 years after treatment. Care should be taken to explain to patients that a positive test result does not necessarily mean treatment has failed. After treatment, each patient should receive serological testing, an electrocardiogram, and an echocardiogram annually. Therapeutic failure should be concluded if there is evidence of clinical progression (e.g., new ECG abnormalities) even if CCM is still mild (Kuschnir I or II). In these cases, retreatment with a different trypanocide may be considered [24].

Drug acquisition in the United States
Benznidazole was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on August 29, 2017, for children ages 2-12, and may be prescribed off-label for adolescents, adults, and children under 2. Benznidazole is available through a central distributor and can be ordered at https://www.benznidazoletablets.com/ en/. Nifurtimox has yet to receive FDA approval but is available in 120-mg tablets under the brand name Lampit through the Centers for Disease Control by way of the Pan American Health Organization, which in turn receives a donation of one million tablets annually from Bayer. Providers can only solicit nifurtimox from the CDC through a special investigational protocol; the drug is provided free of charge to patients.

Treatment of chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy
CCM, which affects roughly 30% of patients infected with T. cruzi, typically engenders malignant ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dilation and dysfunction, apical aneurysms, congestive heart failure, and sudden death [8]. Malignant ventricular arrhythmias are more common in CD than other forms of heart disease and patients with CCM have a higher mortality than those with non-CD cardiomyopathy [59]. A study of Latin American-born immigrants with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy found 19% were positive for CD, and this group had a significantly increased risk of death or transplant (hazard ratio = 4.46) compared to those without CD [60]. A score was developed and validated by Rassi et al. to predict risk of death from CD heart disease [61]. Table 3 details the cardiac examinations all patients with confirmed T. cruzi infection should receive at baseline. Because antitrypanosomal therapy may be less effective once CCM is evident, patients with CCM should be referred to a cardiologist. Recent Brazilian guidelines address clinical management of CCM [24,62], while ACC/AHA guidelines for heart failure [63] are applicable to CCM. Additionally, as described below, specific clinical features of CCM compared to non-CD cardiomyopathy deserve consideration.

Arrhythmias
Arrhythmias are one of the most frequent clinical outcomes of chronic determinate CD and lead to bradyarrhythmias, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation. In Brazil, CD is responsible for 25% of all pacemaker implants [64]. In a study of Latin American-born patients with pacemakers in Los Angeles, 7.5% were found to have CD [65], suggesting CD as an underlying cause of cardiomyopathy may be severely underdiagnosed in the U.S. [66•].
A primary objective of treating CCM is preventing sudden death. An implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is recommended for CD patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and for CD patients who have recovered from cardiac arrest. Moreover, although data are limited, amiodarone may improve outcomes for patients at risk of sudden death due to nonsustained ventricular tachycardia with signs of myocardial dysfunction [8] and is recommended in Latin American guidelines [62]. An ongoing, randomized, prospective study in Brazil (CHAGASICS) is comparing mortality and hospitalization among patients treated with ICD or amiodarone [67].

Use of ACE Inhibitors and Beta-blockers
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to reduce mortality in patients with CCM [68]. Bradycardia in CD patients could be aggravated by the use of beta-blockers [8]. Nonetheless, in a Brazilian randomized trial, beta-blocker therapy improved survival in patients with CCM compared to untreated patients [69]. Another randomized trial suggested carvedilol was safe and produced an increase in LVEF in patients with CCM [68]. In the latter study, ACE inhibitors were administered first and beta-blockers were given after patients' clinical condition improved.

Transplantation
Diagnosis of CD is not a contraindication for transplantation. In fact, a systematic review found that CD patients actually had better survival than non-CD patients following heart transplant [70]. CD-related heart failure is the third most common reason for heart transplantation in South America [71]. Immunosuppression entails the risk of reactivation of the acute form of CD, Electrocardiogram CD patients with a normal ECG have a good prognosis. The presence of conduction abnormalities may be an early marker of cardiac damage [9]. Right bundle branch block, often in tandem with left anterior fascicular block, is a hallmark of CCM. The number of abnormalities on ECG has been shown to correspond with the severity of myocardial damage [9].

Baseline and annually
Echocardiogram Left ventricular systolic dysfunction triggered by fibrosis is a common feature of CCM. Wall motion abnormalities and apical aneurysms are frequent features of CCM.
Baseline and annually

24-h Holter
To evaluate the presence of arrhythmias and autonomic dysfunction, which elevate the risk of sudden death.
Baseline Chest X-ray To assess cardiomegaly. Baseline and therefore, prophylactic antiparasitic treatment may be indicated for CD-positive transplant recipients [71,72].

Treatment of gastrointestinal complications
Gastrointestinal manifestations of chronic CD, most commonly megacolon and megaesophagus, are rarely observed in Mexican and Central American patients, but impact ≈15% of patients with T. cruzi infection from Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, and Paraguay (i.e., the Southern Cone). Of these, 30% exhibit both cardiac and digestive complications. In patients originating from these countries with confirmed T. cruzi infection, several signs and symptoms could point to gastrointestinal involvement of CD (for a complete list, see [73]). Dysphagia and regurgitation could be indicative of esophageal involvement, while volvulus, constipation, or irregular bowel movements can result from colonic damage [73]. In cases where there is clinical suspicion of gastrointestinal complications from CD, a barium enema and radiological study are recommended. Early-stage gastrointestinal manifestations are not necessarily a contraindication for etiological treatment [73], but more advanced cases of megaesophagus or megacolon may require surgical correction before any contemplation of antitrypanosomal treatment [20].

State of clinical research
Development of safer, more effective drugs for etiological treatment of CD is a top priority. Recent clinical trials of posaconazole and ravuconazole showed these agents were initially effective at clearing the parasite, but the effect was not sustained at 12-month follow-up [38][39][40]. Because benznidazole exhibited superior efficacy in these studies, attention shifted toward improving the dosage regimen of this drug. Evidence emerged that lower doses of benznidazole might still be effective while improving the side effect profile [74,75]. MULTIBENZ, a clinical trial in Spain, is evaluating efficacy of lower doses of benznidazole, while BENDITA, a proof-of-concept study in Bolivia, is assessing effectiveness of lower doses and durations of benznidazole as a monotherapy and in combination with ravuconazole. Another proof-ofconcept study just underway is gauging antitrypanosomal activity of fexinidazole, which was recently proven safe and effective against human African trypanosomiasis [76]. A wide range of research initiatives are focusing on the identification of biomarkers, both to help determine which patients are at risk of progression to chronic symptoms and to measure the effectiveness of antitrypanosomal therapy [77][78][79]. Finally, development of new diagnostic tools with high specificity and sensitivity, consistent in different patient populations and T. cruzi genetic strains, will greatly facilitate widespread screening [80].

Conclusions
CD is a life-threatening, severely underdiagnosed parasitic infection. Patients who have spent significant time in rural areas of Latin America or who report being bitten by or in contact with triatomines will benefit from screening for T. cruzi infection. Antitrypanosomal therapy using benznidazole or nifurtimox is highly effective for treating the acute phase of the disease, congenitally transmitted cases in infants, and reactivation in immunosuppressed patients. Additionally, treatment with these antiparasitic drugs prevents future congenital transmission. Efficacy in the chronic indeterminate phase exceeds 60% in children. This rate is lower in adults, yet this could be due to the difficulty of measuring seroreversion in chronic patients. However, antitrypanosomal therapy improves clinical outcomes for patients in the chronic indeterminate phase by slowing or avoiding the progression to the advanced chronic form of the disease, resulting in improved outcomes in terms of mortality and morbidity, and should therefore be offered to patients in the absence of contraindications. Although benznidazole and nifurtimox, the only available drugs with proven efficacy against T. cruzi, may cause side effects in a substantial portion of patients, these can be successfully managed through a program of close monitoring. CCM is often accompanied by severe damage to the conduction system. Baseline abnormalities on ECG or echocardiogram should trigger an immediate referral to a cardiologist and further evaluation with a 24-h Holter and chest X-ray. A defibrillator and heart failure treatment may be required. Digestive manifestations may affect another subset of patients, especially those born in the Southern Cone of South America. Early screening, diagnosis and treatment is highly cost-saving and critical to preventing the long-term complications of CD. This should be initiated in primary care settings.

Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest Colin Forsyth received salary from the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative and Médecins sans Frontières/Doctors without Borders USA while working on this article. Sheba Meymandi has agreed to a consultant relationship with Bayer, manufacturer of nifurtimox, and Exeltis, which distributes benznidazole in the U.S. Salvador Hernandez declares that he has no conflict of interest. Sandy Park declares that she has no conflict of interest. Daniel R. Sanchez declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
With regard to the authors' research cited in this paper, all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In addition, all applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.